I want to Get Price in Soldity from External api , I Using the Chainlink For this :
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
pragma solidity >=0.7.0 <0.9.0;
import "https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/develop/contracts/src/v0.8/ChainlinkClient.sol";
contract Fiat is ChainlinkClient {
using Chainlink for Chainlink.Request;
uint256 public price;
bytes32 private jobId;
uint256 private fee;
constructor() {
setPublicChainlinkToken();
jobId = "83ba9ddc927946198fbd0bf1bd8a8c25";
fee = 0.1 * 10 ** 18; // (Varies by network and job)
}
/**
* Create a Chainlink request to retrieve API response, find the target price
* data, then multiply by 100 (to remove decimal places from price).
*/
function findExhangeRateFiatToBaseFiat(string memory _url
, address _oracle) public returns (bytes32 requestId)
{
Chainlink.Request memory request = buildChainlinkRequest(jobId, address(this), this.fulfill.selector);
// Set the URL to perform the GET request on
// NOTE: If this oracle gets more than 5 requests from this job at a time, it will not return.
request.add("get", _url);
string[] memory path = new string[](2);
path[0] = "Realtime Currency Exchange Rate";
path[1] = "5. Exchange Rate";
request.addStringArray("path", path);
// Multiply the result by 10000000000 to remove decimals
request.addInt("times", 10000000000);
// Sends the request
return sendChainlinkRequestTo(_oracle, request, fee);
}
/**
* Receive the response in the form of uint256
*/
function fulfill(bytes32 _requestId, uint256 _price) public recordChainlinkFulfillment(_requestId)
{
price = _price;
}
}
Now I Have a Problem :
When I Send Request to This Api :
https://www.alphavantage.co/query?function=CURRENCY_EXCHANGE_RATE&from_currency=IRR&to_currency=USD&apikey=K41HVINGOVEW3HHR
it Show me This Result :
{
"Realtime Currency Exchange Rate": {
"1. From_Currency Code": "IRR",
"2. From_Currency Name": "Iranian Rial",
"3. To_Currency Code": "USD",
"4. To_Currency Name": "United States Dollar",
"5. Exchange Rate": "0.00002381",
"6. Last Refreshed": "2022-02-09 11:45:08",
"7. Time Zone": "UTC",
"8. Bid Price": "0.00002381",
"9. Ask Price": "0.00002381"
}
}
and I want this Result: "5. Exchange Rate": "0.00002381"
but when I Call this Api and Call the price in Remix it shows me this Result 238100 Actually it should show me this result 0.00002381.
What's the Problem? how can I Get the Current Price?
Kovan Testnet
Oracle:0x58bbdbfb6fca3129b91f0dbe372098123b38b5e9
URL:https://www.alphavantage.co/query?function=CURRENCY_EXCHANGE_RATE&from_currency=IRR&to_currency=USD&apikey=K41HVINGOVEW3HHR
floats or doubles does not exist in solidity, so in order to convert it to a number it get rid of the decimals, i'm not really sure of how decimals are managed in this case but you could check that and then you can work in a similar way as you would work when dealing with eth, gwei, wei, also you should check how this line of code affects the response request.addInt("times", 10000000000); since it could help you to change the format of the response
Related
I am completely new to this blockchain world so I want to try learn it. While I am following a tutorial to create a simple ERC-1155 contract to mint a token and set its price. When I am trying to run the buyToken function from another address, it keeps saying "Not Enough Fund". When I debug the msg.value value is 0, even though I have 100 ethers balance on each of my address. When I change the amount of token to 0, it works successfully. What should I need to do to be able to do the transaction?
Log
This is my contract that I have modified on:
// Contract based on https://docs.openzeppelin.com/contracts/4.x/erc1155
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "#openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/ERC1155.sol";
/**
* #title NFTMinter
* #dev NFT Contract Minter
* #custom:dev-run-script ./scripts/deploy_with_ethers.ts
*/
contract NFTMinter is ERC1155 {
constructor() ERC1155("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/noopmood/TutorialNFTInGo/main/metadata/{id}.json") payable {}
// Define the mapping of addresses to balances
mapping(address => mapping(uint256 => uint256)) public _balances;
// Define the mapping of address to tokenIds owned
mapping(address => uint256[]) public _tokenIds;
// Define the mapping of tokenId to price
mapping(uint256 => uint256) public tokenPrice;
// Define the sender to address payable type
address payable public sender;
struct Token {
uint256 tokenId;
uint256 balance;
}
function mintCaller(uint256 tokenId, uint256 amount) public {
_mint(msg.sender, tokenId, amount, "");
}
// Mints new tokens and sets the price for each token.
function mintAddress(uint256 tokenId, uint256 amount, address addr, uint256 price) public{
_mint(addr, tokenId, amount, "");
// Update the balance of the recipient
_balances[addr][tokenId] += amount;
// Add the tokenId to the address
_tokenIds[addr].push(tokenId);
// Set the price of the token
tokenPrice[tokenId] = price;
}
// Get all tokenIds from its owner address
function getTokenIdsByAddress(address addr) public view returns (uint[] memory) {
return _tokenIds[addr];
}
// Get the balance / amount of the tokenId
function getTokenByIdAndAddress(address addr, uint256 tokenId) public view returns (Token memory) {
Token memory result;
result.tokenId = tokenId;
result.balance = _balances[addr][tokenId];
return result;
}
// Get the tokenIds along with its corresponding balances/amount
function getAllTokenByAddress(address holder) public view returns (Token[] memory) {
Token[] memory result = new Token[](_tokenIds[holder].length);
for (uint i = 0; i < _tokenIds[holder].length; i++) {
result[i].tokenId = _tokenIds[holder][i];
result[i].balance = _balances[holder][_tokenIds[holder][i]];
}
return result;
}
// Transfers the tokens from one address to another.
function transfer(address addr, uint256 tokenId, uint256 amount) public {
require(_balances[msg.sender][tokenId] >= amount, "Not enough balance");
// Transfer the token
_safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, addr, tokenId, amount, "");
// Update the sender's balance
_balances[msg.sender][tokenId] -= amount;
// Update the recipient's balance
_balances[addr][tokenId] += amount;
}
// Allows a buyer to purchase a token by sending the required amount to the contract and updating the balance of the buyer.
function buyToken(uint256 tokenId, uint256 amount) public payable {
require(msg.value >= amount * tokenPrice[tokenId], "Not enough funds");
// Deduct the amount from the buyer
sender = payable(msg.sender);
sender.transfer(amount * tokenPrice[tokenId]);
// Transfer the token to the buyer
_safeTransferFrom(address(0), msg.sender, tokenId, amount, "");
// Update the buyer's balance
_balances[msg.sender][tokenId] += amount;
}
}
On what the step to reproduce this:
Deploy the contract with value, for me I pass 20 Ether
Run the mintAddress function by passing, tokenId: 1, amount: 10, price: 10, address: the address an account
Run the transfer function by passing address: the address of account you want to transfer the token into, tokenId: 1, amount: 10
Change the account in upper part to the address you use in transfer function
Run buyToken function, tokenId: 1, amount: 10
It will said Not Enough Fund
buyToken
What I have tried so far:
I read in another post, that I should deploy the contract with the value in it. But it still doesn't work
I have checked that the balance of my account in remix have 100 ethers, but when I try to doing the buy token with it, it still said 'Not Enough Fund'
What I am expecting:
To be able to buy the token with the price that has been set when minting the token.
Your error is failing from here:
// require is like if statement. if condition does not satisfied, it shows the passed message
require(msg.value >= amount * tokenPrice[tokenId], "Not enough funds")
When a user sends funds alongside the transaction, not as an function argument, solidity will catch it with msg.value. Looks like you are not sending any value alongside the transaction or not sending enough funds. in Remix IDE
you need to pass the necessary value in the above red borderd box
I'm new to smart contract and Solidity programming and I've been trying to deploy an NFT contract on goerli testnet. The contract deploys without any problem but when I try to call the "createCollectible" function, I get the following error:
Gas estimation errored with the following message (see below). The transaction execution will likely fail. Do you want to force sending?
execution reverted
{
"originalError": {
"code": 3,
"data": "0xf0019fe60000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000c6a000000000000000000000000b54644506388a04187d943dbbbd3edbb3ee53094",
"message": "execution reverted"
}
}
Here is my contract:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity >=0.6.0 <0.9.0;
import "#openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/ERC721.sol";
import "#chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/VRFConsumerBaseV2.sol";
import "#chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/LinkTokenInterface.sol";
import "#chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/VRFCoordinatorV2Interface.sol";
/**
* #title The AdvandedCollectible contract
* #notice A contract that mints an NFT
*/
contract AdvancedCollectible is ERC721, VRFConsumerBaseV2 {
VRFCoordinatorV2Interface immutable COORDINATOR;
LinkTokenInterface immutable LINKTOKEN;
uint256 public tokenCounter;
uint64 immutable s_subscriptionId;
// The gas lane to use, which specifies the maximum gas price to bump to.
// For a list of available gas lanes on each network,
// see https://docs.chain.link/docs/vrf-contracts/#configurations
bytes32 immutable s_keyhash;
uint32 immutable s_numWords = 1;
uint16 immutable s_requestConfirmations = 3;
// Depends on the number of requested values that you want sent to the
// fulfillRandomWords() function. Storing each word costs about 20,000 gas,
// so 100,000 is a safe default for this example contract. Test and adjust
// this limit based on the network that you select, the size of the request,
// and the processing of the callback request in the fulfillRandomWords()
// function.
uint32 immutable s_callbackGasLimit = 100000;
uint256 public s_requestId;
uint256 public s_randomWords;
address s_owner;
enum Breed {
PUG,
SHIBA_INU,
ST_BERNARD
}
mapping(uint256 => Breed) public tokenIdToBreed;
mapping(uint256 => address) public requestIdToSender;
event requestCollectible(uint256 indexed requestId, address requester);
event breedAssigned(uint256 tokenId, Breed breed);
constructor(
address vrfCoordinator,
address link,
bytes32 keyhash,
uint64 subscriptionId
) VRFConsumerBaseV2(vrfCoordinator) ERC721("Dogie", "DOG") {
tokenCounter = 0;
COORDINATOR = VRFCoordinatorV2Interface(vrfCoordinator);
LINKTOKEN = LinkTokenInterface(link);
s_keyhash = keyhash;
s_owner = msg.sender;
s_subscriptionId = subscriptionId;
}
modifier onlyOwner() {
require(msg.sender == s_owner, "You are not the owner");
_;
}
function createCollectible() public returns (uint256) {
s_requestId = COORDINATOR.requestRandomWords(
s_keyhash,
s_subscriptionId,
s_requestConfirmations,
s_callbackGasLimit,
s_numWords
);
requestIdToSender[s_requestId] = msg.sender;
emit requestCollectible(s_requestId, msg.sender);
}
function fulfillRandomWords(uint256 requestId, uint256[] memory randomWords)
internal
override
{
s_randomWords = randomWords[0];
Breed breed = Breed(s_randomWords % 3);
uint256 newTokenId = tokenCounter;
tokenIdToBreed[newTokenId] = breed;
emit breedAssigned(newTokenId, breed);
address owner = requestIdToSender[requestId];
_safeMint(owner, newTokenId);
tokenCounter++;
}
function setTokenURI(uint256 tokenId, string memory _tokenURI) public {
require(
_isApprovedOrOwner(_msgSender(), tokenId),
"ERC721: Caller is not owner nor approved."
);
setTokenURI(tokenId, _tokenURI);
}
}
Does anybody have an idea what I'm doing wrong here?
So I realized that I'm missing one small yet important step, and that is adding a consumer to my subscription.
Using the Chainlink VRF V2, you need to create a subscription, add funds to that subscription and add the address where your contract is deployed at as a consumer to the subscription. I wasn't doing that last step and that's why my transaction's execution kept reverting.
I have deployed a ERC-1155 based contract (based on OpenZeppelin) and minted some NFTs on this contract successfully. But when I want to use these NFTs in OpenSea, it always says "Unidentified contract".
Example: https://testnets.opensea.io/assets/0xc7d3e4a5A0c3e14ba8C68ea1b8a99a9dBf3ca76F/2
API-Example: https://testnets-api.opensea.io/api/v1/asset/0xc7d3e4a5A0c3e14ba8C68ea1b8a99a9dBf3ca76F/2/?force_update=true
Following their official Tutorial repository (which does not compile any more because of outdated dependencies and other issues) I have added some (maybe) opensea-specific functions and data that might required for OpenSea in order to work properly. However, OpenSea is able to grab all required data to display an NFT, but as long as they say "Unidentified contract", this all makes no sense so far.
My question has:
has someone already managed to deploy a ERC-1155 and used it with OpenSea properly without this issue? Is there anything we have to "register" somehow contracts that are not based on ERC-721?
🔢 Code to reproduce
import "#openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/ERC1155.sol";
import "#openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol";
import "#openzeppelin/contracts/security/Pausable.sol";
import "#openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/extensions/ERC1155Burnable.sol";
import "#openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Counters.sol";
import "#openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";
contract OwnableDelegateProxy { }
contract ProxyRegistry {
mapping(address => OwnableDelegateProxy) public proxies;
}
contract MetaCoin is ERC1155, AccessControl, Pausable, ERC1155Burnable {
bytes32 public constant URI_SETTER_ROLE = keccak256("URI_SETTER_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant PAUSER_ROLE = keccak256("PAUSER_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant MINTER_ROLE = keccak256("MINTER_ROLE");
address proxyRegistryAddress;
constructor(address _proxyRegistryAddress) ERC1155("https://abcoathup.github.io/SampleERC1155/api/token/{id}.json") {
_setupRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, msg.sender);
_setupRole(URI_SETTER_ROLE, msg.sender);
_setupRole(PAUSER_ROLE, msg.sender);
_setupRole(MINTER_ROLE, msg.sender);
proxyRegistryAddress = _proxyRegistryAddress;
}
function setURI(string memory newuri) public onlyRole(URI_SETTER_ROLE) {
_setURI(newuri);
}
function pause() public onlyRole(PAUSER_ROLE) {
_pause();
}
function unpause() public onlyRole(PAUSER_ROLE) {
_unpause();
}
function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId)
public
view
override(ERC1155, AccessControl)
returns (bool)
{
return super.supportsInterface(interfaceId);
}
function mint(address account, uint256 id, uint256 amount, bytes memory data)
public
onlyRole(MINTER_ROLE)
{
_mint(account, id, amount, data);
}
function mintBatch(address to, uint256[] memory ids, uint256[] memory amounts, bytes memory data)
public
onlyRole(MINTER_ROLE)
{
_mintBatch(to, ids, amounts, data);
}
function _beforeTokenTransfer(address operator, address from, address to, uint256[] memory ids, uint256[] memory amounts, bytes memory data)
internal
whenNotPaused
override
{
super._beforeTokenTransfer(operator, from, to, ids, amounts, data);
}
/**
* Override isApprovedForAll to whitelist user's OpenSea proxy accounts to enable gas-free listings.
*/
function isApprovedForAll(
address _owner,
address _operator
) public override view returns (bool isOperator) {
// Whitelist OpenSea proxy contract for easy trading.
ProxyRegistry proxyRegistry = ProxyRegistry(proxyRegistryAddress);
if (address(proxyRegistry.proxies(_owner)) == _operator) {
return true;
}
return ERC1155.isApprovedForAll(_owner, _operator);
}
}
💻 Environment
node: v16.7.0
deps:
"#openzeppelin/contracts": "^4.3.0",
"#nomiclabs/buidler": "^1.4.8",
"#nomiclabs/hardhat-ethers": "^2.0.2",
"#nomiclabs/hardhat-etherscan": "^2.1.1",
"#nomiclabs/hardhat-waffle": "^2.0.1",
"#openzeppelin/hardhat-upgrades": "^1.9.0",
"#typechain/ethers-v5": "^6.0.5",
"#typechain/hardhat": "^1.0.1",
"#types/chai": "^4.2.15",
"#types/chai-as-promised": "^7.1.3",
"#types/mocha": "^8.2.2",
"#types/node": "^14.14.37",
"chai": "^4.3.3",
"chai-as-promised": "^7.1.1",
"chai-datetime": "^1.8.0",
"ethereum-waffle": "^3.3.0",
"ethers": "^5.4.5",
"hardhat": "^2.6.1",
"hardhat-typechain": "^0.3.5",
"ts-generator": "^0.1.1",
"ts-node": "^9.1.1",
"typechain": "^4.0.3",
"typescript": "^4.2.4"
This is taken from name in your contract.
For ERC-1155 tokens, add a public variable name
string public name = "My Collection Name";
I finally found the root cause! OpenSea expects a public property called name in order to display the proper Name of the Collection instead of a static label Unidentified contract.
I came across this while looking at their reference code (which depends on a now 3-year-old MultiToken-Contract implementation and needs all in all some downgrades of Node and other tools in order to get it build [a downgrade to Node 10 worked best for me today] ).
I've altered the chainlink APIconsumer example to read a JSON file which contains data that I wish to bring into and store in the smart contract
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
import "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/develop/evm-contracts/src/v0.6/ChainlinkClient.sol";
contract APIConsumer is ChainlinkClient {
string public Name;
address private oracle;
bytes32 private jobId;
uint256 private fee;
/**
* Network: Kovan
* Oracle: Chainlink - 0x2f90A6D021db21e1B2A077c5a37B3C7E75D15b7e
* Job ID: Chainlink - 50fc4215f89443d185b061e5d7af9490
* Fee: 0.1 LINK
*/
constructor() public {
setPublicChainlinkToken();
oracle = 0x2f90A6D021db21e1B2A077c5a37B3C7E75D15b7e;
jobId = "50fc4215f89443d185b061e5d7af9490";
fee = 0.1 * 10 ** 18; // 0.1 LINK
}
/**
* Create a Chainlink request to retrieve API response, find the target price
* data, then multiply by 100 (to remove decimal places from price).
*/
function requestAthleteData() public returns (bytes32 requestId)
{
Chainlink.Request memory request = buildChainlinkRequest(jobId, address(this), this.fulfill.selector);
// Set the URL to perform the GET request on
request.add("get", "https://1e68b62e-578e-4390-bf43-6b70a92a23b6.mock.pstmn.io/get");
// Set the path to find the desired data in the API response, where the response format is:
// {"USD":243.33}
request.add("path", "Name");
// Multiply the result by 100 to remove decimals
// request.addInt("times", 100);
// Sends the request
return sendChainlinkRequestTo(oracle, request, fee);
}
/**
* Receive the response in the form of uint256
*/
function fulfill(bytes32 _requestId, string memory _name) public recordChainlinkFulfillment(_requestId)
{
Name = _name;
}
}
This is the data its trying to read:
https://1e68b62e-578e-4390-bf43-6b70a92a23b6.mock.pstmn.io/get
[ { "Name": "Tom", "Birthday": "2021-07-01", "Nationality": "SA", "Address": "123 st st" } ]
It has no problems deploying but then when I call the function 'requesttAthletedata' it processes it but doesn't return anything. Am I missing a step somewhere? Or is it a problem with the code?
First, change the _name argument in fulfill() to bytes32.
Second, change your request path to this:
request.add("path", "0.Name");
Chainlink cannot currently write strings to a smart contract, only bytes32 which can then be converted into a string. Also, your JSON object was within an array (at the first index) which is why we need to specify "0.Name" as the JSON path.
Third, if you want to convert the bytes32 to a string within the smart contract, you will need to do it within the fulfill() method.
Your final code should look like this:
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
import "#chainlink/contracts/src/v0.6/ChainlinkClient.sol";
contract test is ChainlinkClient {
string public Name;
address private oracle;
bytes32 private jobId;
uint256 private fee;
/**
* Network: Kovan
* Oracle: Chainlink - 0x2f90A6D021db21e1B2A077c5a37B3C7E75D15b7e
* Job ID: Chainlink - 50fc4215f89443d185b061e5d7af9490
* Fee: 0.1 LINK
*/
constructor() public {
setPublicChainlinkToken();
oracle = 0x2f90A6D021db21e1B2A077c5a37B3C7E75D15b7e;
jobId = "50fc4215f89443d185b061e5d7af9490";
fee = 0.1 * 10 ** 18; // 0.1 LINK
}
/**
* Create a Chainlink request to retrieve API response, find the target price
* data, then multiply by 100 (to remove decimal places from price).
*/
function requestAthleteData() public returns (bytes32 requestId)
{
Chainlink.Request memory request = buildChainlinkRequest(jobId, address(this), this.fulfill.selector);
// Set the URL to perform the GET request on
request.add("get", "https://1e68b62e-578e-4390-bf43-6b70a92a23b6.mock.pstmn.io/get");
// Set the path to find the desired data in the API response, where the response format is:
// {"USD":243.33}
request.add("path", "0.Name");
// Multiply the result by 100 to remove decimals
// request.addInt("times", 100);
// Sends the request
return sendChainlinkRequestTo(oracle, request, fee);
}
/**
* Receive the response in the form of uint256
*/
function bytes32ToString(bytes32 _bytes32) public pure returns (string memory) {
uint8 i = 0;
while(i < 32 && _bytes32[i] != 0) {
i++;
}
bytes memory bytesArray = new bytes(i);
for (i = 0; i < 32 && _bytes32[i] != 0; i++) {
bytesArray[i] = _bytes32[i];
}
return string(bytesArray);
}
function fulfill(bytes32 _requestId, bytes32 _name) public recordChainlinkFulfillment(_requestId)
{
string memory stringName = bytes32ToString(_name);
Name = stringName;
}
}
I created an ERC20 SC, this is the initial supply amount 100000000000. But, when I run unit test (truffle test) to show the total balance amount of the accounts[0] and the actual amount is 99999998877, expected amount should be 100000000000. Can someone explain to me, why that's happened?
Thank you.
it("should return the total supply", function() {
return CToken.deployed().then(function(instance){
return tokenInstance.totalSupply.call();
}).then(function(result){
assert.equal(result.toNumber(), 100000000000, 'total supply is wrong');
})
});
it("should return the balance of token owner", function() {
var token;
return CToken.deployed().then(function(instance){
token = instance
return tokenInstance.balanceOf.call(accounts[0]);
}).then(function(result){
assert.equal(result.toNumber(), 99999998877, 'balance is wrong');
})
});
Contract code:
pragma solidity >=0.4.21 <0.6.0;
import "../node_modules/openzeppelin-solidity/contracts/token/ERC20/StandardToken.sol";
import "../node_modules/openzeppelin-solidity/contracts/ownership/Ownable.sol";
/**
* #title BearToken is a basic ERC20 Token
*/
contract CToken is StandardToken, Ownable{
uint256 public totalSupply;
string public name;
string public symbol;
uint32 public decimals;
/**
* #dev assign totalSupply to account creating this contract
*/
constructor() public {
symbol = "CT";
name = "CToken";
decimals = 18;
totalSupply = 100000000000;
owner = msg.sender;
balances[msg.sender] = totalSupply;
//emit Transfer(0x0, msg.sender, totalSupply);
}
}
Your total supply is 10^29 (10^11 tokens, each token has 10^18 decimal points), which is not something javascript number can safely handle. https://docs.ethers.io/ethers.js/html/notes.html#why-can-t-i-just-use-numbers
web3 returns a BN instance, don't convert it to number.
You can assert like this:
const BN = web3.utils.BN
const ten = new BN("10")
const expected = ten.pow(new BN("27"))
assert(result.eq(expected), "Result doesn't match expected value")