I'm trying to use Scribble (Racket v8.0 [cs]) to generate some HTML using #lang scribble/html and I've reduced my source file to only the lang statement (to isolate other issues):
#lang scribble/html
To run the code I'm using terminal:
% scribble test.scrbl
However, I'm running into the following error during compilation:
dynamic-require: name is not provided
name: 'doc
module: #<resolved-module-path:"/Users/josh/Desktop/blog architecture/00001 article name/test.scrbl">
context...:
.../private/map.rkt:40:19: loop
.../racket/cmdline.rkt:191:51
body of "/Applications/Racket v8.0/share/pkgs/scribble-lib/scribble/run.rkt"
Obviously something is missing - perhaps a require statement? I'm not sure. If you have a better approach to using #lang scribble/html I'm open to that as long as I can use the html tags.
Thank you!
Hello person from 6 months ago! I hope you have solved your problem, but for other travelers here's what worked for me:
Don't use the scribble binary, but directly use the racket executable.
So, instead of:
$ scribble test.scrbl
Do
$ racket test.scrbl
This seemed to work for me with scribble/text, and outputted exactly what I wanted (nothing weirdly processed, nothing "helpfully" escaped - just my text + my racket code executed)
Related
I have a binary I've been trying to fuzz with AFL, the only thing is AFL only fuzzes STDIN, and File inputs and this binary takes input through its arguments pass_read [input1] [input2]. I was wondering if there are any methods/fuzzers that allow fuzzing in this manner?
I don't not have the source code so making a harness is not really applicable.
Michal Zalewski, the creator of AFL, states in this post:
AFL doesn't support argv fuzzing, because TBH, it's just not horribly useful in
practice. There is an example in experimental/argv_fuzzing/ showing how to do it
in a general case if you really want to.
Link to the mentioned example on GitHub: https://github.com/google/AFL/tree/master/experimental/argv_fuzzing
There are some instructions in the file argv-fuzz-inl.h (haven't tried myself).
Bash only Solution
As an example, lets generate 10 random strings and store them in a file
cat /dev/urandom | tr -dc 'a-zA-Z0-9' | fold -w 10 | head -n 10 > string-file.txt
Next, lets read 2 lines from string-file and pass it into our application
exec handle< string-file.txt
while read string1 <&handle ; do
read string2 <&handle
pass_read $line1 $line2 >> crash_file.txt
done
exec handle<&-
We then have any crashes stored within crash_file.txt for further analysis.
This may not be the most elegant solution, but perhaps you gives you an idea of some other possibilities if no tool necessarily fulfills the current requirements
I looked at the AFLplusplus repo on GitHub. Inside AFLplusplus/utils/argv_fuzzing/, there is a Makefile. If you run it, you will get a .so file (a shared library) that you can use to do argv fuzzing, even if you only have the binary. Obviously, you must use AFL_PRELOAD. You can read more in the README.
My problem is simple: I'm trying to write a tcl script to use $grofile instead writing every time I need this file name.
So, what I did in TkConsole was:
% set grofile "file.gro"
% mol load gro ${grofile}
and, indeed, I succeeded uploading the file.
In the script I have the same lines, but still have this error:
wrong # args: should be "set varName ?newValue?"
can't read "grofile": no such variable
I tried to solve my problem with
% set grofile [./file.gro]
and I have this error,
invalid command name "./file.gro"
can't read "grofile": no such variable
I tried also with
% set grofile [file ./file.gro r]
and I got the first error, again.
I haven't found any simple way to avoid using the explicit name of the file I want to upload. It seems like you only can use the most trivial, but tedious way:
mol load file.gro
mol addfile file.xtc
and so on and so on...
Can you help me with a brief explanation about why in the TkConsole I can upload the file and use it as a variable while I can not in the tcl script?
Also, if you have where is my mistake, I will appreciate it.
I apologize if it is basic, but I could not find any answer. Thanks.
I add the head of my script:
set grofile "sim.part0001_protein_lipid.gro"
set xtcfile "protein_lipid.xtc"
set intime "0-5ms"
set system "lower"
source view_change_render.tcl
source cg_bonds.tcl
mol load gro $grofile xtc ${system}_${intime}_${xtcfile}
It was solved, thanks for your help.
You may think you've typed the same thing, but you haven't. I'm guessing that your real filename has spaces in it, and that you've not put double-quotes around it. That will confuse set as Tcl's general parser will end up giving set more arguments than it expects. (Tcl's general parser does not know that set only takes one or two arguments, by very long standing policy of the language.)
So you should really do:
set grofile "file.gro"
Don't leave the double quotes out if you have a complicated name.
Also, this won't work:
set grofile [./file.gro]
because […] is used to indicate running something as a command and using the result of that. While ./file.gro is actually a legal command name in Tcl, it's… highly unlikely.
And this won't work:
set grofile [file ./file.gro r]
Because the file command requires a subcommand as a first argument. The word you give is not one of the standard file subcommands, and none of them accept those arguments anyway, which look suitable for open (though that returns a channel handle suitable for use with commands like gets and read).
The TkConsole is actually pretty reasonable as quick-and-dirty terminal emulations go (given that it omits a lot of the complicated cases). The real problem is that you're not being consistently accurate about what you're really typing; that matters hugely in most programming languages, not just Tcl. You need to learn to be really exacting; cut-n-paste when creating a question helps a lot.
I have a problem with path in a tcl file. I tried to use
source " /tmp/mob.tcl "
and this path in bash file :
/opt/ns-allinone-2.35/ns-2.35/indep-utils/cmu-scen-gen/setdest/setdest -v 1 -n $n -p 10 -M 64 -t 100 -x 250 -y 250 >> /tmp/mob.tcl
The terminal give me this output:
..."
(procedure "source" line 8)
invoked from within
"source "/tmp/mob.tcl" "
(file "mobilita_source.tcl" line 125)
How I can do this?
Firstly, this:
source " /tmp/mob.tcl "
is very unlikely to be correct. The spaces around the filename inside the quotes will confuse the source command. (It could be correct, but only if you have a directory in your current directory whose name is a single space. That's really unlikely, unless you're a great deal more evil than I am.)
It really helps a lot if you stop making this error.
Secondly, the error message is both
Incomplete, with just an ellipsis instead of a full error on the first line
Really worrying, with source claimed to be a procedure (second line of that short trace).
It's legal to make a procedure called source, and sometimes the right thing to do, but if you're doing it then you have to be ever so careful to duplicate the semantics of the standard Tcl command or odd things will happen.
Thirdly, you've got a file of what is apparently generated code, and you're hitting a problem in it, and you're not telling us what is on/around line 125 of the file (the error trace is pretty clear on that front) or in the contents of the source procedure (which is non-standard; the standard source is implemented in C) and you're expecting us to guess what's going wrong for you??? Seriously?
Tcl error traces are usually quite clear enough for you to figure out what went wrong and where. If there's an unclear error, and it didn't come from user code (by calling error or return -code error) then let us know; we'll help (or possibly even change Tcl to make things clearer in the future). But right now, there's a complete shortage of information.
Here's an example of what a normal source error looks like:
% source /tmp/foo/bar/boo
couldn't read file "/tmp/foo/bar/boo": no such file or directory
% puts $errorInfo
couldn't read file "/tmp/foo/bar/boo": no such file or directory
while executing
"source /tmp/foo/bar/boo"
If a script generates an error directly, it's encouraged to be as clear as that, but we cannot enforce it. Sometimes you have to be a bit of a detective yourself…
I have looked at how to embed HTML syntax in JavaScript string from HTML syntax highlighting in javascript strings in vim.
However, when I use CoffeeScript I cannot get the same thing working by editing coffee.vim syntax file in a similar way. I got recursive errors which said including html.vim make it too nested.
I have some HTML template in CoffeeScript like the following::
angular.module('m', [])
.directive(
'myDirective'
[
->
template: """
<div>
<div>This is <b>bold</b> text</div>
<div><i>This should be italic.</i></div>
</div>
"""
]
)
How do I get the template HTML syntax in CoffeeScript string properly highlighted in VIM?
I would proceed as follows:
Find out the syntax groups that should be highlighted as pure html would be. Add html syntax highlighting to these groups.
To find the valid syntax group under the cursor you can follow the instructions here.
In your example the syntax group of interest is coffeeHereDoc.
To add html highlighting to this group execute the following commands
unlet b:current_syntax
syntax include #HTML syntax/html.vim
syn region HtmlEmbeddedInCoffeeScript start="" end=""
\ contains=#HTML containedin=coffeeHereDoc
Since vim complains about recursion if you add these lines to coffee.vim i would go with an autocommand:
function! Coffee_syntax()
if !empty(b:current_syntax)
unlet b:current_syntax
endif
syn include #HTML syntax/html.vim
syn region HtmlEmbeddedInCoffeeScript start="" end="" contains=#HTML
\ containedin=coffeeHereDoc
endfunction
autocmd BufEnter *.coffee call Coffee_syntax()
I was also running into various issues while trying to get this to work. After some experimentation, here's what I came up with. Just create .vim/after/syntax/coffee.vim with the following contents:
unlet b:current_syntax
syntax include #HTML $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/html.vim
syntax region coffeeHtmlString matchgroup=coffeeHeredoc
\ start=+'''\\(\\_\\s*<\\w\\)\\#=+ end=+\\(\\w>\\_\\s*\\)\\#<='''+
\ contains=#HTML
syn sync minlines=300
The unlet b:current_syntax line disables the current syntax matching and lets the HTML syntax definition take over for matching regions.
Using an absolute path for the html.vim inclusion avoids the recursion problem (described more below).
The region definition matches heredoc strings that look like they contain HTML. Specifically, the start pattern looks for three single quotes followed by something that looks like the beginning of an HTML tag (there can be whitespace between the two), and the end pattern looks for the end of an HTML tag followed by three single quotes. Heredoc strings that don't look like they contain HTML are still matched using the coffeeHeredoc pattern. This works because this syntax file is being loaded after the syntax definitions from the coffeescript plugin, so we get a chance to make the more specific match (a heredoc containing HTML) before the more general match (the coffeeHeredoc region) happens.
The syn sync minlines=300 widens the matching region. My embedded HTML strings sometimes stretched over 50 lines, and Vim's syntax highlighter would get confused about how the string should be highlighted. For complete surety you could use syn sync fromstart, but for large files this could theoretically be slow (I didn't try it).
The recursion problem originally experienced by #heartbreaker was caused by the html.vim script that comes with the vim-coffeescript plugin (I'm assuming that was being used). That plugin's html.vim file includes the its coffee.vim syntax file to add coffeescript highlighting to HTML files. Using a relative syntax include, a la
syntax include #HTML syntax/html.vim
you get all the syntax/html.vim files in VIM's runtime path, including the one from the coffeescript plugin (which includes coffee.vim, hence the recursion). Using an absolute path will restrict you to only getting the particular syntax file you specify, but this seems like a reasonable tradeoff since the HTML one would embed in a coffeescript string is likely fairly simple.
This is weird and I'm not sure who the culprit really is.
I'm doing some scripting, on FreeBSD (6.2)? which makes extensive use of the following ***bash***ism:
do_something <(mysql --skip-column-names -B -e 'select ... from ... where ...;')
... where "do_something is a somewhat crufty utility (in Perl) that won't read from a pipeline. If I use a regular file it works fine. My bash script using things like exec 4< <(...) with these sorts of queries (following by loops of the form while read x y z <&4; do ... never seem to have any issues.
However, Perl (5.8.x) seems to periodically block (apparently forever). I tried changing out the chomp(my $data = <MYDATA>); with a routine that used sysread and I wrote some test cases in Python for comparison. These seem to block far less often than the idiomatic Perl code, but they still do it sometimes. (The Python code using f.read() or os.read(f.fileno()...) seems to behave about equally in this issue).
I've tried reproducing the issue using ... <(cat ...) (where I'm cating the regular file) and that never seems to reproduce that stall.
I've glanced at some ktrace/kdump data ... but I'm far more familiar with Linux strace or even Solaris truss ... so I haven't figured out what's going from there yet, either.
I suppose we can mostly rule out Perl, because I've reproduced the same issue using Python ... I don't see how the bash could be doing anything wrong here (it's just creating a named pipe in /var/tmp/sh-np-xxx and wiring the processes up to that).
What could the mysql shell/utility be doing that might cause this? I don't think I've seen it from anything else (such as cat or dd). I haven't tested this scenario under Linux ... but I've used <(...) (process substitution) for years under Linux and don't recall ever seeing this.
Is it a FreeBSD issue?
Sure I can work around the issue using temporary files ... but I'd sure rather understand why it's doing this (and avoid some of the races and clean-up messiness that temporary files entail).
Any suggestions?
The big difference between operating on the output of mysql and directly on a file is timing. When the perl process is stalled, the big question is: "why is it not making forward progress"? You can use the "l" option to ps to see the wait channel for the perl process; that way you can see if it blocked on a read, or if something else is going on. If it is really blocked on pipe input, I expect the MWCHAN entry for perl to be "piperd".
The same information would be interesting for the mysql process.
What does your Python test code look like?
Another way of writing this while avoiding the bashism is this; that would allow you to rule out bash:
mysql --skip-column-names -B -e 'select ... from ... where ...;' | do_something /dev/stdin
Other interesting questions:
Does the --unbuffered option to mysql change anything?
Does piping the mysql output through dd change anything? (eg. "perlscript <(mysql ... | dd)
Summary: Need more information.