This question already has answers here:
one div gets bigger while the other gets smaller
(3 answers)
Make flex item expand on hover, shrinking its siblings
(2 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I'm very new to coding and I just want to do something basic in CSS. I have a landing page which is split into two down the middle. On the left side, is a yellow div. On the right side, a grey div.
When I hover over a div, it increases its width (ltr for the left div and rtl right div).
On the same hover event I want the OTHER div to decrease its width. So there's no overlap between the two.
With the code I have the left side div works. The hover event also works. When I hover over the left side. The width goes up to 51% and the right side div's width becomes 49%.
However, the right side equivalent doesn't work. When I hover over the right side. The right side div increases its width but the left side div does not decrease dwn to 49%. The right side just overlaps the left.
Any ideas? I found some answers about parent/child relationships and played around but with no success.
Apologies for my poorly written code. I am only starting out and would appreciate some advice.
#leftside {
/*this is the orange half*/
height: 100%;
width: 50%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
opacity: 0.5;
background-image: linear-gradient(rgba(255, 255, 0, 1), rgba(255, 165, 0, 1));
transition: all 1s;
}
#leftside:hover {
opacity: 1.0;
width: 51%;
}
#leftside:hover+#rightside {
width: 49%
}
#rightside {
/*this is the grey half*/
height: 100%;
width: 50%;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
opacity: 0.5;
background-image: linear-gradient(rgba(255, 255, 255, 0), rgba(160, 160, 160, 1));
transition: all 1s;
}
#rightside:hover {
opacity: 1.0;
width: 51%;
}
#rightside:hover+#leftside {
width: 49%
}
<div id="leftside">
<a class="leftsidehome" href="page1.html"></a>
</div>
<div id="rightside">
<a class="rightsidehome" href="page2.html"></a>
</div>
The problem with your code is #rightside:hover+#leftside because CSS cannot look back. Below a possible solution using flexbox.
.container {
display: flex;
width: 100%;
}
#leftside,
#rightside {
flex-grow: 1; /* Allow each flex item to grow */
flex-shrink: 1; /* Allow each flex item to shrink */
width: 50%;
height: 100px; /* Used only to make them visible */
transition: width 1s; /* Animate the change of width */
}
#leftside {
background: yellow;
}
#rightside {
background: grey;
}
#leftside:hover {
width: 51%;
}
#rightside:hover {
width: 51%;
}
<div class="container">
<div id="leftside">
<a class="leftsidehome" href="page1.html"></a>
</div>
<div id="rightside">
<a class="rightsidehome" href="page2.html"></a>
</div>
</div>
Related
This question already has answers here:
Image inside div has extra space below the image
(10 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I am not asking how to round corners of image. In given case when I mouse-hover on the image you can see that the image is not covering whole div as well as the lower corners are not rounded, but if I add display: block to the image, it covers the div and the lower corners seems to be rounded, I am unable to understand why this is happening?
See images for before and after display:block.
HTML:
<div class="row">
<div class="campus-col">
<img src="./images/london.png" alt="london campus" />
<div class="layer">
<h3>LONDON</h3>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.row {
margin-top: 5%;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.campus-col {
flex-basis: 32%;
border-radius: 10px;
margin-bottom: 30px;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.campus-col img {
width: 100%;
display: block; /**** THIS PROPERTY ROUNDS THE LOWER CORNER *****/
}
.layer {
background: transparent;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
transition: 0.5s;
}
.layer:hover {
background: rgba(226, 0, 0, 0.7);
}
BEFORE display:block on mouse-hover the image is-
AFTER display:block on mouse-hover the image is -
You can just write the following code instead of display: block;
opacity:1;
This will also work the same as display block. Just try this code and check wether again it is rounding the corners?
I have a container with two elements absolutely positioned. While rotating the container on hover, why the top elements always remains on top even when the container is rotated by 180deg. why don't we see the bottom element then?
body {
perspective: 1000px;
}
.container {
margin: 20px 0 0 20px;
position: relative;
height: 400px;
width: 250px;
transition: all 3s;
}
.container:hover {
transform: rotateY(180deg);
}
.item {
position: absolute;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.item-1 {
height: 120%;
background: orange;
/* z-index: -1; */
}
.item-2 {
background: cyan;
/* z-index: 1; */
}
<div class="container">
<div class=" item item-1"></div>
<div class=" item item-2">Hover Over Me!</div>
</div>
code: https://jsfiddle.net/rj5b9dhc/
I have the solution, but I'm curious why above code doesn't work
solution code: https://jsfiddle.net/512p9x3r/1/
Because of backface-visibility: hidden; in item-2 css in solution code.
Check this: w3schools
Updated:
When .item (two items) height is 100%, .item-2 have no height in it css and covering 100% of container and .item-1 height is 120% (it's mean that it height is 20% more than .item-2) and covering 20% of container.
Cause of that .item-1 is before .item-2, .item-1 will be showing on .item-2.
as the Reference explained:
This property is useful when an element is rotated. It lets you choose
if the user should see the back face or not.
When container has rotated, .item-2 will be hidden.
I've been trying to create a gray connector between div containers (image below) for a while now. The margin between the containers is set to 2.5vw per container on each side.
I've tried to create it using an .svg background on a :before pseudo element and positioning it, but I couldn't make it work. The gray connector should stay fixed in relation to the boxes until the boxes wrap (mobile version), in which case the connectors should be hidden. The mobile version is easy to setup, but when the elements are next to each other I'm finding it almost impossible to apply the gray connector to the elements. The connector should stay fixed in relation to the containers when transitioning between laptop screens and large desktop screens.
Here's the outcome I want:
Gray connector between boxes.
Here's the outcome I've got and the code I've used:
Outcome I've got.
.box-container:after{
content: '';
height: 700px;
width: 600px;
position: absolute;
background-image: url("folder_path/Connector-1.svg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: -80px 60px;
background-overflow: visible !important;
z-index: 0 !important;
}
.box-container{
z-index: 1 !important;
}
Maybe I've been going at it the wrong way, all workarounds are welcome.
Here is one way to do it:
main {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
section {
display: inline-block;
width: 100px;
height: 200px;
background: orange;
box-shadow: 0 5px 15px rgba(0, 0, 0, .3);
}
section + section {
margin-left: 46px;
}
.connector {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
z-index: -1;
background: #444;
width: 100px;
height: 200px;
transform-origin: top left;
transform: skewX(36.87deg); /* do some trigonometry here to get the deg */
}
.connector:nth-of-type(2) {
left: 150px;
}
<main>
<section></section>
<section></section>
<section></section>
<div class="connector"></div>
<div class="connector"></div>
</main>
I figured out the solution! It's to create a pseudo-element, with a height of 100% and a width equal to the margin between the elements. To keep it responsive, it's important to use vw for the width unit, both for the margin between elements and also the width of the decoration itself. The margin of the <div>s are 2.5vw each, so setting the width of the pseudo element to 5 makes it fit perfectly. Heres the code:
.container:after{
content: '';
z-index:-1;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: -5vw;
width: 5vw;
height: 100%;
background-color: #444;
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 40%, 100% 100%, 0% 60%);
}
This question already has answers here:
Why is my element not sticking to the left when using position sticky in css?
(2 answers)
Why isn't position:sticky with left:0 working inside a scrollable container?
(1 answer)
Closed 3 years ago.
I'm trying to make an interface where two parts overlap, and one can scroll through the first part horizontally and the second part vertically. I quickly discovered the css sticky position.
Here is code demonstrating the issue I encountered using position: sticky; :
body {
margin: 0;
}
#d1 {
background: red;
position: sticky;
top: 0;
width: 2000px;
height: 50px;
opacity: 0.8;
}
#d2 {
background: blue;
position: sticky;
left: 0;
width: 50px;
height: 2000px;
opacity: 0.8;
}
<div id="d1"></div>
<div id="d2"></div>
(doesn't work in my browser, here is a jsfiddle https://jsfiddle.net/2bovgy84/1/ )
If you scroll down red div stays on top (what I expect), but if you scroll right blue div gets "stuck" half-way through (but I expect it to behave like the red one does)
I do not understand this behavior, at all.
body needs to be allowed to grow wider than HTML/window's width so it doesn't drag the blue element along with it (backgrounds on html/body shows what happens : https://jsfiddle.net/Lq473pue/1/ ).
you can use for that:
display:inline-block;
display:table;
float:left;
jsfiddle updated : https://jsfiddle.net/Lq473pue/
min-width:100%; can also be handy for body
The body needs the width or you need elements that are not sticky to create that width. Otherwise your body will be the width of the viewport.
https://jsfiddle.net/y9r74c0x/20/
body {
margin: 0;
width: 2000px;
}
#d1 {
background: red;
position: sticky;
bottom: 0;
width: 2000px;
height: 50px;
opacity: 0.8;
}
#d2 {
background: blue;
position: sticky;
right: 0;
width: 50px;
height: 2000px;
opacity: 0.8;
}
<div id="d1"></div>
<div id="d2"></div>
How do I make an html div tag to be on top of everything? I tried adding z-index: 1000, but it remains the same.
In order for z-index to work, you'll need to give the element a position:absolute or a position:relative property. Once you do that, your links will function properly, though you may have to tweak your CSS a bit afterwards.
Yes, in order for the z-index to work, you'll need to give the element a position: absolute or a position: relative property... fine.
But... pay attention to parents!
The element's z-index may be limited by its parent's z-index value.
You have to go down the nodes of the elements to check if at the level of the common parent the first descendants have a defined z-index.
All other descendants can never be in the foreground if at the base there is a lower definite z-index.
In this snippet example, div1-2-1 has a z-index of 1000 but is nevertheless under the div1-1-1 which has a z-index of 3.
This is because div1-1 has a z-index greater than div1-2.
.div {
}
#div1 {
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
#div1-1 {
z-index: 2;
position: absolute;
left: 230px;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
top: 31px;
background-color: indianred;
}
#div1-1-1 {
z-index: 3;
position: absolute;
top: 50px;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: burlywood;
}
#div1-2 {
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
left: 80px;
top: 5px;
background-color: red;
}
#div1-2-1 {
z-index: 1000;
position: absolute;
left: 70px;
width: 120px;
height: 100px;
top: 10px;
color: red;
background-color: lightyellow;
}
.blink {
animation: blinker 1s linear infinite;
}
#keyframes blinker {
50% {
opacity: 0;
}
}
.rotate {
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
padding-left: 50px;
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 20px;
}
<div class="div" id="div1">div1</br>z-index: 1
<div class="div" id="div1-1">div1-1</br>z-index: 2
<div class="div" id="div1-1-1">div1-1-1</br>z-index: 3</div>
</div>
<div class="div" id="div1-2">div1-2</br>z-index: 1</br><span class='rotate blink'><=</span>
<div class="div" id="div1-2-1"><span class='blink'>z-index: 1000!!</span></br>div1-2-1</br><span class='blink'> because =></br>(same</br> parent)</span></div>
</div>
</div>
More simply :
For z-index:1000 to have an effect you need a non-static positioning scheme.
Add position:relative; to a rule selecting the element you want to be on top
You need to add position:relative; to the menu. Z-index only works when you have a non static positioning scheme.
z-index property enables you to take your control at front. the bigger number you set the upper your element you get.
position property should be relative because position of html-element should be position relatively against other controls in all dimensions.
element.style {
position:relative;
z-index:1000; //change your number as per elements lies on your page.
}
I gonna assumed you making a popup with code from WW3 school, correct?
check it css. the .modal one, there're already word z-index there. just change from 1 to 100.
.modal {
display: none; /* Hidden by default */
position: fixed; /* Stay in place */
z-index: 1; /* Sit on top */
padding-top: 100px; /* Location of the box */
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%; /* Full width */
height: 100%; /* Full height */
overflow: auto; /* Enable scroll if needed */
background-color: rgb(0,0,0); /* Fallback color */
background-color: rgba(0,0,0,0.4); /* Black w/ opacity */
}
It seems like nesting an element inside a <dialog> element puts it on top of everything. It is placed both horizontally and vertically centered to the screen if you use showModal() but you lose the interactivity with other elements in the page.
document.querySelector("dialog").showModal();
<dialog>
<div class="element">I am on top of everything else</div>
</dialog>
<div class="backdrop">Backdrop element</div>
If you still want interactivity with the background elements, you can use the show() method. It is placed only horizontally centered to the screen.
document.querySelector("dialog").show();
<dialog>
<div class="element">I am on top of everything else</div>
</dialog>
<div class="backdrop">Backdrop element to check if I am underneath or not.</div>