Related
I am looking to find out how i can display a products variants on a page in Shopify. Currently I have a page where I have hard coded a products quantity and size and then linked the price to the product page where the dropdowns for the variants are then predefined.
The problem is that if any variants are changed or any new ones are added then this will not reflected unless its hard coded, hence I need to have some sort of automation so the page correlates what it is available.
From what I know I would probably need to write a custom template, but not sure how i can go about doing this.
The following is an example of what I am looking to do.
Product - Cards
Quantity - 5 10 15 20 25
Style - A A A A A
Would appreciate it, if anybody is able to help or guide me as to how i can do this.
Thanks in advance.
1). You can check with old backup files
2). Created new test store and check product.liquid file
Shopify provide script to get variant in it's default file.
First I would like to apologize for a new question as my profile does not yet allow me to comment on other people's comments especially on two SO posts I've seen. So please bear with this older guy :-)
I am trying to read a list of 100 character files ranging in size from around 90KB to 2MB and then using the qdap package do some statistics with the text I extract from the files namely count sentences, words etc. The files contain webpage source previously scraped using RSelenium::remoteDriver$getPageSource() and saved to file using write(pgSource, fileName.txt). I am reading the files in a loop using:
pgSource <- readChar(file.path(fPath, fileNames[i]), nchars = 1e6)
doc <- read_html(pgSource)
that for some files is throwing
Error in eval(substitute(expr), envir, enclos) :
Excessive depth in document: 256 use XML_PARSE_HUGE option [1]
I have seen these posts, SO33819103 and SO31419409 that point to similar problems but cannot fully understand how to use #shabbychef's workaround as suggested in both posts using the snippet suggested by #glossarch in the first link above.
library(drat)
drat:::add("shabbychef");
install.packages('xml2')
library("xml2")
EDIT: I noticed that when previously I was running another script scraping the data live from the webpages using URL's I did not encounter this problem. The code was the same, I was just reading the doc <- read_html(pgSource) after reading it from the RSelenium's remoteDriver.
What I would like to ask this gentle community is whether I am following the right steps in installing and loading xml2 after adding shabbychef's drat or whether I need to add some other step as suggested in SO17154308 post. Any help or suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thank you.
I don't know if this is the right thing to do, but my question was answered by #hrbrmstr in one of his comments. I decided to post an answer so that people stumbling upon this question see that it has at least one answer.
The problem is basically solved by using the "HUGE" option when reading the html source. My problem was only related to when I loaded previously saved source. I did not find the same problem whilst using a "live" version of the application, i.e. reading the source from the website directly.
Anyway, now the August 2016 update of the excellent xml2 package permits the use of the HUGE option as follows:
doc <- read_html(pageSource, options = "HUGE")
For more information please read the xml2 reference manual here
CRAN-xml2
I wish to thank #hrbrmstr again for his valuable contribution.
Any ideas ?
I think the original source was a goldmine database, looking around it appears that the file was likely built using an application called ACT which I gather is a huge product I don't really want to be deploying for a one off file total size less than 5 meg.
So ...
Anyone know of a simple tool that I can run this file through to convert it to a standard CSV or something?
It does appear to be (when looking at it in notepad and excel) in some sort of csv type format but it's like the data is encrypted somehow.
Ok this is weird,
I got a little confused because the data looked a complete mess, in actual fact the mess was the data, that's what it was meant to look like.
Simply put, i opened the file in notepad, seemed to have a sort of pattern so i droppped it on excel.
Apparently excel has no issues reading these files ... strange huh !!!
I am unaware of any third party tooling for opening these files specifically, although there is an SDK available for C# which could resolve your problem with a little elbow grease.
The SDK can be aquired for free Here
Also there is a developer forum which could provide some valuable resources including training material with sample code Here
Resources will be provided with the SDK
Also, out of interest since ACT is a Sage product have you any Sage software floating about which you could attempt to access the data with? Most offices have!
Failing all of the above there is a trial available for ACT! Here!
Good luck with your problem!
I've got lots of source code files written in various languages, but none of them have a standard comment at the top (sometimes even across the same project). Some of them don't have any header comment at all :-)
I've been thinking about creating a standard template that I can use at the top of my source files, and was wondering what fields I should include.
I know I want to include my name and a short description of what the file contains/does. Should I also include the date created? The date last modified? The programmer who last modified the file? What other fields have you found to be useful?
Any tips and comments welcome.
Thanks,
Cameron
This seems to be a dying practice.
Some people here on StackOverflow are against code comments altogether (reasoning that code should be written to be self explanatory) While I wouldn't go that far, some of the points of the anti-comment crowd make sense, such as the fact that comments tend to be out of date.
Header blocks of comments suffer from these symptoms even more so. Every organization I've been with that has had these header blocks, they are out of date. They have a author name of some guy who doesnt even work there any more, a description that does not match the code at all (assuming it ever did) and a last modified date, that once compared with version control history, seems to have missed its last dozen updates.
In my personal opinion, keep comments close to the code. If you want to know purpose of, and/or history of, a code file, use your version control system.
Date created, date modified and author who last changed the file should be stored in your source control software.
I usually put:
The main purpose of the file and things within the file.
The project/module the file belongs to.
The license associated with the file (and a LICENSE file in the project root).
Who is responsible for the file (either the team, person, or both)
Back in 2002, when I was straight out of college and jobs were few and far between after the dot-com bust, I joined a service company which used to create software customized for their clients in Java. I had to sit in the office of a client (which was a ramshackle room in an electric sub-station rigged with an AC to keep the servers running), sharing chairs/PCs with other guys in the team. The other engineers (if I can call them engineers ;) in the group used to make changes ad-hoc to the source code, compile the files and put them into production.
No way to figure out who made what change.
No way to figure out why any change was made.
No way to go to previous version of code, unless the engineer "remembered" what he modified.
Backup: Copy over files from the production server, which were replaced with new files.
Location of backup: Home directory of engineer copying over files to production server.
Reports of production servers going down due to botched attempts of copying over files to the server (missed a file to be copied over, backups getting lost or wrong files being copied over or not all files being copied over) were met with shrugs (oh no, is it down? let's see what happened; hey who changed what recently...? ummm...).
During those days, after spending several frustrating days trying to figure out the whos and whys behind the code, I had devised a system for comments in a list in the header of the source file which detailed the following:
Date of change made
Who made the change
Why was the change made
Two months later when the list threatened to challenge the size of the source code in the file, the manager had the bright idea of getting a source version control system.
I have never needed to put any comments in headers of source files (except for copyright notices) in any company I worked since. In my current company, everything else is mostly self-evident by looking at the code, or going to the bug reporting system which is integrated with the source version control system.
What fields do you need? If you have to ask whether to put some info there, you don't really need that info. Unless you are forced, by some bureaucratic incompetence of your employer, I don't see why you should go looking for more info than you already feel should be there.\
In most organizations, all source files have to begin with a legal blurb. If you're really lucky, it's just a one-liner, but in most cases it's a really long block of legalese. As a result, few people ever read these. Our eye just travels to the first program element and then goes up to its documentation.
So if you want to write anything, write it in association with the topmost program element, not the file.
Any other bookkeeping information should generally be part of your version control, not maintained (poorly) in the file itself.
In addition to the comment above stating license, the project that it belongs to, etc I also tend to put the "weird" requirements at the top as well (such as "built with version X of library Y") so you, or the person who picks it up after you won't change something that the program relies on without realizing it (or, if they do, they will at least know what to change back)
A lot depends on whether you're using an auto-documentation generation tool or not.
While I agree with many of the comments, if you're using JavaDoc or some other documentation generating tool that depends on comments, you'll obviously need to include the things it wants to see.
You did not mention that you are using a version control system and your comment in Neil N's answer confirms this for your older code. While using version control is the best way to go I also have experienced many situations where the cost of doing so for older code would not be paid for by the project's sponsor. If you do not have a centralized change history for the project then the change history can be put in the modules. It is good that you are using a version control system for your new code.
Your company name
All rights reserved (c) year - or reference to appropriate license
Project or library this file is for
Module it belongs to
Description of what it contains
History
-------
01/08/2010 - Programmer - version
Initial creation.
01/09/2010 - Programmer - version
Change description.
01/10/2010 - Programmer - version
Change description.
Those useful fields that you mentioned are good ones. Who modified the file and when.
Your version control software should allow for the embedding of keywords within comments. For example, in CVS, the $Id$ will resolve to the file, date/time modified, and user that modified the file. It will automatically be kept up to date with each check-in.
Include the following information:
What this file is for. That's a very useful piece of knowledge and it's more important than anything else. You should tell the reader, why there is such a file, why did you group functions in a separate file/package/module and why they are used. Maybe briefly, one or two lines, but that should be there.
Legal stuff, if appplicant.
Leave the place for special commands of console editors, such as of Emacs.
Add special commands that your auto-documenting system requires.
Things things you shouldn not include are
Who created the file
When it was created
Who modified it the last time
When it was last modified
What was added by the latest modification
You can--and should--retrieve it via the version control system, where it's constantly and automatically kept up-to-date. Let alone that most of these points are just useless.
Who created the file
When it was created
Who modified it the last time
When it was last modified
What was added by the latest modification
What is the best method to determine the version number I should use for a software or component? Is there a general rule to set version numbers?
I'm pretty sure it is a basic question but I didn't find anything useful after searching a while.
Microsoft have a convention of:
[major].[minor].[revision].[build]
Or follow Jeff's versioning system.
I've been doing this as an interim until I find a better solution. I don't build many large applications, mostly reports and smaller macros, but it's still important for me to keep track of changes and versions.
[Current year].[Current month].[Current day]
FileName 9.7.17.rpt for example.
It works for me and my boss, and it gives a value which you can compare to today's date to see how old the file is. I also keep a changelog.txt file in the same folder as the most current version and it keeps track of all the changes from the previous versions. I also keep track of all versions in a version control page on each projects tab in OneNote.
Thanks for the answer. I'll also throw in how I store the projects for giggles.
Every project gets its own folder. Inside that folder I'll have 4 main items that help me keep track of what's going on in the project.
An old versions folder
A folder for any reference material I might need for the project
The actual project file
And the changelog
That tree will look something like this.
Project X
Old versions
X Report 9.4.12.rpt
X Report 9.5.3.rpt
X Report 9.7.20.rpt
Reference
SQL calls.txt
Client list.txt
Procedures.doc
X Report 9.7.29.rpt
X Report changelog.txt
This way of keeping track of my work really cuts down on the amount of time that I need to spend documenting anything and organizes it in a standard way so if my boss needs to grab something I've worked on, even he knows exactly what everything means and where it is.
For storing multiple projects in my network folder I have these folders.
Inbox
Projects
#Archived Projects
Current Project 1
Current Project 2
Current Project 3
Reference
Inbox is where I toss random things to process later, or a folder where my boss can throw something I'm going to need for a later project. The Projects folder contains all the projects I'm currently working on, and then when I'm done or they no longer become a current priority, they get tossed in #Archived Projects. Reference is a folder for general job reference material, like policies and procedures, phone lists, org charts, fire escape plans. I may never use them, but it's comforting to have a place to put that kind of stuff as opposed to digging through old email.
This is a very common question. Are you sure you searched around? Wikipedia has a good article on software versioning.
Or, you can follow Ubuntu's convention of using year and month.
For example, release on April 2009 would be:
v9.04
Do it like Donald Knuth does with TeX---its version converges to π with each release and will in fact become π when he dies.
Since version 3, TeX has used an
idiosyncratic version numbering
system, where updates have been
indicated by adding an extra digit at
the end of the decimal, so that the
version number asymptotically
approaches π. This is a reflection of
the fact that TeX is now very stable,
and only minor updates are
anticipated. The current version of
TeX is 3.1415926; it was last updated
in March 2008.
from Wikipedia
A common scheme seems to be to use [major].[minor].[revision]. Where the major version number increments on large/major feature changes or rewrites (or stays 0 as long as you didn't reach a stable version, although many open source projects never get past 0 here), minor version number increases on minor changes, such as a collection of bugfixes, an added small feature and the like. revision increments with each build and reflects the smallest granularity of tracking your exact version. Things like small fixes, etc. get rolled into this, usually.
Usually the first number are major changes/major releases, the second number are used when minor features and bug fixes are added, and the third number is used for minor bug fixes and revision numbers.
Ex. 1.0.0
Depends on a lot of things.
If you are doing .Net work, you can have the system keep track of version numbers for your .dlls and .exe files automatically.
We frequently use the subversion revision as part of our version number. We use a system like:
major.minor.svn-version
We increment the major/minor manually based on internal decisions, and have the svn-version propagate to distinguish builds.
The most important thing is that version numbers make sense to your users.