I have a css div I want first to rotate at 180deg from the center origin and then rotate from -45deg from the "new" bottom left corner.
But I don't manage to apply two different rotations
https://imgur.com/a/9GSToEx -> So you can better understand
CSS
.player1{
background-color: blueviolet;
transform-origin: center;
transform: rotate(180deg);
transform-origin: bottom left;
transform: rotate(45deg);
}
HTML
<div class="player1">
<div class="questionSpace"></div>
</div>
Thank you ^^
This can be a bit tricky because of the need to move the origin and the rotations not being additive.
A fairly straightforward way of getting round the problem is to enclose the element in a parent whose sole purpose is to allow an independent 180deg rotation.
This snippet colors the player1 element with a linear-gradient so it can be seen that the 180deg rotation has taken place.
.player1container {
display: inline-block;
transform: rotate(180deg);
margin: 20vmin;
/* added just for demo */
}
.player1 {
background-color: blueviolet;
width: 20vmin;
height: 10vmin;
background-image: linear-gradient(red, blue);
transform: rotate(-45deg);
transform-origin: top right;
}
<div class="player1container">
<div class="player1">
<div class="questionSpace"></div>
</div>
</div>
Hmm. Your code is wrong, because this rules have conflict and last rule have more priority;
transform: rotate(180deg);
...
transform: rotate(45deg);
You need to use #keyframes
for example:
#rotate {
0% {
transform: rotate(0);
}
50% {
transform: rotate(180deg);
}
100% {
transform-origin: left;
transform: rotate(45deg);
}
}
and then you need to use animation: rotate;
Related
I tried to rotate an animated font arrow when the window reached a min/max size, but when the rotate takes place the animation stops, also just for testing I tried replacing transform: rotate(90deg) to transform: rotate(0deg) which maintains the same arrow's direction but it causes to stop the animation too. The issue is with transform: rotate() and it can be easily tested by inspecting the element and activating/deactivating it in the browsers developer tools.
An easy way to bypass this can be using two <p> each one with an arrow in different direction and with vertical and horizontal animation each, and using display: none; to alternate between them when the min/max size switches, but what I want is to know why this is happening and how to solve this using this approach
.text-center {
text-align: center;
}
.lnr-x3 {
font-size: 2.4rem;
}
#media (max-width: 991px) {
#catalogArrow_h {
transform: rotate(90deg) !important;
transform-origin: center !important;
}
}
.animated-h {
text-decoration: none;
outline-style: none;
-webkit-animation: movingHorizontally 1.7s ease-in-out infinite;
animation: movingHorizontally 1.7s ease-in-out infinite;
}
#keyframes movingHorizontally {
0% {
transform: translateX(0px);
-webkit-transform: translateX(0px);
}
50% {
transform: translateX(-10px);
-webkit-transform: translateX(-10px);
}
100% {
transform: translateX(0px);
-webkit-transform: translateX(0px);
}
}
#-webkit-keyframes movingHorizontally {
0% {
transform: translateX(0px);
-webkit-transform: translateX(0px);
}
50% {
transform: translateX(-10px);
-webkit-transform: translateX(-10px);
}
100% {
transform: translateX(0px);
-webkit-transform: translateX(0px);
}
}
<!-- Font Icons -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v5.6.3/css/all.css" type="text/css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.linearicons.com/free/1.0.0/icon-font.min.css">
<div class="col-12">
<p class="text-center pt-3 px-5">
<span id="catalogArrow_h" class="lnr lnr-x3 lnr-arrow-right fas animated-h"></span>
</p>
</div>
Why does this happen
The transform property is "shared" for many transform functions and css doesn't combine any property's values.
Because your animation is made with transform: translateX(..), adding transform: rotate(..) will overwrite the property's value, not combine them. I.e. the resulting style is transform: rotate(..), not transform: translateX(..) rotate(..).
It would be the same if you were animating the box-shadow and then wanted an inset box-shadow too, it would overwrite one with the other. Or more simply - if you have .box { color: red; color: blue; } css will choose the last value (blue) to apply to the color property.
If there were css properties rotate: 90deg and translate: 4px (there are but not widely supported), then your animation would work, because the translate animation would be applying to a different property than the rotation, not overwriting one that is essentially shared amongst many transform functions.
Ways around it
There are many ways around this problem.
You can set the translate or rotate on the parent element
<div class="rotate-90">
<span class="translate-animate"></span>
</div>
You can add the rotate to your translate animation properties:
#keyframes movingHorizontallyRotated {
0%, 100% { transform: translateX(0px) rotate(90deg); }
50% { transform: translateX(-10px) rotate(90deg); }
}
You can animate a different property to translate the element:
#keyframes movingHorizontally {
0%, 100% { padding: 5px 10px 5px 0px; }
50% { padding: 5px 0px 5px 10px; }
}
You can use/make an already rotated arrow if your framework/ assets provides one.
I am having a bit of an issue with rotation of a cube. I want to make it cross-browser so I am transforming every side of the cube. When I am rotating from left to right the sides align perfectly on all browsers Chrome, Firefox and IE, BUT when the cube is rotated from top to bottom, the sides align only on Chrome (If I make the animation slower on Chrome the sides are broken the same way as the other browsers, so I think working properly is a bug :D). I have provided an example on jsfiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/0n9bnxe5/
HTML:
<div class="flip-card-content">
<div class="flip-card-side-a" style="background:red">
FRONT
</div>
<div class="flip-card-side-b" style="background:green">
BACK
</div>
<div class="flip-card-side-c" style="background:aqua">
LEFT
</div>
</div>
<button id="button">Flip-top</button>
<button id="button2">Filp-right</button>
CSS:
.flip-card-content {
position: relative;
margin: 100px;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
transform-style: preserve-3d;
perspective:1000px;
}
.flip-card-side-a,
.flip-card-side-b,
.flip-card-side-c{
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
height: 100%;
backface-visibility: hidden;
transform-origin:50% 50% 0px;
transition: all .5s ease-in-out;
}
.flip-card-side-a {
transform: rotateY(0deg) translateZ(100px);
z-index: 1;
}
.flip-card-side-b {
transform: rotateX(90deg) translateZ(100px);
}
.flip-card-side-c {
transform: rotateY(-90deg) translateZ(100px);
}
.flip .flip-card-side-a {
transform: rotateX(-90deg) translateZ(100px);
}
.flip .flip-card-side-b {
display:block;
transform: rotateY(0deg) translateZ(100px);
z-index: 1;
}
.flip-right .flip-card-side-a {
transform: rotateY(90deg) translateZ(100px);
}
.flip-
right .flip-card-side-b {
display:none;
}
.flip-right .flip-card-side-c {
transform: rotateY(0deg) translateZ(100px);
z-index:1;
}
JQUERY:
$("#button").on('click', function(){
$(".flip-card-content").removeClass("flip-right");
setTimeout(function(){
$(".flip-card-content").toggleClass("flip");
},500);
});
$("#button2").on('click', function(){
$(".flip-card-content").removeClass("flip");
setTimeout(function(){
$(".flip-card-content").toggleClass("flip-right");
},500);
});
Any advice is welcomed!
Your translateZ doesn't quite work in the way you expect. Have look at how I've positioned the faces on the cube here and compare it to your own. Ultimately, I find the easiest way to rotate items such as cubes etc. is to position all the elements and then just rotate the container.
Also for nice scaling of fonts, images etc. its preferable to leave the front face at its natural size rather than scale up (i.e. move everything backward in 3d space):
.box {
height: 100%;
position: relative;
transform: rotateX(0deg);
transform-origin: 50% 50% -100px;
transform-style: preserve-3d;
transition: all 1s;
width: 100%;
}
.box--rotate-top {
transform: rotateX(-90deg);
}
.box--rotate-left {
transform: rotateY(90deg);
}
.box__face {
backface-visibility: hidden;
height: 100%;
left: 0;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
}
.box__face--front {
background: #f90;
}
.box__face--top {
background: #369;
transform: rotateX(90deg) translateZ(200px);
transform-origin: 0 100% 0;
}
.box__face--left {
background: #867;
transform: rotateY(-90deg) translateZ(200px);
transform-origin: 100% 0 0;
}
Here is the fiddle.
Transition in 3d space are tricky, and different browsers can handle them differently.
Here you have your fiddle corrected.
Your best bet is to leave nothing to the browser imagination
so, instead of changing
transform: rotateY(0deg) translateZ(100px);
to
transform: rotateX(-90deg) translateZ(100px);
make the change happen from
transform: rotateX(0deg) rotateY(0deg) translateZ(100px);
to
transform: rotateX(-90deg) rotateY(0deg) translateZ(100px);
Notice that I didn't change the transform from a mathematical point of view; but now every property matches a similar one.
Note just in case you want to know, in the first case IE is making the followng transition: change the angle of rotation from 0 to -90deg. At the same time, change the axis of rotation from Y to X. So, at the middle of the transition, the rotation is wrong (from your point of view), but in a mathematic sense, both ways of understanding the transition make sense.
Problem
I'm trying to make a layer appear like it's a wall falling down, revealing the layer behind it. I've setup two fixed div positions. The "Wall" div has a z-index of 9999, the "Background" div has a z-index of 0;
In Webkit browsers (Safari/IOS) that I've tested, it seems like once the animation starts on the "wall", the z-indexes are lost or ignored, causing the "wall" layer to abruptly disappear behind the background div.
Any ideas on how to preserve the z-indexes of the layers? Thanks in advance!
Example Code
(note: jsFiddle at the bottom)
HTML Code
<div id="wall">
This is the wall
</div>
<div id="background">
This is the background
</div>
<button id="start" style="float: right;">
Flip Down
</button>
Some javascript to enable the button
$('#start').click(function(){
alert('Should Fall Down like a wall, revealing the background');
$('#wall').addClass('animated flipDown');
});
CSS Code (cribbed from animate.css)
#wall{
background-color: #F00;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
position:fixed;
top:0;
left:0;
z-index: 9999;
}
#background{
background-color: #00F;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
position:fixed;
top:0;
left:0;
z-index: 0;
}
.animated {
-webkit-animation-duration: 1s;
animation-duration: 1s;
-webkit-animation-fill-mode: both;
animation-fill-mode: both;
}
/*** flipDown ***/
#-webkit-keyframes flipDown {
0% {
-webkit-transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(0deg);
transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(0deg);
-webkit-transform-style: flat;
opacity: 1;
}
100% {
-webkit-transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(90deg);
transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(90deg);
-webkit-transform-style: flat;
opacity: 1;
}
}
#keyframes flipDown {
0% {
-webkit-transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(0deg);
-ms-transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(0deg);
transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(0deg);
opacity: 1;
}
100% {
-webkit-transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(90deg);
-ms-transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(90deg);
transform: perspective(400px) rotateX(90deg);
opacity: 0;
}
}
.flipDown {
-webkit-animation-name: flipDown;
animation-name: flipDown;
-webkit-backface-visibility: visible !important;
-ms-backface-visibility: visible !important;
backface-visibility: visible !important;
-webkit-transform-origin: bottom;
-ms-transform-origin: bottom;
transform-origin: bottom;
}
jsFiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/3mHe2/2/
Check out the differences in Safari vs Chrome.
My rotating element wasn't suitable to have a neighbour to the background, but I fixed it by applying
transform: translateZ(1000px);
transform-style: preserve-3d;
to the parent of the rotating element. Safari now thinks it's 1000px infront of the background.
Found a solution. Hopefully this helps someone in the future.
It turns out that there is a "bug" in the safari versions of webkit. When a 3d css animation is playing, the original z-indexes are lost. Instead, it seems like the animating pieces are put into a separate z-index "group" that is separate from the rest of the z-indexes of the DOM.
The solution is to join the backdrop div and the wall div into the same z-index group by wrapping it in a div with a webkit-transform that doesn't change anything. That causes the backdrop and wall to be children of the wrapper div and the z-indexing of the respective children are preserved.
<div id="wrapper" style="-webkit-transform: translate3d(0px, 0px, 0px);">
<div id="wall">
This is the wall
</div>
<div id="background">
This is the background
</div>
</div>
I believe it is the same or similar issue to this:
css z-index lost after webkit transform translate3d
I ran into this issue and nothing would fix it until i added perspective to the parent container of the item that should be behind.
.wrap{
perspective: 1000px;
}
In my case I was able to solve the issue by applying translateZ to the parent and translate scale to the child.
.parent {
transform: translateZ(22px);
}
.child {
transform: scale(0.955);
}
When applying a CSS scale transform to an element, is it possible to set the 'from' value as the current scale?
For example, consider the following 2 CSS keyframes used to apply separate growing and shrinking animation transforms:
#-webkit-keyframes grow
{
from { -webkit-transform: scale(0,0); }
to { -webkit-transform: scale(1,1); }
}
#-webkit-keyframes shrink
{
from { -webkit-transform: scale(1,1); }
to { -webkit-transform: scale(0,0); }
}
This will successfully scale the element it's applied to, but always from 0 to 1 (or vice-versa). If the shrink keyframe gets applied before the grow keyframe has finished, it has the effect of 'jumping' the scale to 0 before the transform begins.
You can see this effect in this jsFiddle showing CSS scale transform on mouseover
Notice that if you mouse over the black square and then quickly mouse out, the scale transform is not smooth.
What I'm essentially after is something like the following:
#-webkit-keyframes grow
{
from { -webkit-transform: CURRENT_SCALE; }
to { -webkit-transform: scale(1,1); }
}
Your animation makes the element go from 0% scale to 100% scale on hover, and from 100% to 0% scale on mouseOut.
I think in this case, the solution could be setting the basic scale of the element according to its start point :
#output
{
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border-radius: 50%;
background: #FF0000;
display: inline-block;
-ms-transform: scale(0,0);
transform: scale(0,0);
-webkit-transform: scale(0,0);
}
In this case, I would harldy recommend using pure CSS solution, using transition on :hover : http://jsfiddle.net/bg6aj/21/
You wont have any "jumping" effect :
#output
{
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border-radius: 50%;
background: #FF0000;
display: block;
-ms-transform: scale(0,0);
transform: scale(0,0);
-webkit-transform: scale(0,0);
transition: all .2s;
-webkit-transition: all .2s;
}
#touchPad:hover + #output {
-ms-transform: scale(1,1);
transform: scale(1,1);
-webkit-transform: scale(1,1);
}
At this point, you'll have no more jumping effect.
Then : can we do something like :
#-webkit-keyframes grow
{
from { -webkit-transform: scale(0,0); }
to { -webkit-transform: scale(1,1); }
}
Answer : quite easy :
#-webkit-keyframes grow
{
0% { -webkit-transform: scale(1,1); }
50% { -webkit-transform: scale(0,0); }
100% { -webkit-transform: scale(1,1); }
}
Which means: take my element (as scale default is 100%), render it with 0% scale at 50% of the animation, and turn it back at 100%. Trying to set something like current_scale doesn't make sense.
Considering that, I'll definitely choose the Transition solution.
I have written below code. But now the requirement is that the image should be rotated 180 degrees. How can I achieve this?
#cell {
background-image: url("../images/logo.PNG");
background-attachment: fixed;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 0px 250px;
background-color: #FFFFFF;
border-left: 2px;
}
HTML tag:
<td width="2%" id="cell"/>
One cross-browser solution is
#cell {
-webkit-transform: rotate(180deg); /* Chrome and other webkit browsers */
-moz-transform: rotate(180deg); /* FF */
-o-transform: rotate(180deg); /* Opera */
-ms-transform: rotate(180deg); /* IE9 */
transform: rotate(180deg); /* W3C compliant browsers */
/* IE8 and below */
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Matrix(M11=-1, M12=0, M21=0, M22=-1, DX=0, DY=0, SizingMethod='auto expand');
}
Note, that for IE8 and below, the rotation center point is not located in the center of the image (as it happens with all other browsers). So, for IE8 and below, you need to play with negative margins (or paddings) to shift the image up and left.
The element needs to be blocked. Other units that can be used are:
180deg = .5turn = 3.14159rad = 200grad
If you don't have any text in the <td> you can use transform: rotate(180deg); on it. If you do have text, this will rotate the text too. To prevent that you can put a <div> inside the <td>, put the text inside that, and rotate that 180 degrees (which puts it upright again).
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ThinkingStiff/jBHRH/
HTML:
<table>
<tr><td width="20%" id="cell"><div>right-side up<div></td></tr>
</table>
CSS:
#cell {
background-image: url(http://thinkingstiff.com/images/matt.jpg);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain;
color: white;
height: 150px;
transform: rotate(180deg);
width: 100px;
}
#cell div {
transform: rotate(180deg);
}
Output:
You can also try this axial type rotation OR rotation on Z-axis.
.box {
background: url('http://aashish.coolpage.biz/img/about/7.jpg');
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
transition: transform .5s linear;
transform-style: preserve-3D;
}
.box:hover {
transform: rotateY(180deg);
}
<div class="box"></div>
You can use CSS3 for this, but there are some browser issues:
transform: rotate(180deg);
Also look here: CSS3 rotate alternative?