Given the following HTML:
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
I would like #copyright to stick to the bottom of #container. Can I achieve this without using absolute positioning?
Likely not.
Assign position:relative to #container, and then position:absolute; bottom:0; to #copyright.
#container {
position: relative;
}
#copyright {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Actually, the accepted answer by #User will only work if the window is tall and the content is short. But if the content is tall and the window is short, it will put the copyright info over the page content, and then scrolling down to see the content will leave you with a floating copyright notice. That makes this solution useless for most pages (like this page, actually).
The most common way of doing this is the "CSS sticky footer" approach demonstrated, or a slightly slimmer variation. This approach works great -- IF you have a fixed height footer.
If you need a variable height footer that will appear at the bottom of the window if the content is too short, and at the bottom of the content if the window is too short, what do you do?
Swallow your pride and use a table.
For example:
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
border-collapse: collapse;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<table id="container">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div id="main">Lorem ipsum, etc.</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<div id="footer">Copyright some evil company...</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Try it out. This will work for any window size, for any amount of content, for any size footer, on every browser... even IE6.
If you're cringing at the thought of using a table for layout, take a second to ask yourself why. CSS was supposed to make our lives easier -- and it has, overall -- but the fact is that even after all these years, it's still a broken, counter-intuitive mess. It can't solve every problem. It's incomplete.
Tables aren't cool, but at least for now, they are sometimes the best way to solve a design problem.
The flexbox approach!
In supported browsers, you can use the following:
Example Here
.parent {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
margin-top: auto;
}
.parent {
height: 100px;
border: 5px solid #000;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background: #f00;
margin-top: auto;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">Align to the bottom</div>
</div>
The solution above is probably more flexible, however, here is an alternative solution:
Example Here
.parent {
display: flex;
}
.child {
align-self: flex-end;
}
.parent {
height: 100px;
border: 5px solid #000;
display: flex;
}
.child {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background: #f00;
align-self: flex-end;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">Align to the bottom</div>
</div>
As a side note, you may want to add vendor prefixes for additional support.
Yes you can do this without absolute positioning and without using tables (which screw with markup and such).
DEMO
This is tested to work on IE>7, chrome, FF & is a really easy thing to add to your existing layout.
<div id="container">
Some content you don't want affected by the "bottom floating" div
<div>supports not just text</div>
<div class="foot">
Some other content you want kept to the bottom
<div>this is in a div</div>
</div>
</div>
#container {
height:100%;
border-collapse:collapse;
display : table;
}
.foot {
display : table-row;
vertical-align : bottom;
height : 1px;
}
It effectively does what float:bottom would, even accounting for the issue pointed out in #Rick Reilly's answer!
Pure CSS, without absolute positioning, without fixing any height, cross-browser (IE9+)
check out that Working Fiddle
Because normal flow is 'top-to-bottom' we can't simply ask the #copyright div to stick to the bottom of his parent without absolutely positioning of some sort, But if we wanted the #copyright div to stick to the top of his parent, it will be very simple - because this is the normal flow way.
So we will use this in our advantage.
we will change the order of the divs in the HTML, now the #copyright div is at the top, and the content follow it right away.
we also make the content div stretch all the way (using pseudo elements and clearing techniques)
now it's just a matter of inverting that order back in the view. that can be easily done with CSS transform.
We rotate the container by 180deg, and now: up-is-down. (and we inverse back the content to look normal again)
If we want to have a scroolbar within the content area, we need to apply a little bit more of CSS magic. as can be showed Here [in that example, the content is below a header - but its the same idea]
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body,
#Container {
height: 100%;
color: white;
}
#Container:before {
content: '';
height: 100%;
float: left;
}
#Copyright {
background-color: green;
}
#Stretch {
background-color: blue;
}
#Stretch:after {
content: '';
display: block;
clear: both;
}
#Container,
#Container>div {
-moz-transform: rotateX(180deg);
-ms-transform: rotateX(180deg);
-o-transform: rotate(180deg);
-webkit-transform: rotateX(180deg);
transform: rotateX(180deg);
}
<div id="Container">
<div id="Copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
<div id="Stretch">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div>Element 1</div>
<div>Element 2</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS Grid
Since the usage of CSS Grid is increasing, I would like to suggest align-self to the element that is inside a grid container.
align-self can contain any of the values: end, self-end, flex-end for the following example.
#parent {
display: grid;
}
#child1 {
align-self: end;
}
/* Extra Styling for Snippet */
#parent {
height: 150px;
background: #5548B0;
color: #fff;
padding: 10px;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
#child1 {
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
background: #6A67CE;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
line-height: 50px;
}
<div id="parent">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="child1">
1
</div>
</div>
Create another container div for the elements above #copyright. Just above copyright add a new div:
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
It will force the footer to be under everything else, just like in the case of using relative positioning (bottom:0px;).
Try this;
<div id="container">
<div style="height: 100%; border:1px solid #ff0000;">
<!-- Other elements here -->
</div>
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="position:relative;border:1px solid #00ff00;top:-25px">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
While none of the answers provided here seemed to apply or work in my particular case, I came across this article which provides this neat solution :
#container {
display: table;
}
#copyright {
display: table-footer-group;
}
I find it very useful for applying responsive design for mobile display without having to reorder all the html code of a website, setting body itself as a table.
Note that only the first table-footer-group or table-header-group will be rendered as such : if there are more than one, the others will be rendered as table-row-group.
You can indeed align the box to the bottom without using position:absolute if you know the height of the #container using the text alignment feature of inline-block elements.
Here you can see it in action.
This is the code:
#container {
/* So the #container most have a fixed height */
height: 300px;
line-height: 300px;
background:Red;
}
#container > * {
/* Restore Line height to Normal */
line-height: 1.2em;
}
#copyright {
display:inline-block;
vertical-align:bottom;
width:100%; /* Let it be a block */
background:green;
}
Using the translateY and top property
Just set element child to position: relative and than move it top: 100% (that's the 100% height of the parent) and stick to bottom of parent by transform: translateY(-100%) (that's -100% of the height of the child).
BenefitS
you do not take the element from the page flow
it is dynamic
But still just workaround :(
.copyright{
position: relative;
top: 100%;
transform: translateY(-100%);
}
Don't forget prefixes for the older browser.
CodePen link here.
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.overlay {
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.container {
width: 900px;
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 50px;
}
.height {
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
}
.footer {
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="overlay">
<div class="container">
<div class="height">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
footer
</div>
</div>
If you want it to "stick" to the bottom, regardless of the height of container, then absolute positioning is the way to go. Of course, if the copyright element is the last in the container it'll always be at the bottom anyway.
Can you expand on your question? Explain exactly what you're trying to do (and why you don't want to use absolute positioning)?
If you do not know the height of child block:
#parent {
background:green;
width:200px;
height:200px;
display:table-cell;
vertical-align:bottom;
}
.child {
background:red;
vertical-align:bottom;
}
<div id="parent">
<div class="child">child
</div>
</div>
http://jsbin.com/ULUXIFon/3/edit
If you know the height of the child block add the child block then add padding-top/margin-top:
#parent {
background:green;
width:200px;
height:130px;
padding-top:70px;
}
.child {
background:red;
vertical-align:
bottom;
height:130px;
}
<div id="parent">
<div class="child">child
</div>
</div>
You can use grid by assigning the available space to the content at the top:
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 1fr auto;
height: 10rem; /* or 100% or anything */
}
<div id="container">
This is random content.
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Also, if there's stipulations with using position:absolute; or position:relative;, you can always try padding parent div or putting a margin-top:x;. Not a very good method in most cases, but it may come in handy in some cases.
Solution for this specific scenario:
Place inner at the bottom of parent . The height of the parent is set by the height of its "tallest" sibling
The set up:
I have a row with multiple <div class="container">
These <div class="container"> are next to each other inside another <div class="supercontainer">
Each <div class="container"> has 3 inner divs on top of each other: <div class="title">, <div class="content">, <div class="footer">
The desired result:
All <div class="container"> have the same height. The height is not defined in px, it will be the height of the "tallest" among them.
<div class="title"> should be at the top of <div class="container">
<div class="content"> should be placed below <div class="title">
<div class="footer"> should be placed at the bottom of <div class="container"> without overlapping with the previous content
This is the current state: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/ExvWQww
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
__________ Solution with FLEXBOX __________
This is the outcome: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/MWvpBMz
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
margin-top: auto;
border: solid 1px fuchsia;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
__________ Solution with TABLE-ROW __________
This is the outcome: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/rNzyKJm
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
border-collapse:collapse;
display : table;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
border: solid 1px fuchsia;
display: table-row;
vertical-align: bottom;
height: 1px;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
#container{width:100%; float:left; position:relative;}
#copyright{position:absolute; bottom:0px; left:0px; background:#F00; width:100%;}
#container{background:gray; height:100px;}
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Don't wanna use "position:absolute" for sticky footer at bottom. Then you can do this way:
html,
body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
/* Equal to height of footer */
/* But also accounting for potential margin-bottom of last child */
margin-bottom: -50px;
}
.footer{
background: #000;
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
}
.footer,
.push {
height: 50px;
}
<html>
<body>
<!--HTML Code-->
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content">content</div>
<div class="push"></div>
</div>
<footer class="footer">test</footer>
</body>
</html>
Here is an approach targeted at making an element with a known height and width (at least approximately) float to the right and stay at the bottom, while behaving as an inline element to the other elements. It is focused at the bottom-right because you can place it easily in any other corner through other methods.
I needed to make a navigation bar which would have the actual links at the bottom right, and random sibling elements, while ensuring that the bar itself stretched properly, without disrupting the layout. I used a "shadow" element to occupy the navigation bar's links' space and added it at the end of the container's child nodes.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
<span id="copyright-s">filler</span>
</div>
<style>
#copyright {
display:inline-block;
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
right:0;
}
#copyright-s {
float:right;
visibility:hidden;
width:20em; /* ~ #copyright.style.width */
height:3em; /* ~ #copyright.style.height */
}
</style>
Maybe this helps someone: You can always place the div outside the other div and then push it upwards using negative margin:
<div id="container" style="background-color: #ccc; padding-bottom: 30px;">
Hello!
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="margin-top: -20px;">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
Just because this hasn't been mentioned at all, what usually works well in situations like yours:
Placing the copyright-div after the container-div
You would only have to format the copyright-div in a similar way to the other container (same overall width, centering, etc.), and all is fine.
CSS:
#container, #copyright {
width: 1000px;
margin:0 auto;
}
HTML:
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
</div>
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
The only time this might not be ideal is when your container-div is declared with height:100%, and the user would need to scroll down to see the copyright. But even still you could work around (e.g. margin-top:-20px - when the height of your copyright element is 20px).
No absolute positioning
No table layout
No crazy css, that looks different in every other browser (well IE at least, you know)
Simple and clear formatting
Aside: I know the OP asked for a solution that "... sticks to the bottom of the 'container' div ...", and not something under it, but come on, people are looking for good solutions here, and this is one!
There is nothing called float:bottom in CSS. The best way is using positioning in such cases:
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
For those only have one child in the container, you can use the table-cell and vertical-align approach which worked reliably for positioning a single div at the bottom of its parent.
Note that using table-footer-group as other answers mentioned will break the height calculation of parent table.
#container {
display: table;
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
}
#item {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="item">Single bottom item</div>
</div>
According: w3schools.com
An element with position: absolute; is positioned relative to the
nearest positioned ancestor (instead of positioned relative to the
viewport, like fixed).
So you need to position the parent element with something either relative or absolute, etc and position the desired element to absolute and latter set bottom to 0.
Related
Given the following HTML:
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
I would like #copyright to stick to the bottom of #container. Can I achieve this without using absolute positioning?
Likely not.
Assign position:relative to #container, and then position:absolute; bottom:0; to #copyright.
#container {
position: relative;
}
#copyright {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Actually, the accepted answer by #User will only work if the window is tall and the content is short. But if the content is tall and the window is short, it will put the copyright info over the page content, and then scrolling down to see the content will leave you with a floating copyright notice. That makes this solution useless for most pages (like this page, actually).
The most common way of doing this is the "CSS sticky footer" approach demonstrated, or a slightly slimmer variation. This approach works great -- IF you have a fixed height footer.
If you need a variable height footer that will appear at the bottom of the window if the content is too short, and at the bottom of the content if the window is too short, what do you do?
Swallow your pride and use a table.
For example:
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
border-collapse: collapse;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<table id="container">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div id="main">Lorem ipsum, etc.</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<div id="footer">Copyright some evil company...</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Try it out. This will work for any window size, for any amount of content, for any size footer, on every browser... even IE6.
If you're cringing at the thought of using a table for layout, take a second to ask yourself why. CSS was supposed to make our lives easier -- and it has, overall -- but the fact is that even after all these years, it's still a broken, counter-intuitive mess. It can't solve every problem. It's incomplete.
Tables aren't cool, but at least for now, they are sometimes the best way to solve a design problem.
The flexbox approach!
In supported browsers, you can use the following:
Example Here
.parent {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
margin-top: auto;
}
.parent {
height: 100px;
border: 5px solid #000;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background: #f00;
margin-top: auto;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">Align to the bottom</div>
</div>
The solution above is probably more flexible, however, here is an alternative solution:
Example Here
.parent {
display: flex;
}
.child {
align-self: flex-end;
}
.parent {
height: 100px;
border: 5px solid #000;
display: flex;
}
.child {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background: #f00;
align-self: flex-end;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">Align to the bottom</div>
</div>
As a side note, you may want to add vendor prefixes for additional support.
Yes you can do this without absolute positioning and without using tables (which screw with markup and such).
DEMO
This is tested to work on IE>7, chrome, FF & is a really easy thing to add to your existing layout.
<div id="container">
Some content you don't want affected by the "bottom floating" div
<div>supports not just text</div>
<div class="foot">
Some other content you want kept to the bottom
<div>this is in a div</div>
</div>
</div>
#container {
height:100%;
border-collapse:collapse;
display : table;
}
.foot {
display : table-row;
vertical-align : bottom;
height : 1px;
}
It effectively does what float:bottom would, even accounting for the issue pointed out in #Rick Reilly's answer!
Pure CSS, without absolute positioning, without fixing any height, cross-browser (IE9+)
check out that Working Fiddle
Because normal flow is 'top-to-bottom' we can't simply ask the #copyright div to stick to the bottom of his parent without absolutely positioning of some sort, But if we wanted the #copyright div to stick to the top of his parent, it will be very simple - because this is the normal flow way.
So we will use this in our advantage.
we will change the order of the divs in the HTML, now the #copyright div is at the top, and the content follow it right away.
we also make the content div stretch all the way (using pseudo elements and clearing techniques)
now it's just a matter of inverting that order back in the view. that can be easily done with CSS transform.
We rotate the container by 180deg, and now: up-is-down. (and we inverse back the content to look normal again)
If we want to have a scroolbar within the content area, we need to apply a little bit more of CSS magic. as can be showed Here [in that example, the content is below a header - but its the same idea]
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body,
#Container {
height: 100%;
color: white;
}
#Container:before {
content: '';
height: 100%;
float: left;
}
#Copyright {
background-color: green;
}
#Stretch {
background-color: blue;
}
#Stretch:after {
content: '';
display: block;
clear: both;
}
#Container,
#Container>div {
-moz-transform: rotateX(180deg);
-ms-transform: rotateX(180deg);
-o-transform: rotate(180deg);
-webkit-transform: rotateX(180deg);
transform: rotateX(180deg);
}
<div id="Container">
<div id="Copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
<div id="Stretch">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div>Element 1</div>
<div>Element 2</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS Grid
Since the usage of CSS Grid is increasing, I would like to suggest align-self to the element that is inside a grid container.
align-self can contain any of the values: end, self-end, flex-end for the following example.
#parent {
display: grid;
}
#child1 {
align-self: end;
}
/* Extra Styling for Snippet */
#parent {
height: 150px;
background: #5548B0;
color: #fff;
padding: 10px;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
#child1 {
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
background: #6A67CE;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
line-height: 50px;
}
<div id="parent">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="child1">
1
</div>
</div>
Create another container div for the elements above #copyright. Just above copyright add a new div:
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
It will force the footer to be under everything else, just like in the case of using relative positioning (bottom:0px;).
Try this;
<div id="container">
<div style="height: 100%; border:1px solid #ff0000;">
<!-- Other elements here -->
</div>
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="position:relative;border:1px solid #00ff00;top:-25px">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
While none of the answers provided here seemed to apply or work in my particular case, I came across this article which provides this neat solution :
#container {
display: table;
}
#copyright {
display: table-footer-group;
}
I find it very useful for applying responsive design for mobile display without having to reorder all the html code of a website, setting body itself as a table.
Note that only the first table-footer-group or table-header-group will be rendered as such : if there are more than one, the others will be rendered as table-row-group.
You can indeed align the box to the bottom without using position:absolute if you know the height of the #container using the text alignment feature of inline-block elements.
Here you can see it in action.
This is the code:
#container {
/* So the #container most have a fixed height */
height: 300px;
line-height: 300px;
background:Red;
}
#container > * {
/* Restore Line height to Normal */
line-height: 1.2em;
}
#copyright {
display:inline-block;
vertical-align:bottom;
width:100%; /* Let it be a block */
background:green;
}
Using the translateY and top property
Just set element child to position: relative and than move it top: 100% (that's the 100% height of the parent) and stick to bottom of parent by transform: translateY(-100%) (that's -100% of the height of the child).
BenefitS
you do not take the element from the page flow
it is dynamic
But still just workaround :(
.copyright{
position: relative;
top: 100%;
transform: translateY(-100%);
}
Don't forget prefixes for the older browser.
CodePen link here.
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.overlay {
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.container {
width: 900px;
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 50px;
}
.height {
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
}
.footer {
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="overlay">
<div class="container">
<div class="height">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
footer
</div>
</div>
If you want it to "stick" to the bottom, regardless of the height of container, then absolute positioning is the way to go. Of course, if the copyright element is the last in the container it'll always be at the bottom anyway.
Can you expand on your question? Explain exactly what you're trying to do (and why you don't want to use absolute positioning)?
If you do not know the height of child block:
#parent {
background:green;
width:200px;
height:200px;
display:table-cell;
vertical-align:bottom;
}
.child {
background:red;
vertical-align:bottom;
}
<div id="parent">
<div class="child">child
</div>
</div>
http://jsbin.com/ULUXIFon/3/edit
If you know the height of the child block add the child block then add padding-top/margin-top:
#parent {
background:green;
width:200px;
height:130px;
padding-top:70px;
}
.child {
background:red;
vertical-align:
bottom;
height:130px;
}
<div id="parent">
<div class="child">child
</div>
</div>
You can use grid by assigning the available space to the content at the top:
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 1fr auto;
height: 10rem; /* or 100% or anything */
}
<div id="container">
This is random content.
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Also, if there's stipulations with using position:absolute; or position:relative;, you can always try padding parent div or putting a margin-top:x;. Not a very good method in most cases, but it may come in handy in some cases.
Solution for this specific scenario:
Place inner at the bottom of parent . The height of the parent is set by the height of its "tallest" sibling
The set up:
I have a row with multiple <div class="container">
These <div class="container"> are next to each other inside another <div class="supercontainer">
Each <div class="container"> has 3 inner divs on top of each other: <div class="title">, <div class="content">, <div class="footer">
The desired result:
All <div class="container"> have the same height. The height is not defined in px, it will be the height of the "tallest" among them.
<div class="title"> should be at the top of <div class="container">
<div class="content"> should be placed below <div class="title">
<div class="footer"> should be placed at the bottom of <div class="container"> without overlapping with the previous content
This is the current state: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/ExvWQww
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
__________ Solution with FLEXBOX __________
This is the outcome: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/MWvpBMz
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
margin-top: auto;
border: solid 1px fuchsia;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
__________ Solution with TABLE-ROW __________
This is the outcome: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/rNzyKJm
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
border-collapse:collapse;
display : table;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
border: solid 1px fuchsia;
display: table-row;
vertical-align: bottom;
height: 1px;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
#container{width:100%; float:left; position:relative;}
#copyright{position:absolute; bottom:0px; left:0px; background:#F00; width:100%;}
#container{background:gray; height:100px;}
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Don't wanna use "position:absolute" for sticky footer at bottom. Then you can do this way:
html,
body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
/* Equal to height of footer */
/* But also accounting for potential margin-bottom of last child */
margin-bottom: -50px;
}
.footer{
background: #000;
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
}
.footer,
.push {
height: 50px;
}
<html>
<body>
<!--HTML Code-->
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content">content</div>
<div class="push"></div>
</div>
<footer class="footer">test</footer>
</body>
</html>
Here is an approach targeted at making an element with a known height and width (at least approximately) float to the right and stay at the bottom, while behaving as an inline element to the other elements. It is focused at the bottom-right because you can place it easily in any other corner through other methods.
I needed to make a navigation bar which would have the actual links at the bottom right, and random sibling elements, while ensuring that the bar itself stretched properly, without disrupting the layout. I used a "shadow" element to occupy the navigation bar's links' space and added it at the end of the container's child nodes.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
<span id="copyright-s">filler</span>
</div>
<style>
#copyright {
display:inline-block;
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
right:0;
}
#copyright-s {
float:right;
visibility:hidden;
width:20em; /* ~ #copyright.style.width */
height:3em; /* ~ #copyright.style.height */
}
</style>
Maybe this helps someone: You can always place the div outside the other div and then push it upwards using negative margin:
<div id="container" style="background-color: #ccc; padding-bottom: 30px;">
Hello!
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="margin-top: -20px;">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
Just because this hasn't been mentioned at all, what usually works well in situations like yours:
Placing the copyright-div after the container-div
You would only have to format the copyright-div in a similar way to the other container (same overall width, centering, etc.), and all is fine.
CSS:
#container, #copyright {
width: 1000px;
margin:0 auto;
}
HTML:
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
</div>
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
The only time this might not be ideal is when your container-div is declared with height:100%, and the user would need to scroll down to see the copyright. But even still you could work around (e.g. margin-top:-20px - when the height of your copyright element is 20px).
No absolute positioning
No table layout
No crazy css, that looks different in every other browser (well IE at least, you know)
Simple and clear formatting
Aside: I know the OP asked for a solution that "... sticks to the bottom of the 'container' div ...", and not something under it, but come on, people are looking for good solutions here, and this is one!
There is nothing called float:bottom in CSS. The best way is using positioning in such cases:
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
For those only have one child in the container, you can use the table-cell and vertical-align approach which worked reliably for positioning a single div at the bottom of its parent.
Note that using table-footer-group as other answers mentioned will break the height calculation of parent table.
#container {
display: table;
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
}
#item {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="item">Single bottom item</div>
</div>
According: w3schools.com
An element with position: absolute; is positioned relative to the
nearest positioned ancestor (instead of positioned relative to the
viewport, like fixed).
So you need to position the parent element with something either relative or absolute, etc and position the desired element to absolute and latter set bottom to 0.
First of all, please look at this code.
I learned that this was a common way to realize liquid layout.
But I can not understand some of this code.
.container {
overflow: hidden;
}
main {
float: left;
width: 100%;
margin-right: -340px;
background: red;
}
.main-inner {
margin-right: 340px;
background: blue;
}
.sidebar {
float: right;
width: 340px;
background: green;
}
<div class="container">
<main>
<div class="main-inner">
<p class="main-title">Main</p>
</div>
</main>
<aside class="sidebar">
<div class="sidebar-inner">
sidebar
</div>
</aside>
</div>
Question 1
I understand that the negative margin has the effect of moving an element in the specified direction. However, when you run this code, the main element does not seem to be moving at all. Why is this?
Question 2
Since we set the width of the main element to 100%, I understand that the aside element hits the main element and that the main element and aside element can not be side by side.
So, I think that we prepare a horizontal width that can apply the aside element by applying negative margin, but the background color of the main element is applied in the same way as when the horizontal width is 100%. Why is the background color of the main element not (100% - aside width)? How is this series of rendering done?
Question 3
Which document on W3.org describes these actions? I tried looking, but I could not find any detailed information on them.
thank you.
Let's start by adding the properties one by one and see what is happening.
Intially we have this code with no margin applied and only float elements:
.container {
overflow: hidden;
background:yellow;
}
main {
float: left;
width: 100%;
background: red;
}
.main-inner {
background: blue;
}
.sidebar {
float: right;
width: 340px;
background: green;
}
<div class="container">
<main>
<div class="main-inner">
<p class="main-title">Main</p>
</div>
</main>
<aside class="sidebar">
<div class="sidebar-inner">
sidebar
</div>
</aside>
</div>
It's clear that you made the red element to be width:100% floating on the left and the green one to float on the right with a fixed width. You may also notice that p element is having a default margin that's why the blue is not totally covering the red.
Now if you add negative margin-right you will not move the element or decrease the width but you will pull the content from the right in order to overlap the element. Here is a basic illustration:
.box {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
background: red;
float: left;
}
<div class="box" style="margin-right:-100px;height:220px">
</div>
<div class="box" style="background:blue;">
</div>
As you can see the blue box is overlapping the red one by exactly 100px because we applied -100px to the margin-right of the red box. Same logic will happen in your case, you applied a negative margin equal to the size of the sidebar so you created the need space to move the sidebar at the same level of the main element.
.container {
overflow: hidden;
background:yellow;
}
main {
float: left;
width: 100%;
background: red;
margin-right:-340px;
}
.main-inner {
background: blue;
}
.sidebar {
float: right;
width: 340px;
background: green;
}
<div class="container">
<main>
<div class="main-inner">
<p class="main-title">Main</p>
</div>
</main>
<aside class="sidebar">
<div class="sidebar-inner">
sidebar
</div>
</aside>
</div>
So the main element is still 100% width BUT the sidebar is overlapping it due to negative margin.
Now the last step is to add the margin inside the main and in this case it will reduce the width of the inner element to make the total (width + margin) always equal to the width of parent element (containing block)
.container {
overflow: hidden;
background:yellow;
}
main {
float: left;
width: 100%;
background: red;
margin-right:-340px;
}
.main-inner {
background: blue;
margin-right:340px;
}
.sidebar {
float: right;
width: 340px;
background: green;
}
<div class="container">
<main>
<div class="main-inner">
<p class="main-title">Main</p>
</div>
</main>
<aside class="sidebar">
<div class="sidebar-inner">
sidebar
</div>
</aside>
</div>
Here is another illustration of margin with block element non floated:
.container {
border: 2px solid;
max-width: 50vw;
margin: auto;
}
.first {
height: 100px;
background: red;
margin: 0 -50px;
}
.second {
height: 100px;
background: blue;
margin: 0 50px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="first">
</div>
<div class="second">
</div>
</div>
In this case the width is increasing/decrasing due to margin because the logic is always: width + margin = width of containing block.
With elements like float and inline block the logic is the same but we won't have width changes because the width is defined either by the content or explicitly.
.container {
border: 2px solid;
display:inline-block;
}
.first {
float:left;
height: 100px;
background: red;
margin-right:-50px;
}
.second {
display:inline-block;
width:200px;
height: 120px;
background: blue;
margin-top:20px;
margin-right:-100px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="first">
some text here
</div>
<div class="second">
</div>
</div>
Here the float element has a width defined by the content, the inline-block has a width equal to 200px. The negative margin is creating the overlap and the size of the parent element (the containing block) is equal to width + margins.
For the references:
8 Box model
9 Visual formatting model
10 Visual formatting model details
The above explanation is very simplifed. Refer to the specification links for a full and details explanation.
The odd placement from <main> comes from a browser css-rule
p {
display: block;
-webkit-margin-before: 1em;
-webkit-margin-after: 1em;
-webkit-margin-start: 0px;
-webkit-margin-end: 0px;
}
You can reset it using a css reset like normalize.css.
However, I recommend using display: flex. Some wonderful resources.
.container {
display: flex;
}
main {
width: 75%;
}
aside {
width: 25%;
}
Is it possible to make the wrapper fill the window height (no scrolling) and the center div scrollable without messing around with pixels and javascript?
<div id="wrapper">
<h1>Header</h1>
<div id="center">
<div style="height:1000px">high content</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
Basically I want the header to be visible at the top and the footer to be always visible at the bottom and have a scrollable content in the center which occupies the remaning height.
The header, footer and center divs' heights are all unknown (no set px or %, i.e. variable font-size or padding). Is it possible with pure CSS?
2014 UPDATE: The modern way to solve this layout problem is to use the flexbox CSS model. It's supported by all major browsers and IE11+.
2012: The correct way to do this with CSS alone is to use display: table and display: table-row. These are supported by all major browsers, starting with IE8. This is not using tables for display. You'll use divs:
html, body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.wrapper {
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background: yellow; /* just to make sure nothing bleeds */
}
.header {
display: table-row;
background: gray;
}
.content {
display: table-row; /* height is dynamic, and will expand... */
height: 100%; /* ...as content is added (won't scroll) */
background: turquoise;
}
.footer {
display: table-row;
background: lightgray;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="header">
<h1>Header</h1>
<p>Header of variable height</p>
</div>
<div class="content">
<h2>Content that expands in height dynamically to adjust for new content</h2>
Content height will initially be the remaining
height in its container (<code>.wrapper</code>).
<!-- p style="font-size: 4000%">Tall content</p -->
</div>
<div class="footer">
<h3>Sticky footer</h3>
<p>Footer of variable height</p>
</div>
</div>
That's it. The divs are wrapped as you'd expect.
A cross-browser solution derived from Dan Dascalescu answer:
http://jsfiddle.net/Uc9E2
html, body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
}
.l-fit-height {
display: table;
height: 100%;
}
.l-fit-height-row {
display: table-row;
height: 1px;
}
.l-fit-height-row-content {
/* Firefox requires this */
display: table-cell;
}
.l-fit-height-row-expanded {
height: 100%;
display: table-row;
}
.l-fit-height-row-expanded > .l-fit-height-row-content {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
.l-scroll {
/* Firefox requires this to do the absolute positioning correctly */
display: inline-block;
}
}
.l-scroll {
overflow-y: auto;
position: relative;
height: 1000px;
}
.l-scroll-content {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
height: 1000px;
min-height:100px;
}
<div class="l-fit-height">
<section class="l-fit-height-row">
<div class="l-fit-height-row-content">
<p>Header</p>
</div>
</section>
<section class="l-fit-height-row-expanded">
<div class="l-fit-height-row-content l-scroll">
<div class="l-scroll-content">
<p>Foo</p>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="l-fit-height-row">
<div class="l-fit-height-row-content">
<p>Footer</p>
</div>
</section>
</div>
Using overflow:auto will let you do this.
demo
So what you are talking about is a sticky footer. I went and did some more research and here is what I have for you.
<div id="wrapper" style="height:100%">
<div id="header" style="float:none;"><h1>Header</h1></div>
<div style="overflow:scroll;float:none;height:auto;">high content</div>
<div id="footer" style="clear:both;position:fixed;bottom:0px;"><h1>Footer</h1></div>
</div>
This will give you a sticky footer. The key is position:fixed and bottom:0px;
Unfortunately this means it also hovers above any content in the scrollview. So far there seems to be only Javascript to figure this out but I will keep looking.
Given the following HTML:
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
I would like #copyright to stick to the bottom of #container. Can I achieve this without using absolute positioning?
Likely not.
Assign position:relative to #container, and then position:absolute; bottom:0; to #copyright.
#container {
position: relative;
}
#copyright {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Actually, the accepted answer by #User will only work if the window is tall and the content is short. But if the content is tall and the window is short, it will put the copyright info over the page content, and then scrolling down to see the content will leave you with a floating copyright notice. That makes this solution useless for most pages (like this page, actually).
The most common way of doing this is the "CSS sticky footer" approach demonstrated, or a slightly slimmer variation. This approach works great -- IF you have a fixed height footer.
If you need a variable height footer that will appear at the bottom of the window if the content is too short, and at the bottom of the content if the window is too short, what do you do?
Swallow your pride and use a table.
For example:
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
border-collapse: collapse;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<table id="container">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div id="main">Lorem ipsum, etc.</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<div id="footer">Copyright some evil company...</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Try it out. This will work for any window size, for any amount of content, for any size footer, on every browser... even IE6.
If you're cringing at the thought of using a table for layout, take a second to ask yourself why. CSS was supposed to make our lives easier -- and it has, overall -- but the fact is that even after all these years, it's still a broken, counter-intuitive mess. It can't solve every problem. It's incomplete.
Tables aren't cool, but at least for now, they are sometimes the best way to solve a design problem.
The flexbox approach!
In supported browsers, you can use the following:
Example Here
.parent {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
margin-top: auto;
}
.parent {
height: 100px;
border: 5px solid #000;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background: #f00;
margin-top: auto;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">Align to the bottom</div>
</div>
The solution above is probably more flexible, however, here is an alternative solution:
Example Here
.parent {
display: flex;
}
.child {
align-self: flex-end;
}
.parent {
height: 100px;
border: 5px solid #000;
display: flex;
}
.child {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background: #f00;
align-self: flex-end;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">Align to the bottom</div>
</div>
As a side note, you may want to add vendor prefixes for additional support.
Yes you can do this without absolute positioning and without using tables (which screw with markup and such).
DEMO
This is tested to work on IE>7, chrome, FF & is a really easy thing to add to your existing layout.
<div id="container">
Some content you don't want affected by the "bottom floating" div
<div>supports not just text</div>
<div class="foot">
Some other content you want kept to the bottom
<div>this is in a div</div>
</div>
</div>
#container {
height:100%;
border-collapse:collapse;
display : table;
}
.foot {
display : table-row;
vertical-align : bottom;
height : 1px;
}
It effectively does what float:bottom would, even accounting for the issue pointed out in #Rick Reilly's answer!
Pure CSS, without absolute positioning, without fixing any height, cross-browser (IE9+)
check out that Working Fiddle
Because normal flow is 'top-to-bottom' we can't simply ask the #copyright div to stick to the bottom of his parent without absolutely positioning of some sort, But if we wanted the #copyright div to stick to the top of his parent, it will be very simple - because this is the normal flow way.
So we will use this in our advantage.
we will change the order of the divs in the HTML, now the #copyright div is at the top, and the content follow it right away.
we also make the content div stretch all the way (using pseudo elements and clearing techniques)
now it's just a matter of inverting that order back in the view. that can be easily done with CSS transform.
We rotate the container by 180deg, and now: up-is-down. (and we inverse back the content to look normal again)
If we want to have a scroolbar within the content area, we need to apply a little bit more of CSS magic. as can be showed Here [in that example, the content is below a header - but its the same idea]
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body,
#Container {
height: 100%;
color: white;
}
#Container:before {
content: '';
height: 100%;
float: left;
}
#Copyright {
background-color: green;
}
#Stretch {
background-color: blue;
}
#Stretch:after {
content: '';
display: block;
clear: both;
}
#Container,
#Container>div {
-moz-transform: rotateX(180deg);
-ms-transform: rotateX(180deg);
-o-transform: rotate(180deg);
-webkit-transform: rotateX(180deg);
transform: rotateX(180deg);
}
<div id="Container">
<div id="Copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
<div id="Stretch">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div>Element 1</div>
<div>Element 2</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS Grid
Since the usage of CSS Grid is increasing, I would like to suggest align-self to the element that is inside a grid container.
align-self can contain any of the values: end, self-end, flex-end for the following example.
#parent {
display: grid;
}
#child1 {
align-self: end;
}
/* Extra Styling for Snippet */
#parent {
height: 150px;
background: #5548B0;
color: #fff;
padding: 10px;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
#child1 {
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
background: #6A67CE;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
line-height: 50px;
}
<div id="parent">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="child1">
1
</div>
</div>
Create another container div for the elements above #copyright. Just above copyright add a new div:
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
It will force the footer to be under everything else, just like in the case of using relative positioning (bottom:0px;).
Try this;
<div id="container">
<div style="height: 100%; border:1px solid #ff0000;">
<!-- Other elements here -->
</div>
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="position:relative;border:1px solid #00ff00;top:-25px">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
While none of the answers provided here seemed to apply or work in my particular case, I came across this article which provides this neat solution :
#container {
display: table;
}
#copyright {
display: table-footer-group;
}
I find it very useful for applying responsive design for mobile display without having to reorder all the html code of a website, setting body itself as a table.
Note that only the first table-footer-group or table-header-group will be rendered as such : if there are more than one, the others will be rendered as table-row-group.
You can indeed align the box to the bottom without using position:absolute if you know the height of the #container using the text alignment feature of inline-block elements.
Here you can see it in action.
This is the code:
#container {
/* So the #container most have a fixed height */
height: 300px;
line-height: 300px;
background:Red;
}
#container > * {
/* Restore Line height to Normal */
line-height: 1.2em;
}
#copyright {
display:inline-block;
vertical-align:bottom;
width:100%; /* Let it be a block */
background:green;
}
Using the translateY and top property
Just set element child to position: relative and than move it top: 100% (that's the 100% height of the parent) and stick to bottom of parent by transform: translateY(-100%) (that's -100% of the height of the child).
BenefitS
you do not take the element from the page flow
it is dynamic
But still just workaround :(
.copyright{
position: relative;
top: 100%;
transform: translateY(-100%);
}
Don't forget prefixes for the older browser.
CodePen link here.
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.overlay {
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.container {
width: 900px;
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 50px;
}
.height {
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
}
.footer {
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="overlay">
<div class="container">
<div class="height">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
footer
</div>
</div>
If you want it to "stick" to the bottom, regardless of the height of container, then absolute positioning is the way to go. Of course, if the copyright element is the last in the container it'll always be at the bottom anyway.
Can you expand on your question? Explain exactly what you're trying to do (and why you don't want to use absolute positioning)?
If you do not know the height of child block:
#parent {
background:green;
width:200px;
height:200px;
display:table-cell;
vertical-align:bottom;
}
.child {
background:red;
vertical-align:bottom;
}
<div id="parent">
<div class="child">child
</div>
</div>
http://jsbin.com/ULUXIFon/3/edit
If you know the height of the child block add the child block then add padding-top/margin-top:
#parent {
background:green;
width:200px;
height:130px;
padding-top:70px;
}
.child {
background:red;
vertical-align:
bottom;
height:130px;
}
<div id="parent">
<div class="child">child
</div>
</div>
You can use grid by assigning the available space to the content at the top:
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 1fr auto;
height: 10rem; /* or 100% or anything */
}
<div id="container">
This is random content.
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Also, if there's stipulations with using position:absolute; or position:relative;, you can always try padding parent div or putting a margin-top:x;. Not a very good method in most cases, but it may come in handy in some cases.
Solution for this specific scenario:
Place inner at the bottom of parent . The height of the parent is set by the height of its "tallest" sibling
The set up:
I have a row with multiple <div class="container">
These <div class="container"> are next to each other inside another <div class="supercontainer">
Each <div class="container"> has 3 inner divs on top of each other: <div class="title">, <div class="content">, <div class="footer">
The desired result:
All <div class="container"> have the same height. The height is not defined in px, it will be the height of the "tallest" among them.
<div class="title"> should be at the top of <div class="container">
<div class="content"> should be placed below <div class="title">
<div class="footer"> should be placed at the bottom of <div class="container"> without overlapping with the previous content
This is the current state: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/ExvWQww
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
__________ Solution with FLEXBOX __________
This is the outcome: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/MWvpBMz
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
margin-top: auto;
border: solid 1px fuchsia;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
__________ Solution with TABLE-ROW __________
This is the outcome: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/rNzyKJm
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
border-collapse:collapse;
display : table;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
border: solid 1px fuchsia;
display: table-row;
vertical-align: bottom;
height: 1px;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
#container{width:100%; float:left; position:relative;}
#copyright{position:absolute; bottom:0px; left:0px; background:#F00; width:100%;}
#container{background:gray; height:100px;}
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Don't wanna use "position:absolute" for sticky footer at bottom. Then you can do this way:
html,
body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
/* Equal to height of footer */
/* But also accounting for potential margin-bottom of last child */
margin-bottom: -50px;
}
.footer{
background: #000;
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
}
.footer,
.push {
height: 50px;
}
<html>
<body>
<!--HTML Code-->
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content">content</div>
<div class="push"></div>
</div>
<footer class="footer">test</footer>
</body>
</html>
Here is an approach targeted at making an element with a known height and width (at least approximately) float to the right and stay at the bottom, while behaving as an inline element to the other elements. It is focused at the bottom-right because you can place it easily in any other corner through other methods.
I needed to make a navigation bar which would have the actual links at the bottom right, and random sibling elements, while ensuring that the bar itself stretched properly, without disrupting the layout. I used a "shadow" element to occupy the navigation bar's links' space and added it at the end of the container's child nodes.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
<span id="copyright-s">filler</span>
</div>
<style>
#copyright {
display:inline-block;
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
right:0;
}
#copyright-s {
float:right;
visibility:hidden;
width:20em; /* ~ #copyright.style.width */
height:3em; /* ~ #copyright.style.height */
}
</style>
Maybe this helps someone: You can always place the div outside the other div and then push it upwards using negative margin:
<div id="container" style="background-color: #ccc; padding-bottom: 30px;">
Hello!
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="margin-top: -20px;">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
Just because this hasn't been mentioned at all, what usually works well in situations like yours:
Placing the copyright-div after the container-div
You would only have to format the copyright-div in a similar way to the other container (same overall width, centering, etc.), and all is fine.
CSS:
#container, #copyright {
width: 1000px;
margin:0 auto;
}
HTML:
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
</div>
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
The only time this might not be ideal is when your container-div is declared with height:100%, and the user would need to scroll down to see the copyright. But even still you could work around (e.g. margin-top:-20px - when the height of your copyright element is 20px).
No absolute positioning
No table layout
No crazy css, that looks different in every other browser (well IE at least, you know)
Simple and clear formatting
Aside: I know the OP asked for a solution that "... sticks to the bottom of the 'container' div ...", and not something under it, but come on, people are looking for good solutions here, and this is one!
There is nothing called float:bottom in CSS. The best way is using positioning in such cases:
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
For those only have one child in the container, you can use the table-cell and vertical-align approach which worked reliably for positioning a single div at the bottom of its parent.
Note that using table-footer-group as other answers mentioned will break the height calculation of parent table.
#container {
display: table;
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
}
#item {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="item">Single bottom item</div>
</div>
According: w3schools.com
An element with position: absolute; is positioned relative to the
nearest positioned ancestor (instead of positioned relative to the
viewport, like fixed).
So you need to position the parent element with something either relative or absolute, etc and position the desired element to absolute and latter set bottom to 0.
I have a problem when I try to center the div block "products" because I don't know in advance the div width. Anybody have a solution?
Update: The problem I have is I don't know how many products I'll display, I can have 1, 2 or 3 products, I can center them if it was a fixed number as I'd know the width of the parent div, I just don't know how to do it when the content is dynamic.
.product_container {
text-align: center;
height: 150px;
}
.products {
height: 140px;
text-align: center;
margin: 0 auto;
clear: ccc both;
}
.price {
margin: 6px 2px;
width: 137px;
color: #666;
font-size: 14pt;
font-style: normal;
border: 1px solid #CCC;
background-color: #EFEFEF;
}
<div class="product_container">
<div class="products" id="products">
<div id="product_15">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div id="product_15">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div id="product_15">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Update 27 Feb 2015: My original answer keeps getting voted up, but now I normally use #bobince's approach instead.
.child { /* This is the item to center... */
display: inline-block;
}
.parent { /* ...and this is its parent container. */
text-align: center;
}
My original post for historical purposes:
You might want to try this approach.
<div class="product_container">
<div class="outer-center">
<div class="product inner-center">
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear"/>
</div>
Here's the matching style:
.outer-center {
float: right;
right: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.inner-center {
float: right;
right: -50%;
position: relative;
}
.clear {
clear: both;
}
JSFiddle
The idea here is that you contain the content you want to center in two divs, an outer one and an inner one. You float both divs so that their widths automatically shrink to fit your content. Next, you relatively position the outer div with it's right edge in the center of the container. Lastly, you relatively position the inner div the opposite direction by half of its own width (actually the outer div's width, but they are the same). Ultimately that centers the content in whatever container it's in.
You may need that empty div at the end if you depend on your "product" content to size the height for the "product_container".
An element with ‘display: block’ (as div is by default) has a width determined by the width of its container. You can't make a block's width dependent on the width of its contents (shrink-to-fit).
(Except for blocks that are ‘float: left/right’ in CSS 2.1, but that's no use for centering.)
You could set the ‘display’ property to ‘inline-block’ to turn a block into a shrink-to-fit object that can be controlled by its parent's text-align property, but browser support is spotty. You can mostly get away with it by using hacks (eg. see -moz-inline-stack) if you want to go that way.
The other way to go is tables. This can be necessary when you have columns whose width really can't be known in advance. I can't really tell what you're trying to do from the example code — there's nothing obvious in there that would need a shrink-to-fit block — but a list of products could possibly be considered tabular.
[PS. never use ‘pt’ for font sizes on the web. ‘px’ is more reliable if you really need fixed size text, otherwise relative units like ‘%’ are better. And “clear: ccc both” — a typo?]
.center{
text-align:center;
}
.center > div{ /* N.B. child combinators don't work in IE6 or less */
display:inline-block;
}
JSFiddle
Most browsers support the display: table; CSS rule. This is a good trick to center a div in a container without adding extra HTML nor applying constraining styles to the container (like text-align: center; which would center all other inline content in the container), while keeping dynamic width for the contained div:
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="centered">This content is centered</div>
</div>
CSS:
.centered { display: table; margin: 0 auto; }
.container {
background-color: green;
}
.centered {
display: table;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: red;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="centered">This content is centered</div>
</div>
Update (2015-03-09):
The proper way to do this today is actually to use flexbox rules. Browser support is a little bit more restricted (CSS table support vs flexbox support) but this method also allows many other things, and is a dedicated CSS rule for this type of behavior:
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="centered">This content is centered</div>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column; /* put this if you want to stack elements vertically */
}
.centered { margin: 0 auto; }
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column; /* put this if you want to stack elements vertically */
background-color: green;
}
.centered {
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: red;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="centered">This content is centered</div>
</div>
six ways to skin that cat:
Button one: anything of type display: block will assume the full parents width. (unless combined with float or a display: flex parent). True. Bad example.
Button 2: going for display: inline-block will lead to automatic (rather than full) width. You can then center using text-align: center on the wrapping block. Probably the easiest, and most widely compatible, even with ‘vintage’ browsers...
.wrapTwo
text-align: center;
.two
display: inline-block; // instantly shrinks width
Button 3:
No need to put anything on the wrap. So perhaps this is the most elegant solution. Also works vertically. (Browser support for transtlate is good enough (≥IE9) these days...).
position: relative;
display: inline-block; // instantly shrinks width
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
Btw: Also a great way for vertically centering blocks of unknown height (in connection with absolute positioning).
Button 4:
Absolute positioning. Just make sure to reserve enough height in the wrapper, since noone else will (neither clearfix nor implicit...)
.four
position absolute
top 0
left 50%
transform translateX(-50%)
.wrapFour
position relative // otherwise, absolute positioning will be relative to page!
height 50px // ensure height
background lightgreen // just a marker
Button 5:
float (which brings also block-level elements to dynamic width) and a relative shift. Although I've never seen this in the wild. Perhaps there are disadvantages...
.wrapFive
&:after // aka 'clearfix'
content ''
display table
clear both
.five
float left
position relative
left 50%
transform translateX(-50%)
Update: Button 6:
And nowadays, you could also use flex-box. Note, that styles apply to the wrapper of the centered object.
.wrapSix
display: flex
justify-content: center
→ full source code (stylus syntax)
I found a more elegant solution, combining "inline-block" to avoid using float and the hacky clear:both. It still requires nested divs tho, which isnt very semantic but it just works...
div.outer{
display:inline-block;
position:relative;
left:50%;
}
div.inner{
position:relative;
left:-50%;
}
Hope it helps!
<div class="outer">
<div class="target">
<div class="filler">
</div>
</div>
</div>
.outer{
width:100%;
height: 100px;
}
.target{
position: absolute;
width: auto;
height: 100px;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
.filler{
position:relative;
width:150px;
height:20px;
}
If the target element is absolutely positioned, you can center it by moving it 50% in one direction (left: 50%) and then transforming it 50% in the opposition direction (transform:translateX(-50%)). This works without defining the target element's width (or with width:auto). The parent element's position can be static, absolute, relative, or fixed.
By default, div elements are displayed as block elements, so they have 100% width, making centering them meaningless. As suggested by Arief, you must specify a width and you can then use auto when specifying margin in order to center a div.
Alternatively, you could also force display: inline, but then you'd have something that pretty much behaves like a span instead of a div, so that doesn't make a lot of sense.
This will center an element such as an Ordered List, or Unordered List, or any element.
Just wrap it with a Div with the class of outerElement and give the inner element the class of innerElement.
The outerelement class accounts for IE, old Mozilla, and most newer browsers.
.outerElement {
display: -moz-inline-stack;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
zoom: 1;
position: relative;
left: 50%;
}
.innerElement {
position: relative;
left: -50%;
}
use css3 flexbox with justify-content:center;
<div class="row">
<div class="col" style="background:red;">content1</div>
<div class="col" style="">content2</div>
</div>
.row {
display: flex; /* equal height of the children */
height:100px;
border:1px solid red;
width: 400px;
justify-content:center;
}
Slight variation on Mike M. Lin's answer
If you add overflow: auto; ( or hidden ) to div.product_container, then you don't need div.clear.
This is derived from this article -> http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
Here is modified HTML:
<div class="product_container">
<div class="outer-center">
<div class="product inner-center">
</div>
</div>
</div>
And here is modified CSS:
.product_container {
overflow: auto;
/* width property only required if you want to support IE6 */
width: 100%;
}
.outer-center {
float: right;
right: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.inner-center {
float: right;
right: -50%;
position: relative;
}
The reason, why it's better without div.clear (apart that it feels wrong to have an empty element) is Firefox'es overzealous margin assignment.
If, for example, you have this html:
<div class="product_container">
<div class="outer-center">
<div class="product inner-center">
</div>
</div>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
</div>
<p style="margin-top: 11px;">Some text</p>
then, in Firefox (8.0 at the point of writing), you will see 11px margin before product_container. What's worse, is that you will get a vertical scroll bar for the whole page, even if the content fits nicely into the screen dimensions.
Try this new css and markup
Here is modified HTML:
<div class="product_container">
<div class="products" id="products">
<div id="product_15" class="products_box">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div id="product_15" class="products_box">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div id="product_15" class="products_box">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
</div>
And here is modified CSS:
<pre>
.product_container
{
text-align: center;
height: 150px;
}
.products {
left: 50%;
height:35px;
float:left;
position: relative;
margin: 0 auto;
width:auto;
}
.products .products_box
{
width:auto;
height:auto;
float:left;
right: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.price {
margin: 6px 2px;
width: 137px;
color: #666;
font-size: 14pt;
font-style: normal;
border: 1px solid #CCC;
background-color: #EFEFEF;
}
<div class="product_container">
<div class="outer-center">
<div class="product inner-center">
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
.outer-center
{
float: right;
right: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.inner-center
{
float: right;
right: -50%;
position: relative;
}
.clear
{
clear: both;
}
.product_container
{
overflow:hidden;
}
If you dont provide "overflow:hidden" for ".product_container" the "outer-center" div will overlap other nearby contents to the right of it. Any links or buttons to the right of "outer-center" wont work. Try background color for "outer-center" to understand the need of "overflow :hidden"
I found interesting solution, I was making slider and had to center slide controls and I did this and works fine. You can also add relative position to parent and move child position vertical. Take a look http://jsfiddle.net/bergb/6DvJz/
CSS:
#parent{
width:600px;
height:400px;
background:#ffcc00;
text-align:center;
}
#child{
display:inline-block;
margin:0 auto;
background:#fff;
}
HTML:
<div id="parent">
<div id="child">voila</div>
</div>
Do display:table; and set margin to auto
Important bit of code:
.relatedProducts {
display: table;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
No matter how many elements you got now it will auto align in center
Example in code snippet:
.relatedProducts {
display: table;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
a {
text-decoration:none;
}
<div class="row relatedProducts">
<div class="homeContentTitle" style="margin: 100px auto 35px; width: 250px">Similar Products</div>
test1
test2
test3
</div>
I'm afraid the only way to do this without explicitly specifying the width is to use (gasp) tables.
Crappy fix, but it does work...
CSS:
#mainContent {
position:absolute;
width:600px;
background:#FFFF99;
}
#sidebar {
float:left;
margin-left:610px;
max-width:300;
background:#FFCCCC;
}
#sidebar{
text-align:center;
}
HTML:
<center>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<div id="mainContent">
1<br/>
<br/>
123<br/>
123<br/>
123<br/>
</div><div id="sidebar"><br/>
</div></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
Simple fix that works in old browsers (but does use tables, and requires a height to be set):
<div style="width:100%;height:40px;position:absolute;top:50%;margin-top:-20px;">
<table style="width:100%"><tr><td align="center">
In the middle
</td></tr></table>
</div>
<style type="text/css">
.container_box{
text-align:center
}
.content{
padding:10px;
background:#ff0000;
color:#ffffff;
}
use span istead of the inner divs
<div class="container_box">
<span class="content">Hello</span>
</div>
I know this question is old, but I'm taking a crack at it. Very similar to bobince's answer but with working code example.
Make each product an inline-block. Center the contents of the container. Done.
http://jsfiddle.net/rgbk/6Z2Re/
<style>
.products{
text-align:center;
}
.product{
display:inline-block;
text-align:left;
background-image: url('http://www.color.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/New_Product.jpg');
background-size:25px;
padding-left:25px;
background-position:0 50%;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
}
.price {
margin: 6px 2px;
width: 137px;
color: #666;
font-size: 14pt;
font-style: normal;
border: 1px solid #CCC;
background-color: #EFEFEF;
}
</style>
<div class="products">
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
</div>
See also: Center inline-blocks with dynamic width in CSS
This is one way to center anything within a div not know the inner width of the elements.
#product_15{
position: relative;
margin: 0 auto;
display: table;
}
.price, img{
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
my solution was:
.parent {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.product {
width: 240px;
margin-left: auto;
height: 127px;
margin-right: auto;
}
add this css to your product_container class
margin: 0px auto;
padding: 0px;
border:0;
width: 700px;