I have written a custom PMD rule specific to my project requirements that is working fine with sonar in standalone mode (following the steps given in this link). I need to integrate the same to hudson.
How can I integrate the custom PMD-sonar rule to Hudson, what is the best way to do so ? Do I need to make changes to the sonar-hudson plugin ?
I got the way out myself. It seems there is no extra configuration required for hudson as the configuration manager itself takes only the url to sonar. Standalone PMD custom rule with sonar integration is sufficient.
Related
Steps to reproduce a problem:
Download and install dotnet core 3.0
Create a new project: dotnet new webapp -n MyApp
Run app dotnet run
Navigate to http://localhost:5000/Privacy
Edit Privacy page MyApp\Pages\Privacy.cshtml
Refresh
The changes do not get picked up by the toolkit and old page is rendered.
Same flow for dotnet core 2.2 (freshly installed) results in an updated page.
Is there a flag, which needs to be set somewhere within config to get autodetect working for 3.0 or is this a bug?
Use the dotnet CLI command to watch run your project:
dotnet watch run
Optionally you can watch run without hot reload enabled:
dotnet watch run --no-hot-reload
Add this instruction to the project file [ProjectName].csproj:
<ItemGroup>
<!-- extends watching group to include *.cshtml and *.razor files -->
<Watch Include="**\*.cshtml;*.razor;*.js;*.css" Exclude="**\obj\**\*;bin\**\*" />
</ItemGroup>
For further information see Microsoft DotNet 5.0 Documentation.
While searching the root cause of that issue i came accross with that SO question. To resolve that issue you need to add Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Razor.RuntimeCompilation NuGet package to your project and modify your Startup.cs like below.
Inside ConfigureServices method of Startup.cs
For ASP.NET Core MVC:
IMvcBuilder mvc = services.AddControllersWithViews();
mvc.AddRazorRuntimeCompilation();
For ASP.NET Core Razor Pages:
IMvcBuilder mvc = services.AddRazorPages();
mvc.AddRazorRuntimeCompilation();
PS: Do not forget to use this feature 'dotnet-watch' for development environment only since it does not make sense for production environment for most cases.
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/migration/22-to-30?view=aspnetcore-3.0&tabs=visual-studio
2021 UPDATE (Better Solution): You do not need to execute AddRazorRuntimeCompilation method in Startup.cs. You can keep this feature running by adding a value to projects debug configuration.
Please add new Environment variable to Project Properties > Debug > Environment variables
Name: ASPNETCORE_HOSTINGSTARTUPASSEMBLIES
Value: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Razor.RuntimeCompilation
I'm not entirely sure this is the same issue, but ASP.NET Core 2.2 introduced an In Process IIS hosting model. This provides a lot of performance benefits in a production environment, but basically negates one of ASP.NET Core's most useful development features: automatic updates. If you're using the In Process model in development, you'll need to build after code changes, just like with older ASP.NET MVC sites. You can switch the hosting model back to the Out of Process model (the old way) either by going to your project properties or editing your csproj. In properties, there's a dropdown now on the Debug tab, which corresponds to the <AspNetCoreHostingModel> tag in the csproj.
UPDATE
For what it's worth, I've actually seen this behavior to be somewhat random actually. Some changes for me seem to kick off an automatic build like they used to, while other changes don't show up unless I manually build. There doesn't seem to be a lot of rhyme or reason to which changes required what either. It's possible that the tooling for this isn't quite there yet, and a future update to Visual Studio may make the In Process model behave consistently like the Out of Process model did with code changes in development. All I know is that switching to Out of Process definitely resolves all issues with this, so it's related to the In Process model in some way.
I created a solution based of the different csproj files using solution maker tool. This tool creates a master solution but does not add configurations to the projects or the solution, the way Visual Studio adds configuration settings to the solution file when it builds it. I tried to build it using MSbuild new.sln command from the Developer Command prompt for VS2013. I even tried using the command by giving configuration options but it still doesn't work. The solution builds without actually building any output when triggered by MSbuild unless built in Visual Studio first. Is there a way for MSbuild or another way to add the configuration settings to the solution file so it can actually build it?
I used devenv to build the solution instead and it worked.
I'm completely new to OpenShift and so far ran in hundreds of bugs while trying to create my first application. Now I want to configure Maven to use my own goals. So far I tried:
adding a Jenkins and configuring the Maven Build - the Jenkins didn't take up the changes and finally stopped building altogether
adding a file .openshift/action_hook/pre_build with the content export MAVEN_ARGS="clean package -Popenshift" as explained here
adding a file .openshift/action_hook/build with the content mvn clean package -Popenshift as explained there
Evidently, the documentation is somewhat obsolete... so what is the correct way?
I finally managed to get the Jenkins to build with my goals. The misconception was that it would use the configured Maven goals INSTEAD of the default ones, when it would just use them additionally (he never had to, since the shell script failed). So deleting the script and adding a custom Maven build works.
It is possible to take the source code directly from a svn repository and analyze it with sonar? Or configure sonar just to run a Checkstyle or pmd plugin for certain sources?
I need to do this on non-maven projects.
Sonar can run without maven entirely. Now there's sonar-runner
Yes, you just need to write a maven or ant script to check out the latest from SVN first, then run the sonar:sonar command.
It looks like Sonar forces you to create a pom.xml file and install maven2, even for a non-mavenized project: http://docs.sonarqube.org/display/SONAR/Analyzing+Source+Code
(fyi - Sonar is dead easy with a mavenized project, but in any setup the key will be in getting in the habit of looking at and using the results of Sonar to improve development. That's the hard part.)
I am new in Hudson.
I would like to execute a 'sourcecodeanalyzer' command in Hudson as Post-build Actions to generate an html report. Please let me know is this at all possible, if yes let me know the Hudson configuration steps to execute the command.
Your earliest response in this regard will be extremely helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Yes, it is almost certainly possible.
You will need to configure the Hudson project to have either a post-build action or a build step that runs your source code analyzer.
You've not stated in your question precisely which analyzer - it may be that Hudson already has a plug-in installed for it, in which case it may be listed on the Config page for the project at the bottom under Post-build Actions.
If not, next check to see if there's a plug-in available for the analyzer that hasn't been installed. From the main Hudson page select Manage Hudson, then Manage Plugins, and choose the Available tab. If there is a plug-in available it's definitely a good idea to use it as they are generally very well integrated with Hudson itself.
As a last resort you'll have to configure a build step to run the analyzer. Configure the project, then choose "Add build step". The drop-down that appears depends on your environment (Windows or Linux) but should include the ability to run a shell command or batch file. You can configure your analyzer there.
(If you're building Windows Visual Studio applications, a more flexible way that I've used is to use the MSBuild plug-in for builds, and have an MSBuild script that builds the application and then runs analysis tools. This can automate pretty much everything: mine builds the application, builds an acceptance test database, runs the acceptance tests and copies the result HTML to a page linked from the project.)
You could create a new job with a "Execute Shell" build step. Type in the command you wish to run in the text box. Then all you have to do is trigger this job by selecting:
"Build after other projects are built"
And select the trigger job from the list.
Hope this helps!
As a follow up to Jeremy's post. If you don't see the ability to add post build steps, you might work with maven jobs. In that case you need the Hudson M2 Extra Steps Plugin. This will give you pre and post build steps.
I use the 'Post build task' plugin to delete some resources after a build. You could call any shell script or command lines. If you want you could make the call depends on some logging output.
there is one best way to solve this:
Upgrade to Fortify SCA 2.6.x (as of writing, latest version is 2.6.5).
Download the Fortify Maven Plugin version 2.6 from https://customerportal.fortify.com and install it into your Hudson server's Maven repository.
Update your project's pom to carry out the Fortify scan. There is an example provided with the Maven plugin.
Currently , I am experiment with sonar plug in. It looks great check the details here
http://sonar.codehaus.org/a-new-hudson-plugin-for-a-closer-integration-with-sonar/
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Sonar+plugin