I have fetched data to phonepe api "https://api-preprod.phonepe.com/apis/merchant-simulator/pg/v1/pay" the base 64 payload as request in body and Sha256 x-verify as x-verify in headers. When i fetch data on phonepe website postman it works and i get a transaction initiated response but It doesn't work on either localhost or on official website "wearmiho.com".
Shows error
""Access to fetch at 'https://api-preprod.phonepe.com/apis/merchant-simulator/pg/v1/pay' from origin 'https://www.wearmiho.com' has been blocked by CORS policy: Response to preflight request doesn't pass access control check: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource. If an opaque response serves your needs, set the request's mode to 'no-cors' to fetch the resource with CORS disabled.""
I have tried to add mode: "no-cors" to headers but it still didn't worked shows error failed
Possible reasons
1.) Maybe it needs to have the domain name pre-register on phonepe As for example firebase requires some registered domain to have access to its functionalities I have talked to the phonepe team they said for test credentials it should work on any url like localhost or live website
2.) Maybe my code got some error but its the same as on phonepe postman ref "https://developer.phonepe.com/v1/reference/pay-api#pay-request-for-web-flow"(the side postman ALso i used js)
I have already a code to retrieve the objects in the bucket using oci-java-sdk and this is working as expected. I would like to retrieve the URL of the file which was uploaded to the bucket in object storage and when I use this URL, this should redirect to the actual location without asking any credentials.
I saw preauthenticated requests but again i need to create one more request. I dont want to send one more request and want to get URL in the existing GetObjectResponse.
Any suggestions>
Thanks,
js
The URL of an object is not returned from the API but can be built using information you know (See Update Below!). The pattern is:
https://{api_endpoint}/n/{namespace_name}/b/{bucket_name}/o/{object_name}
Accessing that URL will (generally, see below) require authentication. Our authentication mechanism is described at:
https://docs.cloud.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/API/Concepts/signingrequests.htm
Authentication is NOT required if you configure the bucket as a Public Bucket.
https://docs.cloud.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Object/Tasks/managingbuckets.htm?TocPath=Services%7CObject%20Storage%7C_____2#publicbuckets
As you mentioned, Pre-authenticated Requests (PARs) are an option. They are generally used in this situation, and they work well.
https://docs.cloud.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Object/Tasks/usingpreauthenticatedrequests.htm
Strictly speaking, it is also possible to use our Amazon S3 Compatible API...
https://docs.cloud.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Object/Tasks/s3compatibleapi.htm
...and S3's presigned URLs to generate (without involving the API) a URL that will work without additional authentication.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/ShareObjectPreSignedURL.html
Update: A teammate pointed out that the OCI SDK for Java now includes a getEndpoint method that can be used to get the hostname needed when querying the Object Storage API. https://docs.cloud.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/tools/java/1.25.3/com/oracle/bmc/objectstorage/ObjectStorage.html#getEndpoint--
Integration Siebel - Google geocoding:
the URL requests sent directly from the browser:
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/xml?address=Landsdorf%20Strasse,,Gr%C3%BCnewald,01945,Deutschland&key=API_key
where API_key = particular API key provided by Google during first registration
Such request is working correctly, the response with geo codes is returned into the browser screen.
However if the same request is sent via Siebel through BS: EAI HTTP Transport
The error is displayed:
SBL-EAI-04116:HTTP Internet Exception during 'Data Send': 'An error
occurred in the secure channel support', code: '12157'.
Described solutions on official Oracle support Web for that error are related to some missing certificate on external Server , (in our case Google Server)
This is a faily generic occuring at the Wininet layer during the SSL handshake.
And action should be: Throughly check the external webserver logs wih increased SSL tracing level on webserver.
but logically it does not make a sense, why URL request directly from the browser (same network) has been successfully sent and response was received
without using any certifications or similar stuff related to SSL handshake
Can someone help with it ?
Thank you
Best regards
I have a hunch here Siebel is sending data in UTF-16 format, and end point is rejecting it. Please check your outgoing trace messages.
Environment :-
Web Service - Rest APIs.
Media Type - JSON.
JAX RS implementation - Jersey.
HTTP Methods - POST, GET, PUT & DELETE.
WSO2 API Gateway Manager - To sit on top of it to publish these APIs.
Problem :-
The delete operation has a request body(a json message) which has input values in it. When I hit the services directly - the whole operation performs successfully.
But once I go through the API Manager (using the URL that it publishes) - the request body seems to be getting dropped/ignored & hence the operation fails.
Rest all the operations are working fine & so is the OAuth too.
Can someone please help me - as to why is the the request body (a json message) is getting discarded when I go through the WSO2 API gateway manager - and what can I do to get it working, please !!
Thanks in advance.
HTTP DELETE opration isn't supposed have body. You can check here and here
Many frameworks discourage using it or warn you that the body may be dropped. The reason is that you want to DELETE some resource identified by your URI thus no body should be required.
Update
WSO2 API Manager depends on Apache HttpComponents/HttpCore library for this functionality and this issue is fixed in their 5.0 which isn't released yet.
You can find the JIRA here reported against httpCode library.
I've set up a MediaWiki server on an Azure website with the PluggableAuth and OpenID Connect extensions. The latter uses the PHP OpenID Connect Basic Client library. I am an administrator in the Azure AD domain example.com, wherein I've created an application with App ID URI, sign-on URL and reply URL all set to https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/. When I navigate to the wiki, I observe the following behavior (cookie values omitted for now):
Client Request
GET https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/ HTTP/1.1
RP Request
GET https://login.windows.net/example.com/.well-known/openid-configuration
IP Response
(some response)
RP Response
HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
Location: https://login.windows.net/{tenant_id}/oauth2/authorize?response_type=code&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.azurewebsites.net%2F&client_id={client_id}&nonce={nonce}&state={state}
Client Request
(follows redirect)
IP Response
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/?code={code}&state={state}&session_state={session_state}
Client Request
(follows redirect)
RP Request (also repeats #2 & #3)
POST https://login.windows.net/{tenant_id}/oauth2/token
grant_type=authorization_code&code={code}&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.azurewebsites.net%2F&client_id={client_id}&client_secret={client_secret}
IP Response
(As interpreted by MediaWiki; I don't have the full response logged at this time)
AADSTS50001: Resource identifier is not provided.
Note that if I change the OpenID PHP client to provide the 'resource' parameter in step 8, I get the following error response from AAD instead:
RP Request
POST https://login.windows.net/{tenant_id}/oauth2/token
grant_type=authorization_code&code={code}&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.azurewebsites.net%2F&resource=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.azurewebsites.net%2F&client_id={client_id}&client_secret={client_secret}
IP Response
AADSTS90027: The client '{client_id}' and resource 'https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/' identify the same application.
(This has come up before.)
Update
I've made some progress based on #jricher's suggestions, but after working through several more errors I've hit one that I can't figure out. Once this is all done I'll submit pull requests to the affected libraries.
Here's what I've done:
I've added a second application to the example.com Azure AD domain, with the App ID URI set to mediawiki://wiki.azurewebsites.net/, as a dummy "resource". I also granted the https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/ application delegated access to this new application.
Passing in the dummy application's URI as the resource parameter in step #8, I'm now getting back the access, refresh, and ID tokens in #9!
The OpenID Connect library requires that the ID token be signed, but while Azure AD signs the access token it doesn't sign the ID token. It comes with the following properties: {"typ":"JWT","alg":"none"}. So I had to modify the library to allow the caller to specify that unsigned ID tokens are considered "verified". Grrr.
Okay, next it turns out that the claims can't be verified because the OpenID Provider URL I specified and the issuer URL returned in the token are different. (Seriously?!) So, the provider has to be specified as https://sts.windows.net/{tenant_id}/, and then that works.
Next, I found that I hadn't run the MediaWiki DB upgrade script for the OpenID Connect extension yet. Thankfully that was a quick fix.
After that, I am now left with (what I hope is) the final problem of trying to get the user info from AAD's OpenID Connect UserInfo endpoint. I'll give that its own section.
Can't get the user info [Updated]
This is where I am stuck now. After step #9, following one or two intermediate requests to get metadata and keys for verifying the token, the following occurs:
RP Request:
(Updated to use GET with Authorization: Bearer header, per MSDN and the spec.)
GET https://login.windows.net/{tenant_id}/openid/userinfo
Authorization: Bearer {access_token}
IP Response:
400 Bad Request
AADSTS50063: Credential parsing failed. AADSTS90010: JWT tokens cannot be used with the UserInfo endpoint.
(If I change #10 to be either a POST request, with access_token in the body, or a GET request with access_token in the query string, AAD returns the error: AADSTS70000: Authentication failed. UserInfo token is not valid. The same occurs if I use the value of the id_token in place of the access_token value that I received.)
Help?
Update
I'm still hoping someone can shed light on the final issue (the UserInfo endpoint not accepting the bearer token), but I may split that out into a separate question. In the meantime, I'm adding some workarounds to the libraries (PRs coming soon) so that the claims which are already being returned in the bearer token can be used instead of making the call to the UserInfo endpoint. Many thanks to everyone who's helped out with this.
There's also a nagging part of me that wonders if the whole thing would not have been simpler with the OpenID Connect Basic Profile. I assume there's a reason why that was not implemented by the MediaWiki extension.
Update 2
I just came across a new post from Vittorio Bertocci that includes this helpful hint:
...in this request the application is asking for a token for itself! In Azure AD this is possible only if the requested token is an id_token...
This suggests that just changing the token request type in step 8 from authorization_code to id_token could remove the need for the non-standard resource parameter and also make the ugly second AAD application unnecessary. Still a hack, but it feels like much less of one.
Justin is right. For authorization code grant flow, your must specify the resource parameter in either the authorization request or the token request.
Use &resource=https%3A%2F%2Fgraph.windows.net%2F to get an access token for the Azure AD Graph API.
Use &resource=https%3A%2F%2Fmanagement.core.windows.net%2F to get a token for the Azure Service Management APIs.
...
Hope this helps
Microsoft's implementation of OpenID Connect (and OAuth2) has a known bug where it requires the resource parameter to be sent by the client. This is an MS-specific parameter and requiring it unfortunately breaks compatibility with pretty much every major OAuth2 and OpenID Connect library out there. I know that MS is aware of the issue (I've been attempting to do interoperability testing with their team for quite a while now), but I don't know of any plans to fix the problem.
So in the mean time, your only real path is to hack your client software so that it sends a resource parameter that the AS will accept. It looks like you managed to make it send the parameter, but didn't send a value that it liked.
I had issues getting this running on Azure, even though I got something working locally. Since I was trying to setup a private wiki anyway, I ended up enabling Azure AD protection for the whole site by turning on:
All Settings -> Features -> Authentication / Authorization
From within the website in https://portal.azure.com
This made it so you had to authenticate to Azure-AD before you saw any page of the site. Once you were authenticated a bunch of HTTP Headers are set for the application with your username, including REMOTE_USER. As a result I used the following plugin to automatically log the already authenticated user into Azure:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Auth_remoteuser