missing scrollbars in canvas div wrapper flexbox item - html

I want to show a canvas, possibly larger than the viewport.
The layout is common: navigation on the left, canvas, controls etc... on the right.
When the canvas is large, I want scrollbars around the canvas where needed. That's what the overflow=auto on the canvas div wrapper is for.
html {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
background: yellow;
}
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: fit-content(200px) 1fr;
height: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #b30a96;
}
.navigation {
background-color: darkkhaki;
}
.right {
display: flex;
height: 100%;
flex-direction: column;
background-color: red;
}
.canvas-wrapper {
overflow: auto;
background-color: #DE8D00;
}
#canvas {
display: block;
background-color: #0bb314;
}
.rest {
background-color: aquamarine;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="navigation">
navigation
</div>
<div class="right">
<div class="canvas-wrapper">
<canvas id="canvas" width="2500" height="1800"></canvas>
</div>
<div class="rest">
rest...
</div>
</div>
</div>
With only the flexbox, I see scrollbars just fine. As soon as I embed the flexbox in the grid, no more scrollbars.
A number of related posts shed some light but got me no closer to solving the problem.
I tried various permutations of width, height, max-width, max-height, min-width, min-height on the wrapper, the flexbox, the grid, with no satisfying result.
Before resorting to JavaScript and forcing the size of the div wrapper, I would like to know whether this can be solved in pure CSS.

after setting
grid-template-columns: fit-content(200px) minmax(0,1fr);
in class .container and adding
min-height: 0;
to class .right, the scrollbars are finally visible around the canvas.
As I understand it, the problem was that the div wrapper didn't have a size, and setting a minimum of zero somehow helps.

Related

div take all available height

I'm using the following HTML
<div className="App">
<div className="AppMenu">
Menu
</div>
<div className="AppContainer">
Test
</div>
</div>
and this CSS:
.App {
min-height: 100vh !important;
max-height: 100vh !important;
height: 100vh !important;
background-color: red;
}
.AppMenu {
background-color: blue;
position: sticky;
top: 0px;
width: 100%;
font-size: 1.3em;
}
.AppContainer {
background-color: green;
}
how can I set / calc AppContainer size to take all heigh => 100vh-(AppMenu height)
with CSS (or js) ?
You already using the full height of a screen with 100vh. There is no need to use a nuke like !important which nearly always just mask the issue instead of solving it. Also min-height: 100vh; + max-height: 100vh; can be considered as bad coding. In this case you want a definite height of 100vh which is done by height: 100vh;. So you having 3 lines of code where you actually only would need 1.
The issue that you get a scrollbar and the screen is overflowing is caused by the default body margin. The element will be 100vh tall and use the default body amrgin which will cause an document height of more then 100vh. Therefor simply reset the default body amrgin to 0 with: body { margin: 0; }
However with that soultion you will have a potencial overflow issue. So you should either set an overflow rule to the container or use min-height instead.
To have the the AppContainer fill the remaining height there are multiple ways to solve it. The easiest way to solve it would be the sue of a CSS-Grid with grid-template-rows: min-content auto;. That way, the Menu will take up as much space as needed and the remining height will be used be the AppContainer.
body {
margin: 0;
}
.App {
height: 100vh;
background-color: red;
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: min-content auto;
}
.AppMenu {
background-color: blue;
position: sticky;
top: 0px;
font-size: 1.3em;
}
.AppContainer {
background-color: green;
}
<div class="App">
<div class="AppMenu">
Menu
</div>
<div class="AppContainer">
Test
</div>
</div>
Last but not least. for HTML you have to use class not className which would be invalid HTML as this attribute doesnt exist.
These lines make no sense. This can be removed:
max-height: 100vh !important;
height: 100vh !important;
To stretch .AppContainer to the full free height, use rule flex: 1:
.AppContainer {
...
flex: 1;
}
And for the .App, set the flex rules. Like this:
.App {
...
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
Flex has very good browser support.
Do you need such a result?
.App {
min-height: 100vh !important;
background-color: red;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.AppMenu {
background-color: blue;
position: sticky;
top: 0px;
width: 100%;
font-size: 1.3em;
}
.AppContainer {
background-color: green;
flex: 1;
}
<div class="App">
<div class="AppMenu">
Menu
</div>
<div class="AppContainer">
Test
</div>
</div>

position: fixed prevents elements to be centered properly

I want to center .donut-graphs inside .dashboard horizontally, so the space between the right edge of the sidebar and the left edge of .donut-graphs is the same as the space from the right edge of .donut-graphs and the right edge of the screen. I have managed to do so, but I had to remove position: fixed from .navbar. The problem is, I can't do that because my sidebar has to stay on top of the screen when you scroll up/down, and with position: fixed on .navbar, the graphs aren't centered properly.
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="navbar">
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="dashboard">
<div class="donut-graphs">
<div class="dashboard-income">
Div 1
</div>
<div class="dashboard-overall">
Div 2
</div>
<div class="dashboard-spent">
Div 3
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
body {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
display: flex;
align-items: stretch;
max-width: 100%;
min-height: 100vh;
}
.navbar {
background-color: #ddd;
flex: 0 0 230px;
position: fixed;
height: 100vh;
width: 230px;
}
.content {
flex: 1;
overflow-x: auto;
text-align: center;
}
.donut-graphs {
display: inline-flex;
border: 1px solid;
margin: 50px auto 0;
position: relative;
text-align: left;
}
.dashboard-income,
.dashboard-overall,
.dashboard-spent {
height: 256px;
width: 357px;
display: inline-block;
}
.dashboard-income {
background-color: green;
}
.dashboard-overall {
background-color: blue;
}
.dashboard-spent {
background-color: red;
}
How can I overcome the issue?
Demo
position: fixed puts element above everything. That element won't attach to any element in body because it is the way that works. It only becomes dependent of viewport
What you want to achive could be done with position: absolute but parent (whose child you want to center) has to be position: relative for this to work.
Read more about positioning elements in css here
.content { padding-left:230px; }
Should do the trick.
Assigning your navbar a fixed position takes it out of the document flow, so when centering your donut graphs the browser doesn't take the navbar into account.
Giving the .content element a padding equivalent to the width of the navbar makes up for this.
The only problem with this approach is that if .navbar changes dimensions, you'll need to change the padding on .content to match.

Vertically center element without it becoming inaccessible offscreen

I'm trying to center an element in the middle of the page. I can center it just fine, but if I resize the page vertically until the view height is smaller than the centered element, the element goes offscreen vertically without a scrollbar. You can see a demonstration of the issue here:
http://codepen.io/mse/pen/BWayXV
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.outer {
text-align: center;
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
.inner {
display: inline-block;
width: 400px;
height: 800px;
background: grey;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
I should mention that I have tried a couple of other methods of vertical centering, including flexbox, and I'm still running into the same issue. Is there a way to solve this problem with this method of vertical centering, or is there at least a vertical centering method that does not have this issue?
Try this
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.outer {
display:flex;
justify-content:center;
align-items:center;
}
.inner {
background: #ccc;
width: 400px;
height: 600px
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"> I'm a block-level element centered vertically within my parent.</div>
</div>
More info: https://css-tricks.com/centering-css-complete-guide/
CSS VH center generator: http://howtocenterincss.com/
This should work
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100vh;
}
.outer {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
.inner {
width: 400px;
height: 800px;
background: grey;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
You can try to limit the size of your inner element. If you define size by a fixed px amount it will start scrolling as soon as the screen becomes smaller than that px amount. If you are ok with changing the height of the inner element you could use vh or you can implement #media queries to decrease the size on smaller screens. Here#s an example:
.inner { height: 100vh; /* 100 view height percentage*/}
Note: The viewport-percentage lengths are relative to the size of the initial containing block and affected by the presence of scrollbars on the viewport.

flexbox html5 video fill remaining space

I try to have a html5 video that fills the remaining space in a flexbox div.
However, it overflows rather than doing what I want:
.wrapper {
padding: 10px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
max-height: 300px;
background-color: green;
}
.content {
width: 100%;
background-color: red;
}
video {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.footer {
width: 100%;
background-color: orange;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content">
<video src="http://www.sample-videos.com/video/mp4/720/big_buck_bunny_720p_1mb.mp4" />
</div>
<div class="footer">footer</div>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/pwhwL29p/
You have a video and a footer inside the .wrapper element. The height: 100% on the video may or may not work, depending on the browser (more details below).
Since you don't have a height defined on the .content element, which holds the video, the results are unpredictable and unreliable. Again, browser behavior varies.
Here's a method that is more efficient and reliable across browsers:
.wrapper {
padding: 10px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
max-height: 300px;
background-color: green;
}
.content {
display: flex; /* NEW */
width: 100%;
background-color: red;
}
video {
width: 100%;
/* height: 100%; <-- REMOVE; not necessary */
}
.footer {
width: 100%;
background-color: orange;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content">
<video src="http://www.sample-videos.com/video/mp4/720/big_buck_bunny_720p_1mb.mp4" />
</div>
<div class="footer">footer </div>
</div>
revised fiddle
Here's how it works:
Turn the .content flex item, which contains the video, into a flex container.
This activates align-items: stretch, a default setting, which makes the video consume all available space in the cross-axis (in this case, height).
Remove height: 100%. Flex layout handles height dynamically.
More details:
Working with the CSS height property and percentage values
Chrome / Safari not filling 100% height of flex parent
UPDATE
From the comments:
Thank you. it works great for the standard video tag. Unfortunately it breaks with video.js
The video script adds a container to the HTML structure:
As a result, the function of the .content flex container no longer works.
You'll need to make adjustments to the CSS. Add this:
#video {
display: flex;
height: auto;
width: 100%;
}
revised fiddle

Div width 100% minus fixed amount of pixels

How can I achieve the following structure without using tables or JavaScript? The white borders represent edges of divs and aren't relevant to the question.
The size of the area in the middle is going to vary, but it will have exact pixel values and the whole structure should scale according to those values. To simplify it, I'd need a way to set "100% - n px" width to the top-middle and bottom-middle divs.
I'd appreciate a clean cross-browser solution, but in case it's not possible, CSS hacks will do.
Here's a bonus. Another structure I've been struggling with and end up using tables or JavaScript. It's slightly different, but introduces new problems. I've been mainly using it in jQuery-based windowing system, but I'd like to keep the layout out of the script and only control the size of one element (the middle one).
New way I've just stumbled upon: css calc():
.calculated-width {
width: -webkit-calc(100% - 100px);
width: -moz-calc(100% - 100px);
width: calc(100% - 100px);
}​
Source: css width 100% minus 100px
You can use nested elements and padding to get a left and right edge on the toolbar. The default width of a div element is auto, which means that it uses the available width. You can then add padding to the element and it still keeps within the available width.
Here is an example that you can use for putting images as left and right rounded corners, and a center image that repeats between them.
The HTML:
<div class="Header">
<div>
<div>This is the dynamic center area</div>
</div>
</div>
The CSS:
.Header {
background: url(left.gif) no-repeat;
padding-left: 30px;
}
.Header div {
background: url(right.gif) top right no-repeat;
padding-right: 30px;
}
.Header div div {
background: url(center.gif) repeat-x;
padding: 0;
height: 30px;
}
While Guffa's answer works in many situations, in some cases you may not want the left and/or right pieces of padding to be the parent of the center div. In these cases, you can use a block formatting context on the center and float the padding divs left and right. Here's the code
The HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
<div class="center"></div>
</div>
The CSS:
.container {
width: 100px;
height: 20px;
}
.left, .right {
width: 20px;
height: 100%;
float: left;
background: black;
}
.right {
float: right;
}
.center {
overflow: auto;
height: 100%;
background: blue;
}
I feel that this element hierarchy is more natural when compared to nested nested divs, and better represents what's on the page. Because of this, borders, padding, and margin can be applied normally to all elements (ie: this 'naturality' goes beyond style and has ramifications).
Note that this only works on divs and other elements that share its 'fill 100% of the width by default' property. Inputs, tables, and possibly others will require you to wrap them in a container div and add a little more css to restore this quality. If you're unlucky enough to be in that situation, contact me and I'll dig up the css.
jsfiddle here: jsfiddle.net/RgdeQ
Enjoy!
You can make use of Flexbox layout. You need to set flex: 1 on the element that needs to have dynamic width or height for flex-direction: row and column respectively.
Dynamic width:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-width">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-width">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-width">
3
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
}
.fixed-width {
width: 200px; /* Fixed width or flex-basis: 200px */
}
.flexible-width {
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width i.e. flex-grow: 1 and flex-shrink: 1*/
}
Output:
.container {
display: flex;
width: 100%;
color: #fff;
font-family: Roboto;
}
.fixed-width {
background: #9BCB3C;
width: 200px; /* Fixed width */
text-align: center;
}
.flexible-width {
background: #88BEF5;
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width */
text-align: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-width">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-width">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-width">
3
</div>
</div>
Dynamic height:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-height">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-height">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">
3
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
}
.fixed-height {
height: 200px; /* Fixed height or flex-basis: 200px */
}
.flexible-height {
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining height i.e. flex-grow: 1 and flex-shrink: 1*/
}
Output:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100vh;
color: #fff;
font-family: Roboto;
}
.fixed-height {
background: #9BCB3C;
height: 50px; /* Fixed height or flex-basis: 100px */
text-align: center;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
.flexible-height {
background: #88BEF5;
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width */
text-align: center;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-height">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-height">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">
3
</div>
</div>
The usual way to do it is as outlined by Guffa, nested elements. It's a bit sad having to add extra markup to get the hooks you need for this, but in practice a wrapper div here or there isn't going to hurt anyone.
If you must do it without extra elements (eg. when you don't have control of the page markup), you can use box-sizing, which has pretty decent but not complete or simple browser support. Likely more fun than having to rely on scripting though.
Maybe I'm being dumb, but isn't table the obvious solution here?
<div class="parent">
<div class="fixed">
<div class="stretchToFit">
</div>
.parent{ display: table; width 100%; }
.fixed { display: table-cell; width: 150px; }
.stretchToFit{ display: table-cell; vertical-align: top}
Another way that I've figured out in chrome is even simpler, but man is it a hack!
.fixed{
float: left
}
.stretchToFit{
display: table-cell;
width: 1%;
}
This alone should fill the rest of the line horizontally, as table-cells do. However, you get some strange issues with it going over 100% of its parent, setting the width to a percent value fixes it though.
We can achieve this using flex-box very easily.
If we have three elements like Header, MiddleContainer and Footer. And we want to give some fixed height to Header and Footer. then we can write like this:
For React/RN(defaults are 'display' as flex and 'flexDirection' as column), in web css we'll have to specify the body container or container containing these as display: 'flex', flex-direction: 'column' like below:
container-containing-these-elements: {
display: flex,
flex-direction: column
}
header: {
height: 40,
},
middle-container: {
flex: 1, // this will take the rest of the space available.
},
footer: {
height: 100,
}
what if your wrapping div was 100% and you used padding for a pixel amount, then if the padding # needs to be dynamic, you can easily use jQuery to modify your padding amount when your events fire.
I had a similar issue where I wanted a banner across the top of the screen that had one image on the left and a repeating image on the right to the edge of the screen. I ended up resolving it like so:
CSS:
.banner_left {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 131px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url("left_image.jpg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.banner_right {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 131px;
right: 0px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url("right_repeating_image.jpg");
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: top left;
}
The key was the right tag. I'm basically specifying that I want it to repeat from 131px in from the left to 0px from the right.
In some contexts, you can leverage margin settings to effectively specify "100% width minus N pixels". See the accepted answer to this question.