Similar to this thread, but in my case, I want anything within the "ForEach Orders" to NOT cause the package to fail, but rather continue on to the next order. So, in the picture below, if the SQL task "Get Lines for Order" fails or anything else within the "ForEach for Orders" has an error, the flow should continue on to the next order. Id rather not have to set an event handler on each task within this level.
So possibly put both wrap both the "Get Lines for Order" and "ForEach for OrderLines" within a sequence container, then put an OnError handler on that?
If I understand your question correctly, you want the package to process all elements within the foreach loop enumerator; if failures occur, keep going.
If this is the case, there is a simpler solution. Click on the foreach loop in question. In the properties box, you will see MaximumErrorCount. Set the value to 0. This will run through all items in the loop, regardless of fail count.
Note: You can still add an OnError event handler to perform some task in the event there is an error. But, the package will continue to execute the foreach loop after that.
Related
I have a large, dynamic number of dbc.Inputs (~200) that trigger a callback.
Their id’s use pattern matching callbacks.
The value entered in the input updates a SQL db.
The problem I am facing:
I need to have debounce=True so that every keystroke doesn’t trigger the callback.
However, having debounce=True also makes it so that if the Input is clicked into, and clicked out of without any changes being made, it still triggers the callback.
Is there any way to make it so the callback only triggers if the current value has been changed? I was hoping this could be done within the args of the input itself but did not see any args that would achieve this.
I am trying to create a conditional statement that only executes a second .exe when the first .exe returns a successful exit code of 0. This is my logic so far. I have played around with setting up a standard output variable but to no avail.
Conditional Flow
Resolved my own question but will leave it up for others:
Right click the execute process task and select properties
Under Misc, there is a ExecValueVariable property
Set this equal to a variable you have created
I have an SSIS package where I am trying to use a For Loop to check a condition (web service response). I have a condition in the EvalExpression within SSIS and I am setting one of the variables in that EvalExpression within a dataflow task that is inside the loop. I am also logging the expression as well as the variables in the expression, and when the EvalExpression should turn false, the loop keeps going. Can someone please explain why that is? Or how can I get the true EvalExpression each iteration.
This is my EvalExpression
(#[User::statusMessageLoop] == 1 && #[User::statusMessageLoopCheck] == 1)
The variable User::statusMessageLoopCheck is set at each iteration of the loop and when I want it to break out of the loop, I set it to 0.
I hope the images below help explain my situation, and thank you all for your input.
for loop properties
conditions under where i want the loop to keep going
break out of the loop when these condition are true
I am assuming you are reading your XML into columns properly and you know how to do that.
Add a script component and select "Transformation"
Add your variable (I am calling mine isTrue) as read-write
Select your column as read on inputs
Enter the script
Add the following code to set your variable
Variables.isTrue = Row.isTrue == true ? 1 : 0;
This is basic if then else logic.
This is how you set a variable using SSIS inherit tools.
If this isn't working, maybe you should check to make sure you are reading the XML properly.
EDIT:
You need an interim variable to hold the test result and then you can set the Package Variable in the post execute. Here is a screen shot of the code:
Sorry about this. I learned this lesson with you. I typically handle all XML and JSON entirely inside C#.
Note that bool test is declared outside of row processing as well.
This assumes you only have one row of processing as well.
In the project I'm developing for the client, if I find a particular condition for an item in the collection, the client told me to pass to the next line of the collection and report the exception.
How is it possible to pass over to next line in case of an exception in the handling of an item?
I except BluePrism passing to the next row of the collection.
I assume you are using Loop stage to go through collection. If so you need to use decision stage to find exception and then when condition is true you report it (in a form you agree with the customer) and then you just simply link it to the Loop End stage, if exception condition is not met you follow regular process logic.
If you are not using Loop stage, you should consider it. It allows you to easily iterate through collection rows. It consists of 2 blocks: Loop Start & Loop End. When your flow reaches the Loop End it will come back to the Start and increment the row count.
My Jmeter with CSV stops after a sample error, even though the Thread Group is configured with continue.
My configuration is Thread Group, While Controler, Http Request, CSV Data set Config. The tests are working.
How can I enforce Jmeter to continue?
You have met one of the conditions that causes the while loop to stop (condition is blank):
From help:
The While Controller runs its children until the condition is "false".
Possible condition values:
blank - exit loop when last sample in loop fails
LAST - exit loop when last sample in loop fails. If the last sample just before the loop failed, don't enter loop.
Otherwise - exit (or don't enter) the loop when the condition is equal to the string "false"
You only have one sample in the loop, so when it produces an error, the blank condition (last sample in loop fails) is true, and the loop exits.
Try to use a value that becomes 'false' when you are ready to exit the loop, or anything else to keep it looping (ie "true").
Alternatively, if you add another sample that always succeeds (ie debug sampler) to the loop, you will see it keeps going, because the failing sample is no longer the last in the loop.