I need to call a contract function from Etherscan that takes a 2d array as an argument, namely: foo (address[][]).
I have tried every thinkable way to call the function with no success. Etherscan displays error
expected array value (arg="foo", coderType="array", value="0xabscde1234567887654321abcde")
What is the correct way to call the function?
This works with Remix, but not etherscan. No quotes necessary. Should work for addresses too.
[[1,2],[6,9],[2323,10]]
Try this statement to pass into a function an address multidimensional array:
[["ADDRESS_1","ADDRESS_2"]]
If you want to pass more address in a second index of matrix you can use this statement:
[["ADDRESS_1","ADDRESS_2"],["ADDRESS_1", "ADDRESS_2"]]
Related
Is there a way in a where clause in Rust to check if a function passed as a parameter takes specified arguments?
If you're defining a function that takes a function argument, that argument has a very specific type associated with it that dictates the arguments. You cannot call that function with something that doesn't match, it just won't compile.
If you're thinking in terms of dynamic languages where the arguments are somewhat subjective, you're assuming you can make a mistake here and call it incorrectly. You can't. It's strictly disallowed.
My use case is this: a function called 'time' that will return how long it takes to run any function you give it.
So the time function needs to know all the parameters to pass into the function when it calls it.
I know how to pass a function into another function, but how can I pass all its parameters, without knowing in advance how many and what type they are, so they can be used when calling the function?
For example, if I pass in an array of all the parameters I need to send, is there some Dart way to call a function by expanding an array into a list of parameters? Or perhaps there's another way to capture and pass a function call, including all parameters, as one executable object?
I'm also interested in knowing if there's a more Dartful way to accomplish what I'm trying to do re: timing function calls.
I believe using a List of parameters with the apply method is the most common way and practical of doing this and I have seen something similar used to pass parameters for JS interop. As far as I know, there isn't a way to expand an array into a list of parameters like you can for javascript. You could of course create your own object to pass arguments, but I think it would add unnecessary complexity and end up being more difficult.
Example of passing parameters to function in dart:js here.
I am trying to simplify some binding to C but I am not sure if this is even possible, what I am trying to do is pass an array and expect to receive in a function so an object can be constructed by the type specified in the parameter or by ccall calling the correct convert function and initialize a struct object.
Previous code, the bindings are full of Vector3(v...) and Color(c...), is there a way to avoid this be automatic handling?
drawline(startPos, endPos, color) = ccall((:DrawLine3D, "my_lib"), Cvoid, (Vector3,Vector3,Color), Vector3(startPos...), Vector3(endPos...), Color(color...))
drawpoint([10,10,10],[100,100,100],[155,155,155,255]) # call example
Is it possible to reduce the code with something like this?:
struct Vector3
x::Cfloat
y::Cfloat
z::Cfloat
Vector3((x,y,z))=new(x,y,z)
end
#first attempt
#trying to call the Vector3 constructor without calling explicitly
drawpoint(startpos::Vector3,endpos::Vector3,color::Color) = ccall((:DrawPoint3D, "my_lib"), Cvoid, (Vector3,Vector3,Color), startpos,endpos,color)
#second attempt (should be the simplest way to go)
#trying to receive arrays so ccall can convert from list or tuple to Struct object
drawpoint(startpos,endpos,color) = ccall((:DrawPoint3D, "my_lib"), Cvoid, (Vector3,Vector3,Color), startpos,endpos,color)
Is something like this even possible in Julia?
You just need to define the appropriate conversion. ccall will call this for you. I think this should do it:
Base.convert(::Type{Vector3}, x::AbstractVector) = Vector3(x)
You'll probably want to add some length checks and such, and I'd probably recommend using tuples or StaticArrays instead of Vectors for efficiency's sake.
I came across this Solidity code:
tx.destination.call.value(tx.value)(tx.data)
but don't understand how it works... especially the tx.data at the end.
This statement is calling a function represented by tx.data on the address at tx.destination passing in wei (tx.value).
To break it down further:
tx.destination is an address. An address has built in members and functions, including call which allows you to execute functions on a contract without the ABI (see Address type definition). For example, you can call a method foobar on a contract without a defined interface like this:
contractAddress.call(bytes4(keccak256("foobar(uint256,uint256)")), val1, val2); // where val1 and val2 are the uint256 parameters to pass in
Using call alone will use some default values when calling the other contract's method. For example, all of the remaining gas will be forwarded. If you want to change those values, you can adjust it by supplying your own gas and/or wei values, which looks like a function call itself:
contractAddress.call.value(9999999)();
This will send 9999999 wei to contractAddress. You can override both the gas and ether sent by chaining multiple function calls:
contractAddress.call.value(99999999).gas(77777)();
The last set of parens in both examples indicate to use the fallback function when sending the wei. You can see a similar example in the Solidity docs FAQ.
If you wanted to call something other than the fallback function, you would combine the 2 examples above, which is what the code you posted is doing. The fact that they are using tx is a bit confusing since that is normally a built-in reference, but they are likely shadowing that and it's referencing a struct with destination, value, and data members.
True or False: When a function is called, the calling program suspends until
the function completes.
True or False: When you call a function with a list as a parameter, you could
change the original calling program’s list from within the function
True or False: When you call a function with a dictionary as a parameter, you could change the original calling program’s dictionary from within the
function.
Im very fuzzy on these questions and what they mean, could someone help explain these?
1.True
the original program will stop and going to run the function. It will back to the place where it stop and start to execute the next line command after function done.
2.False
call by value. it wont change the original variable's value.
3.True
call by pointer or call by reference.
Sometime yes and sometimes no. It depends whether you are calling it synchronously or asynchronously, see this answer for the distinction: Asynchronous vs synchronous execution, what does it really mean?
In most cases yes, because you are just passing by reference, i.e you are passing the location in memory of the param you are passing. However, you can also pass by value, i.e passing a copy of the object. See this question for more detail: What's the difference between passing by reference vs. passing by value?
same answer as your previous question. Whether you are passing an integer, string, array, list, dictionary, it doesn't matter, it all depends on whether you are passing by reference or by value. Which one of these happens by default depends on which programming language you use. You can determine which one is happening pretty easily with some experimentation: Define a function with a dictionary variable, add a key/value pair call another function with the dict as a param, and modify it in the called function, then print it out in the calling function once the called function has returned. If it has been modified, you know you are passing by reference. If it has the original key/value you set in the caller and is not modified, you know you are passing by value.