I have some table like this
table request_buys
| id | invoice | user_id |
| -- | ----------------- | ------- |
| 3 | 20220405/01104298 | 1 |
table traces
| id | request_buy_id | status_id | created_at |
| -- | -------------- | --------- | ------------------- |
| 37 | 3 | 1 | 2022-03-27 14:12:25 |
| 38 | 3 | 2 | 2022-03-28 14:12:25 |
| 39 | 3 | 3 | 2022-03-29 14:12:25 |
| 40 | 3 | 4 | 2022-03-30 14:12:25 |
| 41 | 3 | 5 | 2022-03-31 14:12:25 |
| 42 | 3 | 6 | 2022-04-01 14:12:25 |
table statuses
| id | nama |
| -- | ----------------- |
| 1 | Order Placed |
| 2 | Order Paid |
| 3 | Accepted |
| 4 | Picked by Courier |
| 5 | In Transit |
| 6 | Delivered |
| 7 | Rated |
| 8 | Rejected |
| 9 | Canceled |
and then i try to design query like below
select
request_buys.invoice,
MAX(traces.id) as traces_id,
MAX(statuses.nama) as statuses_nama
from
`request_buys`
inner join `traces` on `request_buys`.`id` = `traces`.`request_buy_id`
inner join `statuses` on `traces`.`status_id` = `statuses`.`id`
where
`user_id` = 1
group by
request_buys.id
and produces output like the following
output
| invoice | traces_id | statuses_nama |
| ----------------- | --------- | ----------------- |
| 20220405/01104298 | 42 | Picked by Courier |
and the output i expect should be like in the table below
expect
| invoice | traces_id | statuses_nama |
| ----------------- | --------- | ----------------- |
| 20220405/01104298 | 42 | Delivered |
I understand my error is in MAX(statuses.nama) which I should change like removing MAX() in statuses.nama
But i just get error like this "SELECT list is not in GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated ... this is incompatible with sql_mode=only_full_group_by"
then I tried some to clear the value "ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY" with a query like the following
SET sql_mode=(SELECT REPLACE(##sql_mode,'ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY',''))
and the result is like this
output
| invoice | traces_id | statuses_nama |
| ----------------- | --------- | ----------------- |
| 20220405/01104298 | 42 | Order Placed |
and I'm really stuck at this
and how to make trace_id.status_id from the "GROUP BY" result based on request_buys.id still have a relationship with statuses.id
Your problem lies with your misuse of the MAX(statuses.nama) expression. Based on your expected output,you intend to get the statuses.nama which matches the MAX(traces.id), NOT the MAX(statuses.nama) value which returns the highest value in terms of alphabetic order. In this case, the initial letter 'P' > 'D' . I have tweaked your code a bit and tried it on workbench,supposing there are more than one invoice for a particular user.(e.g insert into request_buys values (4,'20230405/01104298',1); insert into traces values (43,4,7,'2022-04-01 14:12:25');) It works as intended.
select invoice, t.id as traces_id, s.nama as statuses_name from request_buys r
join traces t on r.id=t.request_buy_id
join statuses s on t.status_id=s.id
join
(select traces.request_buy_id, MAX(traces.id) as traces_id
from `request_buys`
inner join `traces` on `request_buys`.`id` = `traces`.`request_buy_id`
where
`user_id` = 1
group by
traces.request_buy_id ) join_t
on t.request_buy_id=join_t.request_buy_id and t.id=join_t.traces_id
;
If I'm understanding correctly, you're trying to retrieve the most recent status for each invoice. Using MAX(nama) won't return that result, because it just picks the maximum status name alphabetically.
Assuming you're using MySQL 8.x, use ROW_NUMBER() to sort and rank the statuses for each invoice, by the most recent date first. Then grab the latest one using where rowNum = 1
WITH cte AS (
SELECT rb.id AS request_buy_id
, rb.invoice
, t.id AS traces_id
, s.nama AS statuses_nama
, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY rb.id ORDER BY t.created_at DESC) AS RowNum
FROM request_buys rb
INNER JOIN traces t ON rb.id = t.request_buy_id
INNER JOIN statuses s ON t.status_id = s.id
WHERE user_id = 1
)
SELECT *
FROM cte
WHERE RowNum = 1
;
Result:
request_buy_id
invoice
traces_id
statuses_nama
RowNum
3
20220405/01104298
42
Delivered
1
db<>fiddle here
Related
I need to join tableA and tableB on UniqueID however I only want to join on the latest Date in tableA with certain Status restrictions (Not in S). I know I need to use the Max functions however I can't get it to work. How do I get the result table below?
I was thinking of something like:
Select
tableA.UniqueID,
MAX(tableA.Date),
tableA.Status,
tableB.Col1
From tableA
Inner join tableB on (tableB.UniqueID = tableA.UniqueID and tableA.Status = 'A')`
tableA:
| UniqueID | Date | Status |
| -------- | ------------------- |--------|
| 123 | 2015-07-05 00:00:00 | S |
| 123 | 2015-07-06 00:00:00 | S |
| 123 | 2015-07-07 00:00:00 | A |
and tableB:
| UniqueID | Col1 |
| -------- | - |
| 123 | X |
| 125 | Y |
| 126 | Z |
Result table:
| UniqueID | Date | Status | Col1|
| -------- | ------------------- |--------|---- |
| 123 | 2015-07-07 00:00:00 | A | X |
This is one of the ways -
select
t_a.*, t_b.*
from
table_b t_b
join
(
select
uniqueid, date, status,
rank() over (partition by uniqueid order by date desc ) rank_
from
table_a
) t_a on t_b.uniqueid = t_a.uniqueid
where
t_a.rank_ = 1
;
fiddle url : (https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=mysql_8.0&fiddle=06660177b6c116a811218863ce428985)
so what I am trying to do is having 3 tables (pictures, collections, and bridge) with the following columns:
Collections Table:
| id | name |
------------------
| 1 | coll1 |
| 2 | coll2 |
------------------
Pictures Table: (timestamps are unix timestamps)
| id | name | timestamp |
-------------------------
| 5 | Pic5 | 1 |
| 6 | Pic6 | 19 |
| 7 | Pic7 | 3 |
| 8 | Pic8 | 892 |
| 9 | Pic9 | 4 |
-------------------------
Bridge Table:
| id | collection | picture |
-----------------------------
| 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 2 | 1 | 6 |
| 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 7 | 2 | 7 |
-----------------------------
And the result should look like this:
| collection_name | picture_count | newest_picture |
----------------------------------------------------
| coll1 | 4 | 8 |
| coll2 | 3 | 9 |
----------------------------------------------------
newest_picture should always be the picture with the heighest timestamp in that collection and I also want to sort the result by it. picture_count is obviously the count of picture in that collection.
Can this be done in a single statement with table joins and if yes:
how can I do this the best way?
A simple method uses correlated subqueries:
select c.*,
(select count(*)
from bridge b
where b.collection = c.id
) as pic_count,
(select p.id
from bridge b join
pictures p
on b.picture = b.id
where b.collection = c.id
order by p.timestamp desc
limit 1
) as most_recent_picture
from collections c;
A more common approach would use window functions:
select c.id, c.name, count(bp.collection), bp.most_recent_picture
from collections c left join
(select b.*,
first_value(p.id) over (partition by b.collection order by p.timestamp desc) as most_recent_picture
from bridge b join
pictures p
on b.picture = p.id
) bp
on bp.collection = c.id
group by c.id, c.name, bp.most_recent_picture;
I am trying to join two tables with respect to the max values for the values column. I would like to produce the expected results as shown below based on the max value while joining
select * from order
-------------------------
| ID | value | Name |
-------------------------
| 1 | 23 | REM |
| 2 | 0 | SER |
| 3 | 13 | MH |
| 4 | 3 | MH |
| 5 | 1 | MP |
-------------------------
select * from product
-------------------------
| ID | value | Name |
-------------------------
| 1 | 2 | ABC |
| 2 | 2 | DEG |
| 3 | 17 | XYZ |
-------------------------
Desired result:
-------------------------
| ID | Value | Name |
-------------------------
| 1 | 23 | REM |
| 2 | 2 | DEG |
| 3 | 17 | XYZ |
| 4 | 3 | MH |
| 5 | 1 | MP |
-------------------------
I have tried something like below but it's not fetching the value (NAME) from other table
SELECT
MAX(IF(a.value >b.value , a.value ,b.value )) AS Value
from order a left join product b on a.ID= b.ID
Please suggest how to get the expected result from these two tables.
Below is for BigQuery Standard SQL
#standardsql
select as value array_agg(struct(id, value, name) order by value desc limit 1)[offset(0)]
from
(
select * from `project.dataset.order`
union all
select * from `project.dataset.product`
)
group by id
with output
You can do this using a full join:
select id,
(case when p.val is null or p.val < o.val then o.val else p.val end),
(case when p.val is null or p.val < o.val then o.name else p.name end)
from product p full join
order o
using (id);
I just find this the simplest way to think about the problem.
table 1: forum_threads
+-----+------+-------+
| id | title| status|
+-----+------+-------+
| 1 | a | 1 |
| 2 | b | 1 |
| 3 | c | 1 |
| 4 | d | 1 |
| 5 | e | 1 |
| 6 | f | 1 |
+-----+------+-------+
table 2: forum_comments
+-----+----------+--------------------+
| id | thread_id| comment |
+-----+----------+--------------------+
| 1 | 4 | hai |
| 2 | 4 | hello |
| 3 | 2 | welcome |
| 4 | 2 | whats your name |
| 5 | 6 | how are you |
| 6 | 5 | how old are you |
| 7 | 5 | good |
+-----+----------+--------------------+
wanted output
+-----------+----------+-----------------+
| thread_id | title | comment_count |
+-----------+----------+-----------------+
| 5 | e | 2 |
| 6 | f | 1 |
| 2 | b | 2 |
| 4 | d | 2 |
+-----------+----------+-----------------+
my Query
SELECT forum_threads.*,forum_comments.*,count(forum_comments.id) as comment_count
FROM forum_comments
LEFT JOIN forum_threads ON forum_comments.thread_id = forum_threads.id
GROUP BY forum_threads.id
ORDER BY forum_comments.id desc
Here I am trying to get the titles by the latest comment.
when I give ORDER BY forum_comments.id this returns the wrong order.
I need to order by the latest comments in the forum_comments table.
this query returns the wrong order please help me to find out the correct order.
how could I solve this easily?
This query should give you the expected result:
select t2.thread_id, t1.title, t2.comment_count from forum_threads as t1,
(SELECT id, thread_id, count(comment) as comment_count from forum_comments group by thread_id) as t2
where t1.id = t2.thread_id order by t2.id desc;
Instead of using forum_threads.* and forum_comments.* can you give specific column names and try.
If that doesn't work you should try explicitly assigning primary and foreign keys.
What I did was, I wanted each user to have their own "unique" numbering system. Instead of auto incrementing the item number by 1, I did it so that Bob's first item would start at #1 and Alice's number would also start at #1. The same goes for rooms and categories. I achieved this by creating "mapping" tables for items, rooms and categories.
The query below works, but I know it can definitely be refactored. I have primary keys in each table (on the "ids").
SELECT unique_item_id as item_id, item_name, category_name, item_value, room_name
FROM
users_items, users_map_item, users_room, users_map_room, users_category, users_map_category
WHERE
users_items.id = users_map_item.map_item_id AND
item_location = users_map_room.unique_room_id AND
users_map_room.map_room_id = users_room.room_id AND
users_map_room.map_user_id = 1 AND
item_category = users_map_category.unique_category_id AND
users_map_category.map_category_id = users_category.category_id AND
users_category.user_id = users_map_category.map_user_id AND
users_map_category.map_user_id = 1
ORDER BY item_name
users_items
| id | item_name | item_location |item_category |
--------------------------------------------------------
| 1 | item_a | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | item_b | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | item_c | 1 | 1 |
users_map_item
| map_item_id | map_user_id | unique_item_id |
----------------------------------------------------
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
users_rooms
| id | room_name |
----------------------
| 1 | basement |
| 2 | kitchen |
| 3 | attic |
users_map_room
| map_room_id | map_user_id | unique_room_id |
----------------------------------------------------
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
users_category
| id | room_name |
----------------------
| 1 | antiques |
| 2 | appliance |
| 3 | sporting goods |
users_map_category
| map_room_id | map_user_id | unique_category_id |
----------------------------------------------------
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
Rewriting your query with explicit JOIN conditions makes it more readable (while doing the same).
SELECT mi.unique_item_id AS item_id
, i.item_name
, c.category_name
, i.item_value
, r.room_name
FROM users_map_item mi
JOIN users_items i ON i.id = mi.map_item_id
JOIN users_map_room mr ON mr.unique_room_id = i.item_location
JOIN users_room r ON r.room_id = mr.map_room_id
JOIN users_map_category mc ON mc.unique_category_id = i.item_category
JOIN users_category c ON (c.user_id, c.category_id)
= (mc.map_user_id, mc.map_category_id)
WHERE mr.map_user_id = 1
AND mc.map_user_id = 1
ORDER BY i.item_name
The result is unchanged. Query plan should be the same. I see no way to improve the query further.
You should use LEFT [OUTER] JOIN instead of [INNER] JOIN if you want to keep rows in the result where no matching rows are found in the right hand table. You may want to move the additional WHERE clauses to the JOIN condition in this case, as it changes the outcome.