Couchbase unable to retrieve document No index available Code 4000 - couchbase

I have a bucket in Couchbase called mybucket. When I select Documents and then choose my bucket, It has an option to retrieve the documents. When I choose the first one, the web platform of Couchbase shows the content of that document to me:
{
"type": "activity",
"version": "1.0.0",
....
}
So, with that, I am sure that I can see some documents that have "type" = "activity" in my bucket. However, when I want to retrieve them using the Query editor and the following N1QL query:
select * from `mybucket` where `type` = "activity" limit 10;
I get the following response:
[
{
"code": 4000,
"msg": "No index available on keyspace `default`:`mybucket` that matches your query. Use CREATE PRIMARY INDEX ON `default`:`mybucket` to create a primary index, or check that your expected index is online.",
"query": "select * from `mybucket` where `type` = \"activity\" limit 10;"
}
]

Bucket Retrieve documents uses DCP stream vs Query Editor uses N1QL which required the secondary index or primary index
Option 1) CREATE INDEX ix1 ON mybuckte(type);
OR
Option 2) CREATE PRIMARY INDEX on mybucket;

Related

couchbase N1ql query select with non-group by fields

I am new to couchbase and I have been going through couchbase documents and other online resources for a while but I could't get my query working. Below is the data structure and my query:
Table1:
{
"jobId" : "101",
"jobName" : "abcd",
"jobGroup" : "groupa",
"created" : " "2018-05-06T19:13:43.318Z",
"region" : "dev"
},
{
"jobId" : "102",
"jobName" : "abcd2",
"jobGroup" : "groupa",
"created" : " "2018-05-06T22:13:43.318Z",
"region" : "dev"
},
{
"jobId" : "103",
"jobName" : "abcd3",
"jobGroup" : "groupb",
"created" : " "2018-05-05T19:11:43.318Z",
"region" : "test"
}
I need to get the jobId which has the latest job information (max on created timestamp) for a given jobGroup and region (group by jobGroup and region).
My sql query doesn't help me using self-join on jobId.
Query:
/*
Idea is to pull out the job which was executed latest for all possible groups and region and print the details of that particular job
select * from (select max(DATE_FORMAT_STR(j.created,'1111-11-11T00:00:00+00:00')) as latest, j.jobGroup, j.region from table1 j
group by jobGroup, region) as viewtable
join table t
on keys meta(t).id
where viewtable.latest in t.created and t.jobGroup = viewtable.jobGroup and
viewtable.region = t.region
Error Result: No result displayed
Desired result :
{
"jobId" : "102",
"jobName":"abcd2",
"jobGroup":"groupa",
"latest" :"2018-05-06T22:13:43.318Z",
"region":"dev"
},
{
"jobId" : "103",
"jobName" : "abcd3",
"jobGroup" : "groupb",
"created" : " "2018-05-05T19:11:43.318Z",
"region" : "test"
}
If I understand your query correctly, this can be answered using 'group by' and no join. I tried entering your sample data and the following query gives the correct result:
select max([created,d])[1] max_for_group_region
from default d
group by jobGroup, region;
How does it work? It uses 'group by' to group documents by jobGroup and region, then creates a two-element array holding, for every document in the group:
the 'created' timestamp field
the document where the timestamp came from
It then applies the max function on the set of 2-element arrays. The max of a set of arrays looks for the maximum value in the first array position, and if there's a tie look at the second position, and so on. In this case we are getting the two-element array with the max timestamp.
Now we have an array [ timestamp, document ], so we apply [1] to extract just the document.
I'm seeing some inconsistencies and invalid JSON in your examples, so I'm going to do the best I can. First off, I'm using Couchbase Server 5.5 which provides the new ANSI JOIN syntax. There might be a way to do this in an earlier version of Couchbase Server.
Next, I created an index on the created field: CREATE INDEX ix_created ON bucketname(created).
Then, I use a subquery to get the latest date, aggregated by jobGroup and region. I then join the latest date from this query to the entire bucket and select the fields that (I think) you want in your desired result:
SELECT k.jobId, k.jobName, k.jobGroup, k.created AS latest, k.region
FROM (
SELECT j.jobGroup, j.region, MAX(j.created) as latestDate
FROM so j
GROUP BY j.jobGroup, j.region
) dt
LEFT JOIN so k ON k.created = dt.latestDate;
Problems with this approach:
If two documents have the exact same date, this isn't a reliable way to determine the latest. You can add a LIMIT 1 to the subquery, which would just pick one arbitrarily, or you could ORDER BY whatever your preference is.
Subquery performance: I don't know how large your data set is, but this could be pretty slow.
Requires Couchbase Server 5.5, which is currently in beta.
If you are using a different version of Couchbase Server, you may want to consider asking in the Couchbase N1QL Forums for a more expert answer.

Couchbase Index and N1QL Query

I have created a new bucket, FooBar on my couchbase server.
I have a Json Document which is a List with some properties and it is in my couchbase bucket as follows:
[
{
"Venue": "Venue1",
"Country": "AU",
"Locale": "QLD"
},
{
"Venue": "Venue2",
"Country": "AU",
"Locale": "NSW"
},
{
"Venue": "Venue3",
"Country": "AU",
"Locale": "NSW"
}
]
How Do i get the couchbase query to return a List of Locations when using N1QL query.
For instance, SELECT * FROM FooBar WHERE Locale = 'QLD'
Please let me know of any indexes I would need to create as well. Additionally, how can i return only results where the object is of type Location, and not say another object which may have the 'Locale' Property.
Chud
PS - I have also created some indexes, however I would like an unbiased answer on how to achieve this.
Typically you would store these as separate documents, rather than in a single document as an array of objects, which is how the data is currently shown.
Since you can mix document structures, the usual pattern to distinguish them is to have something like a 'type' field. ('type' is in no way special, just the most common choice.)
So your example would look like:
{
"Venue": "Venue1",
"Country": "AU",
"Locale": "QLD",
"type": "location"
}
...
{
"Venue": "Venue3",
"Country": "AU",
"Locale": "NSW",
"type": "location"
}
where each JSON object would be a separate document with a unique document ID. (If you have some predefined data you want to load, look at cbimport for how to add it to your database. There are a few different formats for doing it. You can also have it generate document IDs for you.)
Then, what #vsr wrote is correct. You'd create an index on the Locale field. That will be optimal for the query you want. Note you could create an index on every document with CREATE INDEX ix1 ON FooBar(Locale); too. In this simple case it doesn't really make a difference. Read about the query Explain feature of the admin console to for help using that to understand optimizing queries.
Finally, the query #vsr wrote is also correct:
SELECT * FROM FooBar WHERE type = "Location" AND Locale = "QLD";
CREATE INDEX ix1 ON FooBar(Locale);
https://dzone.com/articles/designing-index-for-query-in-couchbase-n1ql
CREATE INDEX ix1 ON FooBar(Locale) WHERE type = "Location";
SELECT * FROM FooBar WHERE type = "Location" AND Locale = "QLD";
If it is array and filed name is list
CREATE INDEX ix1 ON FooBar(DISTINCT ARRAY v.Locale FOR v IN list END) WHERE type = "Location";
SELECT * FROM FooBar WHERE type = "Location" AND ANY v IN list SATISFIES v.Locale = "QLD" END;

Couchbase Full Text search with combination of dynamic fields and N1QL

Consider following documents and consider that is created Full-text index over following documents:
{
email : "A",
"data" : {
"dynamic_property" : "ANY_TYPE",
"dynamic_property2" : {
"property" : "searchableValue"
},
"field" : "VALUE"
}
},
{
email : "B",
"data" : {
"other_dynamic_prop" : "test-searchableValue-2",
}
},
{
email : "A",
"data" : {
"thirdDynamicProp" : {
"childProp" : "this should be searchableValue!"
}
}
}
The goal: Create N1QL query which will match all the documents with have associated given email address AND the data property contains given substring.
Basically following:
SELECT * FROM `bucket` WHERE `email` = 'A' AND `data` LIKE '%searchableValue%';
The expected result is the first and second document because matching criteria. But the query does not work because data is not a text type but is object type. If the data property would be like:
{"data" : "this should be searchableValue!" }
The query would return expected result.
The question is:
How to create such a N1QL query which would return expected result?
I know that Couchbase is not able to do compare substring in the text, but using Full-text index it should be possible since Couchbase 4.5+
Couchbase4.6 and 5.0 have more/better options (explained below). In couchbase4.5, you can use Array Indexing to solve this:
https://developer.couchbase.com/documentation/server/4.5/n1ql/n1ql-language-reference/indexing-arrays.html
https://www.couchbase.com/blog/2016/october/n1ql-functionality-enhancements-in-couchbase-server-4.5.1
For instance, using the travel-sample sample bucket, following array index, and query would do the kind of substring search you want.
create index tmp_geo on `travel-sample`(DISTINCT ARRAY x FOR x IN object_values(geo) END) where type = "airport";
select meta().id, geo from `travel-sample` where type = "airport"
and ANY x IN object_values(geo) SATISFIES to_string(x) LIKE "12%" END;
N1QL introduced a function TOKENS() in 4.6, which can help you create functional index on tokenized sub-objects (instead of array index in the above example):
https://developer.couchbase.com/documentation/server/4.6/n1ql/n1ql-language-reference/string-functions.html
https://dzone.com/articles/more-than-like-efficient-json-search-with-couchbas
And, Couchbase 5.0 developer build (https://blog.couchbase.com/2017/january/introducing-developer-builds) has N1QL function CURL(), which allows you to access any HTTP/REST endpoint as part of the N1QL query (hence, can access the FTS endpoint). See following blogs for more details & examples:
- https://blog.couchbase.com/2017/january/developer-release--curl-n1ql
- https://dzone.com/articles/curl-comes-to-n1ql-querying-external-json-data
Btw, can you clarify if you want partial tokens or only full tokens in the query?
-Prasad
Here are the specific queries based on the answer from #prasad.
Using Couchbase 4.5:
CREATE INDEX idx_email ON `bucket`( email );
SELECT *
FROM `bucket`
WHERE
`email` = 'A'
AND ANY t WITHIN `data` SATISFIES t LIKE '%searchableValue%' END;
Using Couchbase 4.6:
CREATE INDEX idx_email ON `bucket`( email );
CREATE INDEX idx_tokens ON `bucket`( DISTINCT ARRAY t FOR t IN TOKENS( `data` ) END );
SELECT *
FROM `bucket`
WHERE
`email` = 'A'
AND ANY t IN TOKENS( `data` ) SATISFIES t = 'searchableValue' END;

Error while adding new documents to Azure Search index

I have an index with a couple of fields of type Edm.String and Collection(Edm.String). I want to have another index with the same fields plus another field of type Edm.Double. When I create such an index and try to add the same values (plus the newly added Edm.Double value) as I did to the first index, I'm getting the following error:
{
"error": {
"code": "",
"message": "The request is invalid. Details: parameters : An unexpected 'StartArray' node was found when reading from the JSON reader. A 'PrimitiveValue' node was expected.\r\n"
}
}
Does anyone know what this error means? I tried looking for it on the Internet but I couldn't find anything related to my situation. A sample request I'm sending to the new index looks like this:
POST https://myservicename.search.windows.net/indexes/newindexname/docs/index?api-version=2016-09-01
{
"value": [{
"#search.action": "upload",
"keywords": ["red", "lovely", "glowing", "cute"],
"name": "sample document",
"weight": 0.5,
"id": "67"
}]
}
The old index is the same but it doesn't have the "weight" parameter.
Edit: I created the index using the portal, so I don't have the exact JSON to create the index, but the fields are roughly like this:
Field Type Attributes Analyzer
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
id Edm.String Key, Retrievable
name Edm.String Searchable, Filterable, Retrievable Eng-Microsoft
keywords Collection(Edm.String) Searchable, Filterable, Retrievable Eng-Microsoft
weight Edm.Double Filterable, Sortable
The reason I got the error was because I made a mistake and was trying to send a Collection(Edm.String) when the actual type on the index was Edm.String.

N1QL nested json, query on field inside object inside array

I have json documents in my Couchbase cluster that looks like this
{
"giata_properties": {
"propertyCodes": {
"provider": [
{
"code": [
{
"value": [
{
"name": "Country Code",
"value": "EG"
},
{
"name": "City Code",
"value": "HRG"
},
{
"name": "Hotel Code",
"value": "91U"
}
]
}
],
"providerCode": "gta",
"providerType": "gds"
},
{
"code": [
{
"value": [
{
"value": "071801"
}
]
},
{
"value": [
{
"value": "766344"
}
]
}
],
"providerCode": "restel",
"providerType": "gds"
},
{
"code": [
{
"value": [
{
"value": "HRG03Z"
}
]
},
{
"value": [
{
"value": "HRG04Z"
}
]
}
],
"providerCode": "5VF",
"providerType": "tourOperator"
}
]
}
}
}
I'm trying to create a query that fetches a single document based on the value of giata_properties.propertyCodes.provider.code.value.value and a specific providerType.
So for example, my input is 071801 and restel, I want a query that will fetch me the document I pasted above (because it contains these values).
I'm pretty new to N1QL so what I tried so far is (without the providerType input)
SELECT * FROM giata_properties AS gp
WHERE ANY `field` IN `gp.propertyCodes.provider.code.value` SATISFIES `field.value` = '071801' END;
This returns me an empty result set. I'm probably doing all of this wrongly.
edit1:
According to geraldss answer I was able to achieve my goal via 2 different queries
1st (More general) ~2m50.9903732s
SELECT * FROM giata_properties AS gp WHERE ANY v WITHIN gp SATISFIES v.`value` = '071801' END;
2nd (More specific) ~2m31.3660388s
SELECT * FROM giata_properties AS gp WHERE ANY v WITHIN gp.propertyCodes.provider[*].code SATISFIES v.`value` = '071801' END;
Bucket have around 550K documents. No indexes but the primary currently.
Question part 2
When I do either of the above queries, I get a result streamed to my shell very quickly, then I spend the rest of the query time waiting for the engine to finish iterating over all documents. I'm sure that I'll be only getting 1 result from future queries so I thought I can use LIMIT 1 so the engine stops searching on first result, I tried something like
SELECT * FROM giata_properties AS gp WHERE ANY v WITHIN gp SATISFIES v.`value` = '071801' END LIMIT 1;
But that made no difference, I get a document written to my shell and then keep waiting until the query finishes completely. How can this be configured correctly?
edit2:
I've upgraded to the latest enterprise 4.5.1-2844, I have only the primary index created on giata_properties bucket, when I execute the query along with the LIMIT 1 keyword it still takes the same time, it doesn't stop quicker.
I've also tried creating the array index you suggested but the query is not using the index and it keeps insisting on using the #primary index (even if I use USE INDEX clause).
I tried removing SELF from the index you suggested and it took a much longer time to build and now the query can use this new index, but I'm honestly not sure what I'm doing here.
So 3 questions:
1) Why LIMIT 1 using primary index doesn't make the query stop at first result?
2) What's the difference between the index you suggested with and without SELF? I tried to look for SELF keyword documentation but I couldn't find anything.
This is how both indexes look in Web ui
Index 1 (Your original suggestion) - Not working
CREATE INDEX `gp_idx1` ON `giata_properties`((distinct (array (`v`.`value`) for `v` within (array_star((((self.`giata_properties`).`propertyCodes`).`provider`)).`code`) end)))
Index 2 (Without SELF)
CREATE INDEX `gp_idx2` ON `giata_properties`((distinct (array (`v`.`value`) for `v` within (array_star(((self.`propertyCodes`).`provider`)).`code`) end)))
3) What would be the query for a specific giata_properties.propertyCodes.provider.code.value.value and a specific providerCode? I managed to do both separately but I wasn't successful in merging them.
Thanks for all your help dear
Here is a query without the providerType.
EXPLAIN SELECT *
FROM giata_properties AS gp
WHERE ANY v WITHIN gp.giata_properties.propertyCodes.provider[*].code SATISFIES v.`value` = '071801' END;
You can also index this in Couchbase 4.5.0 and above.
CREATE INDEX idx1 ON giata_properties( DISTINCT ARRAY v.`value` FOR v WITHIN SELF.giata_properties.propertyCodes.provider[*].code END );
Edit to answer question edits
The performance has been addressed in 4.5.x. You should try the following on Couchbase 4.5.1 and post the execution times here.
Test on 4.5.1.
Create the index.
Use the LIMIT. In 4.5.1, the limit is pushed down to the index.