I have this website where Bank users register using API and then Bank can use our SSO login API to log their users directly from Bank's mobile App or website. Now the Bank wants to log into our website via Banno's OAuth. Such that users log into Banno via Bank and then login directly into our website.
How can this be achieved? How will banno know which user to login? How to make it without having users to come into our website and fill user's login details? Can anyone help?
It sounds like your scenario is looking for Banno to be the 'Identity Provider' which is supported by our OAuth + OpenID Connection implementation in our Authentication Framework.
It'll be a good idea to take a look at the Consumer API OpenID Connect Example for inspiration.
When you run that example project, you can navigate in your web browser to https://localhost:8080/login.html. That'll show a page with a "Sign in with Banno" button. The page is meant to be a generic representation of what a non-Jack Henry web page would be.
Imagine that the button was formatted to say "Sign in with [Financial-Institution-name-goes-here]", it would be the same concept.
When you click the "Sign in with Banno" button, you'll be redirected to the Garden demo institution. This happens because the example project is configured to begin the authorization flow and use Garden.
If you're not signed in as your user in Garden, you'll be prompted to sign in.
It's worth noting that the username + password are never shared back to the example project...the user is logging into their (Banno-powered) financial institution.
After signing in (and accepting the permissions which have been requested), your web browser will be redirected to https://localhost:8080/me which finishes the authentication flow.
That page then displays the Identity Token for your convenience as a developer.
The content of the Identity Token is usable to cross-reference the user to your existing system and/or to prefill out registration forms.
Hope this helps!
Related
I have a working implementation of SAML (OneLogin) within an enterprise architecture.
When a guest user arrives at my application they are redirected to the company login where they enter their username / password. After that the user identity is passed back to my application and we log them in.
However, I notice that in other applications within the company I do not have to login at all. Somehow the website "knows who I am" and seems to authenticate me automatically. I presume there is some form of certificate on my pc / browser which the other applications are passing to the SAML??
Can somebody tell me the technical term or process? Is there a process whereby I simply pull the certificate from the browser or PC and pass it to the SAML? I would like my users to be able to auto-login without entering their credentials.
Thanks
There's a number of mechanisms that support an "automatic" authentication like what you describe. In the Identity and Access Management (IAM) realm, we have all sorts of names for it, but many of us call that "seamless single sign-on (SSO)".
Within a corporate environment, I would suspect that you are dealing with a one of two mechanisms: Kerberos authentication (especially if you're a Microsoft shop and log in to a domain-joined machine on a daily basis), or your machine is in an MDM-type of system, which uses a machine- and/or user-based certificate (aka PKI) to authenticate the user or user/machine combination.
Within your enterprise, if there are other applications whose users are immediately authenticated to the application without entering their username and password, then you should talk to your IAM team or your Single Sign On (SSO) administrators to understand why that doesn't work for yours.
I will also say that it's possible that your security team evaluated what information your application offers (insider financials? source code? your secret recipe? credit card data?) and decided that they would still require the user enter their username and password to get access to the data. So when you go to your SSO admins to ask, if they say that it's intentional, you should feel free to ask why and who you should talk to about it.
After a LOT of research and testing I finally have the answer to this question, and it is incredibly simple!
In summary:
I have a working solution with OneLogin that sends me to a page like this:
https://sts.companyname.com/adfs/ls
The url is specified in the config: saml->config->idp->singleSignOnService->url
However, this page requires the user to enter their username and password and, instead, I would like the system to be fully seamless.
The solution, it turns out, is simply to hyperlink to the following url:
https://sts.companyname.com/adfs/ls/IdpInitiatedSignon.aspx?LoginToRp=https://mypage.com/saml/metadata
where "loginToRp" url is the url provided in saml->config->sp->entityID
The ADFS IDP Initiated Signon will connect to your metadata schema and automatically log the user in (without the user needing to provide any credentials)
NOTE: this only applies to intranet sites in a corporate environment
I'm having some issues authenticating my Instagram account and "approving" the right so that the application can use the images from my corporate Instagram account.
Using this documentation to follow our guide: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/instagram-api/getting-started
Here is what I have completed:
An Instagram Business Account or Instagram Creator Account
This has been completed and the Instagram account is a business account
A Facebook Page connected to that account
This has been completed and linked to the Instagram account (Both the Instagram account and the Facebook page are in our Business Manager panel)
A Facebook Developer account that can perform Tasks on that Page
Using my account with all the permissions granted such as (Owner, developer, etc..)
A registered Facebook App with Basic settings configured:
All the details have been completed and signed
Business Verification/Supplemental Terms
My Approved Permissions and Features:
Approvals
The Facebook Login button is displayed inside our WordPress settings panel:
Login Button
Problem:
When I click on the Facebook login button, I only get authenticated to provide my "email address", but instead I need the permissions for Instagram_basic, manage_pages that we're approved.
Only email is being asked
Code: In the code, I have the instagram_basic and manage_pages scopes defined.
<fb:login-button scope="public_profile,email,instagram_basic,manage_pages" onlogin="checkLoginState();"></fb:login-button>
Does anyone know what I might be doing wrong?
Had the same, just click continue and there will be another windows which asks you to confirm the access to instagram and the pages you want the app to have access to.
I integrated my application with the chatbase, but I would like my clients to have direct access to their email directly, as if it were a single step.
When I click a button in my application, it is directed to the logged-in chatbase screen.
Today I can only get it to the login screen, where it is still necessary to put the password to go to the dashboard, not logging directly into the application.
Is this possible? if yes, is there any kind of quickstart?
I followed the tutorial below to get to the login area, remembering that I use node.js
https://scotch.io/tutorials/easy-node-authentication-google
Thank you for your interest in Chatbase. There is currently no support for OAuth logins. Please see our recommended steps for third party integrations below:
Have the user open a Chatbase account with a Google linked email address
Have the user create a Bot in order to obtain the API key
Have the user integrate their analytics on your platform by providing the API key
Send the messages from their bot to their Chatbase API
Provide the user deeplinks to the Chatbase reports from within your UI
Am developing a Windows Store 8.1 app using C# and xaml.
I am doing Single sign on using Azure Active Directory Account login.
I do not want users to be redirected to the Microsoft Account login screen, and then come back. I want to supply them with the login credential screen where we capture their username and password, and then we want to programatically do the authentication against Azure AD, and get back the claims identity.
How can i achieve this?
This is not a supported scenario for security concerns. One of the value propositions for AAD is that the password management, across the whole login lifecycle, is managed and secure. This is particularly important for scenarios in which AAD is securing a 3rd-party SaaS solution. A developer should not be able to have access to a user's credentials at any point.
All that said, it sounds like there is another question here which is answerable: How can I customize the login screen that AAD gives me?
AAD Premium does offer features for adding custom branding to your tenant. However, you still will be working with a screen that is provided for you.
I was following the steps from box.net document
http://developers.box.com/get-started/#authenticating
I can get a ticket as it said first.
Then I use that ticket at following url https://www.box.com/api/1.0/auth/{your ticket}
in a browser, it works as it says. the browser will direct the user to box login page.
In that login page if I input username/password for login.
I can get the auth_token as the document says.
The problem is while I didn't choose username/password for login but use google openid to login an box account.
I will not able to get that auth_token as the document says. the returning response with following status:
not_logged_in
I want to know if this is a bug or I not correctly using the API to get that auth_token.
As many of box user now are using google openid as primely login choice this seems an common use case need be supported.
If anyone know the answer would be very appreciated.
Thanks
If a non-OpenID user is able to authenticate through the Box API's standard authentication process, then your code is fine. We have had reports of issues for our Single Signon issues, so this is likely a bug on our end.
Just make sure your app can authenticate users who have Box passwords. When we resolve these SSO issues, OpenID users will be able to connect your app without any changes on your end.