I am trying to familiarize myself with the PlayJSON library. I have a JSON formatted file like this:
{
"Person": [
{
"name": "Jonathon",
"age": 24,
"job": "Accountant"
}
]
}
However, I'm having difficulty with parsing it properly due to the file having different types (name is a String but age is an Int). I could technically make it so the age is a String and call .toInt on it later but for my purposes, it is by default an integer.
I know how to parse some of it:
import play.api.libs.json.{JsValue, Json}
val parsed: JsValue = Json.parse(jsonFile) //assuming jsonFile is that entire JSON String as shown above
val person: List[Map[String, String]] = (parsed \ "Person").as[List[Map[String, String]]]
Creating that person value throws an error. I know Scala is a strongly-typed language but I'm sure there is something I am missing here. I feel like this is an obvious fix too but I'm not quite sure.
The error produced is:
JsResultException(errors:List(((0)/age,List(JsonValidationError(List(error.expected.jsstring),WrappedArray())))
The error you are having, as explained in the error you are getting, is in casting to the map of string to string. The data you provided does not align with it, because the age is a string. If you want to keep in with this approach, you need to parse it into a type that will handle both strings and ints. For example:
(parsed \ "Person").validate[List[Map[String, Any]]]
Having said that, as #Luis wrote in a comment, you can just use case class to parse it. Lets declare 2 case classes:
case class JsonParsingExample(Person: Seq[Person])
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, job: String)
Now we will create a formatter for each of them on their corresponding companion object:
object Person {
implicit val format: OFormat[Person] = Json.format[Person]
}
object JsonParsingExample {
implicit val format: OFormat[JsonParsingExample] = Json.format[JsonParsingExample]
}
Now we can just do:
Json.parse(jsonFile).validate[JsonParsingExample]
Code run at Scastie.
Related
I have made a generic method which parses json to case class and it also works fine. But if tries to parse big json which have one or two mandatory field then I am not able to figure out which particular mandatory f ield is missing. I am only able to handle it with IllegalArgumentException. Is there a way to handle to know which is field is missing while parsing Json by using json4s.
Here is my code ->
object JsonHelper {
implicit val formats: DefaultFormats = DefaultFormats
def write[T <: AnyRef](value: T): String = jWrite(value)
def parse(value: String): JValue = jParser(value)
}
And this is the method I am using to parse Json and handle failed case ->
def parseJson[M](json: String)(implicit m: Manifest[M]): Either[ErrorResponse, M] = {
try
Right(JsonHelper.parse(json).extract[M])
catch {
case NonFatal(th) =>
th.getCause.getCause match {
case e: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException =>
error(s"Invalid JSON - $json", e)
Left(handle(exception = EmptyFieldException(e.getMessage.split(":").last)))
case _ =>
error(s"Invalid JSON - $json", th)
Left(handle(exception = new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid Json", th)))
}
}
}
Like for a Json ->
{
"name": "Json"
}
And case class ->
case class(name: String, profession: String)
if I try to parse above json into case class currently I am getting Invalid JSON - IllegalArgumentException. But is there a way that the exception tells which is field is missing like in above example "profession" is missing.
Is there a way to handle to know which is field is missing while parsing Json by using json4s.
Maybe you have more complicated setting, but for example for
import org.json4s._
import org.json4s.jackson.JsonMethods._
val str = """{
| "name": "Json"
|}""".stripMargin
val json = parse(str) // JObject(List((name,JString(Json))))
implicit val formats: Formats = DefaultFormats
case class MyClass(name: String, profession: String)
json.extract[MyClass]
it produces
org.json4s.MappingException: No usable value for profession
Did not find value which can be converted into java.lang.String
at org.json4s.reflect.package$.fail(package.scala:56)
at ...
with the name of missing field and if the class is just case class MyClass(name: String) then this produces MyClass(Json).
If the class is case class MyClass(name: String, profession: Option[String]) then this produces MyClass(Json,None).
So normally IllegalArgumentException should be followed by Caused by: org.json4s.MappingException with the field name. I guess now you're swallowing json4s MappingException somewhere. Maybe in th.getCause.getCause match .... It's hard to say without MCVE.
override def accessToken(): ServiceCall[RequestTokenLogIn, Done] = {
request=>
val a=request.oauth_token.get
val b=request.oauth_verifier.get
val url=s"https://api.twitter.com/oauth/access_token?oauth_token=$a&oauth_verifier=$b"
ws.url(url).withMethod("POST").get().map{
res=>
println(res.body)
}
The output which I am getting on terminal is
oauth_token=xxxxxxxxx&oauth_token_secret=xxxxxxx&user_id=xxxxxxxxx&screen_name=xxxxx
I want to convert this response in json format.like
{
oauth_token:"",
token_secret:"",
}
When Calling res.json.toString its not converting into jsValue.
Is there any other way or am I missing something?
According to the documentation twitter publishes, it seems that the response is not a valid json. Therefore you cannot convert it automagically.
As I see it you have 2 options, which you are not going to like. In both options you have to do string manipulations.
The first option, which I like less, is actually building the json:
print(s"""{ \n\t"${res.body.replace("=", "\": \"").replace("&", "\"\n\t\"")}" \n}""")
The second option, is to extract the variables into a case class, and let play-json build the json string for you:
case class TwitterAuthToken(oauth_token: String, oauth_token_secret: String, user_id: Long, screen_name: String)
object TwitterAuthToken {
implicit val format: OFormat[TwitterAuthToken] = Json.format[TwitterAuthToken]
}
val splitResponse = res.body.split('&').map(_.split('=')).map(pair => (pair(0), pair(1))).toMap
val twitterAuthToken = TwitterAuthToken(
oauth_token = splitResponse("oauth_token"),
oauth_token_secret = splitResponse("oauth_token_secret"),
user_id = splitResponse("user_id").toLong,
screen_name = splitResponse("screen_name")
)
print(Json.toJsObject(twitterAuthToken))
I'll note that Json.toJsObject(twitterAuthToken) returns JsObject, which you can serialize, and deserialize.
I am not familiar with any option to modify the delimiters of the json being parsed by play-json. Given an existing json you can manipulate the paths from the json into the case class. But that is not what you are seeking for.
I am not sure if it is requires, but in the second option you can define user_id as long, which is harder in the first option.
I am using Scala with play JSON library for parsing JSON. We are the facing the problem using JSON parsing is, we have same JSON structure, but some JSON files contain different with values structure with the same key name. Let's take an example:
json-1
{
"id": "123456",
"name": "james",
"company": {
"name": "knoldus"
}
}
json-2
{
"id": "123456",
"name": "james",
"company": [
"knoldus"
]
}
my case classes
case class Company(name: String)
object Company{
implicit val _ = Json.format[Company]
}
case class User(id: String, name: String, company: Company)
object User{
implicit val _ = Json.format[Company]
}
while JSON contains company with JSON document, we are getting successfully parsing, but if company contains an array, we are getting parsing exception. Our requirements, are is there anyway, we can use play JSON library and ignore the fields if getting parsing error rather that, ignore whole JSON file. If I am getting, company array values, ignore company field and parse rest of them and map corresponding case class.
I would do a pre-parse function that will rename the 'bad' company.
See the tutorial for inspiration: Traversing-a-JsValue-structure
So your parsing will work, with this little change:
case class User(id: String, name: String, company: Option[Company])
The company needs to be an Option.
Final we found the answer to resolving this issue, as we know, we have different company structure within JSON, so what we need to do, we need to declare company as a JsValue because in any case, whatever the company structure is, it is easily assigned to JsValue type. After that, our requirements are, we need to use object structure, and if JSON contains array structure, ignore it. After that, we used pattern matching with our company JsValue type and one basis of success and failure, we parse or JSON. The solution with code is given below:
case class Company(name: String)
object Company{
implicit val _ = Json.format[Company]
}
case class User(id: String, name: String, company: JsValue)
object User{
implicit val _ = Json.format[Company]
}
Json.parse("{ --- whatevery json--string --- }").validate[User].asOpt match {
case Some(obj: JsObject) => obj.as[Company]
case _ => Company("no-name")
}
Hi everyone recently I faced an issue in converting json into my own data model.
I have a json format message which may contain an empty string:
{
"name" : "John Doe",
"hobbies": ""
}
or a list of hobby types:
{
"name" : "John Doe",
"hobbies": [{"name":"basketball"}]
}
And the following is my case class data model in scala play framework:
case class Person(name: String, hobbies: List[Hobby])
case class Hobby(name: String)
Right now I'm using the default json formatter but of course it's not working well when we have empty string as value.
implicit val HobbyJson= Json.format[Hobby]
implicit val PersonJson = Json.format[Person]
it will throw exception if the hobbies has a empty string. I want to convert it into an empty list when it's the empty string. I search the document Play provides but couldn't find infomation. Can anyone give some suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
As you mentioned, the default Format macros won't work for you here because of the inconsistent treatment of hobbies. So you need to implement your own Reads[Person] - here's how I'd do it:
object PersonJson {
implicit val hobbyConverter = Json.format[Hobby]
val personReads = new Reads[Person] {
override def reads(json: JsValue): JsResult[Person] = {
for {
personName <- (json \ "name").validate[String]
hobbies <- (json \ "hobbies").validate[JsValue]
} yield {
val maybeHobbyList = hobbies.validate[List[Hobby]].asOpt
Person(personName, maybeHobbyList.getOrElse(Nil))
}
}
}
implicit val personConverter = Format(personReads, Json.writes[Person])
}
The key thing to note here is surrounding the whole thing in a JsResult courtesy of the for-comprehension and the yield. This gives us all the necessary checking (like the name field being there and being a String, and the hobbies field being there).
The code within the yield block only runs if we've got something that looks pretty close to a Person. Then we can safely try validating the hobbies as a List[Hobby], and convert the result to an Option[List[Hobby]]. It'll be a None if it didn't work (thus it must have been a string) and so we default it to the empty list as required.
Thanks #millhouse answer, it definitely works. Like he said we need a custom Reads[Person] to properly convert it.
I also post my code as reference.
implicit val personJsonReads: Reads[Person] = (
(__ \ "name").read[String] and
(__ \ "hobbies").read[List[Hobby]].orElse(Reads.pure(List()))
) (Person.apply _)
read[List[Hobby]].orElse(Reads.pure(List())) will generate the empty list when the value cannot convert to List[Hobby].
I am looking for a good abstraction to extract data form JSON (I am using json4s now).
Suppose I have a case class A and data in JSON format.
case class A(a1: String, a2: String, a3: String)
{"a1":"xxx", "a2": "yyy", "a3": "zzz"}
I need a function to extract the JSON data and return A with these data as follows:
val a: JValue => A = ...
I do not want to write the function a from scratch. I would rather compose it from primitive functions.
For example, I can write a primitive function to extract string by field name:
val str: (String, JValue) => String = {(fieldName, jval) => ... }
Now I would like to compose the function a: JValue => A from str. Does it make sense ?
Consider use of Play-JSON, which has a composable "Reads" object. If you've ever used ReactiveMongo, it can be used in much the same way. Contrary to some older posts here, it can be used stand-alone, without most of the rest of Play.
It uses the common "implicit translator" (my term) idiom. I found that my favorite deserializing pattern for using it is not highlighted in the docs, though - the pattern they espouse is a lot harder to get right, IMHO. I make heavy use of .as and .asOpt, which are documented on the first linked page above, in the small section "Using JsValue.as/asOpt". When deserializing a JSON object, you can say something like
val person:Person = (someParsedJsonObject \ "aPerson").as[Person]
and as long as you have an implicit Reads[Person] in scope, all just works. There are built-in Reads for all primitive types and many collection types. In many cases, it makes sense to put the Reads and Writes implicit objects in the companion object for, e.g., Person.
I thought json4s had a similar feature, but I could be wrong.
Argonaut is fully functional Scala library.
It allows to encode/decode case classes (JSON codecs).
import argonaut._, Argonaut._
case class Person(name: String, age: Int)
implicit def PersonDecodeJson: DecodeJson[Person]
jdecode2L(Person.apply)("name", "age")
// Codec for Person case class from JSON of form
// { "name": "string", "age": 1 }
It also provides JSON cursor (lenses/monocle) for custom parsing.
implicit def PersonDecodeJson: DecodeJson[Person] =
DecodeJson(c => for {
name <- (c --\ "_name").as[String]
age <- (c --\ "_age").as[String].map(_.toInt)
} yield Person(name, age))
// Decode Person from a JSON with property names different
// from those of the case class, and age passed as string:
// { "_name": "string", "age": "10" }
Parsing result is represented by DecodeResult type that can be composed (.map, .flatMap) and handle error cases.