Environment Flag for Cucumber Protractor E2E Tests? - json

I have an existing Angular v5 app and have environment.json files for my environments (like DEV, Test, Production, etc.). The environments files are stored in the directory like so: src/Environments/DEV/environment.json.
Here is an example of a dev environment.json file:
{
"Comment": "Environment=DEV",
"API_ORIGIN": "https://myapp-dev",
"ORIGIN": "https://myapp-dev/index.html",
}
There is a root environment.json file in src folder that my app reads from. When I want to use a specific environment I just copy that environment content into the root and run the app.
Now with Cucumber and Protractor is there a way I can pass some command line argument to specify which environment.json file to use based on my setup? I have urls in these environment.json files so I need a way to tell Cucumber and Protractor which environment to use. If I have to copy all of the environment.json files into the e2e folder that is fine with me. Just in case the solution I need to use depends on the tools I am using here is my tsconfig.e2e.json file. Please let me know if it is incorrect:
{
"extends": "../tsconfig.json",
"compilerOptions": {
"outDir": "../out-tsc/e2e",
"baseUrl": "./",
"module": "commonjs",
"target": "es5",
"types": [
"chai",
"cucumber",
"node"
]
}
}
Here is the protractor.conf.js file. Let me know if it is incorrect as well please:
// Protractor configuration file, see link for more information
// https://github.com/angular/protractor/blob/master/lib/config.ts
exports.config = {
allScriptsTimeout: 11000,
specs: [
'./e2e/features/**/*.feature'
],
capabilities: {
'browserName': 'chrome'
},
directConnect: true,
baseUrl: 'http://localhost:4200/',
framework: 'custom',
frameworkPath: require.resolve('protractor-cucumber-framework'),
cucumberOpts: {
// require step definition files before executing features
require: ['./e2e/steps/**/*.ts'],
// <string[]> (expression) only execute the features or scenarios with tags matching the expression
tags: [],
// <string[]> ("extension:module") require files with the given EXTENSION after requiring MODULE (repeatable)
compiler: []
},
// Enable TypeScript for the tests
onPrepare() {
require('ts-node').register({
project: 'e2e/tsconfig.e2e.json'
});
}
};
I'm also using npm if that matters. I'm running these tests with ng e2e command provided by angular.

sure, 2 ways:
pass a parameter to protractor protractor conf.js --params.env="dev" and then refer to it as browser.params.env in specs. Downside is, it will only be available when the config is parsed and the browser is started, so you can really use that in the config itself
Run the process with an env variable MY_VAR=Dev protractor config.js and it will be available anywhere by running process.env.MY_VAR
For reference
https://stackoverflow.com/a/58547994/9150146
https://stackoverflow.com/a/66111592/9150146
P.S.
how you implement it is up to you, but this approach is the most flexible
conf.js
let environment = require('src/Environments/' + process.env.TEST_ENV + '/environment.json');
module.exports = {
baseUrl: environment.API_ORIGIN
}
and start your protractor like so
TEST_ENV=DEV protractor config.js

Related

How to set application variable in angular 6?

I'm using angular 6 where we can create multiple applications and libraries apart from default app.module. I want to use an application variable like a url prefix or cache expiry time which can be used in all libraries and applications. But when i declare a variable in environment.ts i can only refer it in it's root directory that is src folder. since other projects where i want to refer to this variable, are not created in its root directory, it throws error at runtime saying it cannot access variables from folders not declared in it's root directory.
Can you please suggest something which can help me get access to application variable across all application.
I found the solution finally.
I created a folder Config at the root level and added a file environment.ts.
I copied the environment variables from src/app/environment/environment.ts into Config/environment.ts but with different values.
Eg. in src/app/environment/environment.ts
i added a variable setTimeout=3000
export const environment = {
production: false,
setTimout=3000
};
and in Config/environment.ts setTimeout=13000
export const environment = {
production: false,
setTimout=13000
};
in app.component.ts i used this setTimeout variable.
constructor(){
console.log("timeout is "+environment.setTimeout);
}
I ran it in dev env and it consoled 3000.
Now i replaced the folowwing line in angular.json
"configurations": {
"production": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "src/environments/environment.prod.ts"
}
]
with
"configurations": {
"production": {
"fileReplacements": [
{
"replace": "src/environments/environment.ts",
"with": "Config/environment.ts"
}
]
Then i ran ng serve [MyAppName] --prod .
And went to dist/myapp folder and ran lite-server to deploy and run app locally.
And my setTimeout value from config/environment.ts replaced the one used during development in app.component.ts from environment/environment.ts file. It consoled 13000.
So in this way i can create a config like folder and use it in any library or app.

How to use VS Code debugger with webpack-dev-server (breakpoints ignored)

I just want to make VS Code's debugger work with webpack-dev-server without ignoring my breakpoints.
Now, webpack-dev-server serves the bundled files from memory, while, if I understand this correctly, the VS Code debugger searches for them on disk (...or not?...)
As a result, whenever I set a breakpoint I get the dreaded
Breakpoint ignored because generated code not found (source map problem?)
Now, every related question I could find had to do with typescript mostly, and not with the fact that webpack-dev-server serves from memory. I am not using typescript. Seems that people are either not using webpack-dev-server, or I am missing something blatantly obvious, with my money on the latter.
This is my VS Code launch.json
{
// Use IntelliSense to learn about possible attributes.
// Hover to view descriptions of existing attributes.
// For more information, visit: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=830387
"version": "0.2.0",
"configurations": [
{
"type": "chrome",
"request": "launch",
"name": "Launch Chrome against localhost",
"url": "http://localhost:8080",
"webRoot": "${workspaceRoot}",
"sourceMaps": true,
"trace": true
}
]
}
and these are the related lines from my webpack.config.js
devtool: 'cheap-module-source-map',
output: {
path: path.join(__dirname, 'dist'),
filename: '[name].[chunkhash].js'
},
I have tried various modifications to the launch.json to no avail, so I am just pasting it in vanilla form.
Note that the output.path is only used when there is a production build and the files are spewed to disk.
Here is what the structure of the files is in the served page:
And here is the command I am running in development
"scripts": {
"start": "webpack-dev-server --host 0.0.0.0 --config ./webpack.config.js"
},
Finally, here is a relevant chunk from the trace file
From target: {"method":"Debugger.scriptParsed","params":{"scriptId":"30","url":"http://localhost:8080/manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js","startLine":0,"startColumn":0,"endLine":150,"endColumn":57,"executionContextId":2,"hash":"216099518F33D6091EC12795265804FB35669A30","executionContextAuxData":{"isDefault":true,"frameId":"18228.1"},"isLiveEdit":false,"sourceMapURL":"manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js.map","hasSourceURL":false,"isModule":false,"length":5906}}
Paths.scriptParsed: could not resolve http://localhost:8080/manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js to a file under webRoot: e:\Mitch\Workspace\Projects\project-name. It may be external or served directly from the server's memory (and that's OK).
SourceMaps.getMapForGeneratedPath: Finding SourceMap for http://localhost:8080/manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js by URI: manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js.map and webRoot: e:\Mitch\Workspace\Projects\project-name
SourceMaps.loadSourceMapContents: Downloading sourcemap file from http://localhost:8080/manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js.map
To client: {"seq":0,"type":"event","event":"script","body":{"reason":"new","script":{"id":1,"source":{"name":"manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js","path":"http://localhost:8080/manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js","sourceReference":1001}}}}
To client: {"seq":0,"type":"event","event":"scriptLoaded","body":{"path":"http://localhost:8080/manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js"}}
SourceMap: creating for http://localhost:8080/manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js
SourceMap: sourceRoot:
SourceMap: sources: ["webpack:///webpack/bootstrap 7617f9bf7c8b0bc95159"]
SourceMap: webRoot: e:\Mitch\Workspace\Projects\project-name
SourceMap: no sourceRoot specified, using webRoot + script path dirname: e:\Mitch\Workspace\Projects\project-name\
SourceMap: mapping webpack:///webpack/bootstrap 7617f9bf7c8b0bc95159 => webpack\bootstrap 7617f9bf7c8b0bc95159, via sourceMapPathOverrides entry - "webpack:///*": "*"
SourceMaps.scriptParsed: http://localhost:8080/manifest.0ec68ebd5f0abf9b4cd4.js was just loaded and has mapped sources: ["webpack\\bootstrap 7617f9bf7c8b0bc95159"]
From my experience (about 15 mins ago), if 'webpack.config.js' has a value for the context property, then that has to be accounted for for '.vscode/launch.json'.
For an example, if 'webpack.config.js' has the following:
module.exports = {
context: path.resolve(__dirname, 'src'),
entry: './index.ts',
Then launch.json needs that context ('src') too:
"url": "http://localhost:8080/",
"webRoot": "${workspaceRoot}/src",
"sourceMaps": true,
I just updated/fixed my repo so now TypeScript breakpoints should bind.
https://github.com/marckassay/VSCodeNewProject
For Webpack 4:
Install webpack-cli locally if you don't already have it installed (it has been pulled out of webpack).
Add the following VSCode debug configuration to your .vscode/launch.json (that's the file that VSCode opens when you click on the wheel icon in Debug view):
{
"type": "node",
"request": "launch",
"name": "build",
"program": "${workspaceFolder}/node_modules/.bin/webpack-cli",
"args": [
"--config",
"webpack.config.prod.js"
],
"autoAttachChildProcesses": true,
"stopOnEntry": true
}
stopOnEntry will make debugger stop in the very first (shebang) line of webpack.js, like this:
Old thread, but it still comes up in searches...
It feels like turning on "writing the generated code to disk" might be the solution here:
As per https://webpack.js.org/configuration/dev-server/#devserverwritetodisk-, add this to webpack.config.js:
module.exports = {
//...
devServer: {
writeToDisk: true
}
};
If in case someone troubling with start-server-webpack-plugin of webpack:
I have recently stuck on the same issue and #MarkoBonaci's answer came to rescue. However, I stuck on another error which is produced by the webpack plugin: start-server-webpack-plugin.
Below is the error I got, when I launched by application via debugger of vscode:
cd /home/me/projects/villager-topics ; env "NODE_ENV=development"
/home/me/.nvm/versions/node/v11.6.0/bin/node --inspect-brk=33538
node_modules/.bin/webpack-cli --colors --progress --config
./webpack.dev.js Debugger listening on
ws://127.0.0.1:33538/d8bb6d64-a1a1-466e-9501-6313a3dc8bcf For help,
see: https://nodejs.org/en/docs/inspector Debugger attached.
clean-webpack-plugin: /home/rajeev/projects/villager-topics/dist has
been removed. 10% building 1/1 modules 0 active webpack is watching
the files…
98% after emitting StartServerPluginStarting inspector on
127.0.0.1:33538 failed: address already in use
As you can see StartServerPlugin is using the same port 33538 which is already taken by the parent process. So we need to tell StartServerPlugin to use some other port for its inspection initialization. This, we can achieve through the initialization of StartServerPlugin.
new StartServerPlugin({
name: 'server.js',
nodeArgs: ['--inspect=5858'], // allow debugging),
})
Here in nodeArgs we are specifying the inspect port as 5858. After this configuration is saved and then relaunch the application through Debugger of vscode, you will successfully start the application.

Eslint - `Parsing error: unexpected token =` error for assigned fat arrow / property initializer

I'm using an arrow function and it's complaining about a parsing error:
Parsing Error: Unexpected token =
However my code is valid (please tell me if i'm mistaken). Additionally, i've set the .eslintrc settings to use es6 parsing:
.eslintrc
{
"parserOptions": {
"ecmaVersion": 6,
}
}
Here's my code:
class foo() {
// Doesn't like the line below
// even though it is valid:
namedFunction = () => {
}
}
There a way to resolve this error? This makes a huge different in terms of what the value of this from a particular function.
You're using class field (a.k.a. property initializer) syntax, which is not part of ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), nor ES2016 or 2017, and so unsupported by ESLint. It's currently a Stage 3 proposal. If you want to use it with ESLint, you'll need to use babel-eslint. That page describes how to use it, but the gist is:
Installation
$ npm install eslint babel-eslint --save-dev
# or
$ yarn add eslint babel-eslint -D
Note: babel-eslint requires babel/core#>=7.2.0 and a valid Babel configuration file to run. If you do not have this already set up, please see the Babel Usage Guide.
Setup
To use babel-eslint, "babel-eslint" must be specified as the parser in your ESLint configuration file (see here for more detailed information).
.eslintrc.js
module.exports = {
parser: "babel-eslint",
};
With the parser set, your configuration can be configured as described in the Configuring ESLint documentation.
In 2021 it seems that babel-eslint has been deprecated in favour of #babel/eslint-parser, according to the GitHub repo:
NOTE: babel-eslint is now #babel/eslint-parser and has moved into the Babel monorepo.
So to update the instructions from the other answers, you need to:
npm i eslint #babel/eslint-parser --save-dev
Then make sure you configure the parser key in .eslintrc:
{
"parser": "#babel/eslint-parser",
...
}
As an aside, as the OP doesn't mention the runtime, I'm running in Node 12 so I don't need babel to transpile my code but ESlint does need babel to lint the code (sounds weird but that's my understanding). So I also needed a basic babel config, babel.config.json:
{
"presets": [
[
"#babel/env",
{
"targets": {
"node": "12"
}
}
]
]
}
I had a very similar problem. The accepted answer is correct, as far as it goes, and very helpful. But I use a json version of the eslint config, not a javascript one, so once babel-eslint was installed using:
npm i eslint babel-eslint --save-dev
I had to change my json config. It looks like this now:
.eslintrc.json
{
"parserOptions": {
"es6": true,
"ecmaVersion": 6,
"sourceType": "module",
"ecmaFeatures": {
"jsx": true
}
},
"parser": "babel-eslint",
"rules": {
"no-unused-vars": 0
},
"env": {
"browser": true,
"node": true
}
}
It seems that native support for Public class fields without the need for a babel parser is now finally supported in Eslint since eslint8 with setting ecmaVersion: 13.

tell typescript to compile json files

The typescript compiler works fine when I import a json file using
const tasks = require('./tasks.json')
However, when I run tsc, the output directory does not contain no tasks.json file, causing a runtime error.
Is there a way to tell the compiler that it should copy all json files, or should I manually copy/paste all my json files into the dist directory ?
my tsc compilerOptions currently reads
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "es6",
"module": "commonjs",
"sourceMap": true,
"noImplicitAny": true,
"removeComments": false,
"outDir": "./dist/",
"sourceMap": true,
"pretty": true,
"noImplicitThis": true,
"strictNullChecks": true,
"sourceMap": true
},
Thanks !
Problem
For people wanting to copy all JSON files, it's really difficult in TypeScript. Even with "resolveJsonModule": true, tsc will only copy .json files which are directly referenced by an import.
Here is some example code that wants to do a dynamic runtime require(). This can only work if all the JSON files have been copied into the dist/ folder, which tsc refuses to do.
// Works
import * as config from './config.default.json';
const env = process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development';
const envConfigFile = `./config.${env}.json`;
// Does not work, because the file was not copied over
if (fs.existsSync(envConfigFile)) {
const envConfig = require(envConfigFile);
Object.assign(config, envConfig);
}
Solution 1: Keep json files outside the src tree (recommended)
Assuming you have /src/ and /dist/ folders, you could keep your JSON files in the project's / folder. Then a script located at /src/config/load-config.ts could do this at runtime:
const envConfig = require(`../../config.${env}.json`);
// Or you could read manually without using require
const envConfigFile = path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', `config.${env}.json`);
const envConfig = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(envConfigFile, 'utf-8'));
This is the simplest solution. You just need to make sure the necessary config files will be in place in the production environment.
The remaining solutions will deal with the case when you really want to keep the config files in your src/ folder, and have them appear in your dist/ folder.
Solution 2: Manually import all possible files
For the above example we could do:
import * as config from './config.default.json';
import * as testingConfig from './config.testing.json';
import * as stagingConfig from './config.staging.json';
import * as productionConfig from './config.production.json';
This should cause the specified json files to be copied into the dist/ folder, so our require() should now work.
Disadvantage: If someone wants to add a new .json file, then they must also add a new import line.
Solution 3: Copy json files using tsc-hooks plugin (recommended)
The tsc-hooks plugin allows you to copy all files from the src tree to the dist tree, and optionally exclude some.
// Install it into your project
$ yarn add tsc-hooks --dev
// Configure your tsconfig.json
{
"compilerOptions": {
"outDir": "dist"
},
// This tells tsc to run the hook during/after building
"hooks": [ "copy-files" ]
// Process everything except .txt files
"include": [ "src/**/*" ],
"exclude": [ "src/**/*.txt" ],
// Alternatively, process only the specified filetypes
"include": [ "src/**/*.{ts,js,json}" ],
}
I found it tsc-hooks announced here.
Solution 4: Copy json files using an npm build script (recommended)
Before tsc-hooks, we could add a cpy-cli or copyfiles step to the npm build process to copy all .json files into the dist/ folder, after tsc has finished.
This assumes you do your builds with npm run build or something similar.
For example:
$ npm install --save-dev cpy-cli
// To copy just the json files, add this to package.json
"postbuild": "cpy --cwd=src --parents '**/*.json' ../dist/",
// Or to copy everything except TypeScript files
"postbuild": "cpy --cwd=src --parents '**/*' '!**/*.ts' ../dist/",
Now npm run build should run tsc, and afterwards run cpy.
Disadvantages: It requires an extra devDependency. And you must make this part of your build process.
Solution 5: Use js files instead of json files
Alternatively, don't use .json files. Move them into .js files instead, and enable "allowJs": true in your tsconfig.json. Then tsc will copy the files over for you.
Your new .js files will need to look like this: module.exports = { ... };
I found this idea recommended here.
Note: In order to enable "allowJs": true you might also need to add "esModuleInterop": true and "declaration": false, and maybe even "skipLibCheck": true. It depends on your existing setup.
And there is one other concern (sorry I didn't test this):
Will tsc transpile your config files if they are not all statically referenced by other files? Your files or their folders may need to be referenced explicitly in the files or include options of your tsconfig.json.
Solution 6: Use ts files instead of json files
Sounds easy, but there are still some concerns to consider:
Your config files will now look something like this: const config = { ... }; export default config;
See the note above about files / include options.
If you load the config files dynamically at runtime, don't forget they will have been transpiled into .js files. So don't go trying to require() .ts files because they won't be there!
If someone wants to change a config file, they should do a whole new tsc build. They could hack around with transpiled .js files in the dist folder, but this should be avoided because the changes may be overwritten by a future build.
Testing
When experimenting with this, please be sure to clear your dist/ folder and tsconfig.tsbuildinfo file between builds, in order to properly test the process.
(tsc does not always clean the dist/ folder, sometimes it just adds new files to it. So if you don't remove them, old files left over from earlier experiments may produce misleading results!)
In tsconfig.json, add
{
"compilerOptions": {
"resolveJsonModule": true,
},
"include": [
"src/config/*.json"
]
}
Notice that it won't copy those json files which are required. If you need to dynamically require some json files and need them to be copied to dist, then you need to change from, for example,
return require("some.json") as YourType
to
return (await import("some.json")) as YourType
.
In typescript 2.9+ you can use JSON files directly and it automatically copied to dist directories.
This is tsconfig.json with minimum needed configuration:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"allowSyntheticDefaultImports": true,
"esModuleInterop" : true,
"module" : "commonjs",
"outDir" : "./dist",
"resolveJsonModule" : true,
"target" : "es6"
},
"exclude" : [
"node_modules"
]
}
Then you can create a json file.
{
"address": "127.0.0.1",
"port" : 8080
}
Sample usage:
import config from './config.json';
class Main {
public someMethod(): void {
console.log(config.port);
}
}
new Main().someMethod();
If you don't use esModuleInterop property you should access your json properties encapsulated in default field. config.default.port.
The typescript compiler works fine when I import a json file using
const tasks = require('./tasks.json')
TypeScript wouldn't complain about this as long as you have a global require() function defined, for example using node.d.ts. With a vanilla setup you would actually get a compile error that require is not defined.
Even if you've told TypeScript about a global require function it just sees it as a function that's expected to return something, it doesn't make the compiler actually analyze what the function is requiring ("tasks.json") and do anything with that file. This is the job of a tool like Browserify or Webpack, which can parse your code base for require statements and load just about anything (JS, CSS, JSON, images, etc) into runtime bundles for distribution.
Taking this a little further, with TypeScript 2.0 you can even tell the TypeScript Compiler about module path patterns that will be resolved and loaded by a bundler (Browserify or Webpack) using wildcard (*) module name declarations:
declare module "*.json" {
const value: any;
export default value;
}
Now you can import your JSON in TypeScript using ES6 module syntax:
import tasks from "./tasks.json";
Which will not give any compile error and will transpile down to something like var tasks = require("./tasks.json"), and your bundler will be responsible for parsing out the require statements and building your bundle including the JSON contents.
you can include this into your build script && ncp src/res build/res, will copy the files directly to your outDir
You can always get an absolute path to your project, with typescript code. To do it just read the JSON file not by the required keyword but with the help of the fs module. In a path of file use process.cwd() to access typescript project directory:
import * as fs from 'fs';
const task: any = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(`${process.cwd()}/tasks.json`).toString());
To make it work correctly you may need to change your running script to node dist/src/index.js where you specify a dist folder in the path.

What's necessary when deploying an Aurelia/Node application?

I've have built an Aurelia application, but I'm not sure what needs to be pushed to a production server. I've read up on Node and I'm starting to grasp it a little more. If we just push the dist folder (bundled folder), index.html, and package.json, does the server automatically use the json file to pull down the appropriate packages? Or do we have to run npm install on the server's CLI to pull down those packages? If we have to do that, then I'm assuming we must do the same thing with jspm.
Also, along with the json file, do we need do push config.js to production?
Edit
I just ran gulp export and it produces an export folder with the following:
dist folder
jspm_packages folder
config.js
index.html
favicon.ico
I copy all of those files and push them into production. The first error I'm getting it a 404 on main.js
Here's my bundles.js file
module.exports = {
"bundles": {
"dist/app-build": {
"includes": [
"[**/*.js]",
"**/*.html!text",
"**/*.css!text"
],
"options": {
"inject": true,
"minify": true,
"depCache": true,
"rev": false
}
},
"dist/aurelia": {
"includes": [
"aurelia-framework",
"aurelia-bootstrapper",
"aurelia-fetch-client",
"aurelia-router",
"aurelia-animator-css",
"aurelia-templating-binding",
"aurelia-polyfills",
"aurelia-templating-resources",
"aurelia-templating-router",
"aurelia-loader-default",
"aurelia-history-browser",
"aurelia-logging-console",
"bootstrap",
"bootstrap/css/bootstrap.css!text",
"fetch",
"jquery"
],
"options": {
"inject": true,
"minify": true,
"depCache": false,
"rev": false
}
}
}
};
I'm confused on why it's not loading my nprogress bar. I'm getting the 404 where it's searching for appName/jspm_packages/github/rstacruz-nprogress. Why doesn't it automatically configure this to be bundled/exported? How do I fix it to where it automatically includes all of my libraries that I brought in?
Run the command gulp export. It will bundle the app and copy the necessary files (index.html, config.js, etc...) to a export folder. Then, just copy the export folder to the server. There is no need to install packages in production.
EDIT
When you install a package, such as nprogress, you have to include it into one of the bundle files. The bundles are configured in the build/bundles.js. The aurelia navigation-skeleton comes with 2 bundles configured, one for the aurelia libraries and one for the rest of your application. You can also create more bundles if you want. To add a package into a bundle file, you just have to add its name into the specific array, for example:
//...
"dist/aurelia": {
"includes": [
"aurelia-framework",
"aurelia-bootstrapper",
"aurelia-fetch-client",
"aurelia-router",
"aurelia-animator-css",
"aurelia-templating-binding",
"aurelia-polyfills",
"aurelia-templating-resources",
"aurelia-templating-router",
"aurelia-loader-default",
"aurelia-history-browser",
"aurelia-logging-console",
"bootstrap",
"bootstrap/css/bootstrap.css!text",
"fetch",
"jquery",
"nprogress"
],
//...
In the above example I am adding nprogress into aurelia bundle. You could add this into app-build bundle, or even create another bundle just for nprogress.
Now, when you run gulp export, nprogress will be bundled into aurelia-######.js file, and it will be ready to work in production.