When I creating a map in Zabbix, I can't track the total traffic between two hosts. I have a signature:
Arista2→Raidix2
↓{10.253.0.19:ifHCInOctets.["19"].last(0)} + {10.253.0.19:ifHCInOctets.["20"].last(0)}
{10.253.0.19:ifHCOutOctets.["19"].last(0)} + {10.253.0.19:ifHCOutOctets.["20"].last(0)}↑
Where is the plus sign I need to add these two traffic into one. I looked at the documentation and didn't find anything. I need your help guys.
enter image description here
Related
I have two variables:
Start
Destinations
I want to enter start and destination in the applicable fields on this site
https://www.google.nl/maps/dir///#53.0845956,6.814237,13z/data=!4m2!4m1!3e0
So that the distance between the two locations is visible.
Any suggestions how to get this done?
You can use the directions action of Maps URLs:
https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/urls/guide#directions-action
For example:
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/?api=1&origin=Space+Needle+Seattle+WA&destination=Pike+Place+Market+Seattle+WA&travelmode=bicycling
maybe someone can help me with a overpass-turbo.eu-query.
I'd like to highlight (center of it) all cities of a country or region (or current map).
Is there maybe an "simple" example on web?
(Google was not a good friend with this special request, yet. But I am sure someone must tried to search this way already.)
Many thanks for every idea.
Here is an example for finding all cities, towns, villages and hamlets in the country Andorra:
[out:json][timeout:25];
// fetch area “Andorra” to search in
{{geocodeArea:Andorra}}->.searchArea;
// gather results
(
node[place~"city|town|village|hamlet"](area.searchArea);
);
// print results
out body;
>;
out skel qt;
You can view the result at overpass-turbo.eu after clicking the run button.
Note: When running this query for larger countries you might need to increase the timeout value. Also rendering the result in the browser might not be possible due to performance reasons. In this case use the export button and download the raw data instead.
I am trying figure out a way to calculate if a given address or list of addresses correspond to a valid file offset. I know to calculate an offset for a valid address uses the formula:
ByteVirutalAddress - (ImageBase + SectionRelativeVirtualAddress) + PointerToRawdata = ByteOffset
I use this formula when patching instructions using a manual hex editor method as opposed to a nice easy to use GUI like Immunity.
What I am trying to do is find out weather an address or list of addresses correspond to a file offset. For example:
Section name - Address - Size
Image base: 00400000 - 00001000
.text: 00401000 - 00003000
.rdata: 00404000 - 00001000
.data: 00405000 - 0002B000
How do I calculate if addresses 00404185 or 0042F300 relate to a valid file offset or not?
My logic for this is:
you would need to do PointerToRawData + SizeOfRawdata + IMagebase, 400000 in this case. And do this for each section.
OR
Would it be correct to add Virtual Address of the section to the SizeOfRawdata of the section. From the result you should be able to see if either of these 2 addresses correspond to a valid file offset.
From the results, see which of the 2 above addresses are referenced in the result, i.e. result = 42D100. this references 0042300 however does not reference or correspond to 00403185.
Please let me know if my logic is flawed.
I have looked around a lot and have not found an information for this kind of calculation specifically. It is only useful if checking for correct alignment or possible corruption. I know that there are tools out there to do it for you but I like to know how to do things manually rather than rely on a script or tool. It helps when things go wrong with tools and scripts.
just so this can be answered. I have figured out the correct logic for figuring this one out.
It would be correct to use the second option, + < Section SizeOfRawdata> = Maximum possible RVA range for that section. This should give you the maximum possible relative virtual address of that section and then from this, you can see if the address either falls within this value or not.
Trying to get the state from maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/xml is not working for me because not all results are in the same order
The problem is not all locations are the same, I'm using coordinates as the parameter in the urls, most are address_component[5], but the others put the state any and ever where else. The only thing that seems consistant is the formatted address.
See these 2 examples, the states are in different order
for one $xml->result->address_component[5]->short_name is the state
for the other $xml->result->address_component[4]->short_name is the state
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/xml?latlng=38.7811981,-75.6823615&sensor=false
http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/xml?latlng=36.370791599999996,%20-76.75601170000002&sensor=false
There has to be a simple answer! Thanks
I'm getting really frustrated with Google geo results and hope someone can advise me the best was to go.
I have created a AutoSuggest feature where you can start typing the address and Google will respond with suggestions. User then selects and address to move on.
But before I want them to continue on the next page I want to validate their selection. I would have thought this will be easy as we are only checking against what Google has already given. But when I do my validation lookup it displays no results.
Some example code:
Lets say I picked from the suggestion this address: Suffield, CT 06078, USA
Then on validation I do a second lookup with this address ie.
$string = "Suffield, CT 06078, USA";
echo 'http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?output=json&oe=utf8&gl=us&sensor=false&key=[MyKey]&q='.urlencode($string).'';
It gives me Error code 602 (G_GEO_UNKNOWN_ADDRESS)
How can it not be found when its given me the address?
How I can get around this?
You're right. That is quite strange.
Note that it does work when you remove the space between CT and 06078:
http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?q=Suffield,+CT06078,+USA&output=csv&sensor=false
The above returns 41.9817631,-72.6506462. (Link to Google Maps)
Reverse geocoding those coordinates with:
http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?q=41.9817631,-72.6506462&output=csv&sensor=false
returns:
200,4,"Suffield, CT, USA"
It's really strange, to be sure, but I was able to validate the address using the full state name.
Doesn't work:
http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?output=json&oe=utf8&gl=us&sensor=false&key=[MyKey]&q=Suffield,%20CT%2006078
Does Work:
http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?output=json&oe=utf8&gl=us&sensor=false&key=[MyKey]&q=Suffield,%20Connecticut%2006078
And yes, the address they provided to you doesn't work in their own system. That being said, searching for Hartford, CT DOES work. It appears there may be a listing discrepency in their data whereby Suffield + CT returns false results.