I've been trying to convert a cpp file to wasm without emscripten recently and I've been running with some errors, for example, when I run these commands:
clang++ --target=wasm32 -nostdlib -O3 -o public/main.o -c src/*.cpp
wasm-ld --no-entry --export-all --lto-O3 --allow-undefined --import-memory public/main.o -o public/main.wasm
it gives me this error:
wasm-ld: error: unknown file type public/main.o
Here are the versions of clang and lld that I currently have:
clang version 12.0.1
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /nix/store/jp4r5v8pla63qam5w34jvfyfmq8p74am-clang-12.0.1/bin
LLD 12.0.1
Also, I'm running the code on replit
Thank you
Ok, with this commands it works :D
clang++ --target=wasm32 -emit-llvm -c -S -o public/files/main.ll src/main.cpp
llc -march=wasm32 -filetype=obj -o public/files/main.o public/files/main.ll
wasm-ld --no-entry --export-all -o public/main.wasm public/files/main.o
The only thing is that you need to create some new files (main.ll and main.o) but it doesn't matter.
The place where I obtained the solution is here: https://surma.dev/things/c-to-webassembly/index.html
It was really useful
Related
I have just started experimenting with XDP in an VM. I tried to build for bpf and I face an error, how can I resolve this?
# clang -O2 -Wall -target bpf -c all_dropper.c -o dropper.o
error: unknown target triple 'bpf', please use -triple or -arch
This issue is resolved, I had to upgrade the clang version to 3.9.
I have a project in C called triple where you can add, delete and match some Triplets. The idea now is to transform it to html using emcc and emmake.
I tried to compile it with:
emmake make
And then use:
emcc triple.o -s WASM=1 -o triple.html
But I get the error :
WARNING:root:triple.o is not valid LLVM bitcode
ERROR:root:no input files
note that input files without a known suffix are ignored, make sure
your input files end with one of: ('.c', '.C', '.i', '.cpp', '.cxx',
'.cc', '.c++', '.CPP', '.CXX', '.CC', '.C++', '.ii', '.m', '.mi',
'.mm', '.mii', '/dev/null', '.bc', '.o', '.obj', '.lo', '.dylib',
'.so', '.a', '.ll', '.h', '.hxx', '.hpp', '.hh', '.H', '.HXX', '.HPP',
'.HH')
What am I missing? Is there another way to use the make file with emcc instead with gcc?
Here is the make file I am using.
CC=emcc
triple : triple.o insert.o match.o Delete.o printList.o writeList.o
$(CC) -o triple triple.o insert.o match.o Delete.o printList.o
writeList.o
triple.o : triple.c
$(CC) -g -c triple.c
insert.o : insert.c
$(CC) -g -c insert.c
match.o : match.c
$(CC) -g -c match.c
Delete.o : Delete.c
$(CC) -g -c Delete.c
printList.o : printList.c
$(CC) -g -c printList.c
writeList.o : writeList.c
$(CC) -g -c writeList.c
The emcc program is a compiler front-end. This means it takes source code as input. You do not need to compile the code first with GCC. The emscripten website says it best: "use Emscripten Compiler Frontend (emcc) as a drop-in replacement for gcc in your existing project."
If you have the source there seems to be no good reason to compile to LLVM first.
What you need to do is simply replace any reference to gcc in your Makefile with emcc.
Even better - add a CC variable and use this. eg
CC=emcc
then replace all references to the compiler with $(CC). the $ bit is how to access a variable in a Makefile. Using a variable means you can easily change the compiler later.
You haven't specified an output target for the .o lines, so I think it will build to a.o.
Try modifying your makefile to say:
$(CC) -g -c triple.c -o triple.o
I'm trying to compile zlib from the command line, and I'm getting this message when using -Wall -Wextra -Wconversion (full cross-compile script is below):
Compiler error reporting is too harsh for ./configure (perhaps remove
-Werror).
Here's the configure test that's generating the line:
cat > $test.c << EOF
int foo() { return 0; }
EOF
echo "Checking for obsessive-compulsive compiler options..." >> configure.log
if try $CC -c $CFLAGS $test.c; then
:
else
echo "Compiler error reporting is too harsh for $0 (perhaps remove -Werror)." | tee -a configure.log
leave 1
fi
Its not clear to me what exactly is being judged too harsh (especially since -Werror is not present). I also don't quite understand what the sample program used in the test is doing, so its not clear to me what the criteria is for judging the compiler warnings "too harsh".
What is zlib complaining is too harsh?
#! /bin/sh
export PATH="/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin:$PATH"
export CC=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang
export CXX=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang++
export LD=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/ld
export AR=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/ar
export RANLIB=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/ranlib
export CFLAGS="-Wall -Wextra -Wconversion --sysroot="/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS6.1.sdks""
export CXXFLAGS="-Wall -Wextra -Wconversion --sysroot="/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS6.1.sdk""
I had the exact same problem on a newly built machine, and I found the cause was that I didn't actually have the appropriate GNU C compilers installed (reference). Therefore it's complaining that the compiler is too harsh simply because there is no compiler.
Try running:
sudo apt-get install build-essential
and then try running your ./configure again.
My problem was:
cc1: error while loading shared libraries: libimf.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Search for details in configure.log.
mine was failing because it tried to use cc (non existent) instead of gcc
is a old question, but i just had this problem compiling zlib 1.2.11 and to bypass this needed to force sudo previous to configure
sudo ./configure --prefix=path
I'm just trying to build an old project of mine using cuda 5.0 preview.
I get an Error when linking, telling me that certain cuda functions can not be found. For example:
undefined reference to 'cudaMalloc'.
My linking command includes the following options for cuda :
-L/usr/local/cuda/lib64 -L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/lib -L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/common/lib/linux -lcudart
ls -lah /usr/local/cuda/lib64/ gives me 8 cuda libraries including libcudart.so.5.0.7 with symlinks using only the .so-file-ending.
ls /home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/lib/ gives me an empty directory, which is kind of strange?
ls /home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/common/lib/linux/ gives me two directories: i686 and x86_64 both containing only libGLEW.a
I have no idea which way to look for a solution. Any help is appreciated!
EDIT:
Here is my complete linking command (TARGET_APPLICATION is my binary and x86_64/Objectfiles.o stands for all (23) object files including the object file compiled with nvcc):
/home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/bin/mpicxx -CC=g++ -I. -I/home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/src -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include -L/usr/local/cuda/lib64 -L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/lib -L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/common/lib/linux -lcudart -o TARGET_APPLICATION x86_64/Objectfiles.o /usr/lib/liblapack.so /usr/lib/libblas.so /home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/lib/libnullpmpi.a -lm
I use nullmpi for compilation and linking (project uses MPI and CUDA), which internally uses g++ as can be seen by -CC=g++, i wanted to keep this stuff out.
The compilation command for my cuda object file:
/usr/local/cuda/bin/nvcc -c -arch=sm_21 -L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/lib -O3 kernelwrapper.cu -o x86_64/kernelwrapper.RELEASE.2.o
echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH results in:
/usr/local/cuda/lib64:/usr/local/cuda/lib:
echo $PATH results in:
otherOptions:/usr/local/cuda/bin:/home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/bin
I'm building 64-bit. For the sake of completeness I'm building on Ubuntu 12.04. (64bit).
Building the CUDA Samples works fine.
SOLUTION (thanks to talonmies for pointing me to it):
This is the correct linking command:
/home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/bin/mpicxx -CC=g++ -I. -I/home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/src -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include -L/usr/local/cuda/lib64 -L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/lib -L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/common/lib/linux -o TARGET_APPLICATION x86_64/Objectfiles.o /usr/lib/liblapack.so /usr/lib/libblas.so /home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/lib/libnullpmpi.a -lcudart -lm
You have your linking statements in the incorrect order. It should be something more like this:
/home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/bin/mpicxx -CC=g++ -I. -I/home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/src \
-I/usr/lib/openmpi/include -L/usr/local/cuda/lib64 \
-L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/lib \
-L/home/myhome/NVIDIA_CUDA_Samples/C/common/lib/linux \
-o TARGET_APPLICATION x86_64/Objectfiles.o \
/home/myhome/nullmpi-0.7/lib/libnullpmpi.a -llapack -lblas -lm -lcudart
The source of your problem is that you have specified the CUDA runtime library before the object file that contains a dependency to it. The linker simply discards libcudart.so from the linkage because there are no dependencies to it at the point when it is processed. Golden rule in POSIX style compilation statements: linkage statements are parsed left-to-right; so objects containing external dependencies first, libraries satisfying those dependencies afterwards.
Sage is supposed to be able to create compiled code using Cython. I have never been able to get this to work. The problem appears to be with my Sage installation, since compiling fails on the included example. I don't believe I did anything special during installation, but apparently I something wrong. The Sage tutorial says
In order to make your own compiled Sage code, give the file an .spyx extension (instead of .sage). If you are working with the command-line interface, you can attach and load compiled code exactly like with interpreted code (at the moment, attaching and loading Cython code is not supported with the notebook interface). The actual compilation is done “behind the scenes” without your having to do anything explicit. See $SAGE_ROOT/examples/programming/sagex/factorial.spyx for an example of a compiled implementation of the factorial function that directly uses the GMP C library. To try this out for yourself, cd to $SAGE_ROOT/examples/programming/sagex/, then do the following:
sage: load "factorial.spyx"
When I try I get the following message:
Compiling ./factorial.spyx...
Error compiling cython file:
Error compiling ./factorial.spyx:
running build
running build_ext
building '_home_oliver_Desktop_sage_4_7_1_linux_32bit_ubuntu_10_04_lts_i686_Linux_examples_programming_sagex_factorial_spyx_0' extension
creating build
creating build/temp.linux-i686-2.6
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC -I/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/local/include/csage/ -I/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/local/include/ -I/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/local/include/python2.6/ -I/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/numpy/core/include -I/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/devel/sage/sage/ext/ -I/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/devel/sage/ -I/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/devel/sage/sage/gsl/ -I. -I/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/local/include/python2.6 -c _home_oliver_Desktop_sage_4_7_1_linux_32bit_ubuntu_10_04_lts_i686_Linux_examples_programming_sagex_factorial_spyx_0.c -o build/temp.linux-i686-2.6/_home_oliver_Desktop_sage_4_7_1_linux_32bit_ubuntu_10_04_lts_i686_Linux_examples_programming_sagex_factorial_spyx_0.o -w -O2
creating build/lib.linux-i686-2.6
gcc -pthread -shared build/temp.linux-i686-2.6/_home_oliver_Desktop_sage_4_7_1_linux_32bit_ubuntu_10_04_lts_i686_Linux_examples_programming_sagex_factorial_spyx_0.o -L/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/local//lib/ -L/home/wstein/build/sage-4.7.1/local/lib -lmpfr -lgmp -lgmpxx -lstdc++ -lpari -lm -lcurvesntl -lg0nntl -ljcntl -lrankntl -lgsl -lgslcblas -latlas -lntl -lcsage -lpython2.6 -o build/lib.linux-i686-2.6/_home_oliver_Desktop_sage_4_7_1_linux_32bit_ubuntu_10_04_lts_i686_Linux_examples_programming_sagex_factorial_spyx_0.so -L/home/oliver/Desktop/sage-4.7.1-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-Linux/local//lib
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1
Any suggestions? Thanks.
Per DSM's comment, I reinstalled g++-multilib, and now everything works fine.