EDIT: TLDR there is currently no way to know material names on the fragment level.
I want to read the materials from fragments of a node and change their materials according to a map that uses the Revit material names as keys.
I have the following "Materials and Finishes" properties from a node in the model (retrieved via Viewer3D):
And I have the following THREE materials from the fragments of that node:
Is there a way to set the names of the THREE materials to match the model data (or use them at all)?
Ideally I would be able to match these THREE materials with the following materials extracted from this node:
The SVF file format (generated by the Model Derivative service and loaded by Forge Viewer) does not preserve material names unfortunately. The fragments are simply associated with a specific material based on its index in the list.
The "Materials and Finishes" data is basically just a property specific to the original file (in this case a Revit model), and it may not be available in other file formats.
EDIT: I tried looking into the Materials.json.gz file, and unfortunately the names are not included there, either:
{
"name": "LMVTK Simple Materials",
"version": "1.0",
"scene": {
"SceneUnit": 8215,
"YIsUp": 0
},
"materials": {
"0": {
"version": 2,
"userassets": ["0"],
"materials": {
"0": {
"tag": "",
"proteinType": "",
"definition": "SimplePhong",
"properties": {
"integers": {
"mode": 4
},
"booleans": {
"color_by_object": false,
"generic_is_metal": false,
"generic_backface_cull": true
},
"scalars": {
"generic_transparency": {
"units": "",
"values": [0]
}
},
"colors": {
"generic_diffuse": {
"values": [{
"r": 0,
"g": 1,
"b": 0,
"a": 1
}]
}
}
},
"transparent": false,
"textures": {
}
}
}
},
"1": {
"version": 2,
"userassets": ["0"],
"materials": {
"0": {
"tag": "",
"proteinType": "",
"definition": "SimplePhong",
"properties": {
"integers": {
"mode": 4
},
"booleans": {
"color_by_object": false,
"generic_is_metal": false,
"generic_backface_cull": true
},
"scalars": {
"generic_transparency": {
"units": "",
"values": [0]
}
},
"colors": {
"generic_diffuse": {
"values": [{
"r": 0.400000,
"g": 0.400000,
"b": 0.400000,
"a": 1
}]
}
}
},
"transparent": false,
"textures": {
}
}
}
}
...
}
Related
I have the following code which I'm trying to read in CMake.
{
"demo": [
{
"name": "foo0",
"url": "url1",
"verify_ssl": true
},
{
"name": "foo1",
"url": "url1",
"verify_ssl": true
},
{
"name": "foo2",
"url": "url2",
"verify_ssl": true
}
]
}
I'm trying to access a member from the list above, for example demo[0].name without success, what I'm doing wrong?
file(READ "${CONAN_CACHE}/demo.json" MY_JSON_STRING)
string(JSON CUR_NAME GET ${MY_JSON_STRING} demo[0].name)
One at a time.
string(JSON CUR_NAME GET ${MY_JSON_STRING} demo 0 name)
I'm unable to successfully display a model+texture map WITHOUT the viewer applying lighting effects to it.
I am using a localised version of the viewer to investigate the problem but I welcome an Autodesk Material Library setting solution if it exists.
This is an example of how I want to see the material, i.e. no specular, no reflections (ignore the fact this example is in three.js): https://stemkoski.github.io/Three.js/Texture-Repeat.html
This is an example of my problem: https://myhub.autodesk360.com/ue29c31db/g/shares/SHabee1QT1a327cf2b7a7879b97973545818?viewState=NoIgbgDAdAjCA0IBGMAsBmATAMwKYBMBaCAQwHYBjQ1fATlUNt13UO1pIwDYZMAOTCVogAukA
I have attempted many different "Autodesk Material Library" settings, including ramping up "Self Illumination" however, the texture either fails to load and/or, that glossy shine persists.
Could the Materials.json be tweaked to fix this problem?
This is my Materials.json
{
"name": "LMVTK Simple Materials",
"version": "1.0",
"scene": {
"SceneUnit": 8214,
"YIsUp": 2
},
"materials": {
"0": {
"version": 2,
"userassets": ["0"],
"materials": {
"0": {
"tag": "0",
"proteinType": "",
"definition": "SimplePhong",
"properties": {
"integers": {
"mode": 4
},
"booleans": {
"color_by_object": false,
"generic_is_metal": false,
"generic_backface_cull": false
},
"scalars": {
"generic_transparency": {
"units": "",
"values": [0]
}
},
"colors": {
"generic_diffuse": {
"values": [{
"r": 1,
"g": 1,
"b": 1,
"a": 1
}]
}
}
},
"transparent": false,
"textures": {
"generic_diffuse": {
"connections": ["1_generic_diffuse"]
}
}
},
"1_generic_diffuse": {
"tag": "0",
"definition": "UnifiedBitmap",
"properties": {
"scalars": {
"unifiedbitmap_RGBAmount": {
"units": "",
"values": [1]
}
},
"uris": {
"unifiedbitmap_Bitmap": {
"values": ["image0.jpg"]
}
},
"booleans": {
"texture_URepeat": true,
"texture_VRepeat": true,
"unifiedbitmap_Invert": false
},
"integers": {
"texture_MapChannel": 1
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
I recommend trying this approach. Literally bypass the LMV materials (which are all effected by lighting) and use a custom THREE material that is not effected by lighting. You may possibly need to create a custom shader too.
Start with this...
https://forge.autodesk.com/cloud_and_mobile/2016/02/custom-transparent-meshes-with-view-data-api.html
Let me know if that fixes the problem, and if not I can deep dive into it further.
Best, Michael
I'm prototyping a web service to convert data using Design Automation API in Autodesk Forge.
My approach is to invoke an activity that executes a script to import a target data file (such as STEP, IGES format).
As an example, I created an activity to convert a STEP file to DWG as follows:
{
"HostApplication": "",
"RequiredEngineVersion": "22.0",
"Parameters": {
"InputParameters": [{
"Name": "Source",
"LocalFileName": "input.stp"
}, {
"Name": "HostDwg",
"LocalFileName": "$(HostDwg)"
}],
"OutputParameters": [{
"Name": "Result",
"LocalFileName": "output.dwg"
}]
},
"Instruction": {
"CommandLineParameters": null,
"Script": "import\ninput.stp\nsaveas\n\noutput.dwg\n"
},
"Version": 1,
"Id": "Step2Dwg"
}
The workitem to invoke this activity was executed without errors, but the output file (output.dwg) had nothing imported from the input file (input.stp).
Perhaps this is because some fields (e.g., AllowedChildProcess) were missing in the definition of the activity "Step2Dwg", but I do not know how to fix it.
My questions are:
How to fix the definition of the activity "Step2Dwg" to convert data successfully?
Is there any other approach to create an activity to convert data successfully?
You can use the Activity “Translate-STEP2DWG". It takes a .stp file as input and generate result.dwg as output. This is a public activity that anybody can send workitems against to it.
The activity is defined like this:
{
"Id": "Translate-STEP2DWG",
"AppPackages": [],
"HostApplication": "AcTranslators.exe",
"RequiredEngineVersion": "22.0",
"Parameters": {
"InputParameters": [
{
"Name": "HostDwg",
"LocalFileName": "source.stp"
}
],
"OutputParameters": [
{
"Name": "Result",
"LocalFileName": "result.dwg"
}
]
},
"Instruction": {
"CommandLineParameters": "-i source.stp -o result.dwg",
"Script": ""
},
"AllowedChildProcesses": [
],
"IsPublic": true,
"Version": 1,
"Description": ""
}
Here is a sample workitem request body:
{
"ActivityId": "Translate-STEP2DWG",
"Arguments": {
"InputArguments": [
{
"Resource": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/AutoCAD-Core-Engine-Services/TestDwg/3DStep.stp",
"Name": "HostDwg"
}
],
"OutputArguments": [
{
"Name": "Result",
"HttpVerb": "POST"
}
]
}
}
I have a MongoDB that is structured as below:
[
{
"subject_id": "1",
"name": "Maria",
"dob": "1/1/00",
"gender": "F",
"visits": {
"1/1/18": {
"date_entered": "1/2/18",
"entered_by": "Sally"
},
"1/2/18": {
"date_entered": "1/2/18",
"entered_by": "Tim",
}
},
"samples": {
"XXX123": {
"collected_by": "Sally",
"collection_date": "1/3/18"
}
}
},
{
"subject_id": "2",
"name": "Bob",
"dob": "1/2/00",
"gender": "M",
"visits": {
"1/3/18": {
"date_entered": "1/4/18",
"entered_by": "Tim"
}
},
"samples": {
"YYY456": {
"collected_by": "Sally",
"collection_date": "1/5/18"
},
"ZZZ789": {
"collected_by": "Tim",
"collection_date": "1/6/18"
},
"AAA123": {
"collected_by": "Sally",
"collection_date": "1/7/18"
}
}
}
]
If I wanted to query the database to find all samples collected by Sally or all visits entered by Tim, what would be the best way of doing that?
I'm new to MongoDB and my attempts with various regex's haven't produced results. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I first used project on the required fields to use objectToArray followed by unwind to create separate records for array created in project.
The results are then filtered using match.
This works for the data provided in the question -
db.so.aggregate([
{$project: {visits: {$objectToArray: "$visits"}, samples: {$objectToArray: "$samples"}}},
{$unwind: "$visits"},
{$unwind: "$samples"},
{ $match: {
$or : [
{ "visits.v.entered_by" : "Tim" },
{ "samples.v.collected_by" : "Sally" }
]
}
}
])
I am implementing a restful service where I am getting the pdf names and their ids from the database in the JSON fromat. Which one of the both the convenient JSON resful service response?
First Option:
{
"results": {
"documentNames": [
"test.pdf",
"ireport-ultimate-guide.pdf",
"sending report.pdf",
"Motor Hour.pdf"
],
"documentds": [
21116,
21117,
21118,
21119
]
}
}
Second Option:
{
"results": {
"21116": "test.pdf",
"21117": "ireport-ultimate-guide.pdf",
"21118": "sending report.pdf",
"21119": "Motor Hour.pdf"
}
}
I would use this "third option": The result is a list of object.
{
"result": [{
"id": "21116",
"filename": "test.pdf"
},
{
"id": "21117",
"filename": "ireport-ultimate-guide.pdf"
},
{
"id": "21118",
"filename": "sending report.pdf"
},
{
"id": "21119",
"filename": "Motor Hour.pdf"
}
]
}
because it better models the object structure.
I would create an entity for each document that contains both name and I'd.
[
{"name": "doc_1", "id": 123},
{"name": "doc_2", "id": 456}
]