What is the difference between two methods web3.eth.getTransaction and web3.eth.getTransactionReceipt in the web3 library? I tried to read this documentation https://web3js.readthedocs.io/en/v1.2.0/web3-eth.html#gettransactionreceipt but the difference is not clear to me.
The receipt is available only for mined transactions. But because of this, it includes a few more properties:
status - successful or reverted
gasUsed - amount of gas used by this tx alone
cumulativeGasUsed - amount of gas used by this tx and its internal transactions
logs - list of event logs that the transaction produced
The regular getTransaction allows you to get details (such as from, to, data and value) for transactions that are not yet mined. Possible use case: You got only the transactionHash from an external source and need to find out the recipient and don't know whether the transaction has been mined yet.
So they both can be used in different cases.
Related
I am planning out a new project in which I need to connect one particular Fiat payment gateway to my smart contract. I don't want to have a system with a centralized backend, so I am exploring the possibility to use Chainlink to communicate with API and then pass response to my smart contract. I know that Chainlink allows any contract to access any external data source through their decentralized oracle network. The problem is I can't approximate how much LINK it will cost me to get a response from 1 oracle. Is there some average cost of a 1 response from an oracle and what determines such cost
I tried to look up this information, but it does not seem that this topic is discussed much. Also probably I didn't look in the right place
The problem is I can't approximate how much LINK it will cost me to
get response from 1 oracle.
Nobody can. When you make a request to oracle, you are calling a smart contract function and this will cost you gas which varies depending on the congestion in the system. if system is busy, it will cost more gas. Also when you interact with the chainlink, you are actually passing data to chainlink smart contract which makes some calculations, so you pay for those gas too.
Calling one oracle is sending a request to one oracle. oracle is a chainlink node operator, and it set its own price. But sending a request to only one node is not a decentralized approach even though each node have multiple data resources. you should make a request to several nodes meaning that you need to pay each node operator. when you make a request to several nodes, you receive the average of those responses.
The service you want to use is Chainlink Any Api, and in the service the cost of LINK depends on the node operator you are using.
There is a fee required by node operator. When you send a request, you actually require Chainlink node to provide a service. Usually the service is not free and the fee of a request is set by the node operator. The fee varies across different node operators. If you are only a consumer to use service provided by node operators, you just need to check the fee of different node operators.
you, of course, also has to pay gas fee for your transaction, but that it it costed in ETH rather than LINK (as you asking how much LINK it will cost, I assume you know it).
If you are a node operator and want to run the service for yourself, you may want to consider the following 2 factors:
Congestion of the system mentioned by #Yilmaz. When the blockchain you are using is very busy, the gas price is high so that the more gas fee, which is the result of (gas price) x(gas limit), will be cost more.
The logic of fulfill function in your contract. Fulfillment function is the "callback" function of Chainlink Any Api. Oracle node will fetch the data demand in the request and then call the fulfill function in consumer contract. In fulfill function, logics varies from simply saving the data in a variable or doing some calculations. The more complex logics, the more gas limit required.
Hope it helps!
Using OpenEthereum, which is the json rpc call allowing to do it?
I found the parity_pubsub module but I ve no idea of the parameter for getting not yet confirmed transactions.
I also found https://web3js.readthedocs.io/en/v1.2.11/web3-eth-subscribe.html#subscribe-pendingtransactions in the web3 module but it doesn t allows to filter transactions and the documentation doesn t explains how to use the full web3 api along OpenEthereum.
The purpose
The aim is to frontrun transactions for arbitrage by always maintinning the highest gas price until the next block is mined.
This involve detecting competiting transactions (those targetting the same Ethereum address as mine and with a higher gas price than me) with the lowest latency as possible in order to replace them as soon as possible (either for abortting the trade or changing the gas price again). So this exclude constantly polling for the answer as the requirement is to have the lowest number of context switches.
Cannot find a clean way to set Stackdriver alert notifications on errors in cloud functions
I am using a cloud function to process data to cloud data store. There are 2 types of errors that I want to be alerted on:
Technical exceptions which might cause function to 'crash'
Custom errors that we are logging from the cloud function
I have done the below,
Created a log metric searching for specific errors (although this will not work for 'crash' as the error message can be different each time)
Created an alert for this metric in Stackdriver monitoring with parameters as in below code section
This is done as per the answer to the question,
how to create alert per error in stackdriver
For the first trigger of the condition I receive an email. However, on subsequent triggers lets say on the next day, I don't. Also the incident is in 'opened' state.
Resource type: cloud function
Metric:from point 2 above
Aggregation: Aligner: count, Reducer: None, Alignment period: 1m
Configuration: Condition triggers if: Any time series violates, Condition:
is above, Threshold: 0.001, For: 1 min
So I have 3 questions,
Is this the right way to do to satisfy my requirement of creating alerts?
How can I still receive alert notifications for subsequent errors?
How to set the incident to 'resolved' either automatically/ manually?
I was having a similar problem and managed to at least get a mail every time. The "trick" seems to be to use sum instead of count in combination with for most recent value - see the screenshot below.
This causes Stackdriver to send a mail everytime a matching log entry is found and closing the issue a minute later.
Normally, alerts resolve themselves once the alerting policy stops firing. The problem you're having with your alerts not resolving is because your metric only writes non-zero points - if there are no errors, it doesn't write zero. That means that the policy never gets an unambiguous signal that everything is fine, so the alerts just sit there (they'll automatically close after 7 days, but I imagine that's not all that useful for you).
This is a common problem and it's a tricky one to solve. One possibility is to write your policy as a ratio of errors to something non-zero, like request count. As long as the request count is non-zero, the ratio will compute zero if there are no errors, and so an alert on the ratio will automatically resolve. You need to be a bit careful about rounding errors, though - if your request count is high enough, you might potentially miss a single error because the ratio could round to zero.
Aaron Sher, Stackdriver engineer
We got around this issue by having the insertId as a label of the log-based metric we created for every log record we get from the pods running our services.
In the alerting policy, this label helped in two things:
We grouped by it (named as record_id) which served in making each incident unique, so it got reported without waiting for other incidents to get resolved and at the same time it got resolved instantly.
We used it in the documentation of the notification to include a direct link to the issue (log record) itself which was a nice and essential feature to have. https://console.cloud.google.com/logs/viewer?project=MY_PROJECT&advancedFilter=insertId%3D%22${metric.label.record_id}%22
As #Aaron Sher mentioned in his answer, it is a tricky problem. We might have done something not recommended or not efficient, but it works fine and of course we are open for improvement recommendations.
I am studying blockchain with Ethereum, and I want to use past transaction data in the Smart contract using Solidity.
If I use Web3.js module in the program written in javascript, I can get these data easily.
But I can't get these data in the Smart contract using Solidity.
Reference of Solidity says that we can get current block number, blockhash, etc., by using "block.number" and "block.blockhash(uint blockNumber)" functions, but doesn't mention getting transaction data.
(http://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/units-and-global-variables.html#special-variables-and-functions)
please help me.
The answer is simple. Unfortunately, you simply can’t access old transaction or block data onchain from Solidity. At most, you can access hashes of last 256 blocks (see blockhash in documentation )
Alternatively, as a workaround you could consider using Oraclize. Oraclize represents way to read offchain data onchain, so you could try to read transaction data from Etherscan web API. The way Oraclize works is that :
You request to Oraclize smart contract what data you want to fetch from internet (some URL)
Oraclize offchain servers then detect your on-chain request
The look up the data you wanted (they'll make some http request to the URL you provided)
Once they get response, they will send transaction to your contract (calling specific callback method) containing data you requested
With such approach however, you are relying that:
EtherScan is up and running
Oraclize is up un running.
If you only care about transaction data related to your smart contracts, another way would be to store that transaction data onchain. Maybe we could gave you some more suggestions if you tell us more about what specific problem are you solving.
How can I update the smartcontracts of my Truffle dapp which are deployed in the Ethereum blockchain?
Great answer found here.
From axic in Ethereum Stack Exchange site:
Contract code is immutable, the storage is mutable, but you cannot
execute code placed into storage, at least for now.
Bugfixes to contracts
As for bugfixes, the common pattern is to have proxy or lookup
contracts to be a gateway to the real one, which in case of a change
or bugfix would be replaced. Replacing it also means losing the old
storage contents.
Keeping storage
If you want the ability to upgrade code, while keeping storage, you
could think of separating storage and logic. Have a dedicated storage
contract, which accepts write calls from trusted addresses (e.g. the
logic contracts). All important storage should be associated with this
one.
Accessing storage after selfdestruct
As of today there is no real pruning implemented even in the case of
selfdestruct, but that should definitely come in the future. There are
several EIPs discussing this.
Even if pruning is implemented, it shouldn't happen in an instant and
you should be able to read storage from the last state. It is also
planned to have archive nodes to keep states indefinitely -- not sure
that is feasible without limitations just by judging at the growth of
the blockchain.
Redeploying at same address
In short: practically this is not possible. The contract addresses are
calculated from the sender and the nonce. The nonce is sequential,
there cannot be any gaps and there cannot be duplicates.
In theory it is possible to arrive at the same hash with a different
nonce and address combination, but the likelyhood is small.