I'm using AWS JavaScript SDK in nodejs application. SDK setup is as below.
const aws = require('aws-sdk');
aws.config.logger = console;
This config is creating too much noise on console and it's difficult to go over the log.
I tried removing aws.config.logger = console; but that doesn't change anything, still every log is being printed on console.
You can try by disable the Main Console to print anything in the log bar.
Put the below code in your main file through which your server get starts.
Here is the code snippet:
console.log = function(){};
or
console = function(){};
Your complete code may look like:
const aws = require('aws-sdk');
aws.config.logger = console;
console.log = function(){};
Related
Im trying to perform a simple download of a .docx file info a buffer so I can handle it latter inside my Cloud Function. I've been using the whole Google Platform for multiple projects but never faced the need to download in server side, and now I need to, I just cant.
The following piece of code is not working, it just sends timeout as a response (I don't even get an error If I try to catch it or something):
var bucket = admin.storage().bucket("gs://myBucket.com");
return bucket.file("001Lineales/4x3-1/1000.docx").download().then((contents)=>{
var buffer = contents[0];
//I never get into this point
}).catch((error)=>{
//No error
})
I tried in a local NodeJs script and worked as expected. Also tried to perform a readStream() download but no luck, the function gets hang up in any try of downloading the file.
return new Promise((resolve,reject)=>{
var archivo = bucket.file(selectedCategory).createReadStream();
var array = [];
//Under here, never happens
archivo.on('data', (d) => {array.push(d)}).on("end",()=>{
var newbuff = Buffer.concat(array);
resolve(newbuff)
})
})
The file permissions read/write are public. And the main problem is that debugging is difficult cause Im not able to perform this function in local emulator.
What can I do? Thanks in advance.
EDIT:
Double checking a local call with emulator, I get the following error:
Anonymous caller does not have storage.objects.get access to the Google Cloud Storage object.
Double check the service account hat you've assigned to the Cloud Function and that you've given it the permission it needs.
I think Storage Object Viewer will give you what you need to read a file into the buffer.
By default, if you haven't changed it, the AppEngine's default service account gets used, which I don't think has access to Storage.
I have this batch file, which is supposed to run the npm package Nativefier:
SET /P _inputname= Please enter a URL:
nativefier %_inputname%
I would like to run this from an electron app's index.html. I have previously tried using an html form and using the following javascript:
$("form").submit(function(){
var WshShell = new ActiveXObject("WScript.Shell");
WshShell.Run ("Experiment.bat");
});
However, this has not seemed to work. Does anyone have a better solution? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
(I am doing this with the intent of building a desktop application, it is not for a webpage)
The ActiveXObject API you're using is only available in old versions of Internet Explorer, and not Chromium (which is the browser engine behind Electron).
In general, in order to run a native executable from Electron, you want to use Node.js child_process module. It should look something like this. Make sure that webPreferences.nodeIntegration is true in your BrowserWindow options so that you can use Node APIs in your renderer process.
const { spawn } = require("child_process");
$("form").submit(() => {
const process = spawn("path/to/executable.bat");
});
Note that you don't necessarily need a .bat file at all.
If you have nativefier as a dependency, you could grab the executable from your node_modules folder and spawn that directly. For instance (assuming that your form submission contains the URL required for Nativefier to run:
const { spawn } = require("child_process");
$("form").submit((myURL) => {
const process = spawn(`/node_modules/path/to/nativefier/binary ${myURL}`);
});
I am currently moving an ASP.NET application made by a third party from Windows to Linux. I read the documentation and nothing indicates this should be a problem, but sadly
var profile = new CredentialProfile(profileName, credentials) {
Region = RegionEndpoint.EUWest1
};
var netSDKFile = new NetSDKCredentialsFile();
netSDKFile.RegisterProfile(profile);
throws the following exception
Unhandled Exception: Amazon.Runtime.AmazonClientException: The encrypted store is not available. This may be due to use of a non-Windows operating system or Windows Nano Server, or the current user account may not have its profile loaded.
at Amazon.Util.Internal.SettingsManager.EnsureAvailable()
at Amazon.Runtime.CredentialManagement.NetSDKCredentialsFile..ctor()
Is the Amazon .NET SDK(or a part of it) not supported on Linux? If that is the case, is there a possible workaround?
For the most part there is very little that isn't supported on Linux that is supported on Windows. Off of the top of my head I can't think of anything besides NetSDKCredentialsFile which is due to the fact it uses Win32 API to encrypt credentials.
You can use SharedCredentialsFile to register a profile in the credentials file stored under ~/.aws/credentials. This is the same credential stored supported by all of the other AWS SDK and Tools.
Following on from Norm's answer, I found this resource that explained how to use Shared Credentials: https://medium.com/#somchat/programming-using-aws-net-sdk-9ce3f5119633
This is how I was previously using NetSDKCredentials, which won't work for Linux/Mac OS:
//Try this code on a non-Windows platform and you will see the above error
var options = new CredentialProfileOptions
{
AccessKey = "access_key",
SecretKey = "secret_key"
};
var profile = new CredentialProfile("default", options);
profile.Region = RegionEndpoint.USWest1;
NetSDKCredentialsFile file = new NetSDKCredentialsFile();
file.RegisterProfile(profile);
But I was then able to use this example to use SharedCredentials:
var credProfileStoreChain = new CredentialProfileStoreChain();
if (credProfileStoreChain.TryGetAWSCredentials("default", out AWSCredentials awsCredentials))
{
Console.WriteLine("Access Key: " + awsCredentials.GetCredentials().AccessKey);
Console.WriteLine("Secret Key: " + awsCredentials.GetCredentials().SecretKey);
}
Console.WriteLine("Hello World!");
You'll then be able to see your code is able to access the keys:
Access Key: A..................Q
Secret Key: 8.......................................p
Hello World!
I then used System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.IsOSPlatform() (as I am using this code on both Windows and Linux), to determine which credentials to use:
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
//NETSDK Credentials only work on Windows - must use SharedCredentials on Linux
bool isLinux = System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.IsOSPlatform(OSPlatform.Linux);
if (isLinux) {
//Use SharedCredentials
} else {
//Use NetSDKCredentials
}
You may find this section of the AWS documentation helpful, too: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sdk-for-net/v3/developer-guide/net-dg-config-creds.html#creds-locate
After reloading the page, method
cast.framework.CastContext.getInstance()
returns status 'NOT_CONNECTED' and 'NO_SESSION'
My code example:
const castContext = window.cast.framework.CastContext.getInstance();
castContext.setOptions({
receiverApplicationId:
window.chrome.cast.media.DEFAULT_MEDIA_RECEIVER_APP_ID,
autoJoinPolicy: window.chrome.cast.AutoJoinPolicy.ORIGIN_SCOPED,
resumeSavedSession: true
});
await castContext.requestSession(); // wait for prompt
const castSession = castContext.getCurrentSession();
const mediaInfo = new window.chrome.cast.media.MediaInfo(mediaUrl);
const request = new window.chrome.cast.media.LoadRequest(mediaInfo);
await castSession.loadMedia(request);
window.player = new window.cast.framework.RemotePlayer();
window.playerController = new window.cast.framework.RemotePlayerController(
window.player);
Can you please tell me how to connect to an existing session and receive information about playing media?
I been looking around for answers for a while and your switch of port make me think.
Switching port not a valid solution!
Why does a solution suddenly stop working without any changes to my Chromecast code?
Answer: Chrome got the hiccups. I guess this is either because of several live-refresh or something went wrong during development and it has been cached?!
Solution: I cleared the application storage and deleted my Chrome profile. After a restart of Chrome my solution reconnects with the chromecast as it did before.
I'm getting a popup opened from location C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\application\chrome.exe while executing selenium webdriver scripts in chrome browser.
This one is throwing the error as session timed out.
Note: The same codebase is working fine in other machine.
Can you please help me out to get this sorted.
The code I am using is as below:-
var arr = new string[7] {
"--start-maximized", "--ignore-certificate-errors", "--disable-popup-blocking", "--disable-default-apps", "--auto-launch-at-startup", "--always-authorize-plugins", "--user-agent= " + FrameGlobals.userAgentValue
};
chromeCapabilities.AddArguments(arr);
WebDriverObj = new ChromeDriver(chromeCapabilities);
This is how i'm initiating the chrome browser. not mentioning any version inside codebase.
enter image description here
Thanks in advance.
Hema
You can add all your argument one by one and then pass it to the Chromedriver as below:-
WebDriver driver=null;
System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver","./src//lib//chromedriver");
DesiredCapabilities capabilities = DesiredCapabilities.chrome();
ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
options.addArguments("test-type");
options.addArgument("--start-maximized");
options.addArguments("--disable-web-security");
options.addArguments("--allow-running-insecure-content");
capabilities.setCapability("chrome.binary","./src//lib//chromedriver");
capabilities.setCapability(ChromeOptions.CAPABILITY, options);
driver = new ChromeDriver(capabilities);
driver.get("https://www.google.com/");
Replace your argument with above-mentioned arguments
Hope it will help you :)