I'm currently working with the mxGraph library in javascript and I'm trying to create my own shapes in draw.io, to export them, then to reuse them as much as I want in my own program using the mxGraph library.
So far, I have tried to create a custom library, which contains all my shapes. I have exported it in XML which gives me a half-encoded XML file. Then, I'd like to import that mxLibrary in my own app so I can reuse these shapes for creating my own diagrams. I have no idea how to deal with that XML file.
I have also tried taking the XML from Extras -> Edit Diagram and reimport it with the codec, then with mxGraph#addCells but the shapes aren't grouped anymore, and I can't seem to find how to clone them.
My goal would literally to have my list of shapes/cells somewhere, which I can reuse whenever I want.
If this is not possible, how may I do that instead? I have also looked up how to create my own shapes (with redrawPath and the style thing), but it looks really long and boring.
Here's an example of what the XML looks like. The shape is a simple double square.
<mxlibrary>[{"xml":"xVNBbsIwEHyN78EugjOhcOqpLzDJgi05XstZSPJ7trFbiAqCqpV6sLQ7O2N7xrJQZdNvow7mDWtwQr0KVUZESlXTl+CckIWthVoLKQteQm7uTGfjtAg6gqdnBDIJTtodISEJaGlwGThEPIZMg0jQT46q0HuoSO8+6cX3K4zUfP4WsAGKA1M6W5NJjGVWGbAHQ1NMt/keX8qLHy6ypdv21GN7nbEE70FXH33HDyHUylDDO65nXOo2sD1u9rYH3nV1N4lrx/LfHL/8veO9da5Eh5Exjx5+GUIWzJNgmHRXAS1uBLT4eUDcXn7TOJt8tjM=","w":80,"h":80,"aspect":"fixed","title":"custom_shape_1"}]</mxlibrary>
Thank you in advance!
There are 2 ways I know, to do it, depending on your needs.
Embed draw.IO as an iframe in your app, and create a plugin that adds your own palette of icon on the side bar. you can watch the p1 plugin code, and replicate it plugin list in draw.io, look for the p1 plugin
. code example of how to integrate draw.io in your app
hint: if pulgins are not loaded, check the plugin folder link.
If you add the vertices on you own app, create your own style, and reuse it when creating.
updateStyles()
{
var style = new Object();
style[(<any>window).mxConstants.STYLE_SHAPE] =
(<any>window).mxConstants.SHAPE_IMAGE;
style[(<any>window).mxConstants.STYLE_PERIMETER] =
(<any>window).mxPerimeter.RectanglePerimeter;
style[(<any>window).mxConstants.STYLE_IMAGE] =
'../assets/transformer.png';
style[(<any>window).mxConstants.STYLE_FONTCOLOR] = '#000000';
style[(<any>window).mxConstants.STYLE_WHITE_SPACE] = 'wrap';
style[(<any>window).mxConstants.STYLE_VERTICAL_ALIGN] = 'bottom';
this.graph.getStylesheet().putCellStyle('transformer', style);
}
reuse this style whenever creating a vertex using insertVertex function.
try {
const parent = this.graph.getDefaultParent();
this.graph.getModel().beginUpdate();
const vertex = this.graph.insertVertex(parent, uuid.v4(), node, 40, 40, 80, 40, 'transformer');
} finally {
this.graph.getModel().endUpdate();
}
Related
i am using a CesiumJS instance to display a base map of the earth using a imageryProvider from source A.
var viewer = new Cesium.Viewer('cesiumContainer', imageryProvider:providerA);
Now while using the Viewer I would like to be able to change this map to get images from providerB at a certain event.
I tried:
viewer.scene.imageryLayers.get(0).imageryProvider.url = providerB.url
However that does not seem to work and also feels quite like hack anyway.
I could not find anything in Cesium's documentation .
Is this at all possible without restarting / recreating the viewer instance?
I know that there is a Cesium.BaseLayerPicker (https://cesium.com/docs/cesiumjs-ref-doc/BaseLayerPicker.html)
However I do not see what method this picker calls on "select" )
Thanks a lot.
The BaseLayerPicker widget calls this code when the user selects a new layer.
There's a lot of boilerplate widget management in that block of code, but for your sake, only a couple of the lines are critical. First, the old existing active imagery layer is searched for, and removed:
imageryLayers.remove(layer);
Then, a new imagery provider is constructed and added at index 0, the first position, which is the base imagery layer:
imageryLayers.addImageryProvider(newProviders, 0);
You can directly change the URL of the provider but you should also change appropriate parameters("layers" in case of WMS, "layer", "style", "format", "tileMatrixSetID " ... in case of WMTS) depending on the type of provider(WMS or WMTS).
I want to override the color of a component in the viewer, in order to conserve the same rendering effect than other components I would like to clone an existing material and simply modify the color of the clone.
I can change the color of an existing material as follow:
var renderProxy =
viewer.impl.getRenderProxy(
model, fragIds[0])
renderProxy.material.setHex(0xFF0000)
This affects all other components in the model which are using that material, which is not the desired result.
For that purpose I would like to clone material, modify it and affect the new material to a specific component. Invoking the material.clone() method is working:
var newMat = renderProxy.material.clone()
newMat.setHex(0xFF0000)
But the new material will loose all the specific properties that makes it look nice by the renderer.
So my question "is there a way to -easily- clone a viewer material without writing the cloning code for each property"?
You will need to clone the 'prism' material, rather than the 3js phong-material.
Start with this repo: https://github.com/wallabyway/fusion-chair-configurator
as an example, to create a 'metal' material, use these two lines of code (and copy the initPaint() function).
https://github.com/wallabyway/fusion-chair-configurator/blob/c6d5bd575cdf40194c9fbdd1c5f9bb27c70b356e/docs/js/app.js#L107-L108
The szPrism json string, contains lots of parameters. Prism materials are rather complex, but you can find out more about what these parameters do by understanding this article for the Autodesk Cloud Render ART help page (the real-time renderer built inside Revit2019, Fusion360, etc)...
http://help.autodesk.com/view/ARENDERING/ENU/?guid=GUID-49345267-CE6A-4006-BB58-5BEAFD8B0D0E
Try experimenting with Fusion360's 'render' mode. Start by opening 'appearance' and creating some custom materials. You can modify their parameters in real-time to better understand what they do and get the effect you are looking for.
Here is a tutorial video on Fusion360 custom materials: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9AS5rQhtPo
Let me know if that helps.
I have a basic walk animation in Blender that I´m trying to export to THREE.js. It looks nice in Blender playback:
Now, after being exported with the THREE.js exporter, it looks like this on the browser:
The geometry is broken, not in all the body parts, but certainly has some problems. I´m not sure what to do now, I tried exporting with several options checked/unchecked, with no luck.
I also read the explanations in this posts, I think I followed all the required steps but still getting this weird animations:
http://unboring.net/workflows/animation.html#preview
https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/pull/8412#issuecomment-210675561
https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/issues/6050
The code I´m currently using to load the JSON model/animations is like this:
var loader = new THREE.JSONLoader();
var action = {}, mixer;
loader.load(path + '/dino.json', function (geometry, materials) {
materials.forEach(function (material) {
material.skinning = true;
});
character = new THREE.SkinnedMesh(
geometry,
new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial(materials)
);
scene.add(character);
/* ANIMATION */
mixer = new THREE.AnimationMixer(character);
action.walk = mixer.clipAction(geometry.animations[ 3 ]);
action.walk.setEffectiveWeight(1);
action.walk.enabled = true;
/* Update/render functions */
onUpdateFcts.push(function(delta, now){
mixer.update(delta);
});
action.walk.play();
});
I´m using Blender 2.78c and THREE.js r84, with the Blender exporter tool including in this revision.
I found some interesting links about similar animation problems:
Model with bones animation (blender export) animating incorrectly in three.js
http://dev.mothteeth.com/2012/10/threejs-blender-exporting-skeletal-animations/
Blender exports a three.js animation - bones rotate strangely
After reading all of these advices, I had successfully exported the animated mesh without visual artifacts following this workflow:
Create the armature bone by bone around the mesh. When done and in object mode, select first the mesh, then the armature, press CTRL+P > With automatic weights. This generates an armature modifier on the mesh. Against what I read, the armature modifier doesn´t need to be deleted before exporting.
You must have a default pose like the rest position. This must be the one selected on Blender. Also, the playback frame 0 must be selected in that default pose.
I created keyframes at the start and end of every pose for all the bones involved, this seems important.
You must unselect everything and only select the mesh, not the armature. This must be done in object mode.
My export settings:
Note: I must say that this is the same workflow I was following with no luck. This time the difference was that I first deleted every vertex group, also the armature modifier (not the armature itself) and recreated all the steps from the first one. Now, once exported the animated mesh worked fine enough!
I'm a total beginner to all of this.
I'm trying to make a three-second bit in a flash animation (not a game or interface--just a small sequence which uses a parallax star field I found on freeactionscript.com:
http://www.freeactionscript.com/2010/06/endless-starfield-parallax-scrolling/
I'm simply wanting to plug this code into an existing project. I have been digging for hours to find anything on the subject of plugging in AS3 codes, but all I can find are items which presuppose an advanced understanding of ActionScript, and don't really relate to my issue to boot..
The error I keep getting is "1120: Access of undefined property parallaxField." I believe I've placed all the files in the proper file structure, but it still won't render.
I'm not even sure where to begin looking to fix it, how to define the 'parallaxField' property, or how to attach it to the project I'm working on.
Please let me know if there's any other information you need to help, if you can..
Much appreciated!
in that link there is a demo example to download,
you have to have the com folder with the subfolder and file it it place,
then in your main js file import that in the com folder
import com.freeactionscript.ParallaxField;
then define the variable inside your main class
private var parallaxField:ParallaxField;
then inside your constructor function
// create container for our parallax effect
var mainContainer:MovieClip = new MovieClip();
addChild(mainContainer);
// instantiate parallax class
parallaxField = new ParallaxField();
// createField(container, x, y, width, height, numberOfStars, speedX, speedY);
parallaxField.createField(mainContainer, 10, 10, 530, 380, 100, 1, 1.5);
I am putting together a Flash game (using Flixel) and I have a lot of sprites whose images (.png format, mostly) I need to include in my game. I'm used to using code like:
[Embed(source = "../../lib/ship-0001.png")]private var _ship0001Sprite:Class;
in order to include an image file. Is there a way I can do this other than embed? I'd like to use a for loop if possible, grabbing every needed file by number. This way instead if having several lines for each ship type (to grab its sprite, icon, store view, etc), I can just change a variable (eg NUM_SHIP_TYPES) and add the files by number for the new ship.
Is embed the only way to do this where the files are included in the .swf, or is there another way I can do this? Or is there a way I can use a for loop with embed?
This may not be a popular answer. But it depends on preferences. I'm not trying to start a best practices discussion, just listing a possibility.
If you have multiple images for each ship. And its the same number of images per each ships then the below could be a possibility. Of not, then completely ignore what I suggest.
Have a folder for each one of your ship types and then a class file within that folder and place your images within that folder along side the class files..
package shipimages.ship1 { class Ship1Images {
[Embed(source="0001.png")] public var img0001:Class;
[Embed(source="0002.png")] public var img0002:Class;
[Embed(source="0003.png")] public var img0003:Class;
} }
.
package shipimages.ship2 { class Ship2Images {
[Embed(source="0001.png")] public var img0001:Class;
[Embed(source="0002.png")] public var img0002:Class;
[Embed(source="0003.png")] public var img0003:Class;
} }
But as I said, this is only beneficial in a small case scenarios but it does mean everything is more sub divided and if you were to make an Interface it could be easily done for factory pattern.
If you have lots of assets, the best way is to leave them as external files and use Loader to load them.
That way you can display a progress bar and, as you said, it also makes it easier to manage your assets.
Do you want to have the objects readily available within the same swf or do you want to load them externally. Would be the first question, that comes to my mind.
If you want to embedd images inside the swf : Add them all in an fla, create a swc from it and use them in your project. When you want to change something, change the fla. Regenerate the swc. Recompile.
If you want the images to be loaded on runtime, use UrlLoader, personally I prefer using LoaderMax, which is part of the greensock package. It gives you more options to work with loading. Here is an example to help you out : http://www.greensock.com/loadermax-tips/