How to disable typography in github pages? - jekyll

Is there a way to disable typography in github pages?
For instance I want '...' in the output instead of ‘…’ .

Since Jekyll uses Kramdown, that parser will, as documented in syntax / typographic symbols, replace ... with an ellipsis (like this …)
Maybe you can try and use the typographic_symbols Jekyll option which comes from issue 472
--typographic_symbols "{hellip: ...}"
If not, you would need to define a filter, to replace {{ content }} with what you want.
{% assign t = t | replace: '…', '...' }
The OP Mikhail Morfikov also suggests in the comments:
kramdown:
...
typographic_symbols: { hellip: ... , mdash: --- , ndash: -- , laquo: "<<" , raquo: ">>" , laquo_space: "<< " , raquo_space: " >>" }
smart_quotes: apos,apos,quot,quot

Related

Appending long snippets of html in jquery [duplicate]

I have the following code in Ruby. I want to convert this code into JavaScript. What is the equivalent code in JS?
text = <<"HERE"
This
Is
A
Multiline
String
HERE
Update:
ECMAScript 6 (ES6) introduces a new type of literal, namely template literals. They have many features, variable interpolation among others, but most importantly for this question, they can be multiline.
A template literal is delimited by backticks:
var html = `
<div>
<span>Some HTML here</span>
</div>
`;
(Note: I'm not advocating to use HTML in strings)
Browser support is OK, but you can use transpilers to be more compatible.
Original ES5 answer:
Javascript doesn't have a here-document syntax. You can escape the literal newline, however, which comes close:
"foo \
bar"
ES6 Update:
As the first answer mentions, with ES6/Babel, you can now create multi-line strings simply by using backticks:
const htmlString = `Say hello to
multi-line
strings!`;
Interpolating variables is a popular new feature that comes with back-tick delimited strings:
const htmlString = `${user.name} liked your post about strings`;
This just transpiles down to concatenation:
user.name + ' liked your post about strings'
Original ES5 answer:
Google's JavaScript style guide recommends to use string concatenation instead of escaping newlines:
Do not do this:
var myString = 'A rather long string of English text, an error message \
actually that just keeps going and going -- an error \
message to make the Energizer bunny blush (right through \
those Schwarzenegger shades)! Where was I? Oh yes, \
you\'ve got an error and all the extraneous whitespace is \
just gravy. Have a nice day.';
The whitespace at the beginning of each line can't be safely stripped at compile time; whitespace after the slash will result in tricky errors; and while most script engines support this, it is not part of ECMAScript.
Use string concatenation instead:
var myString = 'A rather long string of English text, an error message ' +
'actually that just keeps going and going -- an error ' +
'message to make the Energizer bunny blush (right through ' +
'those Schwarzenegger shades)! Where was I? Oh yes, ' +
'you\'ve got an error and all the extraneous whitespace is ' +
'just gravy. Have a nice day.';
the pattern text = <<"HERE" This Is A Multiline String HERE is not available in js (I remember using it much in my good old Perl days).
To keep oversight with complex or long multiline strings I sometimes use an array pattern:
var myString =
['<div id="someId">',
'some content<br />',
'someRefTxt',
'</div>'
].join('\n');
or the pattern anonymous already showed (escape newline), which can be an ugly block in your code:
var myString =
'<div id="someId"> \
some content<br /> \
someRefTxt \
</div>';
Here's another weird but working 'trick'1:
var myString = (function () {/*
<div id="someId">
some content<br />
someRefTxt
</div>
*/}).toString().match(/[^]*\/\*([^]*)\*\/\}$/)[1];
external edit: jsfiddle
ES20xx supports spanning strings over multiple lines using template strings:
let str = `This is a text
with multiple lines.
Escapes are interpreted,
\n is a newline.`;
let str = String.raw`This is a text
with multiple lines.
Escapes are not interpreted,
\n is not a newline.`;
1 Note: this will be lost after minifying/obfuscating your code
You can have multiline strings in pure JavaScript.
This method is based on the serialization of functions, which is defined to be implementation-dependent. It does work in the most browsers (see below), but there's no guarantee that it will still work in the future, so do not rely on it.
Using the following function:
function hereDoc(f) {
return f.toString().
replace(/^[^\/]+\/\*!?/, '').
replace(/\*\/[^\/]+$/, '');
}
You can have here-documents like this:
var tennysonQuote = hereDoc(function() {/*!
Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die
*/});
The method has successfully been tested in the following browsers (not mentioned = not tested):
IE 4 - 10
Opera 9.50 - 12 (not in 9-)
Safari 4 - 6 (not in 3-)
Chrome 1 - 45
Firefox 17 - 21 (not in 16-)
Rekonq 0.7.0 - 0.8.0
Not supported in Konqueror 4.7.4
Be careful with your minifier, though. It tends to remove comments. For the YUI compressor, a comment starting with /*! (like the one I used) will be preserved.
I think a real solution would be to use CoffeeScript.
ES6 UPDATE: You could use backtick instead of creating a function with a comment and running toString on the comment. The regex would need to be updated to only strip spaces. You could also have a string prototype method for doing this:
let foo = `
bar loves cake
baz loves beer
beer loves people
`.removeIndentation()
Someone should write this .removeIndentation string method... ;)
You can do this...
var string = 'This is\n' +
'a multiline\n' +
'string';
I came up with this very jimmy rigged method of a multi lined string. Since converting a function into a string also returns any comments inside the function you can use the comments as your string using a multilined comment /**/. You just have to trim off the ends and you have your string.
var myString = function(){/*
This is some
awesome multi-lined
string using a comment
inside a function
returned as a string.
Enjoy the jimmy rigged code.
*/}.toString().slice(14,-3)
alert(myString)
I'm surprised I didn't see this, because it works everywhere I've tested it and is very useful for e.g. templates:
<script type="bogus" id="multi">
My
multiline
string
</script>
<script>
alert($('#multi').html());
</script>
Does anybody know of an environment where there is HTML but it doesn't work?
I solved this by outputting a div, making it hidden, and calling the div id by jQuery when I needed it.
e.g.
<div id="UniqueID" style="display:none;">
Strings
On
Multiple
Lines
Here
</div>
Then when I need to get the string, I just use the following jQuery:
$('#UniqueID').html();
Which returns my text on multiple lines. If I call
alert($('#UniqueID').html());
I get:
There are multiple ways to achieve this
1. Slash concatenation
var MultiLine= '1\
2\
3\
4\
5\
6\
7\
8\
9';
2. regular concatenation
var MultiLine = '1'
+'2'
+'3'
+'4'
+'5';
3. Array Join concatenation
var MultiLine = [
'1',
'2',
'3',
'4',
'5'
].join('');
Performance wise, Slash concatenation (first one) is the fastest.
Refer this test case for more details regarding the performance
Update:
With the ES2015, we can take advantage of its Template strings feature. With it, we just need to use back-ticks for creating multi line strings
Example:
`<h1>{{title}}</h1>
<h2>{{hero.name}} details!</h2>
<div><label>id: </label>{{hero.id}}</div>
<div><label>name: </label>{{hero.name}}</div>
`
Using script tags:
add a <script>...</script> block containing your multiline text into head tag;
get your multiline text as is... (watch out for text encoding: UTF-8, ASCII)
<script>
// pure javascript
var text = document.getElementById("mySoapMessage").innerHTML ;
// using JQuery's document ready for safety
$(document).ready(function() {
var text = $("#mySoapMessage").html();
});
</script>
<script id="mySoapMessage" type="text/plain">
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:typ="...">
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<typ:getConvocadosElement>
...
</typ:getConvocadosElement>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
<!-- this comment will be present on your string -->
//uh-oh, javascript comments... SOAP request will fail
</script>
I like this syntax and indendation:
string = 'my long string...\n'
+ 'continue here\n'
+ 'and here.';
(but actually can't be considered as multiline string)
Downvoters: This code is supplied for information only.
This has been tested in Fx 19 and Chrome 24 on Mac
DEMO
var new_comment; /*<<<EOF
<li class="photobooth-comment">
<span class="username">
You:
</span>
<span class="comment-text">
$text
</span>
#<span class="comment-time">
2d
</span> ago
</li>
EOF*/
// note the script tag here is hardcoded as the FIRST tag
new_comment=document.currentScript.innerHTML.split("EOF")[1];
document.querySelector("ul").innerHTML=new_comment.replace('$text','This is a dynamically created text');
<ul></ul>
A simple way to print multiline strings in JavaScript is by using template literals(template strings) denoted by backticks (` `). you can also use variables inside a template string-like (` name is ${value} `)
You can also
const value = `multiline`
const text = `This is a
${value}
string in js`;
console.log(text);
There's this library that makes it beautiful:
https://github.com/sindresorhus/multiline
Before
var str = '' +
'<!doctype html>' +
'<html>' +
' <body>' +
' <h1>❤ unicorns</h1>' +
' </body>' +
'</html>' +
'';
After
var str = multiline(function(){/*
<!doctype html>
<html>
<body>
<h1>❤ unicorns</h1>
</body>
</html>
*/});
Found a lot of over engineered answers here.
The two best answers in my opinion were:
1:
let str = `Multiline string.
foo.
bar.`
which eventually logs:
Multiline string.
foo.
bar.
2:
let str = `Multiline string.
foo.
bar.`
That logs it correctly but it's ugly in the script file if str is nested inside functions / objects etc...:
Multiline string.
foo.
bar.
My really simple answer with regex which logs the str correctly:
let str = `Multiline string.
foo.
bar.`.replace(/\n +/g, '\n');
Please note that it is not the perfect solution but it works if you are sure that after the new line (\n) at least one space will come (+ means at least one occurrence). It also will work with * (zero or more).
You can be more explicit and use {n,} which means at least n occurrences.
The equivalent in javascript is:
var text = `
This
Is
A
Multiline
String
`;
Here's the specification. See browser support at the bottom of this page. Here are some examples too.
This works in IE, Safari, Chrome and Firefox:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="crazy_idea" thorn_in_my_side='<table border="0">
<tr>
<td ><span class="mlayouttablecellsdynamic">PACKAGE price $65.00</span></td>
</tr>
</table>'></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
alert($(".crazy_idea").attr("thorn_in_my_side"));
</script>
to sum up, I have tried 2 approaches listed here in user javascript programming (Opera 11.01):
this one didn't work: Creating multiline strings in JavaScript
this worked fairly well, I have also figured out how to make it look good in Notepad++ source view: Creating multiline strings in JavaScript
So I recommend the working approach for Opera user JS users. Unlike what the author was saying:
It doesn't work on firefox or opera; only on IE, chrome and safari.
It DOES work in Opera 11. At least in user JS scripts. Too bad I can't comment on individual answers or upvote the answer, I'd do it immediately. If possible, someone with higher privileges please do it for me.
Exact
Ruby produce: "This\nIs\nA\nMultiline\nString\n" - below JS produce exact same string
text = `This
Is
A
Multiline
String
`
// TEST
console.log(JSON.stringify(text));
console.log(text);
This is improvement to Lonnie Best answer because new-line characters in his answer are not exactly the same positions as in ruby output
My extension to https://stackoverflow.com/a/15558082/80404.
It expects comment in a form /*! any multiline comment */ where symbol ! is used to prevent removing by minification (at least for YUI compressor)
Function.prototype.extractComment = function() {
var startComment = "/*!";
var endComment = "*/";
var str = this.toString();
var start = str.indexOf(startComment);
var end = str.lastIndexOf(endComment);
return str.slice(start + startComment.length, -(str.length - end));
};
Example:
var tmpl = function() { /*!
<div class="navbar-collapse collapse">
<ul class="nav navbar-nav">
</ul>
</div>
*/}.extractComment();
Updated for 2015: it's six years later now: most people use a module loader, and the main module systems each have ways of loading templates. It's not inline, but the most common type of multiline string are templates, and templates should generally be kept out of JS anyway.
require.js: 'require text'.
Using require.js 'text' plugin, with a multiline template in template.html
var template = require('text!template.html')
NPM/browserify: the 'brfs' module
Browserify uses a 'brfs' module to load text files. This will actually build your template into your bundled HTML.
var fs = require("fs");
var template = fs.readFileSync(template.html', 'utf8');
Easy.
If you're willing to use the escaped newlines, they can be used nicely. It looks like a document with a page border.
Easiest way to make multiline strings in Javascrips is with the use of backticks ( `` ). This allows you to create multiline strings in which you can insert variables with ${variableName}.
Example:
let name = 'Willem';
let age = 26;
let multilineString = `
my name is: ${name}
my age is: ${age}
`;
console.log(multilineString);
compatibility :
It was introduces in ES6//es2015
It is now natively supported by all major browser vendors (except internet explorer)
Check exact compatibility in Mozilla docs here
The ES6 way of doing it would be by using template literals:
const str = `This
is
a
multiline text`;
console.log(str);
More reference here
You can use TypeScript (JavaScript SuperSet), it supports multiline strings, and transpiles back down to pure JavaScript without overhead:
var templates = {
myString: `this is
a multiline
string`
}
alert(templates.myString);
If you'd want to accomplish the same with plain JavaScript:
var templates =
{
myString: function(){/*
This is some
awesome multi-lined
string using a comment
inside a function
returned as a string.
Enjoy the jimmy rigged code.
*/}.toString().slice(14,-3)
}
alert(templates.myString)
Note that the iPad/Safari does not support 'functionName.toString()'
If you have a lot of legacy code, you can also use the plain JavaScript variant in TypeScript (for cleanup purposes):
interface externTemplates
{
myString:string;
}
declare var templates:externTemplates;
alert(templates.myString)
and you can use the multiline-string object from the plain JavaScript variant, where you put the templates into another file (which you can merge in the bundle).
You can try TypeScript at
http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground
ES6 allows you to use a backtick to specify a string on multiple lines. It's called a Template Literal. Like this:
var multilineString = `One line of text
second line of text
third line of text
fourth line of text`;
Using the backtick works in NodeJS, and it's supported by Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, and Opera.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals
Also do note that, when extending string over multiple lines using forward backslash at end of each line, any extra characters (mostly spaces, tabs and comments added by mistake) after forward backslash will cause unexpected character error, which i took an hour to find out
var string = "line1\ // comment, space or tabs here raise error
line2";
Please for the love of the internet use string concatenation and opt not to use ES6 solutions for this. ES6 is NOT supported all across the board, much like CSS3 and certain browsers being slow to adapt to the CSS3 movement. Use plain ol' JavaScript, your end users will thank you.
Example:
var str = "This world is neither flat nor round. "+
"Once was lost will be found";
You can use tagged templates to make sure you get the desired output.
For example:
// Merging multiple whitespaces and trimming the output
const t = (strings) => { return strings.map((s) => s.replace(/\s+/g, ' ')).join("").trim() }
console.log(t`
This
Is
A
Multiline
String
`);
// Output: 'This Is A Multiline String'
// Similar but keeping whitespaces:
const tW = (strings) => { return strings.map((s) => s.replace(/\s+/g, '\n')).join("").trim() }
console.log(tW`
This
Is
A
Multiline
String
`);
// Output: 'This\nIs\nA\nMultiline\nString'
Multiline string with variables
var x = 1
string = string + `<label class="container">
<p>${x}</p>
</label>`;

 (OBJ) symbol in WordPress URL?

I have a question about a WordPress URL in Google Chrome 94.0.4606.81:
I was reading a WordPress article recently and noticed that there is an  (OBJ) symbol in the URL. The symbol is also in the webpage title.
Take Ownership and Select Owner
Question:
What is the purpose of the  (OBJ) symbol -- and how is it possible that it has been included in a URL?
It seems like you got this symbol in the title field of the article. You can remove it from there. If you don't see it select everything in the field with ctrl + a and write the title new.
Honestly, I don't know what nature is this copy/paste issue in WP, and the "Object Replacement Character"
To avoid appearing this character it's enough to use Ctrl+Shift+V shortcut while pasting into WP post title field, means: Paste Text Without Formatting.
If you want to be sure in protecting the post slug (means: post URL) you can use the snippet in your functions.php:
/**
* Remove the strange [OBJ] character in the post slug
* See: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/38637
*/
add_filter("wp_unique_post_slug", function($slug, $post_ID, $post_status, $post_type, $post_parent, $original_slug) {
return preg_replace('/(%ef%bf%bc)|(efbfbc)|[^\w-]/', '', $slug);
}, 10, 6);
preg_replace function searches here for string "%ef%bf%bc" or "efbfbc" (UTF-8 - hex encoded OBJ character) OR any character that IS NOT base alphanumeric character or dash character – to delete.
Since you've mentioned it also made into the title: I use this to filter the title on save to remove these special characters.
function sbnc_filter_title($title) {
// Concatenate separate diacritics into one character if we can
if ( function_exists('normalizer_normalize') && strlen( normalizer_normalize( $title ) ) < strlen( $title ) ) {
$title = normalizer_normalize( $title );
}
// Replace no-break-space with regular space
$title = preg_replace( '/\x{00A0}/u', ' ', $title );
// Remove whitespaces from the ends
$title = trim($title);
// Remove any invisible and control characters
$title = preg_replace('/[^\x{0020}-\x{007e}\x{00a1}-\x{FFEF}]/u', '', $title);
return $title;
}
add_filter('title_save_pre', 'sbnc_filter_title');
Please note that you may need to extend set of allowed UTF range in the preg_replace call based on the languages you support. The range in the example should suit most languages actively used in the word, but if you may write article titles that include archaic scripts like Linear-B, gothic etc. you may need to extend the ranges.
If you copy-pasted it from somewhere, like I did, remember to paste as text using Ctrl + Shift + V to avoid this.
Also, it is the case that this [OBJ] only appears in Chromium-based browsers like Chrome, Edge etc, unlike in Firefox which I believe discards it by default.

Colorizing text in Rmarkdown fails: color-text.lua doesn't work in RevealJS

I'm trying to make revealjs slides via r-markdown. Also, I would like to colorize some texts with an simple notation (i.e. markdown-like notation) using lua filter as suggested in
Using a Pandoc Lua filter of R Markdown Cookbook.
However, the produced slides are not colorized. In the following slide, the word red should be red and blue should be blue, but they don't actually.
Furthermore, the simple notation [blue]{color="blue"}, for instance, is unexpectedly converted into <span color="blue">blue</span>, not into the desirable HTML code <span style="color: blue;">blue</span>.
Does anybody can tell me what I am missing...?
---
title: "title"
output:
bookdown::html_document2:
base_format: "function(..., number_sections) revealjs::revealjs_presentation(...)"
theme: moon
pandoc_args:
- "--lua-filter=color-text.lua"
transition: default
background_transition: zoom
center: true
incremental: true
number_sections: true
toc: true
toc_depth: 3
fig_caption: TRUE
#dev: cairo_pdf
self_contained: false
reveal_plugins: ["zoom", "notes", "menu"] #"search"
reveal_options:
slideNumber: true
previewLinks: true
margin: 0.1
menu:
numbers: true
always_allow_html: yes
link-citations: yes
---
## First
we define a Lua filter and write it to
the file `color-text.lua`.
```{cat, engine.opts = list(file = "color-text.lua")}
Span = function(span)
color = span.attributes['color']
-- if no color attribute, return unchange
if color == nil then return span end
-- tranform to <span style="color: red;"></span>
if FORMAT:match 'html' then
-- remove color attributes
span.attributes['color'] = nil
-- use style attribute instead
span.attributes['style'] = 'color: ' .. color .. ';'
-- return full span element
return span
elseif FORMAT:match 'latex' then
-- remove color attributes
span.attributes['color'] = nil
-- encapsulate in latex code
table.insert(
span.content, 1,
pandoc.RawInline('latex', '\\textcolor{'..color..'}{')
)
table.insert(
span.content,
pandoc.RawInline('latex', '}')
)
-- returns only span content
return span.content
else
-- for other format return unchanged
return span
end
end
```
Now we can test the filter with some text in brackets with
the `color` attribute, e.g.,
> Roses are [red and **bold**]{color="red"} and
> violets are [blue]{color="blue"}.
Yup, I can and you too: your question has the answer already.
You are
trying to make revealjs
Therefore, when you run your code, your lua filter is not producing anything interesting, simply executing return span in the penultimate line and not the desired change.
Therefore, a simple change is your fix.
Replace:
if FORMAT:match 'html' then
with
if FORMAT:match 'html' or FORMAT:match 'revealjs' then
Doing so, the lua filter does its job and I get the desired output, with the proper format.

Download HTML Text with Ruby

I am trying to create a histogram of the letters (a,b,c,etc..) on a specified web page. I plan to make the histogram itself using a hash. However, I am having a bit of a problem actually getting the HTML.
My current code:
#!/usr/local/bin/ruby
require 'net/http'
require 'open-uri'
# This will be the hash used to store the
# histogram.
histogram = Hash.new(0)
def open(url)
Net::HTTP.get(URI.parse(url))
end
page_content = open('_insert_webpage_here')
page_content.each do |i|
puts i
end
This does a good job of getting the HTML. However, it gets it all. For www.stackoverflow.com it gives me:
<body><h1>Object Moved</h1>This document may be found here</body>
Pretending that it was the right page, I don't want the html tags. I'm just trying to get Object Moved and This document may be found here.
Is there any reasonably easy way to do this?
When you require 'open-uri', you don't need to redefine open with Net::HTTP.
require 'open-uri'
page_content = open('http://www.stackoverflow.com').read
histogram = {}
page_content.each_char do |c|
histogram[c] ||= 0
histogram[c] += 1
end
Note: this does not strip out <tags> within the HTML document, so <html><body>x!</body></html> will have { '<' => 4, 'h' => 2, 't' => 2, ... } instead of { 'x' => 1, '!' => 1 }. To remove the tags, you can use something like Nokogiri (which you said was not available), or some sort of regular expression (such as the one in Dru's answer).
See the section "Following Redirection" on the Net::HTTP Documentation here
Stripping html tags without Nokogiri
puts page_content.gsub(/<\/?[^>]*>/, "")
http://codesnippets.joyent.com/posts/show/615

Eliminate html tags from values

I'm trying to eliminate HTML tags from a value displayed in an ssrs report.
My solution came to:
=(new System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex("<[^>]*>")).Replace((new System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex("< STYLE >. *< /STYLE >")).Replace(Fields!activitypointer1_description.Value,""),"")
The problem is that the second expression ("< STYLE >. *< /STYLE >" without the spaces) which should be executed first doesn't do anything. The result contains the styles from the html without the tags attached.
I'm out of ideas.
C
You need to add RegexOptions.Singleline, because by default Regular expressions will stop on newline characters. Here's an example of a console program you can run to verify it:
string decription = #"<b>this is some
text</b><style>and
this is style</style>";
Console.WriteLine(
(new Regex( "<[^>]*>", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.Singleline ))
.Replace(
(new Regex( "<STYLE>.*</STYLE>", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.Singleline ))
.Replace( decription
, "" )
, "" )
);