While attempting to fund me contract is tell me it encountered an error without specifying the error. I attempted to fund 0.1 eth through the fund function, and in the terminal it says:
[block:8404521 txIndex:12]
from: 0x8a9...e4303
to: FundMe.fund() 0x542...E109C
value: 100000000000000000 wei
data: 0xb60...d4288
logs: 0
hash: 0x29a...97939
and in the etherscan it says:status fail :
Contract 0x5422f3458be343e378e7a399e16fff548e7e109c
Warning! Error encountered during contract execution [execution reverted]
I tried looking for problems with my code and found none.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity >=0.6.6 <0.9.0;
import "#chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/AggregatorV3Interface.sol";
//import "#chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/vendor/SafeMathChainlink.sol"; won't need in later complier versions.
contract FundMe {
mapping(address => uint256) public addressToAmountFunded;
function fund() public payable {
uint256 minimumUSD = 50 * 10 ** 18;
require( getConversionRate(msg.value) >= minimumUSD,"You need to send more Eth");
addressToAmountFunded[msg.sender] += msg.value;
}
function getVersion() public view returns (uint256){
AggregatorV3Interface priceFeed = AggregatorV3Interface(0x5f4eC3Df9cbd43714FE2740f5E3616155c5b8419);
return priceFeed.version();
}
function getPrice() public view returns (uint256){
AggregatorV3Interface priceFeed = AggregatorV3Interface(0x5f4eC3Df9cbd43714FE2740f5E3616155c5b8419);
(,int256 answer,,,)=priceFeed.latestRoundData();
return uint256(answer * 10000000000);
}
//10000000000 = Gwei which is why we added 10 zeros to getPrice(answer) to convert it to Wei amount
function getConversionRate(uint256 ethAmount) public view returns (uint256){
uint256 ethPrice = getPrice();
uint256 ethAmountInUsd = (ethPrice * ethAmount)/ 1000000000000000000; //divide 2x because we added 10*((getPrice)answer))
return ethAmountInUsd;
}
}
Aggregator contract address "0x5f4eC3Df9cbd43714FE2740f5E3616155c5b8419" belongs to mainnet
From here get the ETH/USD goerli testnet address:"0xD4a33860578De61DBAbDc8BFdb98FD742fA7028e"
Now in order to call chainlink oracle you have to have LINK token in your contract. Get some link token to your conract address from the faucet
Import the token in metamask. you will see the amount
send link token from your metamask to your contract
deploy your contract. if you are using Remix IDE chose the injected provider to connect to metamask. Because chainlink contract is on goerli, so you need to be on Goerli testnet. Once deployment goes through you can call the fund function.
Since the fund function has no argument, you need to send the value alongside the transaction. That is why inside the function you have msg.value to access to the sent amount.
In Remix ide, under "GAS LIMITinput there isVALUEinput. you need to pass the amount in there before you call thefund` function.
Related
I am trying to implement a token swap of my custom ERC20 token via UniswapV3
I use Rinkeby Ethereum network.
I deployed the token under address: 0x4646CB39EA04d4763BED770F80F0e0dE8efcdF0f
I added the liquidity to Uniswap for this token and ETH.
Now, I try to execute swap in my contract, but it doesn't work. I get the error:
Gas estimation errored with the following message (see below). The transaction execution will likely fail. Do you want to force sending?
execution reverted
My Swap.sol contract takes an address of the token to swap with ETH as a constructor parameter. When I deploy it using DAI token address, the swap works just fine.
I assume this is a Uniswap liquidity related problem, but I added liquidity manually and I can swap my token inside their app.
Contract code:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.10;
pragma abicoder v2;
import "#uniswap/v3-periphery/contracts/libraries/TransferHelper.sol";
import "#uniswap/v3-periphery/contracts/interfaces/ISwapRouter.sol";
import "#uniswap/v3-periphery/contracts/interfaces/IQuoter.sol";
contract Swap {
address private constant SWAP_ROUTER =
0xE592427A0AEce92De3Edee1F18E0157C05861564;
address private constant WETH = 0xc778417E063141139Fce010982780140Aa0cD5Ab;
address public tokenAddress;
address public immutable _owner;
ISwapRouter public immutable swapRouter;
constructor(address token) {
_owner = msg.sender;
swapRouter = ISwapRouter(SWAP_ROUTER);
tokenAddress = token;
}
function swapExactInputSingle() external payable {
require(msg.value > 0, "Must pass non 0 ETH amount");
ISwapRouter.ExactInputSingleParams memory params = ISwapRouter
.ExactInputSingleParams({
tokenIn: WETH,
tokenOut: tokenAddress,
fee: 3000,
recipient: msg.sender,
deadline: block.timestamp,
amountIn: msg.value,
amountOutMinimum: 1,
sqrtPriceLimitX96: 0
});
swapRouter.exactInputSingle{value: msg.value}(params);
}
receive() external payable {}
}
I had the same issue with the swapExactInputMultihop function on uniswap. For each pools/paths you're going through, you need to make sure you've got the correct pool fee set.
You can checkout the swap fees on the uniswap website: V3-overview/fees
or on a video tutorial, going through the whole process:
Blockchain With Wisdom on YouTube
Managed to fix it.
I set the fee: 3000 in contract, but I created liquidity with 1% fee, so I had to change it to fee: 10000 according to docs: fee The fee tier of the pool, used to determine the correct pool contract in which to execute the swap
I want to make a smart contract that deposits UST on the eth anchor protocol, by using the deposit function. Here you can find the docs of this function I try to call. https://docs.anchorprotocol.com/ethanchor/ethanchor-contracts/router . The function gets called trough a proxy contract. I found the implementation address by reading the proxy contract on etherscan.
TestContracts on Ropsten testnet:
proxy: 0x7537aC093cE1315BCE08bBF0bf6f9b86B7475008
etherscan: https://ropsten.etherscan.io/address/0x7537aC093cE1315BCE08bBF0bf6f9b86B7475008
implementation (ROUTERV2): 0x2ba0010394eb3e41454c7d79c0fb6e0deb67284b
etherscan: https://ropsten.etherscan.io/address/0x2ba0010394eb3e41454c7d79c0fb6e0deb67284b
I imported the ROUTERV2 contract for calling the proxy with the abi of the implementation.
my execution order is:
deploying the contract
approving the contract for spending the tokens from the sender using ethers.
approveUST function on smart contract (I am not sure if this is necessary)
calling the depositStable function.
I get the following error when calling the depositStale function UNPREDICTABLE_GAS_LIMIT;
Below You see the contract I try to make. It should take the UST of the user and deposit it on eth anchor.
Here is a github link to the hardhat repo of the contract so you can simulate the bug and hopefully help me solving this issue.
https://github.com/tijgersoftware/Terra-anchor
I thank you for taking the time to read my question!
contract Anchor {
address public proxy;
address public operator;
address public USTAddress;
constructor(
address proxy_,
address operator_,
address USTAddress_
) public {
proxy = proxy_;
operator = operator_;
USTAddress = USTAddress_;
}
function approveUST() public {
ERC20(USTAddress).approve(
address(this),
0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
);
}
function initDepositStable(uint256 amount) public {
RouterV2(proxy).initDepositStable(amount);
}
function depositUST(uint256 amount) public {
// InterfaceOfImplementationContract(proxyAddress).MethodBeingCalled(
// parameter,
// parameter,
// parameter
// );
ERC20(USTAddress).approve(
address(this),
0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
);
RouterV2(proxy).depositStable(operator, amount);
}
}
tags: solidity, smart contracts, ethereum, anchor protocol, terra, brdige trasfer.
The issue is a repeated error message upon attempting to compile a verifiable random number smart contract in remix. This particular function (line 48 in remix or last line of code below) yields the error message consistently across compiler versions (I checked the imported documents versions too), cross brave browser+firefox, and even after checking grammar. I do not understand what this error message is conveying (I am brand new to programming) and I cannot find another thread with this same issue. I suspect the function to be faulty in some sense of how it is either defined or interacting with the other imported documents (VRFConsumerBase.sol).
//SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "#chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/VRFConsumerBase.sol";
/**
* Request testnet LINK and ETH here: https://faucets.chain.link/
* Find information on LINK Token Contracts and get the latest ETH and LINK faucets here:
* https://docs.chain.link/docs/link-token-contracts/
*/
contract RandomNumberConsumer is VRFConsumerBase {
bytes32 public keyHash;
uint256 public fee;
uint256 public randomResult;
/**
* Constructor inherits VRFConsumerBase
*
* Network: Rinkeby
* Chainlink VRF Coordinator address: 0xb3dCcb4Cf7a26f6cf6B120Cf5A73875B7BBc655B
* LINK token address: 0x01BE23585060835E02B77ef475b0Cc51aA1e0709
* Key Hash: 0x2ed0feb3e7fd2022120aa84fab1945545a9f2ffc9076fd6156fa96eaff4c1311
*/
constructor() VRFConsumerBase(
0xb3dCcb4Cf7a26f6cf6B120Cf5A73875B7BBc655B, //VRF Coordinator
0x01BE23585060835E02B77ef475b0Cc51aA1e0709) //Rinkeby LINK Token
{
keyHash = 0x2ed0feb3e7fd2022120aa84fab1945545a9f2ffc9076fd6156fa96eaff4c1311;
fee = 0.1 * 10 ** 18; //0.1 LINK (varies by network)
}
/**
* Requests fulfillRandomness
*/
function getRandomNumber() public returns (bytes32 requestId) {
require(LINK.balanceOf(address(this)) >= fee, "Not enough LINK - fill contract with faucet");
return requestRandomness(keyHash, fee);
}
/**
* Callback function used by VRF Coordinator
*/
function fulfillRandomness(bytes32 requestId, uint256 randomness) internal override {
randomResult = randomness;
}
}
This near identical code can be found at https://docs.chain.link/docs/get-a-random-number/ (line 52).
Here is the error message below,
from solidity:
Warning: Unused function parameter. Remove or comment out the variable name to silence this warning.
--> docs.chain.link/samples/VRF/RandomNumberConsumer.sol:52:32: function fulfillRandomness(bytes32 requestId, uint256 randomness) internal override {
I am following the 'Getting A Random Number with Chainlink VRF' tutorial from Chainlink
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqZWariqh5s (timestamp # 9:30) except I am testing on the Rinkeby network not Kovan. I also double checked with this tutorial.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aXumgdpnPU (timestamp # 12:00)
Neither tutorial encounters this specific error message and both are able to compile and deploy the smart contract successfully. I also receive the error message when I directly open and attempt to compile the smart contract from the Chainlink website without touching the code.
i had the same error i fixed it by leaving the bytes32 parameter empty
your code
(bytes32 requestId , uint256 randomness)
instead use:
(bytes32, uint256 randomness)
I have this code I have entered into Remix IDE, as ReceivedEther.sol, a standalone smart contract.
I've transferred 0.02 Ether to the smart contract, using MetaMask.
When I checked the smart contract's balance, it returns 200000000000000000, as expected.
If I try to use the transferEther function, however, and enter a number smaller than this - say, 0.005 ETH, or 50000000000000000 as the amount - it doesn't work using MetaMask.
When MetaMask prompts me it's never for that amount. It's for 0 ETH and 0.00322 gas fee (or whatever the gas is). Basically it always set the amount of ETH at 0 and only charges the fee.
Why can't I transfer an amount of ETH using this function in the Remix IDE with MetaMask?
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
contract ReceivedEther {
function transferEther(address payable _recipient, uint _amount) external returns (bool) {
require(address(this).balance >= _amount, 'Not enough Ether in contract!');
_recipient.transfer(_amount);
return true;
}
/**
* #return contract balance
*/
function contractBalance() external view returns (uint) {
return address(this).balance;
}
}
Your code sends ETH (stated in the _amount variable) from the smart contract to the _recipient. So it doesn't require any ETH to be sent in order to execute the transferEther() function.
If you want your contract to accept ETH, the function that accepts it (or the general fallback() or receive() function) needs to be marked as payable.
Example:
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
contract ReceivedEther {
receive() external payable {} // note the `payable` keyword
// rest of your implementation
}
Then you can send whathever amount of ETH to the smart contract address (without specifying any function to execute).
See more at https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.5/contracts.html#receive-ether-function
If you want to prefill the amount in MetaMask from Remix IDE, you can use the "Value" input in the "Deploy & Run Transactions" tab.
I am relatively new to Solidity, I am trying to fetch the price of a pair with the following contract:
contract Uniswap {
constructor () public payable {
}
function getBalance() public view returns (uint) {
return address(this).balance;
}
// calculate price based on pair reserves
function getTokenPrice(address pairAddress, uint amount) public payable returns(uint)
{
IUniswapV2Pair pair = IUniswapV2Pair(pairAddress);
IERC20 token1 = IERC20(pair.token1());
(uint Res0, uint Res1,) = pair.getReserves();
// decimals
uint res0 = Res0*(10**token1.decimals());
return((amount*res0)/Res1); // return amount of token0 needed to buy token1
}
}
but when I try to run on Remix the getTokenPriceit returns me the following error message:
The transaction has been reverted to the initial state. Note: The called function should be payable if you send value and the value you send should be less than your current balance. Debug the transaction to get more information.
Any idea why? I am trying to fetch the price of ETH/USDT so the using this website (https://v2.info.uniswap.org/pair/0x0d4a11d5eeaac28ec3f61d100daf4d40471f1852) and with the pair address at the end of the URL. Thanks for the help!
When you deploy a contract in Remix, it deploys to a local network. (By default. You can change it and deploy to mainnet as well, if you inject a production Infura provider for example.)
The Uniswap pair contract 0x0d4a11... does not exist on the local network.
The easiest solution is to deploy your contract on the mainnet (where the 0x0d4a11... Uniswap pair contract exists).
Or you can find another Uniswap pair on a public testnet (well-known are Rinkeby, Ropsten, Goerli, and Kovan), and deploy your contract on the same testnet. Don't forget to change the testnet address of the uniswap pair that you pass to your getTokenPrice() function.
Or you can deploy the Uniswap pair contract and all of its dependencies and change the dependencies addreses (which is a lot of work - my guess is that it's dependend on the Uniswap router contract, the actual token contracts of the pair, maybe they are dependend on some other contract, ...) to your local network. From here it's the same - deploy your contract to the local network, and call the getTokenPrice() with the correct pair address.
You may also invoke uniswap's Subgraph using javascript