This is from package.json file:
"configuration": [
{
"id": "projectmanager",
"title": "Enable or Disable project manager",
"order": 1,
"properties": {
"AIO.projectmanager": {
"type": "boolean",
"order": 1,
"description": "Enabled - true, Disabled - false : for Project manager."
}
}
}
When I debug and run it, the setting does not show up in a GUI nor in the settings.json of the extension development host.
Any way to fix this?
Edit: When i run the extension, it sends a notification saying "[my:\extension\workspace]: property engines is mandatory and must be of type object "
Related
i created a json file with all the data required for my app, it was working fine but one image was showing error saying that it is from another domain, so i changed the image address to another image, and now it says
crbug/1173575, non-JS module files deprecated
i tried changing it back to the previous image and restarted the application it still shows the error.
{
"id": 1,
"name": "92.7",
"tagline": "on the ground by Rose",
"color": "blue",
"url": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/51/Google_Chrome_on_Windows_10_screenshot.png" ,
"icon": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/Google_Chrome_icon_%28September_2014%29.svg/96px-Google_Chrome_icon_%28September_2014%29.svg.png" ,
"img": "https://preview.redd.it/ls2yuc4501l61.jpg?width=512&auto=webp&s=be785e98bf288f69c0b0105fb2bce6ab807b20f4",
"category": "blackpink",
"disliked": false,
"order": 1
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "92.7",
"tagline": "blood sweat and tears by BTS",
"color": "blue",
"url":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/51/Google_Chrome_on_Windows_10_screenshot.png" ,
"icon": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/Google_Chrome_icon_%28September_2014%29.svg/96px-Google_Chrome_icon_%28September_2014%29.svg.png",
"img":"https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZTQ3YmU4MjAtYzQ0NC00NjRjLThmMzYtMTE4MzgzMWJkNjliXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDY5MjMyNTg#._V1_.jpg",
"category": "BTS",
"disliked": false,
"order": 2
}
Error was in the first pic, the second was showing fine but after changing it , now it doesnt start the application and shows the error i mentioned above. I'm using google chrome to run the application.
Delete your launch.json file as it is causing your app to not launch with the default configuration of flutter
I encounter the same error in one of my flutter web projects. you have to delete the launch.json file.
Here is path of file
.vscode -> launch.json
just delete launch.json and your project will run.
{
// Use IntelliSense to learn about possible attributes.
// Hover to view descriptions of existing attributes.
// For more information, visit: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=830387
"version": "0.2.0",
"configurations": [
{
"request": "launch",
"name": "Launch Chrome against localhost",
"type": "dart"
}
]
}
Is there a way to pull the configurations of other portlets or categories within a single angular portlet? I was hoping to use a single system configuration in multiple portlets. In the feature > configuration json, I have added this code that I was hoping would work but I can't get it back into the portlet.
"system": {
"category": "related.configuration",
"name": "Related Configurations",
"fields": {
"development": {
"type": "boolean",
"name": "Developer Mode",
"description": "Should the portlets be set to developer mode?",
"default": false
}
}
},
There is no way to do this with this configuration setup. The configurations are for :
Individual portlets
All portlets of that type
We have a requirement from one of our clients to access the project files that are stored in the BIM360 Design (old Collaboration for Revit - C4R). I can not find any information in the developer pages of the Forge APIs that points to this location. I assume such an API is not part of Forge, but we were wondering if there is any other API that can provide those files.
The exact requirements are:
Constantly monitor for changes on the files located there.
When changes occur, retrieve and backup all those files to a local machine.
The question is, how, if possible, can we access the project files located at the BIM360 Design cloud?
UPDATE (10/04/2018)
We have found these commands - specifically PublishModel and GetPublishModelJob. This does something, we can at the very least prompt the publication on demand, without the need for Revit. It is not clear to me when the items:autodesk.bim360:C4RModel pseudo-file is created. On top of that, the API does not appear to be able to receive a prefered output folder, which makes it really cumbersome to work for the intended purpose of backing up the information inside BIM360 Design.
UPDATE (25/04/2018)
We have tried using both commands (PublishJob and GetPublishModelJob). We have impersonated a Project Admin (via the x-user-id) but Forge is returning a 401 error (which is not even documented). The following (with a redacted documentID) is what we have tried:
{
"jsonapi": {
"version": "1.0"
},
"data": {
"type": "commands",
"attributes": {
"extension": {
"type": "commands:autodesk.bim360:C4RModelGetPublishJob",
"version": "1.0.0"
}
},
"relationships": {
"resources": {
"data": [ { "type": "items", "id": "<document_id>" } ]
}
}
}
}
And this is Forge's response:
{
"jsonapi": {
"version": "1.0"
},
"errors": [
{
"id": "a4547153-1fd4-4710-b0d1-a7184d9e7e22",
"status": "401",
"code": "C4R",
"detail": "Failed to get publish model job"
}
]
}
Any thoughts?
After discussing with #tfrascaroli in Forge Help channel, we found the root cause of this error is caused by the incorrect value of x-user-id, so he didn't have the right permission to push the latest version of the C4R model to BIM360 docs.
{
"jsonapi": {
"version": "1.0"
},
"errors": [
{
"id": "a4547153-1fd4-4710-b0d1-a7184d9e7e22",
"status": "401",
"code": "C4R",
"detail": "Failed to get publish model job"
}
]
}
The x-user-id is not a GUID and not the id we saw in the response of GET users or GET users/:user_id, it should be the value of the uid. After replacing the x-user-id value by the uid, the error doesn't show up again.
[
{
"id": "a75e8769-621e-40b6-a524-0cffdd2f784e", //!<<< We didn't use it for `x-user-id`
"account_id": "9dbb160e-b904-458b-bc5c-ed184687592d",
"status": "active",
"role": "account_admin",
"company_id": "28e4e819-8ab2-432c-b3fb-3a94b53a91cd",
"company_name": "Autodesk",
"last_sign_in": "2016-04-05T07:27:20.858Z",
"email": "john.smith#mail.com",
"name": "John Smith",
"nickname": "Johnny",
"first_name": "John",
"last_name": "Smith",
"uid": "L9EBJKCGCXBB", //!<<<<< Here is the value for the x-user-id
"image_url": "http://static-dc.autodesk.net/etc/designs/v201412151200/autodesk/adsk-design/images/autodesk_header_logo_140x23.png",
"address_line_1": "The Fifth Avenue",
"address_line_2": "#301",
"city": "New York",
"postal_code": "10011",
"state_or_province": "New York",
"country": "United States",
"phone": "(634)329-2353",
"company": "Autodesk",
"job_title": "Software Developer",
"industry": "IT",
"about_me": "Nothing here",
"created_at": "2015-06-26T14:47:39.458Z",
"updated_at": "2016-04-07T07:15:29.261Z"
}
]
Do you have an access right to the workshared Revit file? Publish command is to publish workshared central model in the cloud to Docs. To use it, you need an access to Revit model in the central in the cloud. Forge Publish command does the same thing as publish command in Revit desktop. You need the same access right. To use cloud workshared feature, first you need to have Design license assigned to you, then you also need to be a member a Revit project. Being invited to Docs is not enough.
(As C4R/Design was merged to Docs recently, this C4R specific license part was intentionally kept the same as previous licensing. We also have Team for earlier versions. It makes it a bit complicated. I hope it will be easier as we move forward in future.)
is it possible to check, in an ARM Template, if the name for my Virtual Machine already exists?
I am developing a Solution Template for the Azure Marketplace. Maybe it is possible to set a paramter in the UiDefinition uniqe?
The goal is to reproduce this green Hook
A couple notes...
VM Names only need to be unique within a resourceGroup, not within the subscription
Solution Templates must be deployed to empty resourceGroups, so collisions with existing resources aren't possible
For solution templates the preference is that you simply name the VMs for the user, rather than asking - use something that is appropriate for the workload (e.g. jumpbox) - not all solutions do this but we're trying to improve that experience
Given that it's not likely we'll ever build a control that checks for naming collisions on resources without globally unique constraints.
That help?
This looks impossible, according to the documentation.
There are no validation scenarious.
I assume that you should be using the Microsoft.Common.TextBox UI element in your createUiDefinition.json.
I have tried to reproduce a green check by creating a simple createUiDefinition.json as below with a Microsoft.Common.TextBox UI element as shown below.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/0.1.2-preview/CreateUIDefinition.MultiVm.json",
"handler": "Microsoft.Compute.MultiVm",
"version": "0.1.2-preview",
"parameters": {
"basics": [
{
"name": "textBoxA",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.TextBox",
"label": "VM Name",
"defaultValue": "",
"toolTip": "Please enter a VM name",
"constraints": {
"required": true
},
"visible": true
}
],
"steps": [],
"outputs": {}
}
}
I am able to reproduce the green check beside the VM Name textbox as shown below:
However, this green check DOES NOT imply the VM Name is Available.
This is because based on my testing, even if I use an existing VM Name in the same subscription, it is still showing the green check.
Based on the official documented constraints that are supported by the Microsoft.Common.TextBox UI element, it DOES NOT VALIDATE Name Availability.
Hope this helps!
While bmoore's point is correct that it's unlikely you would ever need this for a VM (nor is there an API for it), there are other compute resources that do have global naming requirements.
As of 2022 this concept is possible now with the use of the ArmApiControl UI element. It allows you to call ARM apis as part of validation in the createUiDefinition.json. Here is an example using the check name API for an Azure App service.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/0.1.2-preview/CreateUIDefinition.MultiVm.json#",
"handler": "Microsoft.Azure.CreateUIDef",
"version": "0.1.2-preview",
"parameters": {
"basics": [
{}
],
"steps": [
{
"name": "domain",
"label": "Domain Names",
"elements": [
{
"name": "domainInfo",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.InfoBox",
"visible": true,
"options": {
"icon": "Info",
"text": "Pick the domain name that you want to use for your app."
}
},
{
"name": "appServiceAvailabilityApi",
"type": "Microsoft.Solutions.ArmApiControl",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"path": "[concat(subscription().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/checknameavailability?api-version=2021-02-01')]",
"body": "[parse(concat('{\"name\":\"', concat('', steps('domain').domainName), '\", \"type\": \"Microsoft.Web/sites\"}'))]"
}
},
{
"name": "domainName",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.TextBox",
"label": "Domain Name Word",
"toolTip": "The name of your app service",
"placeholder": "yourcompanyname",
"constraints": {
"validations": [
{
"regex": "^[a-zA-Z0-9]{4,30}$",
"message": "Alphanumeric, between 4 and 30 characters."
},
{
"isValid": "[not(equals(steps('domain').appServiceAvailabilityApi.nameAvailable, false))]",
"message": "[concat('Error with the url: ', steps('domain').domainName, '. Reason: ', steps('domain').appServiceAvailabilityApi.reason)]"
},
{
"isValid": "[greater(length(steps('domain').domainName), 4)]",
"message": "The unique domain suffix should be longer than 4 characters."
},
{
"isValid": "[less(length(steps('domain').domainName), 30)]",
"message": "The unique domain suffix should be shorter than 30 characters."
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "section1",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.Section",
"label": "URLs to be created:",
"elements": [
{
"name": "domainExamplePortal",
"type": "Microsoft.Common.TextBlock",
"visible": true,
"options": {
"text": "[concat('https://', steps('domain').domainName, '.azurewebsites.net - The main app service URL')]"
}
}
],
"visible": true
}
]
}
],
"outputs": {
"desiredDomainName": "[steps('domain').domainName]"
}
}
}
You can copy the above code and test it in the createUiDefinition.json sandbox azure provides.
I have to create a private yii2 extension on BitBucket, and install it in my projects with composer.
The SSH is set up correctly as far as I can understand, it was not at first - and I got an error "repo not found or you do not have permission" (or something of the kind).
The composer finds the composer.json, I removed it to test and I got an error message that "valid composer.json not found".
Now when i run composer update in my Git Bash it just prints "Nothing to install or update" and nothing appears in my vendor/ folder.
I have no errors to go on here, any ideas are mostly welcome!
I've set up the repo and added the following files:
composer.json
{
"name": "ext. name",
"type": "yii2-extension",
"description": "My desc",
"authors": [
{
"name": "Jorgen",
"email": "jorgen#domain.com",
"homepage": "http://www.domain.com"
}
],
"minimum-stability": "stable",
"support": {
"source": "bitbucket.org/companyname/yii2-extensionname"
},
"require": {
"php": ">=5.4.0",
"yiisoft/yii2": "2.0.*"
},
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {
"companyname\\extensionname\\": ""
}
}
}
.gitignore
vendor/**
models/Test.php
<?php
namespace companyname\extensionname\models;
class Test
{
}
And I've added the following to my Yii2 project composer.json:
"repositories": [
{
"type": "vcs",
"url": "ssh://git#bitbucket.org/companyname/yii2-extensionname",
}
],
Update
So I figured out that if I add my repo in this format it's found and downloaded, but the autoloader-psr4.php file is not updated with my autoloading.
"repositories": [
{
"type": "package",
"package": {
"name": "vendor/yii2-extension-name",
"version": "master",
"source": {
"type": "git",
"url": "git#bitbucket.org:vendor/yii2-extension-name",
"reference": "origin/master"
}
}
}
When I have
"repositories": [
{
"type": "git",
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/vendor/yii2-extension-name"
}
],
I get the following error:
Problem 1
- The requested package vendor/yii2-extension-name could not be found in any version, there may be a typo in the package name.
Potential causes:
- A typo in the package name
- The package is not available in a stable-enough version according to your minimum-stability setting
see https://groups.google.com/d/topic/composer-dev/_g3ASeIFlrc/discussion for more details.
Read https://getcomposer.org/doc/articles/troubleshooting.md for further common problems.
There is no typos, its found and downloaded when I use "package". But then the autoloader is not updated.I've also tried all sorts of variations with git#, https and ssh. It always works as a package, never as a git or vcs.
Edit: oh, and minimum-stability is set to dev while troubleshooting.
You must use the correct name:
{
"name": "vendor/yii2-extension-name",
"type": "yii2-extension",
That is usually your Bitbucket username followed by the name of your repository.
That will work with your repositories Composer setting:
"repositories": [
{
"type": "git",
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/vendor/yii2-extension-name"
}
],