"This application does not support integration with your profile." - html

Past apps that I have built seem to work fine, but when trying integrate a simple HTML page embedded into an iframe, all I get is the above message ("This application does not support integration with your profile").
Any suggestions or direction helps.
Thanks!

It's possible that this question I asked previously might be useful.
Social Media sites preventing other sites displaying their pages in an iFrame

Related

Chrome detecting ads on site without ads

Google Chrome says it is blocking ads on our web application, but our application does not have any ads in it. This is a SAAS application and includes regular downloading of data files.
The Chrome dev console says: "Chrome is blocking ads on this site because this site tends to show ads that interrupt, distract, mislead, or prevent user control. You should fix the issues as soon as possible and submit your site for another review."
Our application has also been marked by Google as being Deceptive for this reason.
Google's resources for resolving the problem are very unhelpful. All they say is to remove intrusive ads, but not what ads we are displaying in particular.
Any knowledge of this problem and possible solutions? Maybe some bad practices to avoid?

I want to use Google docs in django site is there any security issues with directly copying the iframe tag

I want to use Google docs in my django site by embedding it with iframe tag
Or the link provided by Google for embedding.
Is there any security threat by using this method of embedding.
It really depends what are you putting in IFRAME or if someone is putting your site in their IFRAME. if the foreign site is a "normal" site - no worries, but if you allow to anyone to put your site in IFRAME you can become part of unwanted site.
I personally use IFRAMEs only from my own other sites, where it can't be done differently or from extremely trusted sites (like Youtube). Also I prevent everyone to put my site in IFRAME.
There are tons of posts around, so I would recommend to take a look at the Google.

chrome headless mode with dom distiller

For one my projects, we need to extract the distilled content of a crawled webpage. We want to be able to this as an internal service on the server side without the browser. I have been working on using the headless mode of chromium with the distill functionality to be able to do this. Has anyone tried doing this in this forum? Even if you have not done, could someone share some insights on how to potentially do this ?
Thanks,
Praveen.

html angularjs live edit feature in chrome browser?

I have been practicing angularjs tuts from various tutorials,
I ran across a video tutorial which shows/depicts the live edit of html+angularjs in chrome browser
I am bit amazed with the feature , i am searching for the same since a day and unable to get any such feature,
Alterntatively i tried with webstrom7 which is bit buggy not working with chrome properly on frequent occasions, I know that brackets.io does implement such feature but i would be appreciating the below chrome live edit.
can anyone identify this live editor feature from the pic and suggest the best way to grab it for windows box - is the below a plugin ?
Is Batarang. a Chrome Extension!

Open Chrome app within Chrome's main window

I'm fairly new to Chrome app development and was wondering if it's possible to run an app within Chrome's main window, like the TweetDeck app.
Thanks!
No. Chrome Apps' current goal is to provide a native-like app experience outside the Chrome browser. Today, with the exception of certain privileged APIs, putting an app in Chrome would be... well, it would be a website.
If you want an app in one of Chrome's tabs, why not just build a website? What does the open web lack for your project?
Note that we have been thinking about what it would mean for an app to be a component inside a webpage. You could imagine a Facebook Like button or a Google+ +1 button implemented as an app in a webpage in the same way that those buttons today are usually implemented as iframes. There are some interesting security properties that this approach would bring over iframes. But again, this doesn't seem to be what you had in mind. What you had in mind appears to be a regular website.