I'm trying to do the following:
Currently I'm using Serenity (which uses Rest Assured) to perform some API requests, and I correctly obtain the responses and treat them (getResponse.getBody blablabla), resulting in a treated String.
Now, what I want to do is "convert" that String to a Response type and treat it again.
Is that possible? I can't find any information about it.
Thanks!!
AFAIK, you cannot do this, as String type cannot be casted to Response.
Related
We receive a JSON object from network along with a hash value of the object. In order to verify the hash we need to turn that JSON into a string and then make a hash out of it while preserving the order of the elements in the way they are in the JSON.
Say we have:
[
{"site1":
{"url":"https://this.is.site.com/",
"logoutURL":"",
"loadStart":[],
"loadStop":[{"someMore":"smthelse"}],
"there's_more": ... }
},
{"site2":
....
}
]
The Android app is able to get same hash value, and while debugging it we fed same simple string into both algorithms and were able to get out same hash out of it.
The difference that is there happens because of the fact that dictionaries are unordered structure.
While debugging we see that just before feeding a string into a hash algorithm, the string looks like the original JSON, just without the indentations, which means it preserves the order of items in it (on Android that is):
[{"site1":{"url":"https://this.is.site.com/", ...
While doing this with many approaches by now I'm not able to achieve the same: string that I get is different in order and therefore results in a different hash. Is there a way to achieve this?
UPDATE
It appears the problem is slightly different - thanks to #Rob Napier's answer below: I need a hash of only a part of incoming string (that has JSON in it), which means for getting that part I need to first parse it into JSON or struct, and after that - while getting the string value of it - the order of items is lost.
Using JSONSerialization and JSONDecoder (which uses JSONSerialization), it's not possible to reproduce the input data. But this isn't needed. What you're receiving is a string in the first place (as an NSData). Just don't get rid of it. You can parse the data into JSON without throwing away the data.
It is possible to create JSON parsers from scratch in Swift that maintain round-trip support (I have a sketch of such a thing at RNJSON). JSON isn't really that hard to parse. But what you're describing is a hash of "the thing you received." Not a hash of "the re-serialized JSON."
I am using the Yason library in common-lisp, I want to parse a json string but would like the parser to keep one a its node unparsed.
Typically with an example like that:
{
"metadata1" : "mydata1",
"metadata2" : "mydata2",
"payload" : {...my long payload object},
"otherNodesToParse" : {...}
}
How can I set the yason parser to parse my json but skip the payload node and keep it as a string in the json format.
Use: let's say I just want the envelope data (everything that's not the payload), and to forward the payload as-is (as json string) to another system.
If I parse the whole json (so including payload) and then re-encode the payload to json, it is inefficient. The payload size could also be pretty big.
How do you know where the end of the payload object is in the stream? You do so by parsing the stream: if you don't parse the stream you simply can't know where the end of the object is: that's the nature of JSON's syntax (as it is the nature of CL's default syntax). For instance the only way you can know the difference between where to continue after
{x:1}
and after
{x:1.2}
is by parsing the two things.
So you must necessarily parse the whole thing.
So the answer to your question is: you can't do this.
You could (but not, I think, with YASON) decide that you did not want to build an object as a result of the parse. And perhaps, if the stream you are parsing corresponds to something with random access like a string or a file, you could note the start and end positions in the stream to later extract a string from it corresponding to the unparsed data (or you could perhaps build it up as you go).
It looks as if some or all of this might be possible with CL-JSON, but you'd have to work at it.
Unless the objects you are reading are vast the benefit of this seems questionable-to-none. If you really do want to do something like this efficiently you need a serialisation scheme which tells you how long things are.
I'm using jsoncpp to store information in JSON format. I now have the need to store a json string inside of another json string... In other words, I need to store a sub_item inside of an item.
Using jsoncpp to generate the JSON string, I get this...
{"id":"1","name":"Advil","sub_item":"{\"id\":\"2\",\"name\":\"Liquid Gel Advil\"}\n"}
Which works perfectly fine during runtime. However, when my program saves this information into a MySQL database (on exit) and then loads it back up when I restart the program, it loads the same JSON string from the MySQL database, but it now looks like this...
{"id":"1","name":"Advil","sub_item":"{"id":"2","name":"Liquid Gel Advil"}"}
Which is an invalid JSON string. I'm not sure why this is happening can someone please tell me what the heck is going on...
My MySQL query string reads like so:
UPDATE json_string_test SET jsonstring='{"id":"1","name":"Advil","sub_item":"{\"id\":\"2\",\"name\":\"Liquid Gel Advil\"}\n"}';
Upon further research I found out FastWriter was depreciated, and StreamWriterBuilder was the recommended writer. However, it still produced the same problem as FastWrtier....
I managed to rig a fix by doing the following...
1) Before saving to the database, I replaced ALL substrings matching \" to \\" in ONLY the child JSON string (with id 2).
2) Upon loading the JSON string, I replaced ALL substrings matching \\" to \" in ONLY the child JSON string (with id 2).
I don't understand why the heck I have to do this, so if anyone has a better solution or an explanation... I'd love to hear it.
I think you need to transpose your last 2 characters (assuming your posted string is verbatim). You have
Advil\"}\n"}
but I think you need
Advil\"}\n}"
I want to use query string as json, for example: /api/uri?{"key":"value"}, instead of /api/uri?key=value. Advantages, from my point of view, are:
json keep types of parameters, such are booleans, ints, floats and strings. Standard query string treats all parameters as strings.
json has less symbols for deep nested structures, For example, ?{"a":{"b":{"c":[1,2,3]}}} vs ?a[b][c][]=1&a[b][c][]=2&a[b][c][]=3
Easier to build on client side
What disadvantages could be in that case of json usage?
It looks good if it's
/api/uri?{"key":"value"}
as stated in your example, but since it's part of the URL then it gets encoded to:
/api/uri?%3F%7B%22key%22%3A%22value%22%7D
or something similar which makes /api/uri?key=value simpler than the encoded one; in this case both for debugging outbound calls (ie you want to check the actual request via wireshark etc). Also notice that it takes up more characters when encoded to valid url (see browser limitation).
For the case of 'lesser symbols for nested structures', It might be more appropriate to create a new resource for your sub resource where you will handle the filtering through your query parameters;
api/a?{"b":1,}
to
api/b?bfield1=1
api/a?aBfield1=1 // or something similar
Lastly for the 'easier to build in client side', i think it depends on what you use to create your client, usually query params are represented as maps so it is still simple.
Also if you need a collection for a single param then:
/uri/resource?param1=value1,value2,value3
When recaptcha makes the call to https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/userverify?k=
It comes back with this
)]}'
["uvresp",,,,2]
Granted with a valid k it comes back with a bit more. However the )]}' is clearly invalid json.
When I try to retrieve the response with grecaptcha.getResponse() I get an empty string.
Same result when using curl.
Any help would be appreciated.
Actually the value returned is not valid json but well parsed by the Google's API.
Is it a protection ? I don't know, but if you look at the javascript, you can find that:
var jm=function(a,b,c,d,e,g,h,l,r){this.xl=a;this.$c=c||"GET";this.Ka=d;this.Gg=e||null;this.Td=m(h)?h:1;this.ye=0;this.xh=this.Nh=!1;this.uh=b;this.Mh=g;this.md=l||"";this.Zb=!!r;this.Wf=null};f=jm.prototype;f.getUrl=function(){return this.xl};f.ug=function(){return this.$c};f.Ca=function(){return this.Ka};f.fi=function(){return this.Zb};f.bi=function(){return this.md};var nm=function(){G.call(this);this.nj=new hm(0,mm,1,10,5E3);H(this,this.nj);this.ad=0};x(nm,G);var mm=new Nh;nm.prototype.send=function(a){return new Lc(function(b,c){var d=String(this.ad++);this.nj.send(d,a.Uf.toString(),a.ug(),a.Ca(),mm,void 0,u(function(a,d){var h=d.target;if(Xk(h)){var l=a.ml;h.B?(h=h.B.responseText,0==h.indexOf(")]}'\n")&&(h=h.substring(5)),h=Hg(h)):h=void 0;b(new l(h))}else c(new om(a))},this,a))},this)};var om=function(a){y.call(this);this.request=a};x(om,y);
especially take a look at:
var l=a.ml;h.B?(h=h.B.responseText,0==h.indexOf(")]}'\n")&&(h=h.substring(5)),h=Hg(h)):h=void 0;`
The parser explicitly checks that the value begins by )]} and strips it.
I suggest you to just apply the same substring on the "json" string