In using realbrowserlocusts class it appears that I'm limited in any exception handling.
The only reference that partially works is: self.client.wait.until(EC.visibility_of_element_located ....
In a failed condition where the element is not found the script simply starts over again. With the script I'm working with I need to maintain a solid session state; I need to throw and exception(report an error), log the user out and then let the script start over again. I've been testing out the behavior with the locust.py script that Nick B. created with several approaches to "try, except" and they work running without realbrowserlocusts (selenium only) but with it the execution just stops.
Any examples would be greatly appreciated.
In its current format I've been able to run 3x the amount of a browser-based load per/agent/slave than our commercial tool. My goal is to replace it with a locust/selenium approach.
locust-plugins's WebdriverUser has a little bit better exception handling I think. A failure to find an element will log a failed request and if you use RescheduleTaskOnFail (as in the the example) it will restart the task when that happens.
https://github.com/SvenskaSpel/locust-plugins/blob/master/examples/webdriver_ex.py
Related
In developing in Fi-Cloud's CEP I've been having an issue that has been happening repeatedly. As I'm trying to develop a definition to perform a task, CEP's server and Authoring Tool stop responding, although ssh is still responsive.
This issue happens as I develop. I'm using the AuthoringTool to alter the definition bit by bit and then I re-upload it to the server through the authoring tool's export feature.
To reinitiate the proton with the new definition each time I alter it, I use Google's Postman with this single operation:
-PUT (url:http://{ip}:8080/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/instances/ProtonOnWebServer)
header: 'Content-Type' : 'application/json'; body : {"action": "ChangeDefinitions","definitions-url" : "/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/definitions/Definition_Name"}
At the same time, I'm logged in with three ssh intances, one to monitor the files being created on /opt/tomcat10/sample/ and other things, and the other two to 'tail -f ' log files the definition writes to, as events are processed: one log for events recieved and another log for events detected by the EPAgent.
I'm iterating through these procedures over and over as I'm developing and eventualy CEP server and the Authoring Tool stop responding.
By "tailing" tomcat's log file (# tail -f /opt/tomcat10/logs/catalina.out) I can see that, when under these circumstances, if I attemp a:
-GET (url: http://{ip}:8080/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/instances/ProtonOnWebServer)
I get no response back and tomcat logs the following response:
11452100 [http-bio-8080-exec-167] ERROR org.apache.wink.server.internal.RequestProcessor - An unhandled exception occurred which will be propagated to the container.
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
Exception in thread "http-bio-8080-exec-167" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
Ssh is still responsive and I can look at tomcat's log this way.
To get over this and continue, I exit ssh connections and restart CEP's instance in the Fi-Cloud.
Is the procedure I'm using to re-upload and re-run the definition inapropriate? Should I take a different approach to developing?
When you update a definition that the CEP is already working with, and you want the CEP engine to work with the updated definition, you need to:
Export the definition using the authoring tool export (as you did)
Stop the engine run, using REST PUT
PUT //host:8080/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/instances/ProtonOnWebServer
{"action":"ChangeState","state":"stop"}
Start the engine, using REST PUT
PUT //host:8080/ProtonOnWebServerAdmin/resources/instances/ProtonOnWebServer
{"action":"ChangeState","state":"start"}
You don't need to activate the "ChangeDefinitions" action, since it is the same definition name that the engine is already working with.
Activating "ChangeDefinitions" action, only influences the next run of the CEP, and has no influence on the current run.
This answer your question about how you should update a CEP definition.
Hope it will solve your issue.
I have written a script to update my db table after reading data from db tables and solr. I am using asyn.waterfall module. The problem is that the script is not getting exited after successful completion of all operations. I have used db connection pool also thinking that may be creating the script to wait infinitly.
I want to put this script in crontab and if it will not exit properly it would be creating a hell lot of instances unnecessarily.
I just went through this issue.
The problem with just using process.exit() is that the program I am working on was creating handles, but never destroying them.
It was processing a directory and putting data into orientdb.
so some of the things that I have come to learn is that database connections need to be closed before getting rid of the reference. And that process.exit() does not solve all cases.
When my project processed 2,000 files. It would get down to about 500 left, and the extra handles would have filled up the available working memory. Which means it would not be able to continue. Therefore never reaching the process.exit at the end.
On the other hand, if you close the items that are requesting the app to stay open, you can solve the problem at its source.
The two "Undocumented Functions" that I was able to use, were
process._getActiveHandles();
process._getActiveRequests();
I am not sure what other functions will help with debugging these types of issues, but these ones were amazing.
They return an array, and you can determine a lot about what is going on in your process by using these methods.
You have to tell it when you're done, by calling
process.exit();
More specifically, you'll want to call this in the callback from async.waterfall() (the second argument to that function). At that point, all your asynchronous code has executed, and your script should be ready to exit.
EDIT: As pointed out by #Aaron below, this likely has to do with something like a database connection being active, and not allowing the node process to end.
You can use the node module why-is-node-running:
Run npm install -D why-is-node-running
Add import * as log from 'why-is-node-running'; in your code
When you expect your program to exit, add a log statement:
afterAll(async () => {
await app.close();
log();
})
This will print a list of open handles with a stacktrace to find out where they originated:
There are 5 handle(s) keeping the process running
# Timeout
/home/maf/dev/node_modules/why-is-node-running/example.js:6 - setInterval(function () {}, 1000)
/home/maf/dev/node_modules/why-is-node-running/example.js:10 - createServer()
# TCPSERVERWRAP
/home/maf/dev/node_modules/why-is-node-running/example.js:7 - server.listen(0)
/home/maf/dev/node_modules/why-is-node-running/example.js:10 - createServer()
We can quit the execution by using:
connection.destroy();
If you use Visual Studio code, you can attach to an already running Node script directly from it.
First, run the Debug: Attached to Node Process command:
When you invoke the command, VS Code will prompt you which Node.js process to attach to:
Your terminal should display this message:
Debugger listening on ws://127.0.0.1:9229/<...>
For help, see: https://nodejs.org/en/docs/inspector
Debugger attached.
Then, inside your debug console, you can use the code from The Lazy Coder’s answer:
process._getActiveHandles();
process._getActiveRequests();
I am using ssis event handler to trigger an email whenever an error occured in the entire package(PACKAGE+ONEEROR). Here number of emails triggered is equal to number of errors generated.How can I restrict it to one mail eventhough the same error occured 10 times.
Please suggest....
You have a few options. The problem with setting an ONERROR email at the package level is that it will send an email for each error the package encounters. This gets ugly if you have a deep level transform fail, which will error as it fails back up to the package level.
I suggest that you either:
1) Setup ONERROR events at the task level and remove the package level event. Usually this will be good enough. Most tasks will only have one error to report. Be careful with Data Flows, they can act in a similar fashion as the package level events.
2) Setup some sort of advance logging. I’ve seen this done several ways. I’ve seen some people setup Script tasks to log the errors (at the task level) to a variable, and then send a final email containing the variable in the body (at control flow level). I have also seen people call stored procedures (at the task level and package level) for each error that occurs. The sproc would log errors to the DB and allow the package to continue on to the next step/container. The logged errors can then be dumped into a csv and emailed as an attachment.
If you like your current setup, you can try changing the error properties for each container/task. I haven't ever done this, but I do know you can change the way tasks handle errors! I don't like this option because you would possibly be missing errors (maybe? kind of guessing).
update From another solution - If you want to keep your current email ONERROR and simply prevent certain errors from "bubbling" up and sending emails, you can follow this link to learn how to gracefully handle errors. You could prevent certain tasks errors from reaching your ONERROR event at the package level. good luck.
I had a non-OSGi application. To convert it to OSGi, I first bundled it up and gave it a simple BundleActivator. The activator's start() started up a thread of what used to be the main() of my app (and is now a Runnable), and remembered that thread. The activator's stop() interrupted that thread, and waited for it to end (via join()), then returned. This all seemed to be working fine.
As a next step in the OSGiification process, I am now trying to use OSGi configuration management instead of the Properties-based configuration that the application used to use. So I am adding in a ManagedService in addition to the Activator.
But it's no longer clear to me how I am supposed to start and stop my application; examples that I've seen are only serving to confuse me. Specifically, here:
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-config-admin.html
They no longer seem to do any real starting of the application in BundleActivator.start(). Instead, they just register a ManagedService to receive configuration. So I'm guessing maybe I start up the app's main thread when I receive configuration, in the ManagedService? They don't show it - the ManagedService's updated() just has vague comments saying to "apply configuration from config admin" when it is passed a non-null Dictionary.
So then I look here:
http://blog.osgi.org/2010/06/how-to-use-config-admin.html
In there, it seems like maybe they're doing what I guessed. They seem to have moved the actual app from BundleActivator to ManagedService, and are dealing with starting it when updated() receives non-null configuration, stopping it first if it's already started.
But now what about when the BundleActivator's stop() gets called?
Back on the first example page that I mentioned above, they unregister the ManagedService. On the second example page, they don't show what they do.
So I'm guessing maybe unregistering the ManagedService will cause null configuration to be sent to ManagedService.updated(), at which point I can interrupte the app thread, wait for it to end, and then return?
I suspect that I'm thoroughly incorrect, but I don't know what the "real" way to do this is. Thanks in advance for any help.
BundleActivator (BA) and ManagedService (MS) are callbacks to your bundle. BundleActivator is for the active state of your bundle. BA.start is when you bundle is being started and BA.stop is when it is being stopped. MS is called to provide your bundle a configuration, if there is one, or notify you there is no configuration.
So in BA.start, you register your MS service and return. When MS is called (on some other thread), you will either receive your configuration or be told there is no configuration and you can act accordingly (start app, etc.)
Your MS can also be called at anytime to advice of the modification or deletion of your configuration and you should act accordingly (i.e. adjust your app behavior).
When you are called at BA.stop, you need to stop your app. You can unregister the MS or let the framework do it for you as part of normal bundle stop processing.
I have installed the sfErrorNotifierPlugin. When both options reportErrors/reportPHPErrors reportPHPWarnings/reportWarnings are set to false, everything is ok. But I want to catch PHP exceptions and warnings to receive E-mails, but then all my tasks fail, including clear-cache. After few hours of tests I'm 100% sure that the problem is with set_exception_handler/set_error_handler.
There's a similar question:
sfErrorNotifierPlugin on symfony task but the author there is having problems with a custom task. In my case, even built-in tasks fail.
I haven't used sfErrorNotifierPlugin, but I have run into 'The “default” context does not exist.' messages before. It happens when a call is made to sfContext::getInstance() and the context simply doesn't exist. I've had this happen a lot from within custom tasks. One solution is to add sfContext::createInstance() before the call to sfContext::getInstance(). This will ensure that a context exists.
There's an interesting blog post on 'Why sfContext::getInstance() is bad' that goes into more detail - http://webmozarts.com/2009/07/01/why-sfcontextgetinstance-is-bad/
Well, the problem could not be solved this way, unfortunately. Using sfErrorNotifierPlugin, I have enabled reporting PHP warning/errors (apart from symfony exceptions) and this resulted in huge problems, e.g. built-in tasks such as clear-cache failed.
The solution I chose was to load the plugin only in non-task mode (project configuration class):
public function setup()
{
$this->enableAllPluginsExcept('sfPropelPlugin');
if ('cli' == php_sapi_name()) $this->disablePlugins('sfErrorNotifierPlugin');
}
WHen a task is executed, everything works normally. When an app is fired from the browser, emails are sent when exception/warning occurs (maybe someone will find it useful).
Arms has explained the problem correctly. But usually context does not exist when executing backend/maintenance tasks on the console. And it is easier if you handle the condition yourself.
Check, if you really need the context?
If you do, what exactly do you need it for?
Sometimes you only want a user to populate a created_by field. You can work around by hard-coding a user ID.
If you want to do something more integrated, create a page (which will have a context) and trigger the task from there.
you can test the existance of the instance before doing something inside a class. Like:
if(sfContext::hasInstance())
$this->microsite_id = sfContext::getInstance()->getUser()->getAttribute('active_microsite');
I've been experiencing the same problem using the plugin sfErrorNotifier.
In my specific case, I noticed a warning was raised:
Warning: ob_start(): function '' not found or invalid function name in /var/www/ncsoft_qa/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/config/sfApplicationConfiguration.class.php on line 155
Notice: ob_start(): failed to create buffer in /var/www/ncsoft_qa/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/config/sfApplicationConfiguration.class.php on line 155
So, checking the file: sfApplicationConfiguration.class.php class, line 155,
I've replaced the ' ' for a null, then the warnings disappears, and also the error!
ob_start(sfConfig::get('sf_compressed') ? 'ob_gzhandler' : ''); bad
ob_start(sfConfig::get('sf_compressed') ? 'ob_gzhandler' : null); good