Element Positioning affected by Browser Screen Resolution Change - html

newbie developer here.
There's this small problem I always encounter. Every time I try to change browser resolution (or what do you call the event when you scroll the mouse wheel while pressing ctrl), some elements (Mostly form elements) get to be shifted down or somewhere else, which does not conform with the original positioning. Im not sure if the problem is with the CSS or the markup itself and Im not really sure if this is much of a problem. Should I ignore it? (It doesn't feel very comfortable though, thinking that it might become problematic in the near future) Otherwise, any solution on how to avoid this?
Simple explanations are very much appreciated, Thanks.
(Perhaps the used term newbie should be replaced with noob?. Haha.)

Ed, it sounds like you are zooming in. The problem you describe occurs when you use absolute dimensions e.g. width: 20px;. To achieve a fluid layout you could use em instead e.g. width: 10em;.
You may find this Making the transition from px to em article useful.

Ed, perhaps you can also go for max-width and min-width in your css to avoid that. focusing on the resolution lets say 1024 x 768 . you can use min-width for both your columns that at point below this resolution it won't skip downwards. Let me know if that helped

Related

Can I shrink Div and all nested Divs with simple css rules?

I mobilizing a website and would like to know if I can use one or more rather simple css rules to shrink a main div that has many nested divs and still have everything look proportonate in the smaller screen. The page is... http://www.junkyardzombiez.com/choose-a-zombie/ and the container is Any help is appreciated.
There is no magical way to to do as it's something that needs to be built into the site initially. If you had written the CSS to use % rather than PX then you would have more scope to work with but hard coded PX values mean it's built to stay at that size.
As it stands at the moment, you will need to change a number of classes to scale in width based on screen size.
It's worth looking at some frameworks like bootstrap that can help with this.

Responsvie website width

When coding width for responsive, is it preferable to round off the value or specify the value as close as possible?
For example:
Base on my calculation my width is 67.328699%(left div) and 32.84%(right div)
or should I just round it off to
67%(left div) and 33%(right div)
which will add up to 100%?
Thanks for the help.
It's a good question, But I think there is no matter, because in small screens the percentage you round is very very small. But looking at the most famous responsive design of twitter bootstrap HERE they don't round up the values.
I suggest you too look at bootstrap's grid system it will help you a lot in designing responsive pages.
There are two ways to look at this. First, due to the nature of foating point arithmetic, you're probably not going to get an EXACT number, so rounding isn't going to break anything. You're never going to be exactly right anyway. Smarter people have written about this point: https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/floatingpoint.html
Second, think about what the number actually 67.328699% means. you're trying to accurately define a size down to a millionth of a percent, or in other words a hundred millionth of your entire screen width. How much are you actually gaining by doing that?
Also, because of the limitations of floating point math, it's likely that if you make the widths sum to an exact 100%, when the user changes the screen width or sometimes simply with other resolutions, you're going to have the divs jumping. Sometimes they will be on the same line, sometimes they will not. I suggest you have them add up to slightly less than 100%.
edit: on another note, I would have a discussion with your designer and ask why they made such odd proportions. They should make designs around technology. Your job isn't to force the technology to fit a design.
Using 2 decimals would be fine, but keep in mind the box-model when you set the percentages(it's a good idea to always use box-sizing:border-box)
I would specify it rounded off, personally.
But if you are creating a responsive muti-column layout, I would suggest using a grid system like bootstrap

Are there any circumstances under which an image may not scale properly?

Let's say I have < img src="http://www.always-going-to-be-absolute.com/images/thisimage1.jpg" width= "some px" /> (only a .jpg or .gif). With only the width specified, are there any (any!) circumstances under which the height and width of the image may not scale accordingly, or may not scale at all, assuming there is no CSS or other code affecting it? I can't think of any circumstances (and research doesn't bring up any), but I'd like to be sure by running this by some people who have more experience than I do.
thanks!
No there are not. However, note that is it quicker to load an image of the correct size.
If any other css code or anything else is not affecting it, then I don't think there should be a problem. Try using images of correct sizes though. Helps reduce loading time and preserve quality of images as well. Try it out and if you get any scaling or other problems, you know where to ask, right? ^_^
It looks like you're scaling the images through width. From section 13.7 of the HTML 4 specification:
All IMG and OBJECT attributes that concern visual alignment and presentation have been deprecated in favor of style sheets.
I think the only two problems you may have here are:
Small images: If the image is 10x10px and is scaled to fit a 1000x1000px container, it will be pretty hard to make out what the image is supposed to be.
Thin images: If your container is 1000x1000px and the image is 250x25px, scaling the image to fit the container will result in a 1000x100px image.
OR, is there a way to at least determine the width of an image from a URL.jpg (if it's not specified in the html) without downloading the image?
In front-end JavaScript you can simply:
img.clientWidth;
img.clientHeight;
On the back-end, PHP has a getimagesize() function which returns height and width. I imagine other languages also have similar functions.

CSS divs do not fit on all resolutions

When i make websites, it fits on my screen, but when i open the website on another screen, it doesn't work correctly (The divs overlaps eachother). It's the same when i resize the window. I saw a couple of posts about this, but still, no good answer. I tried making a container to put them all in. But it's still the same.
Any answers, why this is happening?
Container CSS code:
#container
{
width: 960px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
I put it into HTML like this:
<div id="container">
Content goes here
</div>
EDIT: Guys, i don't think you understand me. When i'm on another screen resolution, all the divs moves. I think everything moves, if i'm not completely wrong. I would like to know the real way of doing this. What do you do?
http://i49.tinypic.com/8wwo6r.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/359ydc9.jpg
FINAL EDIT: I fixed it with the percentage. It seems to work quite well! Thanks for all your answers! I know this will give me a kind of bad reputation, because i didn't make myself clear enough.
You can use percentages instead of pixel.
#container {
width: 80%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
You can figure out percentages having screen resolution and the size you want using this forumla:
WidthPercentage = ContainerWidth / ScreenWidth * 100
So for your example if your screen resolution is 1360x768:
WidthPercentage = 960 / 1360 * 100 = 70.5%
This is called responsive design.
You can find some guidelines here and some good articles here.
If you don't want to use percentages, you can go with Responsive Design and Media Queries. Basically, you call different CSS rules based on different browser properties (for example: width). See a nice tutorial about this here (you can also see it in action).
Quote:
The second part of responsive design is CSS3 media queries, which currently enjoy decent support across many modern browsers. If you’re not familiar with CSS3 media queries, they basically allow you to gather data about the site visitor and use it to conditionally apply CSS styles. For our purposes, we’re primarily interested in the min-width media feature, which allows us to apply specific CSS styles if the browser window drops below a particular width that we can specify
You've set your <div> (<div id="container">) to be 960 pixels wide. If you view the page in a browser window that's less than 960 pixels wide, then the <div> won't fit in it.
Your question isn't very clear. You've said "when i open the website on another screen, it doesn't work correctly", but you haven't said how it doesn't work. To get help, you need to describe the following three things with enough detail:
What you've done (e.g. what code you've written, what steps you're taking to run that code)
What results you expect from what you've done
What results you're actually getting

resize html website for different screen resolutions

I had to redo a website from flash to html/jquery.
Everything looked great. Until I tested the site on a netbook where the screen resolution is much smaller. All the elements were misaligned or didn't stretch as I wanted it to. Or there were scroll bars everywhere.
So, How would do I make it stretch or resize properly,
Is there a property which I can set somewhere that would resize everything proportionately?
You should use heigh / width in percentage(%) rather px / em. change the css file.
Is there a property which I can set somewhere that would resize everything proportionately?
No, I wish :P You'll need to redo the layout to make it liquid or use media queries to make it responsive to different resolutions. I'm afraid both solutions could be pretty complex.
Is there a property which I can set somewhere that would resize everything proportionately?
Everything? No. Font sizes won't adjust based on window size (at least not without JS).
You can set the widths of most things using percentage units in your stylesheets, but even then there will be a point where things will break down.
The current buzzword is responsive web design (I can't comment on the quality of the links from that page) in which media queries are used to provide different designs for different sized browsers.
The property called Media Query we mostly use this property with Responsible Web Design. In which we tell browsers change the specific css property at that particular screen size.
Check this article for more http://css-tricks.com/6206-resolution-specific-stylesheets/
& for Responsible Web Design mostly use value in Percentage instead of Pixels .
Check THIS website for more reference.
unfortunately there is no "magic" which scales things up/down. i can think of some guidelines:
Use relative widths for things (percentages) instead of absolute value
no hardwired sizes, keep them in separate CSS documents
work your way up: choose a minimum resolution, work upwards from it. it makes sizing things much easier.
The question was to RESIZE not to REALIGN. Using percentiles will only change WHERE the HTML elements show up on the page. It will not change their SIZE.
you can use with and height in percentage to set your screen for all resoulation..Give the 100% width to the body and the div you want give 100% width.