I have a form that repeats a couple of times on a page, each form has input with say name=firstName, I want to set some value in each.
How can I get a list of those inputs and loop through them so I can do setValue?
const names = ["Adam", "Kevin", "Pam"];
browser.elements('css selector', '[name="firstName"]', function(elements) {
elements.value.forEach(function(elementsObj, index) {
browser.setValue(elementsObj.ELEMENT, names);
})
})
– .elements() searches for multiple elements on the page and returns them as web element JSON objects that can be accessed using elements.value
– Now when we have the web elements, we would then apply a forEach loop to iterate over the different elements using elements.value.forEach(function(elementsObj, index)
– Now using setValue we will set the value from the names array to all the input boxes on the webpage
Related
Is there a simple method to locate an XML node by its attribute in Google Apps Script? Here's an XML snippet:
<hd:components>
<hd:text name="ADM Custom admissions TE">
<hd:prompt>Admission</hd:prompt>
<hd:columnWidth widthType="minimum" minWidth="100"/>
</hd:text>
<hd:text name="ADM Insufficient heat end date TE">
<hd:prompt>To</hd:prompt>
</hd:text>
<hd:text name="ADM Insufficient heat start date TE">
<hd:prompt>From</hd:prompt>
</hd:text>
<hd:text name="ADM Third party payment period TE">
<hd:defMergeProps unansweredText="__________"/>
<hd:prompt>When (date or period)?</hd:prompt>
</hd:text>
For purposes of the XML file I'm trying to parse, the "name" attribute is a unique identifier, while what GAS thinks is the "name" for purposes of the XmlService.Element.getChild(name) method ("text" for each node shown in this snippet) is a non-unique classifier for the type of node. I'd like to be able to write a function to retrieve a specific node from this XML file with only the name attribute. XMLPath notation in other languages has this capability using the [# notation. Is there a way to do it in GAS, or do I need to write a function that walks through the XML until it finds a node with the right name attribute, or store it in some different type of data structure for fast searching if the XML file is sufficiently large?
Here's the snippet I started writing: it's fine if there's no built-in function, I just wondered if there was a better/faster way to do this. My function isn't so efficient, and I wondered if the XmlService had a more efficient internal data structure it's using to speed up searching. My approach is just to loop through all of the element's children until there's a match.
function getComponentFromXML(xml,name) {
for (var i = 0; i < xml.length; i++) {
var x = xml[i];
var xname = x.getAttribute('name').getValue();
if (xname == name) {
return getComponentAttributes(x);
}
}
}
There is no built-in search, so the only way is to read the list of elements looking for the one with the desired value of attribute 'name'. If elements is an array of elements to search through, you can do
var searchResults = elements.filter(function (e) {
return e.getAttribute('name') && e.getAttribute('name').getValue() == searchString;
});
(Both checks are needed to avoid an error when there is no 'name' attribute at all.)
How to obtain such an array elements may depend on XML document. If, as in your example, the elements to search are the immediate children of the root element, then
var doc = XmlService.parse(xmlString);
var elements = doc.getRootElement().getChildren();
would be a quick and easy way to do this.
In general, to get all elements without recursion, the getDescendants method can be used. It returns an array of Content object, which can be filtered down to Element objects:
var elements = doc.getDescendants().filter(function (c) {
return c.getType() == XmlService.ContentTypes.ELEMENT;
}).map(function (c) {
return c.asElement();
});
I'm rendering a map of items retrieved from a database and filtered via the value state of an input field and attempting to then set the state of the input field as the value stored in some list item on click. I figured that using document.getElementById().innerHTML would allow me to retrieve the content stored within the appropriate tag and then set it to state which does work, the issue I'm facing is that it will only retrieve the innerHTML of the first item rendered in the map.
I've tried solutions ranging from applying UUID to making the mapped content available to the window and transfering the state of the individual objects but each disparate solution only moves the value of the first item to state - any ideas?
Rendered Content:
window.filteredItems = this.state.items.filter(
(item) => {
return item.companyNameObj.toLowerCase().indexOf(this.state.search.toLowerCase()) !== -1;
}
);
<div className="fixed-width">
<div className="search-container">
<form>
<input type="text" name="search" className="search-bar" placeholder="Search: " onChange={this.handleChange} value={this.state.search} />
</form>
<ul className="search-results">
{window.filteredItems.map((item) => {
return (
<div className="distinct-result-container">
<li key={item.id}>
<div className="image-container">
<img src={item.imageObj} alt={item.companyNameObj + " logo."}/>
</div>
<div className="company-container">
<span onClick={this.stateTransfer}><h3 id={"ID"}>{item.companyNameObj}</h3></span>
<p>Owned by: {item.ownerNameObj}</p>
</div>
</li>
</div>
)
})}
</ul>
</div>
<Footer />
</div>
);
stateTransfer()
stateTransfer(id) {
var search = this.state.search;
var uniqueID = document.getElementById("ID").innerHTML;
this.setState({
search: uniqueID
});
}
The current content of stateTransfer() doesn't represent any significant attempts at approaching a solution to this issue, it's just the minimum required implementation to move the innerHTML content to the input fields value.
EDIT: I've further clarified on the task at hand and a potential solution in the comments below (which follow this), I'm just hoping someone is able to help me with the actual implementation.
#DILEEPTHOMAS The list is comprised of data pulled from a Firebase Realtime Database and is rendered via mapping the filteredList and a search query; that functoionality works fine - what I need is to be able to click the element of any distinct li and have the innerHTML (the text stored in that li's item.companyNameObj) be moved to the value of the input field (so users can navigate the search content with re-typing).
#JoshuaLink I can't necessarily configure the items of the list any
further as it's just data pulled from an external database - I believe
the appropriate solution is to somehow provide a unique HTML ID value
to each newly rendered li and have that selected ID moved to
stateTransfer() where it can be set as the input fields value, I'm
just struggling with the actual implementation of this.
EDIT 2: I've managed to figure out a solution to both parts of the problem as described above - I'll post it as an answer below.
I managed to solve both parts of my problem:
The key issue, which was moving the text stored in each distinct li to the input value, which was apparently easily solved by making my stateTransfer() function accept an event and passing the .innerText value of the h3 through the event (I assumed I would have to use .innerHTML, which would require me to provide each distinct li with a unique generated ID) as follows:
stateTransfer(e) {
var search = this.state.search;
var innerText = e.target.innerText
this.setState({
search: innerText
})
}
The secondary issue, (which I incorrectly assumed was integral to implementing a solution to my question), assigning unique HTML id values to my procedurally generated li's was solved by implementing a for-loop in a componentDidUpdate() function which iterates through the current total length of the list and and assigns an id with the loop iterator concatenated to the end of the string as follows:
componentDidUpdate() {
var i;
var searchCompanyNames = document.querySelectorAll('.comapnyNames');
for(i = 0; i < searchCompanyNames.length; i++) {
searchCompanyNames[i].id = 'companyName-' + i;
}
}
Whilst I didn't need to assign unique ID's to the li's in the correct implementation, it's a useful trick worth noting nonetheless.
I've been looking into how to count cells with the countif function, and how to count cells that are colored using scripts and custom functions (like this thing: http://pastebin.com/4Yr095hV), but how would i count cells with a specific string AND color?
Example, I want to count every cell containing the word "one" that has a fill color of white.
EDIT: I was told to add what i had so far, but I am not sure what was meant by that. For counting cells with a specific string I used:
=COUNTIF(A1:A247,"string")
and for counting cells that are colored i used this what was on this page: https://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/23881/google-spreadsheet-calculating-shaded-cells
but i still don't know how to combine these two TOGETHER.
EDIT: For those looking for this answer, I've found a way to utilize the script Tom posted, and adjusted a line within it.
For Tom's script to work with "wildcards", i used something called .indexOf to always look for any cells containing the string (effectively treating it as if there is always a star before and after the string). On line 32 of his script, I altered it to this:
.map (function(e,i,a) { if (e.toString().toUpperCase().indexOf(this.toString().toUpperCase()) >= 0){ return 1 } else { return 0 } },str))
So now whenever I want to look for a White cell containing the string "Apple1", it will count it regardless of if it's written as "OrangeApple1B" or whatever. And the casing doesn't matter since it seems like this script always converts the given string to Upper Case anyways.
I am still trying to find out how to incorporate this on a totally different spreadsheet though (using something like IMPORTRANGE to count cells on a TOTALLY DIFFERENT SHEET using this script)...
function countIfStringAndColor(r, str, color) {
var COLORS = {
"BLACK":"#000000",
"DARK GRAY 4":"#434343",
"DARK GRAY 3":"#666666",
"DARK GRAY 2":"#999999",
"DARK GRAY 1":"#B7B7B7",
"GRAY":"#CCCCCC"
};
var range = SpreadsheetApp
.getActive()
.getActiveSheet()
.getRange(r.toString());
color = color.indexOf("#") == 0 ? color : COLORS[color.toString().toUpperCase()];
return range
.getBackgrounds()
.reduce(function(a,b) { return a.concat(b) })
.map (function(e,i,a) { return e.toString().toUpperCase() === this.toString().toUpperCase(); },color)
.map(function(e,i,a) { return [e, this[i]] },
range
.getValues()
.reduce(function(a,b) { return a.concat(b) })
.map (function(e,i,a) { return e.toString().toUpperCase() === this.toString().toUpperCase() },str))
.filter(function(e,i,a) {return a[i][0] && a[i][1] })
.length;
}
METHOD OF OPERATION
The function takes three arguments: Range (String), String, String
The associative array 'COLORS' is supplied to convert the common names of colors to hex format. There are about 90 more colors in the list that I didn't supply for space reasons. I can get you the full list if you would like.
Grabbing the Range.
Checks to see if color is already in hex format. If not it tries to find a common name key in COLORS and return the hex value. From here out everything is toString() and toUpperCase() to help prevent errors.
The code from here out is one chain of array manipulation that will produce the solution for the function to return.
Grab the needed background colors.
.reduce, coupled with .concat (both Array Methods), is used to flatten the background color array. It changes it from a rectangular array of arrays to a one dimensional list.
.map goes through each element of the array and applies the given function. In this case we are seeing if the array element (e) is the same as the color supplied. Take note of how 'color' is called outside the closing curly bracket. It is the 'thisArg', and the 'this' inside the function is an image of it. The array is now reduced to a series of true/false elements.
This map is used to combine the two arrays, 'color' and 'str'. The indented part right below is the same steps we used to get 'color' to a series of true/false elements, but now applied to 'str'. All those operations are performed while 'str' is being called as the thisArg for the current map function. The map function then returns a single array of the form [color,str] which is made up of many elements of [true,false] [true,true] [false,false] pairs.
We are only interested in the solutions where both 'color' and 'str' are true, so we can use .filter to remove all the other elements, leaving use with an array of only [true, true] pairs.
Each [true, true] pair is a unique solution to the equation. We can just grab the length of the array to see how many solutions we have found! This is the value that is passed to the return at the beginning.
I'm pretty new to MVC and I'm having a hard understanding how to get the values (basically the IDs) to checkboxes that I'm generating. Here are my checkboxes:
<div id='myCheckboxDiv'>
<input type="checkbox" onclick="checkAll(this)">Check All
#foreach (var form in #Model.DetailObject.DoaFormGroupDocuments)
{
<br>
var checkBoxId = "chk" + form.DocumentId;
#Html.CheckBox(checkBoxId, new { value = form.DocumentId, #checked = true });
#form.DocumentName;
}
</div>
Essentially what I want to do is get the ID to which ever checkbox is checked and save it in to a list after I click a save button at the bottom of the page.
I have run across something like this to handle everything but I'm not quite sure how to use it really...
var values = $('#myCheckboxDiv').find('input:checkbox:checked').map(function () {
// get the name ..
var nameOfSelectedItem = this.attr('name');
// skip the ‘chk’ part and give me the rest
return nameOfSelectedItem.substr(3);
}).get();
The only thing you need to think about is the value of the name attribute your checkbox(es) will have. The way you're handling it right now, your post body is going to have a fairly randomized collection of chkN-named parameters, where N is some number. The modelbinder will need something similarly named as a parameter to your action method in order to bind the posted values to something useful. That's a tall order for something that will be some what variable (the DocumentId values).
The best option would be to set up your checkboxes, instead, as a collection, which means giving them names chk[0], chk[1], etc. Then in your action you can accept a parameter like List<string> chk, and that will contain a list of all the values that were posted.
i have a class (TheList.as). in which i have an array "Data" and it has a couple of values. Then i have a loop through which i am creating a scrollable list which uses the values from "Data" array. [I am trying make a unit converter]
Then i have another class "Units.as". In that class i have created three instances of "TheList". A main list ("myList"), and to sublists "ListFrom" and "ListTo". They are using values from "Data" array. Now i have text field whose value changes to whatever item is clicked. When i click "Angle" in the main list, i want the sublists to get populated with ("Degree", "Radian" etc)..
Here is what i tried
if(myList._TextLabel.text == "Angle")
{
ListFrom.Data = ["Degree", "Radian"];
}
But nothing happens, i do not get any error either. When i do this in an "ENTER_FRAME" event and trace (ListFrom.Data), i can see that the values change, but they do not get assigned to the list items in the list. I would really appreciate the help. Thanks!
Here are complete Classes for understanding the situation better(the code is pretty messy, as i am a newbie to OOP)
TheList.as: http://pastebin.com/FLy5QV9i
Units.as : http://pastebin.com/z2CcHZzC
where you call ListFrom.Data = ["Degree","Radian"], make sure when the data changed, the renders in the ListFrom have been set new data. for example, you may use MyRender in ListFrom for show, you should debug in the set data method in MyRender.
you should call the code below after you call ListFrom.Data = ["Degree","Radian"];
for (var i:int = 0; i < Data.legnth;i++) {
var render:MyRender = ListFrom[i] as MyRender;
if (render) {
render.data = Data[i];
} else {
var render:MyRender = new MyRender();
render.data = Data[i];
ListFrom.addChild(render);
}
}
You can use event listeners, singleton classes or reference one class to another, depending on the style you want. All are equally valid and fast / efficient.