The issue I'm having is a bit different than that I've found thus far the goal is to make an HTML page in which each background img div will be one page, thus when printing it will be clean.
Here is what the code looks like.
.thirdBackgroundPage {
background-image: url("images/firstBackgroundPage.jpeg");
height: 100%;
background-position: center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
}
.icobp {
height: 75%;
width: auto;
display: block;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="thirdBackgroundPage">
<img class="icobp" src="images/imageCenterOfBackgroundPage.jpeg" />
</div>
With this said, there are other <, div class, so the first image is on the third page for example, where right now with this, it brings the image in the center top, however, I need it dead center or bottom.
I've tested a few things, but to no avail. Tried setting it up within a table, but this does not work either. Any help is welcome.
You already had other suggestions to better center your div inside the container, anyway that's mine. In the snippet below I just added a css rule that will add some style attribute to the container so that its content will be correctly centered both vertically and horizontally via display:flex;
Since you talk about printing html pages, I want to warn you that html/css are still not suitable for that since there are no tools to address publishing details like page number or page size. You can control the content size but it will never be accurate and I could experience myself that i will become inaccurate starting from page 30 maybe..I can't remember in details.
Anyway I considered that div .thirdBackgroundPage as filling an A4 page so I gave it those size in mm. Let me know if I got it wrong.
.thirdBackgroundPage {
background-image: url("images/firstBackgroundPage.jpeg");
/*height: 100%;*/
background-position: center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
display: flex;
}
/*Style attributes I added to the list container*/
.thirdBackgroundPage {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
border: solid 1px black;
width: 210mm;
height: 297mm;
}
.icobp {
/*height: 75%;*/
/*Needed to change this to give the pic a size despite the url fake*/
height: 100px;
width: auto;
display: block;
margin: auto;
}
<div class="thirdBackgroundPage">
<img class="icobp" src="images/imageCenterOfBackgroundPage.jpeg" />
</div>
To manipulate the printing you have to use #media print so you can control which one you just want to print. If you needed to center a spcific element you have to use this code #media print as well.And display:none for the other one you dont want to be printed. sometimes you have to use display:block o display:inline-block to get it to work as well. Hope this will help your issue.
#page {
size: A4;
margin: 0;
}
#media print {
html, body {
width: 210mm;
height: 297mm;
}
.thirdBackgroundPage{
vertical-align:middle;
align-items:center;
page-break-before:avoid;
page-break-after:avoid;
page-break-inside:avoid;}
}
<div class="thirdBackgroundPage">
<img class="icobp" src="images/imageCenterOfBackgroundPage.jpeg"/>
</div>
Related
I put three photos inside a container but since I want there to be space between them, I couldn't leave the original size because they would take up the whole container without leaving the space I want.
To make them smaller I modified the height to 80%.
It worked but since I need to add the shadow to the box, I need it to match the edges of the image.
As you can see from the purple, the box is larger than the actual image. I would like to know how to get a box as big as the actual image, so without the purple section.
I added the background color only to the first pic, but the problem can be extended for all the three pics.
I post the code below.
.background {
height: 100vh;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.background * {
width: 100%;
height: 80%;
background-size: contain;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center;
}
<div class="background">
<div class="firstphoto"></div>
<div class="secondphoto"></div>
<div class="thirdphoto"></div>
</div>
Thanks all! ;)
You can take a look at object-fit property: https://www.w3schools.com/css/css3_object-fit.asp
Also, you should put:
.background > * {
flex: 1/3;
}
So that the boxes are taking the same space.
you should add this to each div that contains an image (if they have the same class)
The div would then be positoinned relatively to the image and you could then edit the box-shadow with the box-shadow property
.col{
position:relative;
top:0px;
left:0px;
width:100%;
height:100%;
margin-right:3.33%;
box-shadow: 10px 10px 10px 10px red;
}
Not sure why you're having the images as background images, but I would just use object-fit. Do note, I replaced the divs with image tags.
.background {
height: 100vh;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.background img {
width: 100%;
height: 80%;
padding: 1rem;
box-sizing: border-box;
object-fit: contain;
}
<div class="background">
<img src="https://picsum.photos/200/300" alt="200x300" title="200x300"/>
<img src="https://picsum.photos/50/150" alt="50x150" title="50x150"/>
<img src="https://picsum.photos/30/150" alt="30x150" title="30x150"/>
</div>
Desired Outcome:
Further Details:
Right now I am setting the Div height based on estimates (ie. 10% for search bar, 60% for middle and 30% for bottom) and set the thumbnail size to fit well on my Samsung Phone. The problem is that on different phones, the width is different and Div3 ends up with large borders. To complicate matters, Div2 can scroll up/down (minor problem) but Div3 can scroll left/right (moderate problem).
All thumbnail images are guaranteed to be 16:9 (I believe) as they are obtained from here https://img.youtube.com/vi/NJ2YyejQjpw/maxresdefault.jpg
I'm having conceptual issues trying to size a div (Div3) based on the height generated when an image is stretched the (more or less) the screen width)
Question:
How can I get the three below divs, while allowing for (1) vertical scrolling in Div2 and (2) horizontal scrolling in Div3
Code:
JSFiddle code. Try on iPhone X, it looks weird
Important sections:
#search_bar {
width: 100%;
height: 10%;
border: 0px;
float: right;
padding:0px;
position: relative;
background-color:red;
}
#search_results {
width: 100%;
height: 58%;
padding:4px;
float: right;
overflow:auto;
background-color:green;
}
#playlist_reel {
width: 100%;
height: 32%;
padding:4px;
clear: both;
overflow-x: auto;
white-space: nowrap;
background-color:blue;
}
I went off the diagrams you included and tried to replicate a simple version of it.
Use flexbox for column layout
Have #search_results take up as much space as possible
Have #search_barand #playlist_reel take up only the space they occupy (totally adjustable)
Use a background-image for #search_results so the element is always covered.
Use a static img in .bottom so that it takes up actual DOM space
As for scrolling, the requirement feels a little broad at the time I am posting this. Maybe this demo will get you close enough to experiment with scrolling on your own.
Note: This demo is more easily viewed in either "full page" mode (here in SO) or in the jsFiddle.
html, body { margin: 0; }
.container {
min-height: 100vh;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
width: 380px;
max-width: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#search_bar [type=search] {
width: 100%;
padding: 1em;
font-size: 1.25rem;
}
#search_results {
flex-grow: 1;
background-image: url('http://placekitten.com/400/500');
background-size: cover;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
<div class="container">
<div id="search_bar">
<input placeholder="Search" type="search">
</div>
<div id="search_results"></div>
<div id="playlist_reel">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/400/50" alt="">
</div>
</div>
jsFiddle
UPDATE:
I don't know why I was downvoted, if someone could tell me what I did wrong it would be cool, If you are sure about your answer I could accept a No or yes as answer and a simple idea of how to do it.
.gallery {
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
text-align: center;
}
.gallery img {
min-width: 33%;
max-width: 33%;
min-height: 120px;
max-height: 120px;
}
<div class="gallery">
<!--Images users provide examples:-->
<img src="https://unsplash.it/200">
<img src="https://unsplash.it/200/100">
<img src="https://unsplash.it/100/300">
<!--etc...-->
</div>
That's ok but I noticed that some images look ugly because they are horizontal images or vertical and I'm giving them a squared shape (I don't like how they look when I give them width/height auto because they all together look disordered and bad).
What I recently did was In another part of the web was to do something like:
.image-cool {
min-width: 230px;
max-width: 230px;
min-height: 280px;
max-height: 280px;
/*Has a rectangle shape*/
background: #eee;
}
.image-cool img {
max-width: 230px;
max-height: 230px;
}
<div class="image-cool">
<img src="https://unsplash.it/200">
</div>
That last code works in the next way:
If you put multiple divs with images inside all will be aligned in the screen and the images will adjust its width and height limited by their container and images don't look bad anymore.
The question here is if I could achieve the same result of the second code in the first code using CSS and without adding more HTML like a div or container.
Why would I not want another div?
Because the current HTML of the first part is essential in that way for some long scripts, Yeah I could modify it all but It will take time and I'm just asking to see if I can save some time.
Thanks a lot for your time! :)
Instead of using img tag, you can use background-image and background-size: cover on a div therefore any image size can fit into the element.
.gallery {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
flex-wrap: wrap;
text-align: center;
}
.gallery-image {
width: 33%;
height: 120px;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center center;
background-size: cover;
}
<div class="gallery">
<div class="gallery-image" style="background-image:url(https://unsplash.it/100/300)"></div>
<div class="gallery-image" style="background-image:url(https://unsplash.it/200/100)"></div>
<div class="gallery-image" style="background-image:url(https://unsplash.it/200)"></div>
</div>
I am practising with making a webpage responsive for mobile screen resolutions. I succeeded with the width. How do I manage this with height? My wrappers continues to stay on top instead of vertical align.
I've seen a lot of questions about this problem, but couldn't find a solution specified on my css yet. Hope someone can help me out.
HTML
<body>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="header">
</div>
<div class="content">
<div id="topleftbox"></div>
<div id="toprightbox"></div>
<div id="bottomleftbox"></div>
<div id="bottomrightbox"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
body {
}
.wrapper {
margin: 0 auto;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.header {
min-width: 50%;
height: 20px;
}
.content {
min-width: 500px;
width: 40%;
height: auto;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#topleftbox {
background: url(..);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 229px;
height: 228px;
float: left;
}
#toprightbox {
background: url(...);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 229px;
height: 228px;
float: right;
}
etc.
To use display:table-cell; you need to simulate the full table structure. Luckily you won't have to add any extra markup since you can style against the html and body tags:
html{display:table;width:100%;height:100%;}
body{display:table-row;}
.wrapper{
display:table-cell;
vertical-align:middle;
text-align:center;
}
Note: this vertically centers .wrapper's content, not the div itself.
You could use display:table to render your DIVs like tables and table cells.
More here: http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html
Unlike with centering horizontally there never has been a CSS way to center vertically. The only way is to use javascript to grab the "window.innerHeight" then add the height of the HTML element (wrapper) to it and divide the total in half. And set that as the new top position.
Also your "wrapper" has a height of 100% this should mean it fills the entire screen height. It will not center if it is the same height as the screen. Also it has a width of 100%, I doubt the "margin: 0 auto" is doing anything.
Vertical align within CSS has a few options:
1. Via table-cell. (This does work in IE8+)
{
display:table-cell;
vertical-align:middle;
}
2. line-height = height of element (If you have more than one line of text this will look funky I imagine)
{
height:10em;
line-height:10em;
}
There are more options you can find, but I believe display: table should be your best bet nowadays.
http://www.zann-marketing.com/.../vertically-centering-text-using-css.html
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2939914/
In a nutshell
I need a CSS solution for the following requirements:
Two vertically repeated background images, one aligned to the left, one aligned to the right
One centered column on top with fixed width and a minimum height of 100%
Cross browser compatibility
A little more details
Today a new requirement for my current web site project came up: A background image with gradients on the left and right side (replaces the current body background image). The challenge is now to specify two different background images while keeping the rest of the layout spec. Unfortunately the (simple) layout somehow doesn't go with the two backgrounds.
My layout is basically one centered column with fixed width:
#main_container {
background-color: white;
margin: 0 auto;
min-height: 100%;
width: 800px;
}
Furthermore it's necessary to stretch the column to a minimum height of 100%, since there are quite some pages with only little content. The following CSS styles take care of that:
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
background-image: url('old-background.png');
margin: 0;
height: 100%;
padding: 0;
}
So far so good - until the new body background image with gradients arrived. I tried the following solutions
Two absolute positioned divs behind the main container
One image defined with the body, one with the html CSS class
One image defined with the body, the other one with a large div begind the main container
With either one of them, the dynamic height solution was ruined. Either the main container didn't stretch to 100% when it was too small, or the background remained at 100% when the content was actually longer
Modified:
<body>
<div class="container"><div>
<div id="main_content"></div>
</body>
With css:
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
background: url(left.png) repeat-y top left;
background-attachment:fixed;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
div.container {
background: url(right.png) repeat-y top right;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position:fixed; /* This won't work in all browsers. May need a JS solution for IE6 */
}
#main_content {
height: 100%;
width: 800px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: white;
}
Edit:
This version works for browsers that support position:fixed (not ie6).
Example page: http://jsbin.com/ebozi3/4/edit
Using a "layout table", my issue can be solved. A pure CSS solution, however, would be preferred!
Here's a working table-based solution:
table.layout {
border-collapse: collapse;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 100%;
}
table.layout td {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
vertical-align: top;
}
td.layout_left {
background-image: url('background-left.png');
background-position: top left;
background-repeat: repeat-y;
}
td.layout_center {
background-color: white;
width: 800px;
}
td.layout_right {
background-image: url('background-right.png');
background-position: top right;
background-repeat: repeat-y;
}
And the HTML code:
<table class="layout">
<tr>
<td class="layout_left"> </td>
<td class="layout_center">
<!-- content -->
</td>
<td class="layout_right"> </td>
</tr>
</table>
[revamp]
I'm silly. Very.
Problem: body needs to have bg images, #main_container needs to have 800 width and in the center.
(Lousy approach: I was doing #main_container with bg images, not centered, 800px.)
New approach: I suggest a div inside body and a span inside that new div:
<body>
<div>
<span>
<div id="main_container">
Regular contents.
</div>
</span>
</div>
</body>
Then:
body {
background: url(img/bg_left.gif) repeat-y top left;
}
body>div {
background: url(img/bg_right.gif) repeat-y top right;
}
body>div: {
text-align: center;
}
body>div>span {
display: inline-block;
/* IE only likes this rule on elements that are inline by nature, thus the use of span.
I'm not sure 100% height will work on #main_container. */
}
And your regular rules:
#main_container {
background-color: white;
margin: 0 auto;
min-height: 100%;
width: 800px;
}