I am new to Netflix Hollow,tried implementing Netflix Hollow, but it seems Hollow generates it's required custom APIs for consumer after we execute code for api generation, after that only we can write code for consumers and use the generated APIs. So basically you have to run your code , then again write one class and again run it . Can I generate all these APIs at compile time itself?? Also why Netflix people built this like this way that first you run ,then complete your code then run it again ??? In general auto generated classes are generated in compile time only
Related
I have created a AutoCAD custom .net dll for the desktop version which had some operation.
Adding multiple empty drawing documents.
Opening the existing drawing document and copying the required blocks in the newly created drawing document.
Performing some operation on them, discarding all the unnecessary drawing documents and saving one of them as an output drawing document.
I had a query regarding opening the existing document and adding the empty document using Design Automation API but I couldn't achieve it with Design Automation.
As I explored I found that only AcCoreMgd.dll and AcDbMgd.dl are allowed with accoreconsole.exe.
Load custom .net dll inside accoreconsole.exe
DLL's used by AutoCAD custom .net project for desktop version are (AcCoreMgd.dll,AcCui.dll,AcDbMgd.dll,AcMgd.dll,AcTcMgd.dll,AdUIMgd.dll)
I wanted to use all the above DLL's with Design Automation for AutoCAD.
Will you please let us know how we can use desktop versions like support in Design Automation for AutoCAD?
It is not possible to add other modules when working with Design Automation or AccCoreConsole. Please note AcCoreConsole is a Headless part of AutoCAD in other words no UI libraries are permitted. Following are the libaries that a crx app should bind.
Where XX - module version of AutoCAD release for more details
If you are developing a .NET module, you need to use following Nuget
ac1stXX.lib
acdbXX.lib
acdbmgd.lib
AcDbPointCloudObj.lib
acgeXX.lib
acgiapi.lib
acismobjXX.lib
AcMPolygonObjXX.lib
AcSceneOE.lib
axdb.lib
rxapi.lib
acbrXX.lib
acgexXX.lib
AdImaging.lib
AdIntImgServices.lib
AecModeler.lib
AsdkHlrApiXX.lib
acapp_crx.lib
AcCamera.lib
accore.lib
AcFdEval.lib
AcPublish_crx.lib
Why do you need to open mutilple documents ?, you can insert multiple blocks from different drawings in to Host drawing. Make modifications, save and send to your Server.
Referring to the attached image taken from today's webinar:
(could someone with at least 10 reputation post this image: http://i.imgur.com/LwUHnce.png)
Once, for example, changed parameters, could my appPackage (i.e. changeParamsPlugin) do something like this?
doc.SaveAs(Path.GetDirectoryName(doc.FullDocumentName) + "\\" + outputFile + ".stp", True);
and then file be downloaded like this:
DownloadToDocs(resultUrl, AppProperties.OutputFile + AppProperties.StepExtension); // Output to MyDocuments
Or afterwards should I use model derivative API to translate output in a step file?
First thing to note on this is that Inventor in Design Automation is currently in Private Beta so using this in production is not currently available. If you're interested in exploring our private beta please contact me.
As far as guidance goes for this question, in general translations should be done with the ModelDerivative API in Forge. If you need "custom" work done prior to a translation then using Design Automation is the right way to go.
The AutoCAD "Engine" is available in production for Design Automation, while what you list above is the presentation I gave today with the disclaimer that this is not available in production.
I want to create a Processing library that adds a single function to Processing. A single command. How do I do this?
So I want to be able to write on Processing this:
void setup() {
drawMyCustomShape()
}
In a way that drawMyCustomShape will be on my custom library implementation.
Thanks!
Note: this question is not about creating a new library in processing. Is about creating a library that exports one new command (so you can using without caring of the container class instance).
First of all, are you sure you really need to create an entire library? You could just add that class to your sketch without needing to deploy it as a library. If you're worried about clutter, just put it in its own tab.
If you really need to create a library, then there are three tutorials that you need to read:
Library Overview
Library Basics
Library Guidelines
But basically, you need to create a Java project (in an IDE like eclipse, or with a basic text editor and the command line) that uses Processing as a library. That's where you'd put your MyLibrary class. You'd then export it as a .jar file, and then import that .jar file into Processing. You would then be able to use your class exactly like you can use any other Processing library.
Your proposed setup has some other issues (how are you going to access the sketch variable from the static function?), but I'd suggest treating them as separate questions after you get the basics in place.
It sounds like you are actually looking to create your own extension of the Processing library, as in actually change the core jar file.
You can extend the actual Processing library by forking off of its main branch on Github. By writing your function drawMyCustomShape into the actual core in the forked version, you can then build the Processing Development Environment from your copy of the code. Using that particular copy of the PDE, you could do what you're describing.
Once you compile this build, you could actually distribute this copy of the PDE to your college students. They would be able to use your function as if nothing were changed. (I'm guessing that this is for an intro-level class at the college level, so that's why you would have to hide implementation from your students?)
Here's some links to get you started:
Processing github
Instructions for building the PDE from source
So, finally I found the most adequate answer for my case.
The solution for this is to implement a new Processing Mode that extends the builtin Java Mode. To include static members to the main processing program you will need to add a new static import to the ones that processing adds to your code.
You can do this by forking the Mode Template for 3.0 that #joelmoniz created from #martinleopold:
https://github.com/joelmoniz/TemplateMode/tree/3.0-compatibility
There is a good tutorial here:
http://pvcresin.hatenablog.com/entry/2016/03/17/210135
Why is the most adequate solution? : I think this is the best way to achieve new static methods in processing code and ensure an easy distribution! You just have to set the mode folder in your sketchbook/modes folder. If I were to fork processing it would be a big deal to prepare distributions for all operative systems and also to keep update with main project.
My particular solution:
To add my static imports into Processing I implemented a custom mode where I overrode the PdePreprocessor class which wraps the processing code with all the Java procesing code. So, the idea was to add more imports to the imports that the PdePreprocessor generates on the generated Java source.
In my custom PdePreprocessor I overrode the getCoreImports method to add my custom methods. I did this here because I consider the new imports are part of the core of my custom mode. You could also achieve this by overriding writeImports method.
In order to use my PdePreprocessor implementation I had to overrode the following classes:
Commander
JavaBuild
JavaEditor
JavaMode
JavaEditor
I had to implement a new JavaBuild which preprocesses the Sketch with my custom PdePreprocessor. And also use my custom JavaBuild in all the places where the Processing Java Mode instances the build class. Please share with us if there is a better way to do what I did.
Here is the github for my solution: http://github.com/arypbatista/processing-inpr/
I am making a code completion system for a code editor, and i would like to show a tooltip for every parameter containing its reference data. I would like to emulate the code completion from Eclipse, so i was wondering if the API reference is available in code, or if i have to manually import it using the file system or something like that.
You could reflect the current class in question with flash.utils.describeType
This will return a xml with informations about methods, properties and so on.
This can be very heavy. If you use it all the time, try to use a caching system. The Flex framework has a class for it mx.utils.DescribeTypeCache
I have a couple of test files written in my DSL in my tests plugin/project. Most of the tests use inline multi-line strings and Xtend but in four cases, I need to test code which does some magic with URLs and the classpath, so I really need resources in the classpath for that.
Since loading the resources only works when the extension is correct, I can't give the files a fake extension.
Now my problem: My DSL also has a code generator. This means that eventually, I end up with a couple of generated files in places where I can't have them (they don't compile, for example, and one even contains an error to test error handling when information is split across several files).
I can't disable the Xtext nature because the tests project uses Xtend so for these files, I do need code generation.
Since the generator runs inside Eclipse (I have the DSL plugins installed for other projects), there is no way to override the code generator in Guice.
How can I disable the code generator in this case?
There is a simple way to achieve this:
Open the properties of your project
Expand the entry for your DSL
Select "Compiler"
Select "Enable project specific settings"
Disable/deselect "Compiler is activated" under "General"
If you don't have a properties entry for your DSL:
Add this fragment to your .mwe2 workflow file:
fragment = generator.GeneratorFragment {}
Regenerate your projects
Merge the new code from plugin.xml_gen into plugin.xml both in the base and the UI plugins.
The interesting parts are the two extension points org.eclipse.ui.preferencePages and org.eclipse.ui.propertyPages