Is there a way to override GitHub context variables in GitHub Actions - github-actions

I know that currently this can't be done , I'm trying to run some integration tests on my action that requires an issue event to be passed, I have a sample json with the event data and I would like to override both:
GITHUB_EVENT_NAME
GITHUB_EVENT_PATH
So my action grabs the right event and the sample info. Is there a workaround or a better way to approach this issue? Thanks in advance

Related

How to Simulate a Keyboard Event in Dart HTML

1. Problem and Context
I'm trying to create a browser extension with Dart, more specifically, one that deals with adding keyboard shortcuts to certain websites.
To guarantee better TDD, I'm trying to simulate keyboard events during the tests. However, it seems like many things have changed when it comes to Dart's HTML APIs and I haven't been able to figure out how to make them work.
2. What I'm Trying
I would like to register a specific keystroke — so the generic KeyboardEvent won't cut it apparently, only the KeyEvent class can handle that. So far, I'm trying something like this:
document.body.dispatchEvent(KeyEvent('keypress', keyCode: 65, charCode: 97));
From which I receive an error close to this:
Error: Failed to execute 'dispatchEvent' on 'EventTarget': parameter 1 is not of type 'Event'.
I've also tried the code above with document, document.window and window, none worked. Something similar can be found in the KeyEvent documentation. However, they mention adding to a Stream, which I don't think is possible. It would have to be a Sink instead.
If I'm not able to solve this via dispatching events, I think I'll have to simply inject mocks into the tests.
3. More Resources
2 outdated answers which have helped me so far were:
dart how to create, listen, and emits custom event?
How do I listen for custom events in Dart?

CODED UI TESTS: is there a way to add a warning in html report?

In my Coded UI Test project, I need to check if few Labels or Messages are consistent with the context. But those checks are not critical if not consistent and I need to output them only as warnings.
Note that I'm using nested ordered tests to use only one global ordered test with vstest.console.exe and get in one shot the overall test coverage report.
Till now I was creating assertions to check those consistencies, but an assertion failure leads to Test failure, then to ordered test failure and then to playback stop.
I tried to change Playback.PlaybackSettings.ContinueOnError value before and after the assertion: this works as I expect as the assertion is well reported as a warning in the html report file. But whatever, it causes the ordered test to stop and then my global ordered test chaining to fail...
I tried to use TestContext.WriteLine too instead of creating assert, but it seems that this is not output in the html report.
So my question is:
is there any way to create an assertion only as a Warning that will be output in the html report file and that doesn't lead to a test failure?
Thanks a lot for any answer and help on this ;)
So I got my solution with developping my own Warning Engine to integrate Warnings in test report, 'cause I found no existing solution for that with the current Coded UI Test Assertion engine.
I'll try to take some time to post generic parts of the code structure with comments translated in english (we're french so default comments are french for now...), but here are the main step lines :
Create a template based on the UITestActionLog.html original file
report structure of Coded UI Test engine, with only the start
bloc and the javascript functions and CSS declarations in it.
Create an assertion class with a main function to manage insertion
of Warning html bloc in the html report first created from the template.
Then create custom assert functions to call the main function
whereever on runtime, and custom Stopwatch to inject elapsed time in
the report ('cause I could'nt found a way to get back the elapsed
time directly from the Coded UI Test engine).
That's it.
Just a proposition as a way to do it, maybe not the best one but it worked for me. I'll try to take time to put blocl codes to be clearer on it.

Angular2 functions

Does there exists a build in function that keeps on reloading the whole component until a boolean gets true. Bacause now before I can get some data I need to wait until a user has clicked a button in another component. But there is no relationship between those 2 components.
Does someone knows a way how to do this.
thx!
you can make use of Event Emitters in components to share information so that you need not wait for a user dependent action . Also make use of Service classes in order to pass information between components.
https://angular.io/docs/ts/latest/cookbook/component-communication.html#!#bidirectional-service
Also if you are getting information from a http call try and use observables or promises and then use ngIf or a elvus operator to get info into the component.
More on Angular Concepts https://rahulrsingh09.github.io/AngularConcepts/
I solved it by using a service where is create a subject/observable.
Check the link:
https://angular.io/docs/ts/latest/cookbook/component-communication.html#!#bidirectional-service
check the: Parent and children communicate via a service

Design time slider

I wish to add this design as a time slider in my dashboard.
Has anyone ever designed this using React, HTML? Any help is appreciated.
If those circles, lines are based on your returned json data, it is quite straightforward with React / Redux. You can follow the steps:
You need to add event listeners on your timeline either click or mouseover
Define the state variable mapData in the constructor
trigger the event and retrieve different data via http request
make sure you call setState() with the new data and bind them into your state variables
Bind the state variable into the render() elements and you will see the change.
Hopefully it can help you out.

Angular - building a "public" function (newbie)

I'm After several days learning angularJS through converting my standart JS app to a ng one.
I was wondering about this simple scenario:
I have a global function called fb_connect(),
it can be used from any page (or any controller if you like) to make a facebook-based login.
This function makes a simple http call and receives a JSON object contain data to move on (display a pop up, login, etc...)
I read that I can define a Factory or a Service for my app and use it in any controller, which works fine.
So, I created a fb_connect factory function.
The problem is that now, in every page (every controller), I have to define that fb_connect in the constructor of every controller - for example :
function welcome($scope,fb_connect){});
What is the proper way to do this kind of actions using Angular without having to define these functions each and every time in every controller?
Thanks
Setting up factories and services is all part of the dependency injection system of Angular. Using that system is great when you need to create things that depend on other injected things. It's a big tree of dependencies. It's also nice for creating singletons, such that everywhere in your code end up using the same instance of some object.
It sounds to me like neither of these benefits apply in your case. I'd suggest just not using Angular's DI for it. You have some function defined globally, just call it directly and skip the DI. There's nothing wrong with that.
Of course you say it makes an Ajax call, so doesn't depend on the Angular $http service?
Your two options are:
Declare the function on the $rootScope
Inject it as a service
My advice is to go with making it a service. The whole purpose of services is explained in the Angular.js docs, just like this quote:
Angular services are singletons that carry out specific tasks common to web apps... To use an Angular service, you identify it as a dependency for the dependent (a controller, or another service) that depends on the service.
As you mentioned in your question, you'd prefer to not define the service in every controller you wish to use it in. With $rootScope you'll be injecting that also in every controller. So really it's a question of which you prefer, although to answer your question, the proper way of using a factory or service is to inject it into the controller you wish to use it in.
You can always put it in the $rootScope
myApp.run(function($rootScope, fb_connect){
$rootScope.welcome = function(){
};
});