I am a new with twilio.
I am trying to make a call using CallResource.Create(to, from, url: _url);
regarding the URL : I have the Azure account. I have uploaded custom xml.
Below you can find my xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Response>
<Say voice="alice">Thanks for trying our documentation.Enjoy!</Say>
<Play>http://demo.twilio.com/docs/classic.mp3</Play>
</Response>
For testing i am using test message.
http://demo.twilio.com/docs/classic.mp3 , in the future i am planning to upload custom mp3 file also to azure file storage.
The end URL is
https://xxxx.file.core.windows.net/xxxxx/20180719112627.xml?sv=2017-11-09&ss=bfqt&srt=sco&sp=rwdlacup&se=2018-07-31T18:27:28Z&st=2018-07-01T10:27:28Z&spr=https,http&sig=gNqLuAofhePeOzuyVFWHSb0TCydgIW3ShOrRRfFEZ7o%3D
Unfortunately, i have got the exception:
"An attempt to retrieve content from https://xxxxxxx.file.core.windows.net/xxxxxxx/20180719112627.xml?sv=2016-05-31&sig=Pa4ery3QIruwYbNSJ1Nu7Y3EpKLjbd5mJXi46vnpoyU%3D&spr=https%2Chttp&se=2019-07-19T09%3A26%3A53Z&srt=sco&ss=bfqt&sp=raupwl returned the HTTP status code 405"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Error>
<Code>UnsupportedHttpVerb</Code>
<Message>The resource doesn't support specified Http Verb.
RequestId:907409a8-d01a-0051-1c43-1f4bf1000000
Time:2018-07-19T09:30:41.8204847Z</Message>
</Error>
Rerarding CORS for FILE SERVICE :
it is
Is there a document/guide describing the requirements how to configure the azure environment for integration with twilio?
Many thanks for help.
Have you tried using the SAS url by generating one using Storage Explorer or Azure Portal?
Hi I am using EWS for deleting a Calendar. Below is my XML that i have used for the same. What my understanding is that calendars work as folders in EWS. So have used delete folder api.
Error message:
The EwsId is in EwsLegacyId format which is not supported by the Exchange version specified by your request. Please use the ConvertId method to convert from EwsLegacyId to EwsId format.
While on the same ID when I am calling list item then it is giving right output.
<soap:Header>
<t:RequestServerVersion Version="Exchange2013_SP1" />
</soap:Header>
<soap:Body>
<m:DeleteFolder DeleteType="HardDelete">
<m:FolderIds>
<t:FolderId Id="AQArAGdhdXJhdi5" />
</m:FolderIds>
</m:DeleteFolder>
</soap:Body>
I have an SPA application in Angular and have enabled write to JSON files by enabling PUT in the CORS Config.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<CORSConfiguration xmlns="http://s3.amazonaws.com/doc/2006-03-01/">
<CORSRule>
<AllowedOrigin>*</AllowedOrigin>
<AllowedMethod>GET</AllowedMethod>
<AllowedMethod>PUT</AllowedMethod>
<MaxAgeSeconds>3000</MaxAgeSeconds>
<AllowedHeader>*</AllowedHeader>
</CORSRule>
</CORSConfiguration>
I can create a JSON file via PUT and then do a GET to see the file I have created, from the browser window. However, when downloading the created JSON file via the Online S3 console or CloudBerry, I get an "access denied" even though I am using the root account with the secret key. The error message looks like this:
<Error>
<Code>AccessDenied</Code>
<Message>Access Denied</Message>
<RequestId>876213549363694A</RequestId>
<HostId>
ePMtRfoLm7zUrjYwSG6aIWIBeIwWI0Ajiq+LSUqylKofhdIIbSm5LfncoS0ZvxcC
</HostId>
</Error>
Any suggestions much appreciated!!
S3's permission system is a bit interesting. S3 tracks ownership information for objects in buckets as well as buckets themselves - objects CAN have a different owner than the bucket they belong to, and if the owners are different you must have permission from BOTH of them to access the object - even if you're the owner of the bucket!
You're uploading the object anonymously, so the object ends up owned by the anonymous user. You (the owner of the bucket) have given permission for the anonymous user to read objects from your bucket, and the object is owned by the anonymous user, so unauthenticated GET calls work. However, the anonymous user who performed the upload has NOT given you (the bucket owner) permission to read the object, so calls authenticated using your credentials are rejected... Bizarre.
The quickest way out of this situation is to include an "x-amz-acl: bucket-owner-full-control" header on your PUT request. This grants the owner of the bucket (you) full control to read, write, or delete the object even though it's still "owned" by the anonymous user. You may want to consider making this header required on all anonymous PUT requests in the bucket policy as documented here.
Adding an example:
$http.put("/path", jsonData, {
headers: { 'x-amz-acl': 'bucket-owner-full-control' }
}
);
I'm trying to use the SSIS OData Source component to connect to the CRM OData Endpoint, but it's giving me the following error:
For security reasons DTD is prohibited in this XML document. To enable DTD processing set the DtdProcessing property on XmlReaderSettings to Parse and pass the settings into XmlReader.Create method. (System.Xml)
Has anyone got this working before? Any tricks to prevent it from doing the DTD check?
The XML the service responds starts as the following:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<service xml:base="https://url.com/XRMServices/2011/OrganizationData.svc/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">
So, the problem is that the SSIS OData Connection won't do the OAuth dance, and as such fails to cope with CRM.
What I did instead was use the RSSBus CRM component to connect.
playing with
crm online
azure active directory
ssis
C# (script component)
xml transformation
you can achieve it. Our company created a blog post for that.
sorry for not posting the whole solution here, it's kind of long
Part 1
Part 2
Hello WSO2 community and hello Stackoverflow,
my testing of the SOA suite starting from the ESB is going good: now the ESB recognises external services, create correct proxies that return correct results.
SOLVED
About that, I have two issues: the first is that the "try it"
functionality raises the exception:
"Cannot find dispatch method for {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Envelope
[tagOpened]/soapenv:Text[tagClosed]"
when i try to send a SOAP enveloped created for the mock service of
the web service proxied.
Anyway, if I try the proxy service from an external client (created on
Netbeans) it works great.
ANSWER
For the first part, the reason is most probably the cross domain issue as try-it is sending messages through a java script stub from
the browser. You will notice that this works great when the service
itself is hosted in the ESB itself, because the request passes through
the same domain. This is why, although, it works perfectly through a
normal client invocation, it does not work through try-it.
The second issue is that I'm not able to orchestrate two services. My objective is sending the input of the first service to the second service, and then to the user.
I'm working on the tutorial Tharindu Mathew suggested: everything now makes sense to me except on one thing: the XSLT transformation.
Here is the out sequence the tutorial suggests you to create:
<outSequence xmlns="http://ws.apache.org/ns/synapse">
<switch source="get-property('STATE')">
<case regex="PERSON_INFO_REQUEST">
<log level="full">
<property name="sequence" value="outSequence - STATE 01 - response from PersonInfoService" />
</log>
<xslt key="xslt">
<property name="amount" expression="get-property('ORG_AMOUNT')" />
</xslt>
<log level="full">
<property name="sequence" value="outSequence - STATE 01 - request for CreditService" />
</log>
<property name="STATE" value="CREDIT_REQUEST" />
<send>
<endpoint key="CreditEpr" />
</send>
</case>
<case regex="CREDIT_REQUEST">
<log level="full">
<property name="sequence" value="outSequence - STATE 02 - response from CreditService" />
</log>
<send />
</case>
</switch>
</outSequence>
Now, focusing on the XSLT node of the first case of the switch, you can see that there's just a get for the amount property.
So that I think we have an XML from the in sequence that states the ID, and this get on the amount property (and I don't know what it does).
The tutorial then suggests:
To create the request to this CrediService, we use the following XSLT with the XSLT mediator. Note, we are using the ORG_ID that we stored in this XSLT as a XSLT parameter and using the XSLT mediator as well.
And here is the XSLT showed in the tutorial:
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2005/02/xpath-functions"
xmlns:ns="http://samples.esb.wso2.org"
xmlns:ax21="http://samples.esb.wso2.org/xsd"
exclude-result-prefixes="ns fn">
<xsl:param name="amount"/>
<xsl:output method="xml" omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates select="//ns:getResponse" />
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="ns:getResponse" xmlns:ns="http://samples.esb.wso2.org">
<sam:credit xmlns:sam="http://samples.esb.wso2.org" xmlns:xsd="http://samples.esb.wso2.org/xsd">
<sam:info>
<xsd:amount><xsl:value-of select="$amount"/></xsd:amount>
<xsd:personInfo>
<xsd:address><xsl:value-of select="ns:return/ax21:address"/></xsd:address>
<xsd:id><xsl:value-of select="ns:return/ax21:id"/></xsd:id>
<xsd:name><xsl:value-of select="ns:return/ax21:name"/></xsd:name>
</xsd:personInfo>
</sam:info>
</sam:credit>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
I was asked to put a similar file into the resources directory of WSO2 ESB, but this file is never used in the tutorial:
Copy the personToCredit.xslt in the sample zip to resources directory of WSO2 ESB.
---------LITTLE PARENTHESIS-----------
The WSDL file was not used either after it was stated:
Copy the CreditProxy.wsdl in the sample zip to the resources directory of the WSO2 ESB.
I cannot find the WSDL file in the Configuration/Governance Registry, and I don't know how to address it, so I chose to specify it inline instead.
---------LITTLE PARENTHESIS END-----------
This sentence is followed by the XSLT file text. My main question now is:
Where should I put this XSLT? I do not know where to put the XSLT mediator, neither how to build it.
Should I rely on registries?
A perfect answer could be the code of the out sequence, and the specified connection with the XSLT mediator suggested.
OverTheBitStair
Hi OverTheBitStair (nice nick!),
For the first part, the reason is most probably the cross domain issue as try-it is sending messages through a java script stub from the browser. You will notice that this works great when the service itself is hosted in the ESB itself, because the request passes through the same domain. This is why, although, it works perfectly through a normal client invocation, it does not work through try-it.
For the second part, the short answer is yes, it is possible. In terms of the ESB, we refer to it as a light-weight orchestration engine in addition to being a mediation engine. This means for light-weight and short-lived (<1 day) processes we can solve the orchestration requirements using the ESB without bringing in the Business Process Server.
To do this, we use this method called service chaining. What it does is introduce a method to get some output out of the initial service invocation and use it in a subsequent invocation. The article WSO2 ESB by example - Service Chaining should help you with implementation details on what you are looking for.
Hope this helps.
If you create a service chaining scenario where your proxy service calls two other services and return the result to the caller of the proxy service, it would look something like this:
Caller --> Proxy Service -- seq_A --> Service1 -- seq_B --> Service2 -- seq_C --> (proxy serviced response) --> Caller
In this case, seq_A would be the in sequence of the proxy service, seq_C the out sequence of the proxy service and seq_B another named sequence.
Input, i.e. the message body, to seq_A would be the input to proxy service. seq_A would contain a send mediator at the end and at that point in the sequence the message context would be the input to Service1. The send mediator also points to seq_B to be executed for the reply.
At start of seq_B the message body contains the output from Service1. If you want to keep some message data from before the service call you need to save that in properties in the context.
At the end of seq_B you would have a send mediator; at that point the message body should contain the input to Service2, The send mediator would in this case not need to point to an explicit reply sequence, if seq_C is the out sequence of the proxy service - that one will be used by default then.
When seq_C is executing the message body at that point is the response from Service2. Again, if you need to use/combine with some data prior to the call to Service2, you need that to be saved into properties.
Depending on the particular needs for the input and transformations needed at each step it can be fairly straightforward or a bit cumbersome to handle.
What also should taken into consideration is what needs to happen in error scenarios, as this may add some additional complexity, depending on the requirements.