After POST /authentication api, the response will be like this.
{
"accessToken": "XXXXX",
"authentication": {
"strategy": "local",
"accessToken": "XXXXX",
"payload": {
"iat": 1616402936,
"exp": 1616489336,
"aud": "https://yourdomain.com",
"iss": "feathers",
"sub": "c15ef318-68fc-471c-9710-52f14d87abda",
"jti": "57d103e1-c81b-4fc6-8bbe-952b74aaf8e3"
}
},
"user": {
"id": "c15ef320-68fc-471c-9710-52f14d87ccda",
"email": "abc.abc#abc.com",
}
}
I want to remove the payload object from above response.
How can I do that?
You should look into FeatherJS Hooks - https://docs.feathersjs.com/api/hooks.html
These can be used to inject logic into the API requests. Something like this should work for your example -
app.service('messages').hooks({
after: {
get: [
async context => {
delete context.authentication.payload
return context;
}
]
}
});
Related
In postman I am able to log in the user and get an accessToken:
Doing Post at http://localhost:3030/authentication I type in:
{
"strategy": "local",
"email": "bob#bob.com",
"password": "bob"
}
and then I get:
{
"accessToken": "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6ImFjY2VzcyJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE2NjEzMjgzMDEsImV4cCI6MTY2MTQxNDcwMSwiYXVkIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly95b3VyZG9tYWluLmNvbSIsImlzcyI6ImZlYXRoZXJzIiwic3ViIjoiMSIsImp0aSI6IjMyOWMwZTU3LTM5NTctNDUxOS05N2ZmLTRiNDIxOWI2MDQ2YSJ9.tIiRCMqzNg8F4lb1tzfYrOVvc148qRmZrZ7FPouHhKg",
"authentication": {
"strategy": "local",
"accessToken": "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6ImFjY2VzcyJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE2NjEzMjgzMDEsImV4cCI6MTY2MTQxNDcwMSwiYXVkIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly95b3VyZG9tYWluLmNvbSIsImlzcyI6ImZlYXRoZXJzIiwic3ViIjoiMSIsImp0aSI6IjMyOWMwZTU3LTM5NTctNDUxOS05N2ZmLTRiNDIxOWI2MDQ2YSJ9.tIiRCMqzNg8F4lb1tzfYrOVvc148qRmZrZ7FPouHhKg",
"payload": {
"iat": 1661328301,
"exp": 1661414701,
"aud": "https://yourdomain.com",
"iss": "feathers",
"sub": "1",
"jti": "329c0e57-3957-4519-97ff-4b4219b6046a"
}
},
"user": {
"id": 1,
"email": "bob#bob.com",
"createdAt": "2022-08-24T08:04:57.464Z",
"updatedAt": "2022-08-24T08:04:57.464Z"
}
}
But then when I try to use accessToken for another POST in Postman, I get:
{
"name": "NotAuthenticated",
"message": "Not authenticated",
"code": 401,
"className": "not-authenticated",
"errors": {}
}
Why is this?
One idea I have is maybe I did this part wrong. I thought I was supposed to add
auth.associateCurrentUser({
idField: "id",
as: "group_admin",
}),
But I was getting an error & found something online that said to change it to this (context below):
setField({
from: "params.user.id",
as: "data.group_admin",
}),
import * as authentication from "#feathersjs/authentication";
// Don't remove this comment. It's needed to format import lines nicely.
const { authenticate } = authentication.hooks;
import { setField } from "feathers-authentication-hooks";
export default {
before: {
all: [authenticate("jwt")],
find: [],
get: [],
create: [
setField({
from: "params.user.id",
as: "data.group_admin",
}),
// auth.associateCurrentUser({
// idField: "id",
// as: "group_admin",
// }),
],
update: [],
patch: [],
remove: [],
},
Do you have any ideas to get the accessToken to work with authentication?
I can post more code if needed.
I am using authorize.net's sandbox API to test their gateway in my wix (corvid/code) environment. Funny thing is that when i send JSON to the sandbox API i get a valid JSON response approving the (fake) transaction. however when i set it up thru wix i get data errors in my console. I have built on existing files that i have been able to run basic API responses, and more advanced auths with token responses. so the code works, just not with authorize.net. given my level of expertise, i think it might be something im doing wrong. i've done my due diligence, and there are no questions on this topic. here is my code:
///front end, from the corvid page's code
import {buyIt} from 'backend/authorizeNet';
export function button1_click(event) {
buyIt();
}
pretty basic, just calling code from my backend onClick. the filepath is correct. here is the module on the backend:
//// backend/authorizeNet.jsw
import {fetch} from 'wix-fetch';
export function buyIt() {
let data = {
"createTransactionRequest": {
"merchantAuthentication": {
"name": "***************",
"transactionKey": "****************"
},
"refId": "123456",
"transactionRequest": {
"transactionType": "authCaptureTransaction",
"amount": "5",
"payment": {
"creditCard": {
"cardNumber": "5424000000000015",
"expirationDate": "2020-12",
"cardCode": "999"
}
},
"lineItems": {
"lineItem": {
"itemId": "1",
"name": "vase",
"description": "Cannes logo",
"quantity": "18",
"unitPrice": "45.00"
}
},
"tax": {
"amount": "4.26",
"name": "level2 tax name",
"description": "level2 tax"
},
"duty": {
"amount": "8.55",
"name": "duty name",
"description": "duty description"
},
"shipping": {
"amount": "4.26",
"name": "level2 tax name",
"description": "level2 tax"
},
"poNumber": "456654",
"customer": {
"id": "99999456654"
},
"billTo": {
"firstName": "Ellen",
"lastName": "Johnson",
"company": "Souveniropolis",
"address": "14 Main Street",
"city": "Pecan Springs",
"state": "TX",
"zip": "44628",
"country": "USA"
},
"shipTo": {
"firstName": "China",
"lastName": "Bayles",
"company": "Thyme for Tea",
"address": "12 Main Street",
"city": "Pecan Springs",
"state": "TX",
"zip": "44628",
"country": "USA"
},
"customerIP": "192.168.1.1",
"transactionSettings": {
"setting": {
"settingName": "testRequest",
"settingValue": "false"
}
},
"userFields": {
"userField": [
{
"name": "MerchantDefinedFieldName1",
"value": "MerchantDefinedFieldValue1"
},
{
"name": "favorite_color",
"value": "blue"
}
]
}
}
}
}
return fetch("https://test.authorize.net/xml/v1/request.api", {
"method": "post",
"headers": {"Content-Type": "application/json"},
"body": data
})
.then(response => {console.log(response.json())});///if response.text is used, it gives details
}
note at the end of the backend code, calling response.json give me a json error, due to the return code contains HTML saying that i've requested invalid data. if i change it to response.text i get this in my console:
//console response with response.text
{...}
isFulfilled:
true
isRejected:
false
fulfillmentValue:
"<HTML><HEAD>\n<TITLE>Bad Request</TITLE>\n</HEAD><BODY>\n<H1>Bad Request</H1>\nYour browser sent a request that this server could not understand.<P>\nReference #7.1d60fea5.1557756725.387c74\n</BODY>\n</HTML>\n"
how do i get a good response from the API? like ive done with the same code in postman?
thanks in advance
return fetch(url, {
method: "post",
headers: {"Content-Type": "application/json"},
body: JSON.stringify(data)
})
.then(response => console.log(response.text())
)
this got me the result i was looking for
stringify() converted my object to a JSON string. i still cannot get it to read the incoming JSON, might have to use parse...but if i read as text i get the info i want and my API is showing a successful transaction.
I have the following pipeline:
A file is uploaded to S3, it triggers a Lambda (Let's call it L1) which runs and does some processing.
So at the moment, my entry point looks like this:
public Response handleRequest(S3Event event, Context context) {
....
}
Now, a S3Event JSON looks like this:
{
"Records": [
{
"awsRegion": "xxxxx",
"eventName": "ObjectCreated:Put",
"eventSource": "aws:s3",
"eventTime": "2017-09-12T09:27:59.471Z",
"eventVersion": "2.0",
"requestParameters": {
"sourceIPAddress": "xxxxxx"
},
"responseElements": {
"x-amz-id-2": "xxxxxx",
"x-amz-request-id": "xxxx"
},
"s3": {
"configurationId": "xxxxxx1",
"bucket": {
"name": "xxxxx",
"ownerIdentity": {
"principalId": "xxxxx"
},
"arn": "xxx"
},
"object": {
"key": "xxx",
"size": xxx,
"eTag": "xxxx",
"versionId": null,
"sequencer": "xxx",
"urlDecodedKey": "xxx"
},
"s3SchemaVersion": "1.0"
},
"userIdentity": {
"principalId": "xxxx"
}
}
],
}
If you pass this JSON in the "Test" section, it will succeed.
Now, to the point: I wish to add information to this JSON, something that would look like this:
{
"Records": [
{
"awsRegion": "xxxxx",
"eventName": "ObjectCreated:Put",
"eventSource": "aws:s3",
"eventTime": "2017-09-12T09:27:59.471Z",
"eventVersion": "2.0",
"requestParameters": {
"sourceIPAddress": "xxxxxx"
},
"responseElements": {
"x-amz-id-2": "xxxxxx",
"x-amz-request-id": "xxxx"
},
"s3": {
"configurationId": "xxxxxx1",
"bucket": {
"name": "xxxxx",
"ownerIdentity": {
"principalId": "xxxxx"
},
"arn": "xxx"
},
"object": {
"key": "xxx",
"size": xxx,
"eTag": "xxxx",
"versionId": null,
"sequencer": "xxx",
"urlDecodedKey": "xxx"
},
"s3SchemaVersion": "1.0"
},
"userIdentity": {
"principalId": "xxxx"
}
}
],
"MyErrorMessage":
{
"EnvelopeErrors": [
{
"EnvelopeErrorTrace": "stackTrace",
"EnvelopeErrorPositions": 1,
"EnvelopeErrorLength": 2
},
{
"EnvelopeErrorTrace": "SecondTrace",
"EnvelopeErrorPositions": 3,
"EnvelopeErrorLength": 4
}
],
}
}
Notice is the S3Event JSon but with a bit more data.
My question problem is the following: I want to have a custom input that also works when a pure S3Event is called.
public Response handleRequest(MyS3Event event, Context context) {
....
}
However, I have not been able to achieve this.
I have tried a custom POJO but it does not work when I upload to S3 a file.
I tried to extend the S3EventNotification class (from which S3Event extends), but again with no success.
Is it possible what I am trying to do?
What you can do is to have your Lambda (L1) call itself (asynchronously) by sending it the new, modified event similar to how recursive functions work.
Just be very careful though. You have to put a limit as to how deep you want to keep recursing. You don't want to end up with infinite calls. I am not sure if AWS guards against this.
In the AWS SDK Lambda has an invoke method:
Invokes a specific Lambda function. For an example, see Create the Lambda Function and Test It Manually.
If you are using the versioning feature, you can invoke the specific
function version by providing function version or alias name that is
pointing to the function version using the Qualifier parameter in the
request. If you don't provide the Qualifier parameter, the $LATEST
version of the Lambda function is invoked. Invocations occur at least
once in response to an event and functions must be idempotent to
handle this. For information about the versioning feature, see AWS Lambda Function Versioning and Aliases.
This operation requires permission for the lambda:InvokeFunction
action.
var params = {
FunctionName: 'STRING_VALUE', /* required */
ClientContext: 'STRING_VALUE',
InvocationType: Event | RequestResponse | DryRun,
LogType: None | Tail,
Payload: new Buffer('...') || 'STRING_VALUE',
Qualifier: 'STRING_VALUE'
};
lambda.invoke(params, function(err, data) {
if (err) console.log(err, err.stack); // an error occurred
else console.log(data); // successful response
});
One of the params you send a Payload which is the event the invoked function receives so you can send your MyErrorMessage in/as this payload to get the desired result.
I made a simple API using Loopback.It works fine and give the result below from this URL.
http://localhost:3000/api/CoffeeShops
[
{
"name": "Coffee shop 1",
"city": "City one",
"id": 1
}
]
I need to change this JSON to this template, By using Loopback middleware.
{
"_embedded": {
"CoffeeShops": [
{
"name": "Coffee shop 1",
"city": "City one",
"_links": {
"self": {
"href": "http://localhost:3000/CoffeeShops/1"
},
"CoffeeShop": {
"href": "http://localhost:3000/CoffeeShops/1"
}
}
}
]
}
}
Better yet than a middleware, you can use a remote hook
Use afterRemote hooks to modify, log, or otherwise use the results of a remote method before sending it to a remote client. Because an afterRemote hook runs after the remote method is executed, it can access the result of the remote method, but cannot modify the input arguments.
The following code inside coffee-shop.js will do the trick
CoffeeShop.afterRemote('find', function(ctx, output, next) {
ctx.result = {
_embedded: {
CoffeeShops: [{
name: output.name,
city: output.city,
_links: {
self: {
href: "http://localhost:3000/CoffeeShops/" + id
},
CoffeeShop: {
href: "http://localhost:3000/CoffeeShops/" + id
}
}
}]
}
};
next();
});
I am new to REST and i am making test cases for server client application. where server is made in php using symphony framework and clients are available both in android and ios. Server implements Rest instead of Soap. Now i have to make a test case in soapui to add a group in which nested JSON parameter is going but i am failed to send parameter as nested. I can show you the request from the log on server side.
[2014-09-24 11:14:36] las_api.INFO:
{
"request": {
"url": "http:\/\/192.168.1.134\/las_web\/web\/app_dev.php\/api\/users\/2\/groups.json",
"attributes": {
"_controller": "Las\\ApiBundle\\Controller\\User\\GroupController::cpostAction",
"_format": "json",
"userId": "2",
"_route": "api_post_user_groups",
"_route_params": {
"_format": "json",
"userId": "2"
}
},
"post": {
"group": {
"name": "Seniors"
},
"token": "{81A9B0D9-CA0E-E70F-ADFF-116EE7A1A980}"
},
"get": [
]
},
"ip": "192.168.1.134"
}
Below is the parameter request parameter. where in group there are two parameters first is name of the group and second is the token generated by server on login time.
{
"group": {
"name": "Seniors"
},
"token": "{81A9B0D9-CA0E-E70F-ADFF-116EE7A1A980}"
}
I have successfully made test case for login. I can show you the request from server log while logging.
[2014-09-24 10:11:37] las_api.INFO:
{
"request": {
"url": "http:\/\/192.168.1.134\/las_web\/web\/app_dev.php\/api\/tokens",
"attributes": {
"_controller": "Las\\ApiBundle\\Controller\\TokenController::cpostAction",
"_format": "json",
"_route": "api_post_tokens",
"_route_params": {
"_format": "json"
}
},
"post": {
"password": "abc123",
"username": "abc#gmail.com"
},
"get": [
]
},
"ip": "192.168.1.134"
}