Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I have free Oracle Cloud always free instance. I was not able to connect to it by ssh and it looks like it was stopped.
I cannot re-run it. I get:
Unable to start instance: Instance ocid1.instance.oc1.eu-frankfurt-1.antheljscauatxycmb7qvp36l6jmfffvhfjqspjo6zz3xzbjletwexs7fvsa is disabled and will not accept any action requests. Please contact customer support to reenable.
Customer support doesn't work. Any idea what to do and why it was stopped ?
Is that an ampere A1 flex instance that was stopped? are you within the initial 30 days free trail or it got expired?
I discovered the same issue today with my always-free VM. This Redit post from a few months back is really helpful.
The solution is to create a backup of the boot volume, then terminate the stopped VM instance without deleting the associated boot volume, and finally create a new instance matching the specs of the original VM using the "Create Instance" option from the boot volume page.
The Redit post provides a nice, clear set of instructions. Worked perfectly for me.
As to the reason for Oracle disabling the instance in the first place, #Anupam's answer is very helpful, though I'm not sure where this info came from. I certainly didn't get a heads-up email like the one sent out when Oracle indicated they were going to pause my transaction database.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 8 years ago.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
This question appears to be off-topic because it lacks sufficient information to diagnose the problem. Describe your problem in more detail or include a minimal example in the question itself.
Improve this question
A novice here. The support from mediaTemple and my current host have been quite unhelpful, so stackOverflow may be my hero.
My problem is that entering "www" before the domain and leaving it out direct to different servers.
The background on this is that I first registered the domain with mediaTemple and had a plan with their gridHosting, but after finding their service unsatisfactory, I cancelled my gridhosting plan and moved to another host. This problem occurs even after updating the nameservers. In short, the web server is hosted by proMinecraftHost, but the domain is registered under mediaTemple.
Support from both sides say it's due to dns and the nameservers needing 24-48 hours to update, but I'm fairly skeptical that it really is the cause.
Summarizing, www.mscraft.org directs to the correct server, but mscraft.org(mscraft.org) alone does not.
If anyone could help me, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Thanks in advance.
It's possible you just have the old DNS info in your cache. Try clearing your browser's cache, and also flushing your DNS. On Windows you could do ipconfig /flushdns in a command prompt. Also you could try pinging both addresses (with and without www). You should see the same IP address for both, as I got 198.154.108.107 when I tried them. In other words, I think it's working properly - you are just going to the old location because your machine is remembering too much.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to install MySQL server at work. The goal is to give Remote Access to different users. This part is OK. I have granted permission to others users and it worked.
My question is how and where can i install MySQL server so it is not depended on my work computer being on. At my Works network we have common Networks harddisk. If i install MySQL server there, is it gonna be running all the time? or do i need to contact IT in order to install MySQL on the server hosting Our main work database?
thanks for helping.
There are a lot of considerations to be made when installing new servers. If you are going to be running an SQL Server your I.T. Department should know about it. They are also going to be the best people to determine potential security concerns and where it would be most suitably hosted.
When you say you have "common Networks harddisk" I presume you mean a mapped network drive or SMB Shares. This is for data storage and you cannot install anything to there without direct access to the server they are running on.
It is also likely that your company is already running a dedicated SQL Server which you may be able to utilize.
Either way if you have an IT Department, They need to know and they are the only people who can answer this question.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am currently migrating a localhost MySQL database of quite some size to an AWS server with Oracle. I am using the SQL Developer tool with an installed add-on feature for MySQL support. The migration process is going quite slow and from the diagnostics tools it seems that the space on the server is reduced (sign of data transfer) every fourth hour.
Is this due to the diagnostic tool or any constaint added to the server?
If it is a constraint on the server, how can I remove this so data can be transferred faster?
I have now been migrating for about 40 hours and just 2 gigabytes are transferred. It seems like the transfers are performed every fourth hour.
Hard to tell from your post but are you using the migration wizard in SQL Developer? Is it an online or offline migration?
An online migration for a large database will be very slow, as it is literally rebuilding your database one row at a time, including integrity checks, redo generation, index building, etc.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there some ready off the shelf solution that would periodically connect to MySQL server, check for crashed tables and automatically initiate repair and/or send administrator an email?
MySQL has come up with a MySQL Enterprise Monitor web applciation tool that helps you to monitor the MySQL Servers. It can also be used to send an alert the administrators of errors.
I resorted to writing a simple Scheduled task that runs myisamchk periodically
It is not ready off the shelf, but very easy solution - every table crash is written to MySQL error log (usually .err in data directory. You can create very simple script that is awaken every X minutes and checks this log file (using tail -XXX command for example) for entries with 'marked as crashed'. Then it can alert in any way.
Is it crash a lot? if it is crashing a lot , I think you have to find the reason for why it is crashing. May be there is a hardware problem or another problems.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I got an error with my Msaccess DB.
multiple users are using this DB's frontend. I do not know why I am getting this error message as follows
Error 3218 Could not update; currently locked
can someone help me please......
Get everybody out of their mdb files. Someone might be trying to update the same record. It might even be you, in another instance active on your PC.
The elephant in the room here is that multiple users are using the same front end. This is generally the first step down the road of access pain that often leads to access getting tarred with the “Access is not fit for more than 5 users” brush.
First thing is to get every user to have their own copy of the front end on their local drive. You can use the excellent access auto FE updater to make rolling out a new version easy
www.autofeupdater.com
This is weird. I got this error message because there was no enough space in the Shared drive, I just removed 1GB of some unneccessary files from the shared drive and the application works fine now.
But, took some time to figure it out.