I have a grid that draws squares in cells. It has number of rows and number of columns, then it draw the grid cells and check if in each cell there should be a square or not (according to an array) and draws a square if needed.
The HTML end result looks something like this: (lets say I have 1 row and 3 columns and only 2 cells should have squars)
.row {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
flex: 10000 1 0%;
}
.column {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
max-width: 100px;
min-width: 10px;
padding: 4px;
border: 1px solid grey;
}
.square {
background-color: red;
width: 100%;
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
border-radius: 5px;
}
<div class="row">
<div class="column">
<div class="square"></div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div class="square"></div>
</div>
<div class="column"></div>
</div>
The rows take the full width of the screen and the size of the columns should be identical between all of the columns and changing by the number of columns on the screen (For example if I have 5 columns they should all be with a width of 100px, but if I have 1000 columns they should all be with a width of 10px).
My problem is that after a certain break point in the column size the padding and border radius seems weird and I want to change their values when I hit that break point.
I can't use #container queries as there are still not fully supported.
If it help I'm using vue 2. but I think a CSS solution will be better in this case.
Trying to address the issue described:
My problem is that after a certain break point in the column size the
padding and border radius seems weird and I want to change their
values when I hit that break point. I can't use #container queries as
there are still not fully supported.
I crafted a little demo that helped me better explore the conditions bringing to such a scenario.
Obtaining border: collapse equivalent on flexbox items
The .row element remains a flexbox container but its flex items instead of having their border set, they are styled with their outline set.
The outline doesn't occupy space and it's expected to "collapse" when colliding with the outline produced by another element.
So to make it sure the layout wasn't affected by styling oddities, in the attempt to show off the borders of the flex items, this demo just relies on 2 key aspects to render those borders:
Setting the gap between the flex items
Setting the outline size expected to cover the gap left between
elements
.row {
gap: var(--col-gap);
}
.column {
outline: var(--col-gap) solid gray;
}
Using ::after for adding content to an element
Plus the red dot is applied as an ::after pseudo element with position:absolute, again to make sure that nothing affected the grid layout:
.column.square::after {
position: absolute;
content: '';
background-color: red;
width: 50%;
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
border-radius: 100%;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
The dashboard - exploring the options
Starting from there I added a "dashboard" with position: fixed that remains on top of the page and lets you control:
column width (px): here you set the width changing the cols per row according to the available container space
columns per row: here you set the cols per row changing their width according to the available container space
width
gap between cells (px): the gap between cells on the grid
toggle red dots visibility: will show/hide the red dots proving again that display: none; doesn't change the grid layout that it's depending exclusively by the .column element size set through the custom variable --col-width
toggle counter visibility: will show/hide the counter on top of each flex item
Conclusions so far:
Despite the efforts to minimize any interfence and taking all the steps needed to correctly setup a grid layout depending only on the fixed size of its cells, there are still some rendering issue with sometimes the occurrence of regular mismatching patterns on the border size for some lines. I should say that I only experience the problem on my laptop display and not on my desktop monitor so that's another factor.
I tried with different parameters on my demo and playing with the numbers, considering also the gap. A good and safe layout can be found minimizing potential problems (also raising the border size for example).
I couldn't get further than this using the flex layout.
const container = document.getElementById('container');
//draws the board
emptyElementAndFillWithColumns(container, 100);
//sets some columns randomly as .square
addRandomSquares(container);
//initializes the dashboard with the value coming from the css custom props
let columnsGap = parseInt(getCssCustomProp('col-gap'));
let columnsWidth = parseInt(getCssCustomProp('col-width'));
document.getElementById('gap').value = columnsGap;
document.getElementById('width').value = columnsWidth;
document.getElementById('width').dispatchEvent(new Event('change'));
document.getElementById('cols').value = Math.trunc(container.offsetWidth / (columnsWidth+columnsGap));
//input#width change event handler
document.getElementById('width')
.addEventListener('change', event => {
const width = parseInt(event.target.value);
const newCols = Math.trunc(container.offsetWidth / (width+columnsGap));
setCssCustomProp(container, 'col-width', `${width}px`);
document.getElementById('cols').value = newCols;
});
//input#cols change event handler
document.getElementById('cols')
.addEventListener('change', event => {
const cols = parseInt(event.target.value);
const newWidth = Math.trunc(container.offsetWidth / cols) - columnsGap;
setCssCustomProp(container, 'col-width', `${newWidth}px`);
document.getElementById('width').value = newWidth;
});
//input#gap change event handler
document.getElementById('gap')
.addEventListener('change', event => {
const gap = parseInt(event.target.value);
setCssCustomProp(container, 'col-gap', `${gap}px`);
columnsGap = gap;
});
//input#toggle-dots change event handler
document.getElementById('toggle-dots')
.addEventListener('change', event => {
container.classList.toggle('hide-dots');
});
//input#toggle-counters change event handler
document.getElementById('toggle-counters')
.addEventListener('change', event => {
container.classList.toggle('hide-counters');
});
//sets the --propName custom property at the style of target
function setCssCustomProp(target, propName, value){
target.style.setProperty(`--${propName}`, `${value}`);
}
//gets the --propName custom property value from the rule set on :root
function getCssCustomProp(propName){
const propValue =
getComputedStyle(document.documentElement).getPropertyValue(`--${propName}`);
return propValue;
}
//resets the container and appends a count number of columns
function emptyElementAndFillWithColumns(target, count){
for (i = 0; i <= count; i++) {
const column = document.createElement('div');
column.classList.add('column');
target.append(column);
}
}
//adds the square class to random .column elements in target
function addRandomSquares(target){
target.querySelectorAll('.column').forEach(column => {
if (Math.random() >= 0.5)
column.classList.add('square');
})
}
:root {
--col-width: 100px;
--col-gap: 1px;
}
*,
*::after,
*::before {
box-sizing: border-box;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
font-family: sans-serif;
}
.row {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: var(--col-gap);
counter-reset: itemnr;
}
.column {
position: relative;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: var(--col-width);
height: var(--col-width);
padding: 4px;
outline: var(--col-gap) solid gray;
}
.column.square::after {
position: absolute;
content: '';
background-color: red;
width: 50%;
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
border-radius: 100%;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
.dashboard {
position: fixed;
right: 1rem;
top: 2rem;
border: solid darkgray;
padding: 1em;
z-index: 100;
background: gray;
color: white;
font-weight: 600;
font-size: 1.2rem;
opacity: .9;
}
.dashboard > *{
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr auto;
width: 100%;
gap: 1em;
}
.dashboard label{
}
.dashboard input[type="number"] {
width: 5em;
cursor: pointer;
}
.dashboard input[type="checkbox"] {
width: 1rem;
line-height: 1rem;
cursor: pointer;
}
#container.hide-dots .square::after{
display: none;
}
#container.hide-counters .column::before{
display: none;
}
small{
grid-column: 1 / -1;
font-size:.8rem;
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
margin-bottom: 1rem;
}
.column::before{
position: absolute;
counter-increment: itemnr;
content: counter(itemnr);
font-size: .8rem;
z-index: 10;
font-weight: 600;
}
<div id="container" class="row">
<div class="column square">
</div>
<div class="column"></div>
</div>
<div class="dashboard">
<div>
<label for="width">column width (px):</label>
<input
id="width" type="number" max="100" min="10">
</div>
<div>
<label for="cols">columns per row:</label>
<input
id="cols" type="number" max="50" min="1">
</div>
<div>
<label for="gap">gap between cells (px):</label>
<input
id="gap" type="number" max="10" min="0">
</div>
<div style="margin-top: 1rem;">
<label for="toggle-dots">toggle red dots visibility:</label>
<input id="toggle-dots" type="checkbox" checked>
</div>
<div>
<label for="toggle-counters">toggle counter visibility:</label>
<input id="toggle-counters" type="checkbox" checked>
</div>
</div>
If you want to increase or decrease size of padding you can give padding size in percent (%) that depends on parent element.
Related
I have a tab with heading. I want to make it editable when the user double click on it. So currently i hide the div with heading and replace it by adding a input element dynamically. When i add the input element dynamically the size of the header-wrapper div increases.
I want my dynamically added input take same size as that of the heading element(which is hidden now). And the size of the wrapper div should remain same. I have tried a solution with js. But i am looking a solution purely using CSS. Could this use case be achieved using css alone.
I want my header-wrapper to be fluid and not of fixed width. I just want my input to take same width as that of div with class head. Input should take same width and size as that of head width.
function dblClickHanlder(){
console.log("dbl click handler called");
let inputEl = document.createElement("input");
inputEl.style.display="inline-block";
let headEl = document.querySelector(".head");
headEl.style.display="none";
document.querySelector(".header-wrapper").appendChild(inputEl);
inputEl.focus();
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.wrapper{
border: 1px solid black;
display:flex;
flex:1 0 auto;
}
.header-wrapper{
display: flex;
border: 1px solid red;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="header-wrapper">
<div ondblclick="dblClickHanlder()" class="head">Heading</div>
</div>
</div>
you can get previous width and height of head element before removing it and set to newly created input;
inputEl.style.width = headEl.offsetWidth + "px";
inputEl.style.height = headEl.offsetHeight + "px";
check the snippet below:
function dblClickHanlder(){
console.log("dbl click handler called");
let headEl = document.querySelector(".head");
let inputEl = document.createElement("input");
inputEl.style.width = headEl.offsetWidth + "px";
inputEl.style.height = headEl.offsetHeight + "px";
headEl.style.display="none";
document.querySelector(".header-wrapper").appendChild(inputEl);
inputEl.focus();
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.wrapper{
border: 1px solid black;
display:flex;
flex:1 0 auto;
}
.header-wrapper{
display: flex;
border: 1px solid red;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="header-wrapper">
<div ondblclick="dblClickHanlder()" class="head">Heading</div>
</div>
</div>
Just add the following class to your CSS:
.header-wrapper input {
max-width: 50px;
}
Below is the working example:
function dblClickHanlder() {
console.log("dbl click handler called");
let inputEl = document.createElement("input");
inputEl.style.display = "inline-block";
let headEl = document.querySelector(".head");
headEl.style.display = "none";
document.querySelector(".header-wrapper").appendChild(inputEl);
inputEl.focus();
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.wrapper {
border: 1px solid black;
display: flex;
flex: 1 0 auto;
}
.header-wrapper {
display: flex;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.header-wrapper input {
max-width: 50px;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="header-wrapper">
<div ondblclick="dblClickHanlder()" class="head">Heading</div>
</div>
</div>
hope you can help me.
I am trying to create a navigation with a variable amount of list elements. Now I want to automatically set the height of the list elements based on the height of the surrounding div element, and the number of list elements that are in the div. Is there a way to do so, or can I only do it the other way around, by simply not giving the div a height value, but rather give the list elements a fixed height?
Hope you can help me.
#nav ul{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style: none;
}
#nav{
margin-top: 30px;
width: 19%;
background-color: red;
float:left;
border-top: 1px solid black;
}
#nav ul li{
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
height: 50px;
margin-top: 20px;
line-height: 50px;
border-bottom: 1px solid black;
border-left: 1px solid black;
transform: rotate(20deg);
}
You can use the below code,it will definitely work
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="ISO-8859-1">
<title>Insert title here</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="change" style="height:200px;border:1px solid black">
<ul>
<li>HI</li>
<li>Hello</li>
<li>Bye</li>
<li>Byesdfsd</li>
<li>sdfsd</li>
<li>sdfsd</li>
</ul>
</div>
<script>
var height=document.getElementById("change").style.height;
height=height.replace("px","");
var lis=document.getElementsByTagName("li");
for(var i=0;i<lis.length;i++){
lis[i].style.height=(parseInt(height))/(parseInt(lis.length))+"px";
console.log("getting height "+lis[i].style.height);
}
</script>
</body>
</html>
So you can give the height of the div in a class or in the inline style,but you will have to change the code accordingly in the js part for fetching the height of the div.
I have got the li tags and then depending on their number i have divided the height of the enclosing div by the number of list tags
So basically what you want is that if the div is 100px high and you have 4 items in the list, each item should be 25px high, and if you have 5 items then each should be 20px high. Is it correct?
In this case, if you don't want to resort to javascript, you can use flexbox.
Here, javascript is only used to dinamically add items to the menu in order to demonstrate flexbox behavior:
var menuEl = document.getElementById('menu');
document.getElementById('addMenuItemBtn').onclick = function () {
var numberOfItems = menuEl.childElementCount;
// create a new menu item
var newListElement = document.createElement('li');
newListElement.appendChild(document.createTextNode('Menu item ' + (numberOfItems + 1)));
newListElement.setAttribute('class', 'item');
// append the new item
menuEl.appendChild(newListElement);
}
document.getElementById('removeMenuItemBtn').onclick = function () {
var numberOfItems = menuEl.childElementCount;
if (numberOfItems > 1) {
// if there are at least 2 items, remove the last item
var lastItemIndex = numberOfItems - 1;
var lastItem = menuEl.children[lastItemIndex];
lastItem.remove();
}
}
.container {
list-style: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 320px;
height: 240px; /* enough for 6 items with a height of 40px */
background-color: #DDD;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.item {
width: 100%;
margin: 5px;
padding: 5px;
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 1;
flex-basis: 30px;
}
<ul class="container" id="menu">
<li class="item">Menu item 1</li>
<li class="item">Menu item 2</li>
</ul>
<input type="button" value="Add menu item" id="addMenuItemBtn">
<input type="button" value="Remove menu item" id="removeMenuItemBtn">
Since the container is 240px high and items have a minimum height of 40px (flex-basis: 30px + margin: 5px), there is enough space for 6 items. If you add more than 6 items, the extra elements will overflow.
You can read more about flexbox in this article on css-tricks.com.
You'll likely want to change a lot of things in my snippet, it's just a proof of concept!
Just keep in mind that some old browsers don't support it, or support it with
a legacy syntax.
It's a screenshot from a page currently I'm building. I'm trying to make sure the green button is always on the bottom of the container. Here is a piece of the code:
HTML
<div class="list-product-pat">
<article>
<!-- title, image, spec ... -->
<div class="pricing-pat">
<!-- the button goes here -->
</div>
</article>
</div>
CSS
.list-product-pat article {
position: relative;
min-height: 260px;
}
.list-product-pat .pricing-pat {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
}
So far there is no problem... until the product spec gets too long and it breaks into the green button.
I want to maintain the green button in the most bottom position, but in the same time I also want the height to extend if the product title/product spec gets too long.
In the ideal world, it should be something like this:
So my idea is to maintain the absolute positioning while still keeping it inside the document flow (so the product spec knows the green button is there and doesn't break through it).
I need it only to extend if the spec height gets too long. In other words, if the spec is in normal height, it wouldn't extent. I'd like to avoid a weird gap between the spec and the green button.
Is there any idea how to do it?
Here is a fiddle to see how I did it: http://jsfiddle.net/xaliber/xrb5U/
Adding position:absolute takes it out of the document flow, there's no way to keep it in it.
But you can add padding-bottom equivalent to height of the button to the article container instead, which will prevent long text overrunning the button.
.list-product-pat article {
position: relative;
min-height: 260px;
padding-bottom:80px;
-moz-box-sizing:border-box;
box-sizing:border-box;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/xrb5U/3/
A separate issue is that two containers with different amount of texts will be different sizes (if one is larger than the min-height set). There's no easy fix for this in CSS positioning, you have to resort to Javascript, Flexbox or display:table-cell to keep the height of all them the same but each of them has their own issues too.
As #mikel already pointed out, you can't keep an element with position: absolute inside the normal document flow, but you can workaround this problem by simulating it.
Considering the example below:
img {
position: absolute;
}
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/300x400/d9ca29/ffffff">
<span>Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry</span>
The <img> element is out of flow, this cause the <span> to be hidden behind it.
You can wrap the absolute element inside an empty container, then add height and width to container equal to height and width of the absolute element. By doing so, an invisible box is created around the absolute element, which makes it appear as part of the document normal flow.
If you already know the exact dimensions of the <img> element, you can simulate normal flow using just css:
div {
border: 2px dotted grey;
position: relative;
width: 300px;
height: 400px;
}
img {
position: absolute;
}
<div>
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/300x400/d9ca29/ffffff">
</div>
<span>Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry</span>
Else, if you don't know the dimensions of the absolute element upfront you have to simulate the normal flow dynamically with javascript:
window.addEventListener('load', function() {
var div = document.querySelector('div');
var img = document.querySelector('img');
var rect = img.getBoundingClientRect();
div.style.height = rect.height + 'px';
div.style.width = rect.width + 'px';
});
div {
border: 2px dotted grey;
position: relative;
max-width: 200px;
}
img {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
}
<div>
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/300x400/d9ca29/ffffff">
</div>
<span>Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry</span>
At some point in the (hopefully near) future, you'll be able to use the subgrid feature of CSS Grids. Currently, only Firefox supports this, but other browsers should add support soon.
Subgrid enables you to use Grid features with a non-flat structure (eg, an unordered list). That is, you can line up children of one element with children of another element, or in this case, the image, title, description, and price button.
.list-product-pat {
/* Create a grid with 5 columns that are 175px wide,
each with 5 rows that are sized based on the smallest item in the row */
display: inline-grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(5, 175px);
grid-template-rows: repeat(5, min-content);
/* Colors and spacing to match design */
background: #f4f4f4;
padding: 1em;
grid-column-gap: 1em;
border: 1px solid #ddd;
}
.list-product-pat li {
/* Ensure this item takes up the column */
grid-row: 1 / -1;
/* Make children grid items */
display: grid;
/* Use parent's grid for children */
grid-template-rows: subgrid;
/* Styles to match design */
text-align: center;
justify-items: center;
border: 1px solid #ddd;
background: #fff;
}
/* STYLES TO MATCH DESIGN BELOW */
.list-product-pat > li > img {
margin-top: 1em;
}
.list-product-pat > li > h1 {
margin: .8em 0;
font-size: 1em;
}
.list-product-pat > li > p {
margin: 0;
color: #bbb;
font-size: .8em;
margin: 0 .5em 1em;
}
.list-product-pat > li > a {
text-decoration: none;
color: white;
font-weight: bold;
background: linear-gradient(#60bb76, #48b161);
border-radius: .5em;
box-shadow: 1px 1px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .5);
padding: .5em;
min-width: calc(100% - 1em);
margin-bottom: .5em;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.list-product-pat > li > a > small {
display: block;
font-weight: normal;
font-size: .7em;
margin-top: .2em;
}
<ul class="list-product-pat">
<li>
<img src="https://placehold.it/40x70/">
<h1>HTC Desire C</h1>
<p>GSM, GPS, WiFi, kamera 5MP, bluetooth, Android, touchscreen, 600MHz</p>
1.699.000 <small>6 Produk/4 Website</small>
</li>
<li>
<img src="https://placehold.it/40x70/">
<h1>Samsung 19300 Galaxy S III</h1>
<p>GSM, GPS, WiFi, kamera 8MP, bluetooth, Android, touchscreen, 1.4GHz</p>
5.300.000 <small>8 Produk/5 Website</small>
</li>
<li>
<img src="https://placehold.it/40x70/">
<h1>Samsung Galaxy Grand i9082</h1>
<p>GSM, GPS, WiFi, touchscreen, 1.2GHz</p>
3.499.000 <small>10 Produk/8 Website</small>
</li>
<li>
<img src="https://placehold.it/40x70/">
<h1>Apple iPhone 5 16GB</h1>
<p>GSM, GPS, WiFi, kamera 8MP, bluetooth, iOS 6, touchscreen, 1.2GHz</p>
7.599.000 <small>6 Produk/5 Website</small>
</li>
<li>
<img src="https://placehold.it/40x70/">
<h1>BlackBerry Curve 9360 (Apollo)</h1>
<p>GSM, GPS, WiFi, kamera 5MP, bluetooth, 800MHz</p>
225.000 <small>9 Produk/4 Website</small>
</li>
</ul>
The solution is actually quite simple. Duplicate the absolutely positioned footer with visibility hidden.
<div style="background: silver; position: relative; height: 100px">
Height is 100px
<div style="position: absolute; bottom: 0; left: 0">Footer</div>
<div style="visibility: hidden">Footer</div>
</div>
<br />
<div style="background: silver; position: relative">
No height specified
<div style="position: absolute; bottom: 0; left: 0">Footer</div>
<div style="visibility: hidden">Footer</div>
</div>
Is there any way to have a transition on the order of flex-box items?
In other words, can I have this (details in this fiddle)
#container {
display: flex;
}
#container:hover div:last-child {
order: -1;
}
animated (the element getting the new position assumes it's position over time), please?
I am not really answering the question because I am not using the order property.
But I wanted to do something similar to what you expect, and finally decided to :
In HTML, add a data-order attribute to the elements
Add the CSS properties for each element position
Change the data-order using Javascript
Using CSS transitions for the interpolation
setInterval(changeOrder, 3000);
function changeOrder() {
const allSlides = document.querySelectorAll(".single-slide");
const previous = "1";
const current = "2";
const next = "3";
for (const slide of allSlides) {
const order = slide.getAttribute("data-order");
switch (order) {
case current:
slide.setAttribute("data-order", previous);
break;
case next:
slide.setAttribute("data-order", current);
break;
case previous:
slide.setAttribute("data-order", next);
break;
}
}
}
.all-slides {
display: flex;
width: 80vw;
margin: 0 auto;
perspective: 500px;
height: 500px;
}
.single-slide {
padding: 30px 20px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
text-align: center;
width: 30%;
position: absolute;
background-color: white;
transition: 2s ease;
box-shadow: 0px 5px 10px lightgrey;
}
/* Left slide*/
.single-slide[data-order="1"] {
left: 10vw;
transform: translate(-50%) scale(0.8, 0.8);
z-index: 1;
opacity: 0.7;
}
/* Middle slide */
.single-slide[data-order="2"] {
left: 40vw;
transform: translate(-50%);
z-index: 3;
opacity: 1;
}
/* Right slide*/
.single-slide[data-order="3"] {
left: 90vw;
transform: translate(-120%) scale(0.8, 0.8);
z-index: 2;
opacity: 0.7;
}
.single-slide:nth-child(2) {
order: 3;
}
.single-slide:nth-child(1) {
order: 2;
}
.single-slide:nth-child(3) {
order: 1;
}
<div class="all-slides">
<div class="single-slide" data-order="2">
<h3>First slide </h3>
<p>Some text</p>
</div>
<div class="single-slide" data-order="3">
<h3>Second slide</h3>
<p>Some other text</p>
</div>
<div class="single-slide" data-order="1">
<h3>Third slide</h3>
<p>Yet some other text</p>
</div>
</div>
This could be useful if you want to animate a slider (or anything else), but want to keep the order of the elements in the HTML for accessibility purposes, which is one of the useful usage of the order property. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Flexible_Box_Layout/Ordering_Flex_Items#The_order_property_and_accessibility
Sadly no: the order attribute is animatable, but only as integers. That means that for each step/frame of the animation it will interpolate the value by flooring to the neareast integer. So items will only ever show up in the slot that the computed integer value results in, never in-between in any smooth sort of motion way.
It's technically still an animation: the calculated integer position should still follow the timing function and keyframe rules of the animation, it's just that the items "jump" from position to position as they change.
See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/integer#Interpolation
This question is old now, but I recently tested this, using this Fiddle (adapted from the one posted by Jason in a comment): http://jsfiddle.net/aqrxcd1u/ (code below).
In both Chrome and Firefox this partially animates, in that the order transitions one at a time from the current value to the target value. Meaning it doesn't go from 5->1 but instead goes 5->4->3->2->1.
In desktop Safari it still goes 5->1 directly.
#container {
display: flex;
}
#container div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin-right: 10px;
background-color: red;
}
#container div:nth-child(even) {
background-color: blue;
}
}
#container div:last-child {
order: 5;
transition: order 1s;
}
#container:hover div:last-child {
order: -1 !important;
}
<div id="container">
<div style="order: 1">Element 1A</div>
<div style="order: 2">Element 2B</div>
<div style="order: 3">Element 3C</div>
<div style="order: 4">Element 4D</div>
<div style="order: 5">Element 5E</div>
</div>
As Emil stated, it only animates as an integer. However, I am thinking of a hack:
Put the element you want to display in a wrapper with 1/10 of the height, set the wrapper overflow: visible
Then put 9 spacing element between these wrappers with the same height.
Put order and transition on all of them.
Change order of a wrapper and watch it 'transitioning'.
Sadly, it's ugly and only work in Firefox.
Here is what I tested in Angular
i wonder how it is possible to have multiple spans inside a div, with the last span floating to the bottom right and taking all the remaining width in the "row".
Here is a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/gpakL/
The problem is, that the fullWidth span is not always at the bottom. You can resize your browser window to see the fullWidth span moving.
This is how it should look like:
This is how it shold not look like:
HTML:
<div class="container">
<span class="item">sdfdsfsdf</span>
<span class="item">sdfsdfsdfsdf</span>
<span class="item">dsfdsfdsfsd</span>
<span class="item">fsdfsdfsdffsdf</span>
<span class="item">dsgsdf</span>
<span class="item">dfd</span>
<span class="item">fdfdf</span>
<span class="itemFullWidth">FullWidth</span>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
background-color: blue;
width: 50%;
}
.item {
float: left;
background-color: orange;
height: 30px;
line-height: 30px; /* Vertically center */
margin: 5px;
}
.itemFullWidth {
background-color:green;
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
height: 30px;
line-height: 30px; /* Vertically center */
margin: 5px;
min-width: 80px;
}
If you open to use flexbox, it could be easily done (WebKit demo):
.container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap; /* allow multiple rows */
}
.container > :last-child {
flex: 1; /* absorb remaining space */
}
check this,
Using position: relative; for the container and position: absolute; for the
.itemFullWidth, you can get it to work to some extent. You'll need some js I guess.
You could consider a JavaScript/jQuery assisted solution for this problem. In a more general case, there are jQuery packages like David DeSandro's Masonry or Packery or Isotope: http://desandro.com/
Here is my version of how you could do this using jQuery.
function resetEndItemWidth() {
var wContainer = $(".container").width();
var minWidthEndItem = parseInt($(".itemFullWidth").css("min-width"));
var endItemMargins = $(".itemFullWidth").outerWidth(true)
- $(".itemFullWidth").outerWidth();
var prevItemOffset = $(".itemFullWidth").prev().offset();
var prevItemWidth = $(".itemFullWidth").prev().outerWidth(true);
var freeWidth = wContainer - (prevItemWidth + prevItemOffset.left);
if (freeWidth < minWidthEndItem) {
newWidth = wContainer - endItemMargins;
} else {
newWidth = Math.max(minWidthEndItem,freeWidth);
}
$(".itemFullWidth").width(newWidth);
}
resetEndItemWidth();
$(window).resize(function(){resetEndItemWidth();});
See the demo at: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/m6bx8/
How This Works
I look at the floated sibling before the last item (.itemFullWidth) and determine the amount of free space remaining on the line.
If there is enough free space, I reset the width of the full width item to fill the gap,
otherwise, the full width item is on a separate line and I set it to the width of the parent container.
For full width item (.endItemMargins), you need to account for the left-right margins and you need to get the minimum width from the min-width property.
The min-width requirement could be relaxed if you initialize the original with of the full width item.
Other Comments
The flex box solution is much more elegant. However, it is good to have some options.
Simple jQuery solution, however CSS solutions should be preferred over JS solutions.
http://jsfiddle.net/A8mSu/
HTML:
<div class="container clearfix">
<span class="item">sdfdsfsdf</span>
<span class="item">sdfsdfsdfsdf</span>
<span class="item">dsfdsfdsfsd</span>
<span class="item">fsdfsdfsdffsdf</span>
<span class="item">dsgsdf</span>
<span class="item">dfd</span>
<span class="item">fdfdf</span>
<span class="item itemFullWidth">FullWidth</span>
</div>
JS:
function setWidth()
{
$obj = $('.container .itemFullWidth');
$obj.width('auto').width($obj.parent().width() - $obj.position().left);
}
$(window).resize(setWidth);
$(document).ready(setWidth);
CSS:
.container {
background-color: blue;
width: 50%;
}
.item {
float: left;
background-color: orange;
height: 30px;
line-height: 30px; /* Vertically center */
margin: 5px;
}
.itemFullWidth {
background-color: green;
min-width: 80px;
margin-right: 0;
}
.clearfix:after {
content:"";
display: table;
clear: both;
}
try , Please Checkout http://jsfiddle.net/gpakL/14/
function findWidth (){
var ConWidth = $('.container').width();
var leftWidth = $('.container .item:last').offset().left
var lastItemWidth = $('.container .item:last').width();
var fixPos = ConWidth - (leftWidth + lastItemWidth)
$('.container .itemFullWidth').width( fixPos -20 );
};
$(document).ready(function(){
findWidth();
});
$(window).resize(function(){
findWidth();
});