I already tried using width and height 100% on it, but the issue that arises is that the frame itself takes the whole width and height, but the video keeps its aspect ratio, with a large grey frame around it. Using embeds from Vimeo and Youtube works well, but this issue arises when I use a custom CDN-based video - which is what I need.
Have you tried doing min-width: 100% on the iframe? If the page is not full size, then it might be taking up the width of that. So you could also try: body { height: 100vh; }
My first guess was to just make a CSS rule selecting the element inside the iFrame. But tt seems as you have to do it with Javascript and change the CSS of the loaded page in the iFrame. CSS is rarely able to do this on its own.
For more information see:
How to apply CSS to iframe?
Related
I've been searching in other questions since this is a pretty common problem but none of them applied to my case.
I'm developing a small web app with React, just to get the basics, and the background img works fine in mobile view (there's a media query that changes it at 480px to a portrait one) it resizes from 480px to 320 and looks good.
The problem is that, at certain heights if you stretch or wide the window the background gets stucked in the middle of it (if you recharge the page it appears as it should, being the window in the same exact place as where the problem occurs).
The img is loaded through CSS in the html, If I remove the background-size property it works as expected in desktop and mobile, but when I cross the 1260px width it doesnt cover the full width.
I have this codesandbox with all my code: https://codesandbox.io/s/stoic-brahmagupta-ro2kb?file=/src/style.css
And I attach an image of the problem. Thanks in advance.
As u r testing this you can see the content of the App is overflowing the html element
I rather use min-height on global elements like body or html than static height to prevent such as cases.
So to fix it you just simply add
html {
height: auto;
min-height: 100vh;
To prevent not overflowing instead of scaling we just add min-height equaly of 100vh (viewport height).
I think it will propably do the job without height: auto; but i like add it to prevent even more edge casing
Well this is an odd behaviour.
I'm coding the frontend of a metrics app that must be viewed in a large tv.
I use Html, Js and Css (bootstrap 4).
It's for general public so we must hide browser tabs, etc..
Whenever I set the browser to go fullscreen, a big white row appears at the bottom of the page. Please see attached picture.
The odd part is that there isn't any element there. It's like the viewport just gets bigger and forgets to cover the bottom with stuff.
Is this a known issue?
How to avoid this and cover on fullscreen?
I'ver tried auto, cover, 100% height, etc..
I found the solution right after posting my question.
html,body
{
min-height:100%;
}
The thing is that if you apply height only to body, it will seek for the parent (html) and found that the size is the same as before so both must have the property in order to get the 100% of the height.
Hello I am unable to stretch an iframe to display it's entire content.
Consider this:
http://jsfiddle.net/nDz32/
the content is clipped and I can't scroll down to see the rest of the comments.
Now consider this:
where I have just removed height: 100% !important
http://jsfiddle.net/rASW7/1/
I can scroll through all the comments.
Problem:
This doesn't work in an actual browser. In a browser like Chrome the content is clipped regardless of what I set. I need to have it stretch 100% in every direction as I am to embed it in a webview on a mobile device.
I am helpless I tried every combination I could think of and yet I can't get it to display like it does in the second link inside an actual browser...
I did this on my site. Does this work for you?
Replace yours with this:
.fb-comments, .fb-comments span, .fb-comments.fb_iframe_widget span iframe {width: 100% !important; }
http://jsfiddle.net/nDz32/1/
Looks like the issue was local files using the SDK get resized incorrectly even with CSS styling.
I am working with a webpage with an iframe within it. The iframe has a fair amount of data in it and every-time it loads its height expands to the extent of the content within. However this puts my page out. Is there anyway to lock the height of the iframe and allow the user too scroll through the content??
Hmm, weird... do you have an example link of this issue?
When I try a simple iframe:
http://jsfiddle.net/mP6wT/5/
<iframe src="http://example.org/"></iframe>
It seems to be sized pretty small by default, and scrolls in Chrome/FF/Win... Rather than adjusting to the height...
But at any rate, you should be able to lock the height with CSS:
http://jsfiddle.net/mP6wT/7/
<iframe src="http://example.org/" style="height:400px;"></iframe>
Watch out for iOS. Its kinda screws everything up:
http://salomvary.github.io/iframe-resize-ios-safari.html
how to properly display an iFrame in mobile safari
Give the iframe a fixed height and scroll auto and you should be good.
<iframe height="100px" scroll="auto"></iframe>
Note that 100px is just an example, you might want to choose a height that suits you.
Your iframe probably has height: 100%; set or even the height is being set via script of some sort. Technically you can set the height <iframe height="300"></iframe> or <ifreame style="height: 300px;"></iframe> = height of 300px.
Since you didn't provide any code, I cannot help you any further :( Provide your live example or code, then we can help you better. But generally, either try manually setting the iframes height, re-check your pages code.. maybe some script is setting the height or maybe the code inside the iframe..
I just finished reading YSlow recommendation to always define the image dimensions (height/width) to improve HTML rendering performance.
However, I don't know the image dimension I'm linking too.
What I do know is that the height will never be larger than 200px and the width will never be larger than 300px
Would I be a benefit if I defined (CSS) :
img {max-height: 200px; max-width: 300px}
For HTML performance rendering?
No, setting the max-width and max-height doesn't improve the performance.
The reason for specifying the width and height of images is that the browser will know exactly how much space the image will take up. If you leave the image size unspecified, the browser has to reflow the layout when the image loads.
You can see this nasty effect on some pages, where the page is first loaded with no placeholders for images, and then the contents jumps around making place for the images as they load.
If you can't specify the size of some images, don't worry too much about it. Just make sure that the layout behaves nicely when the images load, and don't jump around too much.
Setting the max height and width of an image in the css will make the img tag resize the img based on the contraints but if you are using a backend scripting language like asp.net or php you an use their img libraries to scale the image on the server side an either save then to the hard drive to use later or resize on the fly.
You can check out http://shiftingpixel.com/2008/03/03/smart-image-resizer/ for php as a starter
Or if you are using .NET you can check out this link http://weblogs.asp.net/gunnarpeipman/archive/2009/04/02/resizing-images-without-loss-of-quality.aspx
Images with different proportions would not look good, since they would be scaled. I would not recommend this.
In this case I would definitely not set the height and width of the image since you don't know what it is going to be. If you know what the size is going to be then setting is good because it will cut down on the amount of repainting and reflow that the browser has to do when rendering a page.
The less it has to do then the better the performance will be on the client side because you are not making the browser work too hard.
Stoyan Stefanov explained it really well in a recent blog post
I think You'd rather want to wrap that <img> into a <span> or <div> element with max-height and max-width set. Also, it ( span or div ) should have overflow:hidden set so the image doesn't go out of the div's range.
It definitelly isn't recommended to set these setting directly to image because You'll get different and slower rendering in different browsers.