CSS grow child to parent's max width - html

There are plenty of questions on how to make a parent's width that of it's child that are suggested as similar questions, this is not what I want.
I am working on theming a piece of software for branding purposes, I do not control the software and only have access to CSS modifications, so JavaScript or modifying the DOM is out of the question or this would be trivial.
Using CSS only, is it possible to achieve the following.
I have a container div that holds two columns, the main content area, and a sidebar. The sidebar contains multiple divs that wrap content for different sidebar elements. The content of these sidebar elements are designed to be scaled to 100% width of it's parent, which works when the parent has a fixed width, which is by default 25% of the container.
What we need is for the sidebar to disappear when it's content is hidden. The content within each sidebar element can be set to display: none, but when all the elements are hidden the sidebar still takes up empty space. The example below using a min-width: fit-content and a max width of the 25% which was previously it's fixed size, which works fine for hiding the sidebar when the content is hidden, but the content in the sidebar doesn't grow. Is there a way to make the content inside of .sidebarElementWrapper below, grow to fit the max-width of #sidebarArea
* {
margin: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
#contentArea {
width: 100%;
background: #A84652;
}
#sidebarArea {
max-width: 25%;
min-width: fit-content;
background: #4262C2;
}
.sidebarElement {
width: 100%;
padding: 12px;
background: #8b8b8b;
border-bottom: 1px solid #2c2c2c;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="contentArea">
</div>
<div id="sidebarArea">
<div class="sidebarElementWrapper">
<div class="sidebarElement">Sidebar Element 1</div>
</div>
<div class="sidebarElementWrapper">
<div class="sidebarElement">Sidebar Element 2</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
To hide the content of a sidebar element, the .sidebarElement is set to display: none, not the wrapper, just of note. Since the wrapper still exists, and the content isn't removed, just hidden, the :empty pseudo-selector also doesn't work.
Edit: Just to clarify as I don't think it was clear after reading through this again, when the content is hidden the sidebar should be gone, doesn't matter how whether it's through display:none or width or some other mechanism. When there is sidebar content it should be 25% the width of the container.
Edit again: Because of some comments, I'm going to attempt to explain this again.
The sidebar has a min and max width, it does not have a fixed width, the sidebar will scale to fit the content inside it. Because the sidebar does not have a fixed width, elements basing their width on 100% of the parent do not act like you may expect, instead the sidebar is defaulting to the min-width from what I can tell, which is the minimum width required to fit the content. I am not looking for this, I want the sidebar to extend out to 25% of the container width, which you can see if you copy this code into a file (because the snippet above will run in a smaller pane it may actually be wider than 25% so it may not be representative)
* {
margin: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
#contentArea {
width: 100%;
background: #A84652;
}
#sidebarArea {
max-width: 25%;
min-width: fit-content;
background: #4262C2;
}
.sidebarElement {
width: 100%;
padding: 12px;
background: #8b8b8b;
border-bottom: 1px solid #2c2c2c;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="contentArea">
</div>
<div id="sidebarArea">
<div class="sidebarElementWrapper">
<div class="sidebarElement">Sidebar Element 1</div>
</div>
<div class="sidebarElementWrapper">
<div class="sidebarElement">Sidebar Element 2</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
In the end, I have a div with a min and max width, and a child element using a percent. The percent width (ie. width:100%) does not scale the child to the element's max width, but 100% of the current width, so no, the code as above does not achieve what I need.

I found a way to do it, fill-available.
.sidebarElement {
width: 100vw;
...
max-width: fill-available;
max-width: stretch;
max-width: -webkit-fill-available;
max-width: -moz-available;
}
Once this is done, the min-width on #sidebarArea can be removed.
* {
margin: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
html,body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
#contentArea {
width: 100%;
background: #A84652;
}
#sidebarArea {
max-width: 25%;
background: #4262C2;
}
.sidebarElement {
width: 100vw;
padding: 12px;
background: #8b8b8b;
border-bottom: 1px solid #2c2c2c;
max-width: fill-available;
max-width: stretch;
max-width: -webkit-fill-available;
max-width: -moz-available;
}
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="contentArea">
</div>
<div id="sidebarArea">
<div class="sidebarElementWrapper">
<div class="sidebarElement">Sidebar Element 1</div>
</div>
<div class="sidebarElementWrapper">
<div class="sidebarElement">Sidebar Element 2</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>

Related

Flex divs not displayed correctly in mobile browsers

I'm trying to achieve a website design which basically has two parts. The top-part, where the menu of the site is and the content-part, with the information.
.wrap {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.box {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100%;
}
.top {
flex: 0 1 auto;
}
.content {
flex: 1;
position: relative;
height: 100%;
}
<div class="wrap">
<div class="box">
<div class="top"></div>
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
</div>
The menu-div should be as big as needed for the menu-content to be displayed and the content-div should fill the rest of the site. Both together should fill 100% in width and 100% in height.
So, this construct works fine on desktop PCs, however - on mobile browsers for Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, the site's height gets extended by the menu's height.
The content is at 100% plus the menu. Can someone please explain to me what I'm doing wrong here?
The Basics
In order to give elements percentage heights, their parents need a defined height. What can be confusing, is that these parents include <html> and <body> Consider this example:
html,body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
div {
height: 100%;
background: lightgreen;
}
<div></div>
Here the <html>, <body> and <div> elements have both been given height: 100%. This trickles down to each child element:
<html> is 100% of the browser viewport
<body> is 100% of its <html> parent
<div> is 100% of its <body> parent
We can simplify this and give the <body> element 100% height using a viewport height unit. This reduces complexity as we no longer need to worry about <html>. Consider this example:
body {
height: 100vh;
margin: 0;
}
div {
height: 100%;
background: lightgreen;
}
<div></div>
Here the <body> takes up 100% of the viewport height and its children can be given percentage heights. We don't need to define a height for <html>.
What You Want to Achieve
With this in mind, we can strip your example down to the basics. Here is exactly what you have described using as few elements as needed:
The <body> can be the flex container. It gets:
display: flex and flex-direction: column
margin: 0 to remove the default body margin.
height: 100vh to stretch it to 100% of the viewport height.
The <div class="top"> is your header that will contain your menu. We don't need to give it a flex property as it will shrink to fit its contents with the initial flex values it is given.
The <div class="content"> is given flex: 1 to grow and fill the rest of the available space.
body {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100vh;
margin: 0;
}
.top {
background: pink;
}
.content {
flex: 1;
background: lightgreen;
}
<div class="top">Menu Content<br>Menu Content<br>Menu Content</div>
<div class="content"></div>

Dynamic allocated row height of css grid gets stretched with growing content

Similar to this question I´m struggling with using CSS grid to create a layout with fixed header and footer containing an middle row, which should use the remaining space of the .static or .dynamic dynamic container. So in this case, both oth them should have a complete height of 200px. Subtracting the 40px (2x 20px for header + footer) the remaining space for the content should be 160px. As you can see at the example, the red reference div on the left is clearly smaller than the whole "sandwich" of div containers. The .dynamic div element is to large and will stretch the whole div container. I want to prohibit this!
Here are a few additional conditions I have to fullfill:
The whole layout should be dynamic, so the .wrapper div later wont have a static height, but will fill 100% of the given height. therefore onlydynamic will be used, since this also uses 100% of the height. The showcase with .static is just there to show that it doesn´t even work with fixed heights.
Neither static nor dynamic should work with overflow to create scrollbars or hidden overflowing content. It should just restrict the dynamic area between .header and .footer to an height.
The containing .content container will expand itself to 100% width and should be treatet as a kind of blackbox: every component should be able to be inserted here. The content will always use 100% of the height and should not strech the ambient parent divs. The content will contain an scrollbar on its own, if the height of the content will be heigher than the dynamically allocated space of the .dynamic container
How am I able to solve this issue with the given description?
Please see the provided example and feel free to adapt it as you need to!
.wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
height: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
width: 100%;
}
.measurement {
height: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
min-height: 200px;
min-width: 3px;
background-color: red;
border: 2px solid blue;
padding: 2px;
margin: 1px;
}
.static,
.dynamic {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 20px 1fr 20px;
width: 50%;
border: 2px solid blue;
padding: 2px;
margin: 1px;
}
.static {
height: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
/*should NOT have an overflow/scrollbar but fit to the remaining space*/
}
.dynamic {
height: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
/*should NOT have an overflow/scrollbar but fit to the remaining space*/
}
.content {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
overflow: auto;
/* Blackbox like content, always expands to 100% width and height */
/* could contain content that is larger than the dynamic-height div and will get scrollbar then */
}
.fixed-height {
background-color: green;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="measurement"></div>
<div class="static">
<div class="fixed-height">TOP</div>
<div class="dynamic-height">
<div class="content">
TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST
</div>
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">BOTTOM</div>
</div>
<div class="dynamic">
<div class="fixed-height">TOP</div>
<div class="dynamic-height">
<div class="content">
TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST
</div>
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">BOTTOM</div>
</div>
</div>
EDIT
As you can see in the image below, the TEST and BOTTOM text is beyond the blue borders. I´m not about the few pixels difference between the borders and the red reference but I'm concerned about the overflow over the bottom border.
This is the expected behaviour: there should be a scrollbar inside the content area, no overflow and no scrollbar inside dynamic div
You need to merge the div.content with the div.dynamic-height and set the max-height: 100% property to your .dynamic-height class.
.content doesn't need an height, it's setted by the definition of the grid row.
.wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
height: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
width: 100%;
}
.measurement {
height: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
min-height: 200px;
min-width: 3px;
background-color: red;
border: 2px solid blue;
padding: 2px;
margin: 1px;
}
.static,
.dynamic {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 20px 1fr 20px;
width: 50%;
border: 2px solid blue;
padding: 2px;
margin: 1px;
}
.static {
height: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
/*should NOT have an overflow/scrollbar but fit to the remaining space*/
}
.dynamic {
height: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
/*should NOT have an overflow/scrollbar but fit to the remaining space*/
}
.content {
width: 100%;
overflow: auto;
/* Blackbox like content, always expands to 100% width and height */
/* could contain content that is larger than the dynamic-height div and will get scrollbar then */
}
.fixed-height {
background-color: green;
}
.dynamic-height {
max-height: 100%;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="measurement"></div>
<div class="static">
<div class="fixed-height">TOP</div>
<div class="dynamic-height content">
TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">BOTTOM</div>
</div>
<div class="dynamic">
<div class="fixed-height">TOP</div>
<div class="content dynamic-height">
TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">BOTTOM</div>
</div>
</div>

css flex layout fit child into flex box

I want to have a child fill the exactly entire flex box of a flex layout.
If I use the following HTML:
<div class="parent">
<div class="child1">
should have 100px height
</div>
<div class="child2">
<div class="intermediatechild2">
<div class="subchild2">should have 200px height and padding</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
and apply the following css:
.parent {
display: flex;
flex-direction : column;
height: 300px;
width: 200px;
}
.child1 {
height: 100px;
background: #008800;
flex: 0 0 auto;
}
.child2 {
height: 100%;
background: #003300;
flex: 0 0 auto;
}
.subchild2 {
height : 100%;
background: #ff0000;
}
.intermediatechild2 {
padding: 20px;
height : 100%;
width : 100%;
box-sizing: border-box;
border: 2px solid blue;
}
I get an overflowing intermediatechild. The height 100% seems to be relative to .parent
A fiddle can be found here:
http://jsfiddle.net/8znFV/4/
I did not understand exactly what you want, but if what you want is only leave. Subchild2 100% and follow the father's height (intermediatechild2), you'll have to add the father's height (intermediatechild2) with px and remove the height. child2.
Recalling that, you have to count the padding in father's height (intermediatechild2), so if you want. Subchild2 has 200px in height, will have to leave her father (intermediatechild2) with 240px, leaving 20 padding-top and 20 padding-bottom height of more than 200.
A note, only work in chrome as your css code is nonstandard, if you want I can breastfeed him at another time =)
Hope it helps
Here's an example: http://zip.net/bsmZgF
Just Remove height:100% from .child2and it will work. this will give 100% height to child2 element so it's going outside of parent.
It should be auto adjusted that's the purpose of flexbox and 100% height is giving more height(same as parent) to child2.
I fixed the problem. The solution lies in staying "display:flex". Once you started flex layout, you seem not to be able to step back to "display:block" with "height:100%".
<div class="parent">
<div class="child1">
should have 100px height
</div>
<div class="child2">
<div class="intermediatechild2">
<div class="subchild2">should have 200px height including padding</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
css:
.parent {
display: flex;
flex-direction : column;
height: 300px;
width: 200px;
}
.child1 {
height: 100px;
background: #008800;
}
.child2 {
background: #003300;
flex: 1;
display: flex;
}
.subchild2 {
background: #ff0000;
flex: 1;
}
.intermediatechild2 {
padding: 20px;
display : flex;
box-sizing: border-box;
border: 2px solid blue;
}
working fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/8znFV/6/

Div Expand to Visually Fill Vertical Space

I have a page that has a header, content, and footer. The header and footer are of fixed height, and I'd like the content to adjust its height so that it fits dynamically between the header and footer. I am planning to put a background-image in my content, so it is critical that it actually fills the rest of the unoccupied vertical space.
I used the Sticky Footer approach to ensure that the footer remains on the bottom of the page. This however does not make the content span the entire height of the remaining space.
I have tried several solutions which involved me adding height:100%, height:auto; position:relative but it did not work.
html,
body {
height: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
}
header {
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
background-color: blue;
}
header nav ul li {
display: inline;
padding: 0 30px 0 0;
float: left;
}
#wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 0 -30px 0;
/* the bottom margin is the negative value of the footer's height */
position: relative;
}
#wrapper #content {
background-color: pink;
width: 400px;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 0 -30px 100px;
padding: 25px 30px 25px 30px;
}
footer {
margin: -30px 0 0 0;
width: 100%;
height: 30px;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<header>
<div id="logo"></div>
<nav>
<ul>
<li>About</li>
<li>Menu</li>
<li>Specials</li>
</ul>
</nav>
</header>
<div id="content">
content
<br>goes
<br>here
</div>
</div>
<footer>footer</footer>
The trick about height:100% is that it requires all of the parent containers to be have their heights set as well. Here's an html example
<html>
<body>
<div id="container">
</div>
</body>
</html>
in order for the container div with a height set to 100% to expand dynamically to the height of the window you need to make sure that the body and html elements have their heights set to 100% as well. so...
html
{
height: 100%;
}
body
{
height: 100%;
}
#container
{
height: 100%;
}
would give you a container that expands to fit your window. then if you need to have footer or header that floats above this window you can do so with z indexing. This is the only solution I've found that fills the vertical height dynamically.
I'm providing a slightly more general solution so it is more useful for others reading this answer and wondering how to apply it to their site.
Assuming you have three divs:
<div id='header'></div>
<div id='contents'></div>
<div id='footer'></div>
where #header is fixed and may have variable height, #contents should consume all remaining vertical space and #footer is fixed and may have variable height you can do:
/* Note you could add a container div instead of using the body */
body {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
#header {
flex: none;
}
#contents {
flex: 1;
height: 100%;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
#footer {
flex: none;
}
Note that this will allow the contents to scroll vertically to show it's whole contents.
You can read more about display:flex here.
Try changing your css to this:
html,
body {
height: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
}
header {
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
background-color: blue;
}
header nav ul li {
display: inline;
padding: 0 30px 0 0;
float: left;
}
#wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 0 -30px 0;
/* the bottom margin is the negative value of the footer's height */
position: relative;
}
#content {
background-color: pink;
width: 400px;
padding: 25px 30px 25px 30px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 30px;
top: 150px;
margin-left: 100px;
}
footer {
margin: -30px 0 0 0;
width: 100%;
height: 30px;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<header>
<div id="logo"></div>
<nav>
<ul>
<li>About</li>
<li>Menu</li>
<li>Specials</li>
</ul>
</nav>
</header>
<div id="content">
content
<br>goes
<br>here
</div>
</div>
<footer>footer</footer>
You probably don't want to be setting the width, padding, margins, ect. of the wrapper. Also, with absolute positioning you can pull the bottom and top of the content to where you want them.
Here's what you are after, I think.
I spend several hours trying to figure this out too and finally have a robust solution without hacks. However, it requires CSS3, which requires a modern browser to support it. So, if this constraint works for you, then I have a real solution for you that works.
http://jsfiddle.net/u9xh4z74/
Copy this code into your own file if you need proof, as the JSFiddle will not actually render the flexbox correctly as embedded code.
Basically, you need to
- set the target container to 100% height, which you seem to already know
- the parent container you set display: flex and flex-direction: vertical (you'll see in the JSFiddle I've also included the alternate styles that do the same thing but are needed for cross browser support)
- you can let the header and footer be their natural heights and dont need to specify anything in that regard
- in the container you want to fill up the remaining space, set flex: 1. You're set! You'll see it works exactly as you semantically have intended. Also in the JSFiddle, I included overflow: auto to demonstrate that if you have even more text than the screen can handle, scrolling works as you would want it to.
<div style="display:flex; flex-direction:vertical;">
...header(s)...
<div style="flex: 1; overflow: auto;">
As much content as you want.
</div>
...footer(s)...
</div>
As a side note, I pursued the option of trying to do this same thing using display: table. It works just fine as well, except that overflowed content does not work as you would expect, instead overflowed content simply expands the container to the size of the content, which I'm pretty sure is not what you want. Enjoy!
Use display:table and display:table-row
Set height:0 for normal divs and height:auto for div that should fill vertical space. Insert a div with {height:100%; overflow-y:auto} into the vertical filler to if the containers height shouldn't expand beyond its preset height.
Behold the power of display:table!
<div style="height:300px;">
<div style="display:table; height:100%; width:100%;border: 1px solid blue;">
<div style="display: table-row; height:0; padding:2px; background-color:yellow;">
Hello
</div>
<div style="display: table-row; height:auto; padding:2px; background-color:green;">
<div style="height:100%; overflow: auto;">
<div style="height: 500px"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: table-row; height:0; padding:2px; background-color:yellow;">
Gbai
</div>
</div>
</div>
There is no 100% height from 100% continer height exactly. You can't solve it this way. Likewise while using mix of height + margin + padding. This is way straight to hell. I suggest you to take a look for tutorials which are sloving this page layout.

Div width 100% minus fixed amount of pixels

How can I achieve the following structure without using tables or JavaScript? The white borders represent edges of divs and aren't relevant to the question.
The size of the area in the middle is going to vary, but it will have exact pixel values and the whole structure should scale according to those values. To simplify it, I'd need a way to set "100% - n px" width to the top-middle and bottom-middle divs.
I'd appreciate a clean cross-browser solution, but in case it's not possible, CSS hacks will do.
Here's a bonus. Another structure I've been struggling with and end up using tables or JavaScript. It's slightly different, but introduces new problems. I've been mainly using it in jQuery-based windowing system, but I'd like to keep the layout out of the script and only control the size of one element (the middle one).
New way I've just stumbled upon: css calc():
.calculated-width {
width: -webkit-calc(100% - 100px);
width: -moz-calc(100% - 100px);
width: calc(100% - 100px);
}​
Source: css width 100% minus 100px
You can use nested elements and padding to get a left and right edge on the toolbar. The default width of a div element is auto, which means that it uses the available width. You can then add padding to the element and it still keeps within the available width.
Here is an example that you can use for putting images as left and right rounded corners, and a center image that repeats between them.
The HTML:
<div class="Header">
<div>
<div>This is the dynamic center area</div>
</div>
</div>
The CSS:
.Header {
background: url(left.gif) no-repeat;
padding-left: 30px;
}
.Header div {
background: url(right.gif) top right no-repeat;
padding-right: 30px;
}
.Header div div {
background: url(center.gif) repeat-x;
padding: 0;
height: 30px;
}
While Guffa's answer works in many situations, in some cases you may not want the left and/or right pieces of padding to be the parent of the center div. In these cases, you can use a block formatting context on the center and float the padding divs left and right. Here's the code
The HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
<div class="center"></div>
</div>
The CSS:
.container {
width: 100px;
height: 20px;
}
.left, .right {
width: 20px;
height: 100%;
float: left;
background: black;
}
.right {
float: right;
}
.center {
overflow: auto;
height: 100%;
background: blue;
}
I feel that this element hierarchy is more natural when compared to nested nested divs, and better represents what's on the page. Because of this, borders, padding, and margin can be applied normally to all elements (ie: this 'naturality' goes beyond style and has ramifications).
Note that this only works on divs and other elements that share its 'fill 100% of the width by default' property. Inputs, tables, and possibly others will require you to wrap them in a container div and add a little more css to restore this quality. If you're unlucky enough to be in that situation, contact me and I'll dig up the css.
jsfiddle here: jsfiddle.net/RgdeQ
Enjoy!
You can make use of Flexbox layout. You need to set flex: 1 on the element that needs to have dynamic width or height for flex-direction: row and column respectively.
Dynamic width:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-width">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-width">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-width">
3
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
}
.fixed-width {
width: 200px; /* Fixed width or flex-basis: 200px */
}
.flexible-width {
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width i.e. flex-grow: 1 and flex-shrink: 1*/
}
Output:
.container {
display: flex;
width: 100%;
color: #fff;
font-family: Roboto;
}
.fixed-width {
background: #9BCB3C;
width: 200px; /* Fixed width */
text-align: center;
}
.flexible-width {
background: #88BEF5;
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width */
text-align: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-width">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-width">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-width">
3
</div>
</div>
Dynamic height:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-height">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-height">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">
3
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
}
.fixed-height {
height: 200px; /* Fixed height or flex-basis: 200px */
}
.flexible-height {
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining height i.e. flex-grow: 1 and flex-shrink: 1*/
}
Output:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100vh;
color: #fff;
font-family: Roboto;
}
.fixed-height {
background: #9BCB3C;
height: 50px; /* Fixed height or flex-basis: 100px */
text-align: center;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
.flexible-height {
background: #88BEF5;
flex: 1; /* Stretch to occupy remaining width */
text-align: center;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="fixed-height">
1
</div>
<div class="flexible-height">
2
</div>
<div class="fixed-height">
3
</div>
</div>
The usual way to do it is as outlined by Guffa, nested elements. It's a bit sad having to add extra markup to get the hooks you need for this, but in practice a wrapper div here or there isn't going to hurt anyone.
If you must do it without extra elements (eg. when you don't have control of the page markup), you can use box-sizing, which has pretty decent but not complete or simple browser support. Likely more fun than having to rely on scripting though.
Maybe I'm being dumb, but isn't table the obvious solution here?
<div class="parent">
<div class="fixed">
<div class="stretchToFit">
</div>
.parent{ display: table; width 100%; }
.fixed { display: table-cell; width: 150px; }
.stretchToFit{ display: table-cell; vertical-align: top}
Another way that I've figured out in chrome is even simpler, but man is it a hack!
.fixed{
float: left
}
.stretchToFit{
display: table-cell;
width: 1%;
}
This alone should fill the rest of the line horizontally, as table-cells do. However, you get some strange issues with it going over 100% of its parent, setting the width to a percent value fixes it though.
We can achieve this using flex-box very easily.
If we have three elements like Header, MiddleContainer and Footer. And we want to give some fixed height to Header and Footer. then we can write like this:
For React/RN(defaults are 'display' as flex and 'flexDirection' as column), in web css we'll have to specify the body container or container containing these as display: 'flex', flex-direction: 'column' like below:
container-containing-these-elements: {
display: flex,
flex-direction: column
}
header: {
height: 40,
},
middle-container: {
flex: 1, // this will take the rest of the space available.
},
footer: {
height: 100,
}
what if your wrapping div was 100% and you used padding for a pixel amount, then if the padding # needs to be dynamic, you can easily use jQuery to modify your padding amount when your events fire.
I had a similar issue where I wanted a banner across the top of the screen that had one image on the left and a repeating image on the right to the edge of the screen. I ended up resolving it like so:
CSS:
.banner_left {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 131px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url("left_image.jpg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.banner_right {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 131px;
right: 0px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url("right_repeating_image.jpg");
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: top left;
}
The key was the right tag. I'm basically specifying that I want it to repeat from 131px in from the left to 0px from the right.
In some contexts, you can leverage margin settings to effectively specify "100% width minus N pixels". See the accepted answer to this question.