I am wondering how to read and interpret below error line from a suppliers test bench. My understanding is that the supplier run default configuration.
My assumptions:
<Q{.../2017-09-30}disposition-of-results>
...is referring to a element with namespace.
The Q is for QName the date is for the namespace path and "disposition-of-results" is element name.
The error complaints about that content model does not allow 2 defined elements to come one after another?
Something wrong detected at line -1 of file Xxx. In content of element <xbrl>: The content model does not allow element <Q{.../2017-09-30}disposition-of-results> to appear immediately after element <Q{.../2017-09-30}Sales>. The following elements would be valid here: xbrli:unit, link:footnoteLink, xbrli:context, xbrli:tuple, xbrli:item (or nothing).
Related
In XSLT, what is the difference between the "current node" and the "context node"? You can find both terms used here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.
When would you use one or the other? How do you refer to each?
The current node is whatever the template is currently operating on. Normally this happens to also be the context node, but the context node has special meaning within a nested XPath expression (the part in square brackets). There, it refers to whatever node is currently being tested for a match. Hence, the context node changes within the XPath expression, but not the current node.
The context node can be abbreviated with a dot (.) or sometimes left out entirely. This is probably a little confusing, because outside of a nested expression, a dot signifies the current node. (In that case the current node happens to be the context node, so one might say that it is the current node only proximately, and it is more properly called the context node. But even the spec calls it the current node here.)
Since a dot gives you the context node, in a nested XPath expression the user needs a way to refer back to the current node, the one being processed by the current template. You can do this via the current() function.
Distinguishing these two is useful in some cases. For instance, suppose you have some XML like this:
<a>
<b>
<c>foo<footnote fn="1"/></c>
<d>bar</d>
</b>
<b>
<c>baz</c>
<d>aak<footnote fn="2"/></d>
</b>
<b>
<c>eep</c>
<d>blech<footnote fn="2"/></d>
</b>
<footnote-message fn="1">Batteries not included.</footnote>
<footnote-message fn="2">Some assembly required.</footnote>
</a>
Now suppose you want to convert it to LaTeX like this:
foo\footnote{Batteries not included.}
bar
baz
aak\footnote{Some assembly required.}
eep
blech\footnotemark[2]
The trick is the tell whether a footnote has already been used or not. If this is the first time you've encountered the footnote, you want to write a \footnote command; otherwise you want to write a \footnotemark command. You could use XSL code like this:
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="count(preceding::*[./#fn = current()/#fn]) = 0">\footnote{...}</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>\footnotemark[...]</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
Here we are comparing the context-node fn attribute (from the results of the preceding::* node-set) to the current-node fn attribute. (You don't actually have to say ./#fn; you could just say #fn.)
So in short, the context node leaves you inside the XPath predicate; the current node reaches outside the predicate, back to the node being processed by the current template.
Context Node
The context node is part of the XPath evaluation context and varies with each location step:
step1 / step2 / step3 / ...
where each step is
axis::node-test[predicate]
Each step is evaluated with respect to the context nodes set by the preceding steps.
Each step then selects nodes that become the context node for following steps.
When evaluating predicate, the context node is the node along axis that has passed node-test.
The context node can be accessed as ..
Current Node
The current node () is part of the XSLT processing model:1
The current node is the node in the source XML document best matched by an XSLT template.
The current node becomes the starting context node for each XPath expression in the matched template.
The current node can be accessed as current() within XPath predicates.
1Although insignificant to understanding the basic difference between context node and current node, note that in XSLT 2.0 the description of the evaluation context has been changed. The concepts of current node and current node list have been replaced by the XPath concepts of context item, context position, and context size.
I've been working on designing an experiment in Psychopy, and I am running into some problems with the interaction between my conditions file and a text element. I am trying to get my conditions file (CSV format) to specify the position of two text elements (the variables are "NowPos" and "LaterPos"). In the CSV file, underneath the headers, I have two different coordinate pairings listed. In the "position [x,y]" field of the text element conditions, I have written "$NowPos" (or "$LaterPos", depending on the element). With this, I intend to direct PsychoPy to read the specified variable from my conditions file, which is placed in a loop outside of the routine that calls for the variables it contains. However, it appears that the code automatically compiled by PsychoPy is trying to define "NowPos" and "LaterPos" at the beginning of the program. Because of this, they are undefined at the time that PsychoPy asks for them, causing my code to fail.
Do you have any ideas for getting PsychoPy to look for the right conditions file immediately? Could I have formatted something incorrectly?
Next to the position field, you need to select an option like "Set every repeat", so that a new position value is accessed on every trial.
The problem you describe sounds like you have left it at the default setting of "Constant", in which case the value only needs to be set once, at the beginning of the experiment. At that stage, as you note, the loop hasn't been created, thus its variables haven't been defined, and aren't available to refer to.
I have been digging through IBM knowledge center and have returned frustrated at the lack of definition to some of their scripting interfaces.
IBM keeps talking about a containment path used in their id definitions and I am only assuming that it corresponds to an xml element within file in the websphere config folder hierachy, but that's only from observation. I haven't found this declared in any documentation as yet.
Also, to find an ID, there is a syntax that needs to be used that will retrieve it, yet I cannot find a reference to the possible values of 'types' used in the AdminConfig.getid(...) function call.
So to summarize I have a couple questions:
What is the correct definition of the id "heirachy" both for fetching an id and for the id itself?
e.g. to get an Id of the server I would say something like: AdminConfig.getid('/Cell:MYCOMPUTERNode01Cell/Node:MYCOMPUTERNode01/Server:server1'), which would give me an id something like: server1(cells/MYCOMPUTERNode01Cell/nodes/MYCOMPUTERNode01/servers/server1|server.xml#server_1873491723429)
What are the possible /type values in retrieving the id from the websphere server?
e.g. in the above example, /Cell, /Node and /Server are examples of type values used in queries.
UPDATE: I have discovered this document that outlines the locations of various configuration files in the configuration directory.
UPDATE: I am starting to think that the configuration files represent complex objects with attributes and nested attributes. not every object with an 'id' is query-able through the AdminConfig.getid(<containment_path>). Object attributes (and this is not attributes in the strict xml sense as 'attributes' could be nested nodes with a simple structure within the parent node) may be queried using AdminConfig.showAttribute(<element_id>, <attribute_name>). This function will either return the string value of the inline attribute of the element itself or a string list representation of the ids of the nested attribute node(s).
UPDATE: I have discovered the AdminConfig.types() function that will display a list of all manipulatible object types in the configuration files and the AdminConfig.parent() function that displays what nodes are considered parents of the specified node.
Note: The AdminConfig.parent() function does not reveal the parents in order of their hierachy, rather it seems to just present a list of parents. e.g. AdminConfig.parent('JDBCProvider') gives us this exact list: 'Cell\nDeployment\nNode\nServer\nServerCluster' and even though Server comes before ServerCluster , running AdminConfig.parent('Server') reveals it's parents as: 'Node\nServerCluster'. Although some elements can have no parents - e.g. Cell - Some elements produce an error when running the parent function - e.g. Deployment.
Due to the apparent lack of a reciprocal AdminConfig.children() function, It appears as though obtaining a full hierachical tree of parents/children lies in calling this function on each of the elements returned from the AdminConfig.parent(<>) call and combining the results. That being said, a trial and error approach is mostly fruitful due to the sometimes obvious ordering.
I have three dropdown boxes on a Main_Form. I will add the chosen content into three fields on the form, Form_Applications.
These three lines are added :
Form_Applications.Classification = Form_Main_Form.Combo43.Value
Form_Applications.Countryname_Cluster = Form_Main_Form.Combo56.Value
Form_Applications.Application = Form_Main_Form.Combo64.Value
The first two work perfectly but the last one gives error code 438!
I can enter in the immediate window :
Form_Applications.Classification = "what ever"
Form_Applications.Countryname_Cluster = "what ever"
but not for the third line. Then, after enter, the Object doesn't support this property or method error appears.
I didn't expect this error as I do exactly the same as in the first two lines.
Can you please help or do you need more info ?
In VBA Application is a special word and should not be used to address fields.
FormName.Application will return an object that points to the application instance that is running that form as opposed to an object within that form.
From the Application object you can do all sorts of other things such as executing external programs and other application level stuff like saving files/
Rename your Application field to something else, perhaps ApplicationCombo and change your line of code to match the new name. After doing this the code should execute as you expect.
Form_Applications.Application is referring to the application itself. It is not a field, so therefore it is not assignable (at least with a string).
You really haven't provided enough code to draw any real conclusions though. But looking at what you have posted, you definitely need to rethink your approach.
It's to say definitely but you are not doing the same. It looks like you are reading a ComboBox value the same (I will assume Combo64 is the same as 43 and 56) but my guess is that what you are assigning that value to is the problem:
Form_Applications.Application =
Application is not assignable. Is there another field you meant to use there?
What does backpatching mean ? Please illustrate with a simple example.
Back patching usually refers to the process of resolving forward branches that have been planted in the code, e.g. at 'if' statements, when the value of the target becomes known, e.g. when the closing brace or matching 'else' is encountered.
In intermediate code generation stage of a compiler we often need to execute "jump" instructions to places in the code that don't exist yet. To deal with this type of cases a target label is inserted for that instruction.
A marker nonterminal in the production rule causes the semantic action to pick up.
Some statements like conditional statements, while, etc. will be represented as a bunch of "if" and "goto" syntax while generating the intermediate code.
The problem is that, These "goto" instructions, do not have a valid reference at the beginning(when the compiler starts reading the source code line by line - A.K.A 1st pass). But, after reading the whole source code for the first time, the labels and references these "goto"s are pointing to, are determined.
The problem is that can we make the compiler able to fill the X in the "goto X" statements in one single pass or not?
The answer is yes.
If we don't use backpatching, this can be achieved by a 2 pass analysis on the source code. But, backpatching lets us to create and hold a separate list which is exclusively designed for "goto" statements. Since it is done in only one pass, the first pass will not fill the X in the "goto X" statements because the comipler doesn't know where the X is at first glance. But, it does stores the X in that exclusive list and after going through the whole code and finding that X, the X is replaced by that address or reference.
Backpaching is the process of leaving blank entries for the goto instruction where the target address is unkonown in the forward transfer in the first pass and filling these unknown in the second pass.
Backpatching:
The syntax directed definition can be implemented in two or more passes (we have both synthesized attributes and inherited attributes).
Build the tree first.
Walk the tree in the depth-first order.
The main difficulty with code generation in one pass is that we may not know the target of a branch when we generate code for flow of control statements
Backpatching is the technique to get around this problem.
Generate branch instructions with empty targets
When the target is known, fill in the label of the branch instructions (backpatching).
backpatching is a process in which the operand field of an instruction containing a forward reference is left blank initially. the address of the forward reference symbol is put into this field when its definition is encountered in the program.
Back patching is the activity of filling up the unspecified information of labels
by using the appropriate semantic expression in during the code generation process.
It is done by:
boolean expression.
flow of control statement.