Been using Google Colab for some time now, but recently i upgraded to Pro+ thinking it would give me the possibility to open more sessions simultaniously. I was wrong despite what the description about the upgrade stated in the Google Colab Pro+.
So i'm asking if anyone knows if it's normal or should i report it as a 'bug'?
If anyone can help me out, it would be most welcome.
Thanks
I responded to a similar post here. https://stackoverflow.com/a/69132974/16879039.
TLDR I think its a bug. If you need more resources immediately, I had luck by choosing a TPU session instead of GPU (No guarantees and might be difficult to convert your code depending on what you're doing).
Related
When launching Chrome, the software_reporter_tool.exe process seems to scan my hard drive. According to the information found on the net, it would be a kind of malware detector.
I already have an anti-virus program, so I don't see the point of this process.
Who can tell me how to disable it?
Thanks in advance
I just Start using System Frontier, The installation was a little complicated with a couple of errors but it was completed and the page is loading I completed the Post-installation steps.
Now the Issue:
When I go to tools create tool load the information and script, The Edit Page that should load after that is not loading is just a Blank Page.
What I try:
I check Data base information: I don't have a basic knowledge of MySQL but so far I see no errors.
I tried to restart the IIS Server and services.
I tried to load the Page in Different browsers and Run as incognito still the page will not load.
Conclusion:
If anyone has tried the tools and presented with this error and might have a solution please let me know Thanks in advance.
PS: I'm not a native English speaker so if there was any typos or error sorry about that I hope it was understandable.
After reading a little more I found the issue and there is an option that should have been activated for the issue to be a result or I will say to activate the option.
Answers:
Add an entry for your management server. (Settings > Management Servers)
Sorry, I hope I did not waste anyone's time.
I'm trying to find a way of replicating the action / instruction that a physical button being pushed on a control panel sends to the software of a CNC machine of ours.
Ultimately I would like to integrate this instruction into an executable file I could make using AutoIT, but that is further down the line!
After some googling, resulting in all kinds of weird and wonderful results, I'm at a loss of how to begin this task. I believe I need to either use debugging software to find the instruction as it takes place, or possibly Process Monitor?
The machine runs off of a Windows XP machine.
Unfortunately obtaining this information from the manufacturer is not an option.
If anyone could help point me in the right direction that would be appreciated,
Thanks
Edit: I have since come across Windows Hooks, Detours and Interception, but still haven't made much progress!
Your topic is too broad ... You might as well be asking "How do I reverse engineer?" First thing I would do would be to load up the program in a debugger, put a breakpoint in the callback function and find out what the button is doing. What you will most likely find is that it's pushing some information onto the stack and making a call to an external .DLL such as an API or device driver ( you could probably find out which DLL using Process Monitor too ). Just load that .DLL up into your new program and make the same call.
I have a Realtime API application in which the prototype of gapi.drive.realtime.CollaborativeString is modified to provide extra methods. Today (October 30, 2014) at about 10 AM EDT, the app suddenly stopped working. It turns out that accessing gapi.drive.realtime.CollaborativeString.prototype throws an error because gapi.drive.realtime.CollaborativeString, along with all the other Collaborative classes, is now undefined!
I am currently working around this by adding the required methods to each CollaborativeString individually, but I would appreciate if someone on the Google Drive API team could tell me:
Has the API actually been changed today to remove the public handles for these classes?
If so, why?
Most importantly, why was there no warning or change in the documentation? Unless there was no change and I'm just being stupid, this caused significant downtime on a production service today. The documentation still lists the classes in the gapi.drive.realtime namespace.
Thank you in advance for your clarification and sorry for the StackOverflow format. Also posted in the Google Drive issues forum.
We made some changes to the API to avoid exposing obfuscated private properties, which were causing problems for several of our users who were using custom objects (https://developers.google.com/drive/realtime/reference/gapi.drive.realtime.custom).
I'm sorry for the downtime that this caused. We did not know that anyone was modifying the prototype objects, and in fact we never doing so would work at all (though obviously it does).
I would be happy to have a 1-on-1 conversation about your app and how we can prevent future downtime. We have a pre-release channel that I would be happy to whitelist you for so that you can test changes before they affect your production users.
I am new to the field of crash analysis. I recently, by accident, happened to crash Google Chrome. I do not know the reason as to why the crash really happened. I'd like to know it in depth though.
When the crash happened, there was a Crash report that was generated. I have saved that report in a text file on my system, as I did not know what to do with it at the out start.
Now I have heard people in the info sec world talk about things like, analyzing and reversing a crash dump, fuzzing a crash dump etc. and trying to reproduce the crash.
I am interested in understanding how these things are done and in the first place what they actually are. I need help with resources that can help me understand how to analyze and reproduce a crash etc. I happened to come across: -Chrome: Found a crash, is it a security vulnerability? and Best way to triage crashes found via fuzzing, on Linux? but these resources seemed a bit advance and not very basic. Also googling up gave me some resources of how to analyze a BSOD in Windows, but I could not find anything relevant for Google Chrome Crash Analysis.
Please help provide some good resources where I can understand these concepts.
My Platform is Mac OSX 10.9.2 and my Google Chrome is Version 35.0.1916.153.
Im afraid this is a broad topic. For a head start, read about use after free , index out of read/write class of bugs. These are the most common in browsers.
By reproducing they mean you do the same step of things which made the browser crash and see if it is crashing again. Like lets say opening a malformed HTML/PDF/Font (or any browser input, there are many many more file types.) If you could reproduce the crash, you could attach Chrome to a debugger and check the registers at the time of crash.
To know if the crash is of any use, see this particular question on SE. For OSX, there is an amazing tool called Crashwrangler by Apple itself. If Crashwrangler reports the crash as exploitable, it is a definite security bug. Else you would need to do manual analysis to reach a conclusion. For this you need some knowledge about assembly language and software exploitation. OpenSecurityTraining has some amazing content on this. I highly recommend it. Start with x86 Assembly on the beginner section and finally MOV to reverse engineering. It is important to know how the stack is laid out in the memory and registers to understand a crash dump. I wish you all the best in the journey. Hope this helps.