SSRS number of occurences for runningvalue - reporting-services

I'm trying to create the ABC / Pareto Analysis. Intention is to mark by 'A' all products which generate 80% of total sales, 'B' products which generate additional 15% and 'C' the rest. It's up to 100k products which have to be taken into account and fastest way to calculate running total is by using the RunningValue in the Report Builder / Paginated Reports.
I did some testing by calculating running total while downloading data to the dataset but it's very slow and therefore not an option. RunningValue on the other hand works perfectly fine and I can mark the products by 'A', 'B', and 'C' in the Tablix. This is the formula:
=IIF(RunningValue(Fields!ACT.Value, Sum, Nothing ) / Sum(Fields!ACT.Value, "Facts")<0.8, "A", IIF(RunningValue(Fields!ACT.Value, Sum, Nothing ) / Sum(Fields!ACT.Value, "Facts")<0.95,"B","C"))
However, I can't find a way how to count the number of products with A, B and C. Idea is to show that X% of products create 80% of total sales, Y% additional 15% and Z% generate only 5% of turnover.
I'd be thankful for any advice, I'm running out of options. Original datasource is Power BI dataset and calculating running total while downloading the data is really slow for this number of products. Tested with MDX and DAX.

You can use custom code for your pareto count calculation.
Add the following code to your report
Public Dim a_count, b_count, c_count As Integer
Public Function Pareto( current As Integer, total As Integer) As String
If current / total < 0.8 Then
a_count = a_count + 1
Return "A"
ElseIf current / total < 0.95 Then
b_count = b_count + 1
Return "B"
Else
c_count = c_count + 1
Return "C"
End If
End Function
For your parent classification column use the expression
= Code.Pareto( RunningValue(Fields!ACT.Value, Sum, Nothing ) , Sum(Fields!ACT.Value, "Facts"))
To display the counter variables use the expressions
= Code.a_count
= Code.b_count
= Code.c_count

Related

SQL Inner Join w/ sub query to return difference w/criteria

What am I doing:
I'm attempting to take two tables, one with 2016 data and one with 2015 data, and subtract the cells in each column to display only the differences greater than or equal to 10,000, rounded to the nearest 100th place, in a new table.
The Issue:
I am able to get the new table to pop up with the correct amounts displayed for the subtraction part only. I'm not able to add any additional criteria to filter the results to display the >= 10000 or the rounding to the 100th spot.
After research it looks like my JOIN needs a subquery to display what i would like, but I've been messing around with it for hours now and I can't seem to get it to display anything when I add a sub. Any assistance would be great. Here is what I have that works without the >= 10000 and rounding:
SELECT
`prioryeardata`.location,
`currentdata`.`2010` - `prioryeardata`.`2010` AS '2010_Difference',
`currentdata`.`2011` - `prioryeardata`.`2011` AS '2011_Difference',
`currentdata`.`2012` - `prioryeardata`.`2012` AS '2012_Difference',
`currentdata`.`2013` - `prioryeardata`.`2013` AS '2013_Difference',
`currentdata`.`2014` - `prioryeardata`.`2014` AS '2014_Difference',
`currentdata`.`2015` - `prioryeardata`.`2015` AS '2015_Difference'
FROM `prioryeardata`
JOIN `currentdata`
ON `prioryeardata`.location = `currentdata`.location;
Have a look at the below query it may help (using sql-server)
select location,Round([2010_Difference],3).[2010_Difference],Round([2011_Difference],3)[2011_Difference]
,Round([2012_Difference],3)[2012_Difference],Round([2013_Difference],3)[2013_Difference]
,Round([2014_Difference],3)[2014_Difference],Round([2015_Difference],3)[2015_Difference] from
( SELECT
prioryeardata.location,
currentdata.year2010 - prioryeardata.year2010 AS [2010_Difference],
currentdata.year2011 - prioryeardata.year2011 AS [2011_Difference],
currentdata.year2012 - prioryeardata.year2012 AS [2012_Difference],
currentdata.year2013 - prioryeardata.year2013 AS [2013_Difference],
currentdata.year2014 - prioryeardata.year2014 AS [2014_Difference],
currentdata.year2015 - prioryeardata.year2015 AS [2015_Difference]
FROM prioryeardata
JOIN currentdata
ON prioryeardata.location = currentdata.location
) t where t.[2015_Difference]>=10000 --or .......
Edit
select location,Round([2010_Difference],3).[2010_Difference],Round([2011_Difference],3)[2011_Difference]
,Round([2012_Difference],3)[2012_Difference],Round([2013_Difference],3)[2013_Difference]
,Round([2014_Difference],3)[2014_Difference],Round([2015_Difference],3)[2015_Difference]
from
(select t.location
,case when [2010_Difference]>10000 then [2010_Difference] Else 0 End as [2010_Difference]
,case when [2011_Difference]>10000 then [2011_Difference] Else 0 End as [2011_Difference]
,case when [2012_Difference]>10000 then [2012_Difference] Else 0 End as [2012_Difference]
,case when [2013_Difference]>10000 then [2013_Difference] Else 0 End as [2013_Difference]
,case when [2014_Difference]>10000 then [2014_Difference] Else 0 End as [2014_Difference]
,case when [2015_Difference]>10000 then [2015_Difference] Else 0 End as [2015_Difference]
from
( SELECT
prioryeardata.location,
currentdata.year2010 - prioryeardata.year2010 AS [2010_Difference],
currentdata.year2011 - prioryeardata.year2011 AS [2011_Difference],
currentdata.year2012 - prioryeardata.year2012 AS [2012_Difference],
currentdata.year2013 - prioryeardata.year2013 AS [2013_Difference],
currentdata.year2014 - prioryeardata.year2014 AS [2014_Difference],
currentdata.year2015 - prioryeardata.year2015 AS [2015_Difference]
FROM prioryeardata
JOIN currentdata
ON prioryeardata.location = currentdata.location
) t where t.[2010_Difference]>=10000 or t.[2011_Difference]>=10000 or t.[2012_Difference]>=10000
or t.[2013_Difference]>=10000 or t.[2014_Difference]>=10000 or t.[2015_Difference]>=10000
)tt
If you want cells to show blank instead of a value, use a pattern like this under your SELECT:
CASE WHEN `currentdata`.`2015` - `prioryeardata`.`2015` >= 10000 THEN
`currentdata`.`2015` - `prioryeardata`.`2015` ELSE NULL END AS '2015_Difference'
strictly speaking the else null is unnecessary, I just put it in for your learning benefit
If you want to only show rows where the difference is greater than ten k put this in on the end of your query:
WHERE
`currentdata`.`2015` - `prioryeardata`.`2015` >= 10000
If you want to only show rows where all years were over ten k, add similar filters for other years separated by AND. If you want to show rows where any year was over ten k, separate them with OR
To round values to the nearest 100 (i.e. 12345 becomes 12300) I believe you would use
ROUND(12345,-2)

Complex SSRS expression (Average of Average)

I have 4 datasets and I need to calculate the average of a field and their cumulative average.
Here are my 4 datasets : Dataset1,Dataset2,Dataset3,Dataset4:
This what I want . I want to find the average of the average values as given below :
Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset1")
Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset2")
Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset3")
Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset4")
A logic of = Avg(Avg,Avg,Avg..) throws an error. So basically it doesn't work. There's gotta be a way surely ?
We need to also take into account that sometimes one of the datasets may be empty ( null or 0 ). Is there any way of doing it in SSRS ?
If you don't need a weighted average you can use ISNOTHING to check for the NULLs like:
=(IIF(ISNOTHING(Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset1")), 0, Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset1") ) +
IIF(ISNOTHING(Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset2")), 0, Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset2") ) +
IIF(ISNOTHING(Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset3")), 0, Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset3") ) +
IIF(ISNOTHING(Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset4")), 0, Avg(Fields!Discount.Value,"Dataset4") ) ) / 4

MDX Help: - Comparing Values in Two Max Time Periods within a larger Set of Time Periods to Populate an Indicator

I'm brand new to MDX and need some help. In SSRS I have a dataset that pulls from an SSAS cube. The dataset always contains six months of data. What I need to be able to do is to compare a value for the max(timeID) with a value for the second max(timeID) and if the value for the max(timeID) > value for the second max(timeID) than the arrow goes up in the indicator, etc...
So for the dataset below I would subtract 20130201's Value which is 8 from
20130301's Value which is 10. The result would be a positive number and the indicator would be an upward pointing green arrow. If it was 0 it would be straight and if negative the arrow would be red and point down. I understand how to deal with the indicator - that's not an issue. It's the MDX I need help with.
20130201 8
20130301 10
20121201 4
I can write it in SQL and it would look like this.
Select Item, case when sum(Time1ContentCount) > sum(Time2ContentCount) then 3 when sum(Time1ContentCount) = sum(Time2ContentCount) then 2 when sum(Time1ContentCount) sum(Time2ContentCount) then 1 end as Indicator, sum(Time1ContentCount) as Time1Count, sum(Time2ContentCount) as Time2Count from (Select timeID, dc.Item, Case when timeID = (Select max(timeID) from FactUsage) then count(fu.Contentid) else 0 END as Time1ContentCount, Case when timeID = (Select max(timeID) from FactUsage where timeID <>(Select max(timeID) from FactUsage)) then count(fu.Contentid) else 0 END as Time2ContentCount from factUsage fu INNER JOIN dimContent dC on dc.ContentID = fu.ContentID WHERE TimeID in (Select distinct top 6 timeid from factUsage order by timeID desc) Group by timeID, Item) a group by Item
Thanks so much for your help!
Edit:
I changed the statement to read as follows for the indicator.
WITH Member MEASURES.Indicator AS (
IIF(( [Measures].[Activity], [Time].[Time ID].LastChild ) >
( [Measures].[Activity], [Time].[Time ID].LastChild.PrevMember),3,
(IIF(([Measures].[Activity], [Time].[Time ID].LastChild ) =
([Measures].[Activity], [Time].[Time ID].LastChild.PrevMember), 2,1))))
SELECT {Measures.Indicator} on 0
FROM [DW]
It works when I run it as a query against the cube in SSMS but I tried to put it in the indicator and that doesn't work. Just adding the IIF statement doesn't work either. When I tried to add it into the query or the cube itself so I could just pull from there it errors out with an out of memory error.
I don't know how much you can edit in the MDX expression - or in your report builder, but to get the difference between two values in a series, you can create a measure (in your report) that is the difference between the CurrentMember and PrevMember. Since the time series (timeid) is sorted by the key, it will always be in the right order (or your schema and architecture needs a rework)
So basically, you can do :
WITH
MEMBER MEASURES.GrowthTime AS (
( [Measures].[Value], [TimeID].CurrentMember ) -
( [Measures].[Value], [TimeID].PrevMember )
)
MEMBER MEASURES.GrowthRatio AS (
( [Measures].[Value], [TimeID].CurrentMember ) /
( [Measures].[Value], [TimeID].PrevMember )
)
SELECT { Measures.Value, Measures.GrowthTime, Measures.GrowthRatio } on 0,
[TimeID].CHILDREN on 1
FROM Cube
This is pseudo as i don't know your cube structure. For TimeID you would want it like [DimensionName].[AttributeName].CurrentMember and PrevMember

Select data which have same letters

I'm having trouble with this SQL:
$sql = mysql_query("SELECT $menucompare ,
(COUNT($menucompare ) * 100 / (SELECT COUNT( $menucompare )
FROM data WHERE $ww = $button )) AS percentday FROM data WHERE $ww >0 ");
$menucompare is table fields names what ever field is selected and contains data bellow
$button is the week number selected (lets say week '6')
$ww table field name with row who have the number of week '6'
For example, I have data in $menucompare like that:
123456bool
521478bool
122555heel
147788itoo
and I want to select those, who have same word in the last of the data and make percentage.
The output should be like that:
bool -- 50% (2 entries)
heel -- 25% (1 entry)
itoo -- 25% (1 entry)
Any clearness to my SQL will be very appreciated.
I didn't find anything like that around.
Well, keeping data in such format probably not the best way, if possible, split the field into 2 separate ones.
First, you need to extract the string part from the end of the field.
if the length of the string / numeric parts is fixed, then it's quite easy;
if not, you should use regular expressions which, unfortunately, are not there by default with MySQL. There's a solution, check this question: How to do a regular expression replace in MySQL?
I'll assume, that numeric part is fixed:
SELECT s.str, CAST(count(s.str) AS decimal) / t.cnt * 100 AS pct
FROM (SELECT substr(entry, 7) AS str FROM data) AS s
JOIN (SELECT count(*) AS cnt FROM data) AS t ON 1=1
GROUP BY s.str, t.cnt;
If you'll have regexp_replace function, then substr(entry, 7) should be replaced to regexp_replace(entry, '^[0-9]*', '') to achieve the required result.
Variant with substr can be tested here.
When sorting out problems like this, I would do it in two steps:
Sort out the SQL independently of the presentation language (PHP?).
Sort out the parameterization of the query and the presentation of the results after you know you've got the correct query.
Since this question is tagged 'SQL', I'm only going to address the first question.
The first step is to unclutter the query:
SELECT menucompare,
(COUNT(menucompare) * 100 / (SELECT COUNT(menucompare) FROM data WHERE ww = 6))
AS percentday
FROM data
WHERE ww > 0;
This removes the $ signs from most of the variable bits, and substitutes 6 for the button value. That makes it a bit easier to understand.
Your desired output seems to need the last four characters of the string held in menucompare for grouping and counting purposes.
The data to be aggregated would be selected by:
SELECT SUBSTR(MenuCompare, -4) AS Last4
FROM Data
WHERE ww = 6
The divisor in the percentage is the count of such rows, but the sub-stringing isn't necessary to count them, so we can write:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Data WHERE ww = 6
This is exactly what you have anyway.
The divdend in the percentage will be the group count of each substring.
SELECT Last4, COUNT(Last4) * 100.0 / (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Data WHERE ww = 6)
FROM (SELECT SUBSTR(MenuCompare, -4) AS Last4
FROM Data
WHERE ww = 6
) AS Week6
GROUP BY Last4
ORDER BY Last4;
When you've demonstrated that this works, you can re-parameterize the query and deal with the presentation of the results.

Combine 2 SELECTs into one SELECT in my RAILS application

I have a table called ORDEREXECUTIONS that stores all orders that have been executed. It's a multi currency application hence the table has two columns CURRENCY1_ID and CURRENCY2_ID.
To get a list of all orders for a specific currency pair (e.g. EUR/USD) I need to lines to get the totals:
v = Orderexecution.where("is_master=1 and currency1_id=? and currency2_id=? and created_at>=?",c1,c2,Time.now()-24.hours).sum("quantity").to_d
v+= Orderexecution.where("is_master=1 and currency1_id=? and currency2_id=? and created_at>=?",c2,c1,Time.now()-24.hours).sum("unitprice*quantity").to_d
Note that my SUM() formula is different depending on the the sequence of the currencies.
e.g. If I want the total ordered quantities of the currency pair USD it then executes (assuming currency ID for USD is 1 and EUR is 2.
v = Orderexecution.where("is_master=1 and currency1_id=? and currency2_id=? and created_at>=?",1,2,Time.now()-24.hours).sum("quantity").to_d
v+= Orderexecution.where("is_master=1 and currency1_id=? and currency2_id=? and created_at>=?",2,1,Time.now()-24.hours).sum("unitprice*quantity").to_d
How do I write this in RoR so that it triggers only one single SQL statement to MySQL?
I guess this would do:
v = Orderexecution.where("is_master=1
and ( (currency1_id, currency2_id) = (?,?)
or (currency1_id, currency2_id) = (?,?)
)
and created_at>=?"
,c1, c2, c2, c1, Time.now()-24.hours
)
.sum("CASE WHEN currency1_id=?
THEN quantity
ELSE unitprice*quantity
END"
,c1
)
.to_d
So you could do
SELECT SUM(IF(currency1_id = 1 and currency2_id = 2, quantity,0)) as quantity,
SUM(IF(currency2_id = 1 and currency1_id = 2, unitprice * quantity,0)) as unitprice _quantity from order_expressions
WHERE created_at > ? and (currency1_id = 1 or currency1_id = 2)
If you plug that into find_by_sql you should get one object back, with 2 attributes, quantity and unitprice_quantity (they won't show up in the output of inspect in the console but they should be there if you inspect the attributes hash or call the accessor methods directly)
But depending on your indexes that might actually be slower because it might not be able to use indexes as efficiently. The seemly redundant condition on currency1_id means that this would be able to use an index on [currency1_id, created_at]. Do benchmark before and after - sometimes 2 fast queries are better than one slow one!