CSS weird scroll behaviour workaround? - html

I'm trying to find a workaround to the weird CSS overflow behaviour describe in this answer:
If you are using visible for either overflow-x or overflow-y and something other than visible for the other, the visible value is interpreted as auto.
I have a horizontally scrollable section with many card inside of it, I want each card to scale up when the user hover over it.
I started with a simple
.card:hover{
transform: scale(1.5);
}
that obviously resulted in a vertical scrollbar appearing on the horizontally scrollable section, for the rule described at the beginning.
So I tried modifying the position property to absolute on hover and also added a wrapper around the card to prevent other card from collapsing due to the previous element being removed from the document flow, this seems to work but also produces a very weird behaviour: if you scroll horizontally the hover effect kinda breaks, it only works if the mouse is positioned on an overlapping area between the card normal position and the hovered (absolute) position. Since the card gets absolutely positioned on hover, that position remains the same even if the user scrolls horizontally.
I'm trying to find a CSS/HTML only solution, if there is one.
The ideal would be to either have both overflow-y: visibile and overflow-x: scroll or to find a way to calculate the top, left values according to the scrolled position of the cards.
Here is a minimal example (also on jsfiddle):
.container-wrapper{
position: relative;
}
.container{
width: 100%;
display: flex;
overflow-x: scroll;
border: 1px solid orangered;
}
.wrapper{
flex: 0 0 calc( 100% / 5);
}
.card{
height: 100px;
margin: 0 0.5em;
background-color: blue;
}
.card:hover{
width: 200px;
position: absolute;
transform: scale(1.4);
}
/* color */
.red{
background-color: red;
}
.pink{
background-color: pink;
}
.yellow{
background: yellow;
}
.cyan{
background: cyan;
}
.green{
background: green;
}
<div class="container-wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="card red"></div>
</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="card pink "></div>
</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="card yellow"></div>
</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="card cyan "></div>
</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="card red"></div>
</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="card green "></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Hope I've been clear, thank you all.

Related

Place inner <div> at the bottom of parent <div>. The height of the parent <div> is set by the height of its "tallest" sibling <div> [duplicate]

Given the following HTML:
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
I would like #copyright to stick to the bottom of #container. Can I achieve this without using absolute positioning?
Likely not.
Assign position:relative to #container, and then position:absolute; bottom:0; to #copyright.
#container {
position: relative;
}
#copyright {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Actually, the accepted answer by #User will only work if the window is tall and the content is short. But if the content is tall and the window is short, it will put the copyright info over the page content, and then scrolling down to see the content will leave you with a floating copyright notice. That makes this solution useless for most pages (like this page, actually).
The most common way of doing this is the "CSS sticky footer" approach demonstrated, or a slightly slimmer variation. This approach works great -- IF you have a fixed height footer.
If you need a variable height footer that will appear at the bottom of the window if the content is too short, and at the bottom of the content if the window is too short, what do you do?
Swallow your pride and use a table.
For example:
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
border-collapse: collapse;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<table id="container">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div id="main">Lorem ipsum, etc.</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<div id="footer">Copyright some evil company...</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Try it out. This will work for any window size, for any amount of content, for any size footer, on every browser... even IE6.
If you're cringing at the thought of using a table for layout, take a second to ask yourself why. CSS was supposed to make our lives easier -- and it has, overall -- but the fact is that even after all these years, it's still a broken, counter-intuitive mess. It can't solve every problem. It's incomplete.
Tables aren't cool, but at least for now, they are sometimes the best way to solve a design problem.
The flexbox approach!
In supported browsers, you can use the following:
Example Here
.parent {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
margin-top: auto;
}
.parent {
height: 100px;
border: 5px solid #000;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background: #f00;
margin-top: auto;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">Align to the bottom</div>
</div>
The solution above is probably more flexible, however, here is an alternative solution:
Example Here
.parent {
display: flex;
}
.child {
align-self: flex-end;
}
.parent {
height: 100px;
border: 5px solid #000;
display: flex;
}
.child {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background: #f00;
align-self: flex-end;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">Align to the bottom</div>
</div>
As a side note, you may want to add vendor prefixes for additional support.
Yes you can do this without absolute positioning and without using tables (which screw with markup and such).
DEMO
This is tested to work on IE>7, chrome, FF & is a really easy thing to add to your existing layout.
<div id="container">
Some content you don't want affected by the "bottom floating" div
<div>supports not just text</div>
<div class="foot">
Some other content you want kept to the bottom
<div>this is in a div</div>
</div>
</div>
#container {
height:100%;
border-collapse:collapse;
display : table;
}
.foot {
display : table-row;
vertical-align : bottom;
height : 1px;
}
It effectively does what float:bottom would, even accounting for the issue pointed out in #Rick Reilly's answer!
Pure CSS, without absolute positioning, without fixing any height, cross-browser (IE9+)
check out that Working Fiddle
Because normal flow is 'top-to-bottom' we can't simply ask the #copyright div to stick to the bottom of his parent without absolutely positioning of some sort, But if we wanted the #copyright div to stick to the top of his parent, it will be very simple - because this is the normal flow way.
So we will use this in our advantage.
we will change the order of the divs in the HTML, now the #copyright div is at the top, and the content follow it right away.
we also make the content div stretch all the way (using pseudo elements and clearing techniques)
now it's just a matter of inverting that order back in the view. that can be easily done with CSS transform.
We rotate the container by 180deg, and now: up-is-down. (and we inverse back the content to look normal again)
If we want to have a scroolbar within the content area, we need to apply a little bit more of CSS magic. as can be showed Here [in that example, the content is below a header - but its the same idea]
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body,
#Container {
height: 100%;
color: white;
}
#Container:before {
content: '';
height: 100%;
float: left;
}
#Copyright {
background-color: green;
}
#Stretch {
background-color: blue;
}
#Stretch:after {
content: '';
display: block;
clear: both;
}
#Container,
#Container>div {
-moz-transform: rotateX(180deg);
-ms-transform: rotateX(180deg);
-o-transform: rotate(180deg);
-webkit-transform: rotateX(180deg);
transform: rotateX(180deg);
}
<div id="Container">
<div id="Copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
<div id="Stretch">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div>Element 1</div>
<div>Element 2</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS Grid
Since the usage of CSS Grid is increasing, I would like to suggest align-self to the element that is inside a grid container.
align-self can contain any of the values: end, self-end, flex-end for the following example.
#parent {
display: grid;
}
#child1 {
align-self: end;
}
/* Extra Styling for Snippet */
#parent {
height: 150px;
background: #5548B0;
color: #fff;
padding: 10px;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
#child1 {
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
background: #6A67CE;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
line-height: 50px;
}
<div id="parent">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="child1">
1
</div>
</div>
Create another container div for the elements above #copyright. Just above copyright add a new div:
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
It will force the footer to be under everything else, just like in the case of using relative positioning (bottom:0px;).
Try this;
<div id="container">
<div style="height: 100%; border:1px solid #ff0000;">
<!-- Other elements here -->
</div>
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="position:relative;border:1px solid #00ff00;top:-25px">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
While none of the answers provided here seemed to apply or work in my particular case, I came across this article which provides this neat solution :
#container {
display: table;
}
#copyright {
display: table-footer-group;
}
I find it very useful for applying responsive design for mobile display without having to reorder all the html code of a website, setting body itself as a table.
Note that only the first table-footer-group or table-header-group will be rendered as such : if there are more than one, the others will be rendered as table-row-group.
You can indeed align the box to the bottom without using position:absolute if you know the height of the #container using the text alignment feature of inline-block elements.
Here you can see it in action.
This is the code:
#container {
/* So the #container most have a fixed height */
height: 300px;
line-height: 300px;
background:Red;
}
#container > * {
/* Restore Line height to Normal */
line-height: 1.2em;
}
#copyright {
display:inline-block;
vertical-align:bottom;
width:100%; /* Let it be a block */
background:green;
}
Using the translateY and top property
Just set element child to position: relative and than move it top: 100% (that's the 100% height of the parent) and stick to bottom of parent by transform: translateY(-100%) (that's -100% of the height of the child).
BenefitS
you do not take the element from the page flow
it is dynamic
But still just workaround :(
.copyright{
position: relative;
top: 100%;
transform: translateY(-100%);
}
Don't forget prefixes for the older browser.
CodePen link here.
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.overlay {
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.container {
width: 900px;
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 50px;
}
.height {
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
}
.footer {
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="overlay">
<div class="container">
<div class="height">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
footer
</div>
</div>
If you want it to "stick" to the bottom, regardless of the height of container, then absolute positioning is the way to go. Of course, if the copyright element is the last in the container it'll always be at the bottom anyway.
Can you expand on your question? Explain exactly what you're trying to do (and why you don't want to use absolute positioning)?
If you do not know the height of child block:
#parent {
background:green;
width:200px;
height:200px;
display:table-cell;
vertical-align:bottom;
}
.child {
background:red;
vertical-align:bottom;
}
<div id="parent">
<div class="child">child
</div>
</div>
http://jsbin.com/ULUXIFon/3/edit
If you know the height of the child block add the child block then add padding-top/margin-top:
#parent {
background:green;
width:200px;
height:130px;
padding-top:70px;
}
.child {
background:red;
vertical-align:
bottom;
height:130px;
}
<div id="parent">
<div class="child">child
</div>
</div>
You can use grid by assigning the available space to the content at the top:
#container {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 1fr auto;
height: 10rem; /* or 100% or anything */
}
<div id="container">
This is random content.
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Also, if there's stipulations with using position:absolute; or position:relative;, you can always try padding parent div or putting a margin-top:x;. Not a very good method in most cases, but it may come in handy in some cases.
Solution for this specific scenario:
Place inner at the bottom of parent . The height of the parent is set by the height of its "tallest" sibling
The set up:
I have a row with multiple <div class="container">
These <div class="container"> are next to each other inside another <div class="supercontainer">
Each <div class="container"> has 3 inner divs on top of each other: <div class="title">, <div class="content">, <div class="footer">
The desired result:
All <div class="container"> have the same height. The height is not defined in px, it will be the height of the "tallest" among them.
<div class="title"> should be at the top of <div class="container">
<div class="content"> should be placed below <div class="title">
<div class="footer"> should be placed at the bottom of <div class="container"> without overlapping with the previous content
This is the current state: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/ExvWQww
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
__________ Solution with FLEXBOX __________
This is the outcome: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/MWvpBMz
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
margin-top: auto;
border: solid 1px fuchsia;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
__________ Solution with TABLE-ROW __________
This is the outcome: https://codepen.io/xavier-atero/pen/rNzyKJm
.supercontainer {
border: solid 1px black;
display: flex;
}
.container, .other-container {
position: relative;
border: solid 1px red;
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
border-collapse:collapse;
display : table;
}
.title {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px blue;
}
.content {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px cyan;
}
.footer {
margin: 10px;
background: lime;
border: solid 1px fuchsia;
display: table-row;
vertical-align: bottom;
height: 1px;
}
<body>
<div class="supercontainer">
<div class="container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
<div class="other-container">
<div class="title">
This part represents the title and it is placed on top.
</div>
<div class="content">
This one represents the body and it is placed below the title. This one is longer than the first one to stretch the parent div. Since it is longer, the footers of the two containers are not alinged.
</div>
<div class="footer">
And this one is the footer. It should always be at the bottom of the container
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
#container{width:100%; float:left; position:relative;}
#copyright{position:absolute; bottom:0px; left:0px; background:#F00; width:100%;}
#container{background:gray; height:100px;}
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
</div>
Don't wanna use "position:absolute" for sticky footer at bottom. Then you can do this way:
html,
body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
/* Equal to height of footer */
/* But also accounting for potential margin-bottom of last child */
margin-bottom: -50px;
}
.footer{
background: #000;
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
}
.footer,
.push {
height: 50px;
}
<html>
<body>
<!--HTML Code-->
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content">content</div>
<div class="push"></div>
</div>
<footer class="footer">test</footer>
</body>
</html>
Here is an approach targeted at making an element with a known height and width (at least approximately) float to the right and stay at the bottom, while behaving as an inline element to the other elements. It is focused at the bottom-right because you can place it easily in any other corner through other methods.
I needed to make a navigation bar which would have the actual links at the bottom right, and random sibling elements, while ensuring that the bar itself stretched properly, without disrupting the layout. I used a "shadow" element to occupy the navigation bar's links' space and added it at the end of the container's child nodes.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
<span id="copyright-s">filler</span>
</div>
<style>
#copyright {
display:inline-block;
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
right:0;
}
#copyright-s {
float:right;
visibility:hidden;
width:20em; /* ~ #copyright.style.width */
height:3em; /* ~ #copyright.style.height */
}
</style>
Maybe this helps someone: You can always place the div outside the other div and then push it upwards using negative margin:
<div id="container" style="background-color: #ccc; padding-bottom: 30px;">
Hello!
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="margin-top: -20px;">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
Just because this hasn't been mentioned at all, what usually works well in situations like yours:
Placing the copyright-div after the container-div
You would only have to format the copyright-div in a similar way to the other container (same overall width, centering, etc.), and all is fine.
CSS:
#container, #copyright {
width: 1000px;
margin:0 auto;
}
HTML:
<div id="container">
<!-- Other elements here -->
</div>
<div id="copyright">
Copyright Foo web designs
</div>
The only time this might not be ideal is when your container-div is declared with height:100%, and the user would need to scroll down to see the copyright. But even still you could work around (e.g. margin-top:-20px - when the height of your copyright element is 20px).
No absolute positioning
No table layout
No crazy css, that looks different in every other browser (well IE at least, you know)
Simple and clear formatting
Aside: I know the OP asked for a solution that "... sticks to the bottom of the 'container' div ...", and not something under it, but come on, people are looking for good solutions here, and this is one!
There is nothing called float:bottom in CSS. The best way is using positioning in such cases:
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
For those only have one child in the container, you can use the table-cell and vertical-align approach which worked reliably for positioning a single div at the bottom of its parent.
Note that using table-footer-group as other answers mentioned will break the height calculation of parent table.
#container {
display: table;
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
}
#item {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="item">Single bottom item</div>
</div>
According: w3schools.com
An element with position: absolute; is positioned relative to the
nearest positioned ancestor (instead of positioned relative to the
viewport, like fixed).
So you need to position the parent element with something either relative or absolute, etc and position the desired element to absolute and latter set bottom to 0.

CSS Transform - Image Rotate overlapping other divs

I am rotating an image using a CSS transform like this...
https://jsfiddle.net/7ed1aqrt/
.content1{background:teal;}
.imagecontainer{text-align:center;background:wheat;width:100%;}
img{transform: rotate(90deg);}
.content2{background:pink;}
<div class ="content1">Content 1</div>
<div class ="imagecontainer">
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/300x200/000/fff">
</div>
<div class ="content2">Content 2</div>
But the rotated image is breaking out of it's container and overlapping the divs above and below it.
Is there a way to stop this from happening?
Just try adding overflow: hidden; to your image container. When rotating an image that has different widths/height then you will need to offset it with a margin. See the updated answer below:
Updated answer
.content1 {
background: teal;
}
.imagecontainer {
text-align: center;
background: wheat;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden; /* Prevent overflowing of nested elements */
}
img {
display: block;
transform: rotate(90deg);
margin: 50px auto; /* account for 100px width/height difference */
}
.content2 {
background: pink;
}
<div class="content1">Content 1</div>
<div class="imagecontainer">
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/300x200/000/fff">
</div>
<div class="content2">Content 2</div>
I had the same issue, I just added padding to the image and it stopped overlapping. Try adding this code to the .image-container class
.image-container{
padding : 20px;
}
I don't think it's the perfect solution, but it helps.

Unable to create layout when position:fixed is used

I'm planning to create a layout where one of the DIV is fixed using Bootstrap. However, the DIV is creating an undesirable effect.
JSFIDDLE: http://jsfiddle.net/cstoq3ec/
Here's the HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-6">
<div class="simple">
This is just a plain block
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-6">
<div class="simple">
This is just a plain block
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-6">
<div class="fixed">
hey
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-6">
<p class="scroll">
This is the scrollable section.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.fixed {
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
background-color: red;
color: #fff;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.scroll {
height: 1000px;
background-color: grey;
color: #fff;
}
.simple {
background-color: grey;
color: #fff;
margin: 15px 0;
}
Notice how the red color DIV is extended all the way to the right side! I want it to stay within its DIV. How should I proceed?
You can't. that's why you have position:absolute.
Once you use position:fixed on an element you get it completely out of the HTML flow so it does not matter what their parents are and their size. You used width:100%so it's 100% of window width.
Is you wonder why, then, it is affected by parent padding (left and top margin), it is because you haven't set any "left, top, bottom or right value" and modern browsers automatically set the values based on the parent. use your own value to check as you can see here: FIDDLE
.fixed {
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
background-color: red;
color: #fff;
box-sizing: border-box;
top:0;
left:0;
}
which, btw, in my opinion you should never rely on as You may have unexpected problems in some browsers. Once you use absolute or fixed position is highly recomend to set at least "top and left values".
If You need the fixed element same width as Your parent I would use javascript / Jquery so you calculate the width of the parent and then use the value to your fixed element.

Adding image between two row divs without affecting the the divs

I can't figure out a consistent way to add a small image between rows
Let's say I have this html
<div class="row">
...
</div>
<div class="row">
...
</div>
Now I need to display a small image between them but without affecting the rows.
There is a brown row and a black row, and the image with stars between them. How can I do this in a consistent way?
I tried adding a div with the image to the end of the row div like that
<div class="row">
...
<div class="div-with-image" style="position:absolute; bottom: -10px;">
<img src="...">
</div>
</div>
This kind of works but not in a consistent way. I tried adding the div.div-with-image inside the columns div, but that's not good either as sometimes the row is with a fixed size and that messes it up.
Does anyone have any good ideas? I know like 2 ways how to do it, but none of them are consistent and not very well reusable.
EDIT:
I think I have an idea.
<div class="row outer">
<div class="cols">
<div class="row">
<div class="cols star-row">
...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<style>
.outer{
background-image: url('somethingnice.png');
}
.star-row{
background-image: url('star-row.png');
background-position: 50% 101%;
}
</style>
I'll try this and let you know how this works.
This is not between so much as over the top of. Basically it uses a pseudo element (:after) and creates an overlay of the image of stars that is matched to the space available. It keeps the HTML minimal and the CSS does all the heavy lifting so you can easily change or tweak for different screen sizes.
HTML:
<div class="row columns small-12 brown"></div>
<div class="row columns small-12 black"></div>
CSS:
.black {
background-color: black;
z-index:-1; /* make behind .brown:after */
}
.brown {
background-color: brown;
}
.black,
.brown {
height: 20px; /* half height of image */
}
.brown:after {
content: '';
width: 100%;
display: block;
height: 40px; /* brown + black */
background: url('star-row.png') 50% 5px fixed no-repeat; /* adjust to match your image dimensions */
z-index: 2;
}
JSFiddle example
Edit - Another approach
Alternatively you could use HTML coded stars then the positioning is easier and the rows can vary in height as long as they don't go past a minimum (the height of the stars), but you have to decide on your number of stars. Media Queries can sort out how many to show for various screen sizes, or what font size to use.
CSS:
.black {
background-color: black;
position: relative;
}
.brown {
background-color: brown;
z-index: -1;
}
.black, .brown{
min-height:30px;
}
.black:before {
content: '\2605\00a0\00a0\2605\00a0\00a0\2605\00a0\00a0\2605\00a0\00a0\2605\00a0\00a0\2605\00a0\00a0\2605\00a0\00a0\2605\00a0\00a0\2605\00a0\00a0\2605';
color: #fff;
text-align: center;
font-size: 36px;
width: 100%;
display: block;
height: 60px;
position: absolute;
top: -30px;
}
(Your) HTML:
<div class="row brown">
<div class="large-12 columns">
<p>[content]</p>
<p>[more content]</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row black">
<div class="large-12 columns">
<p>[content]</p>
<p>[etc]</p>
</div>
</div>
(where \2605 is a star and \00a0 is a non-breaking space)
Updated JSFiddle

why is min-height not increasing to accommodate increasing content

I thought setting the min-height property will expand if necessary to accommodate its contents, but I was shocked to realized that it is not displaying the content at all, especially when I re-size. Some contents is completely loss from display. This code below is not the exact code thought, but this is the closest to my problem I can get.
<div class="parent">
<div class="box"> Box One</div>
<div class="box"> Box two</div>
<div class="box"> Box three</div>
<div class="box"> Box four</div>
<div class="box"> Box five</div>
<div class="box"> Box six</div>
</div>
<style>
.parent {
min-height: 300px;
width: 100%;
background-color: blue;
}
.box {
width: 50%;
height: 50px;
color white;
}
</style>
The Problem: You can see the problem when the content inside the .box increase and the size of the browser is decreased to mobile version. Then you can see the real problem, that the content is getting out of the blue box.
You can see the problem here : https://jsfiddle.net/bro49tg7/3/ resize the width of the output to smaller screen.
To Solve this problem
Change your css code to this:
.box{
width: 50%;
min-height: 50px; /* changed this */
color: #fff;
}
Exactly as Hunzaboy says, you need a min-height on each box for this to work. Take a look at this fiddle:
https://jsfiddle.net/6zpek8m6/
.parent {
min-height: 300px;
}
.box {
min-height: 50px;
}