So there is a page that I want to perform some action on with puppeteer. The problem is that there is a text area in which I want to type in something however the id of it is :
id="pin-draft-title-13a10e18-5a1e-49b9-893c-c5e028dc63e1"
As you might have guess for some reason only pin-draft-title remains the same but the whole number part changes for every refresh so puppeteer can't find it. I tried deleting the id and copying the selector itself the whoe #_Root div>div etc but that seems to be changing after sometime as well. So the main question is is there any way i can just select it using the pin-draft-title part and no matter what numbers follow it still selects it ?
You can use [id^=pin-draft-title-]
In case of javascript, if you want to select all the elements whos ID starts with a specified string or pattern, in your case "pin-draft-title", then consider using the following syntax.
document.querySelectorAll('[id^="pin-draft-title"]');
Related
I am having trouble using selecting from this select element.
<select name="vehicle_attrs[position_count]" class="mb1"><option>Position / Quantity</option><option>Front</option><option>Rear</option></select>
I have tried
select('Front', :from=>'mb1')
select('Front', :from=>'vehicle_attrs[position_count]')
select('Front', :from=>'vehicle_attrs[1]')
All of them result in a can not find selection box error
I've never liked how restrictive Capybara's concept of a 'locator' is (i.e. must have a name/id/label), but if you dig into the source code, those helpful methods like select, click_on, and fill_in are just wrappers for find and some native method of Element, which takes arbitrary CSS, and works in almost all situations. In this case, you could use:
find('[name="vehicle_attrs[position_count]"]').find('option', text: 'Front').select_option
Since dropdowns often have multiple similar options, where one is a substring of the other, you might consider using an exact string match, like
find('[name="vehicle_attrs[position_count]"]').find('option', text: /\AFront\z/).select_option
From the docs for select - https://www.rubydoc.info/github/teamcapybara/capybara/Capybara/Node/Actions#select-instance_method - we can see that the from option takes "The id, Capybara.test_id atrtribute, name or label of the select box".
Neither 'mb1' or 'vehicle_attrs[1]' are any of those so they would be expected to fail.
'vehicle_attrs[position_count]' is the name so assuming the box is actually visible on the page (not replaced with a JS driven select widget, etc), that should work. If it doesn't, then edit your question and add the full exact error message you get when trying to use it. Of course if there is only one select box on the page with an option of 'Front' then you don't need to specify the from option at all and can just do
select 'Front'
I search the documentation but I didn't know exactly how to call that.
I have a template Index2Name that return a name based on an index.
I'm trying to use that name in a link:
[[Articles/{{Index2Name|0001}}|{{Index2Name|0001}}]]
or
Image:Big-0001.png|link=Articles/{{Index2Name|0001}}|''{{Index2Name|0001}}''
In the last example, the name is printed but the link doesn't work. (In gallery element)
It doesn't work. The value from the template is printed but it is not converted to a link.
How can I make this works? And does this have a name? (For future reference)
EDIT: Index2Name is a simple switch returning a few words depending of the id. Since I'm using subpages I only want the name to appear (Example: MyArticle) but the link is Articles/MyArticle
Could you clarify exactly what you want to happen please. (Where you want to link and how you want it to look).
But for example if you use:
[[Image:Big-0001.png|''{{Index2Name|0001}}'']]
It will link to the page Image:Big-0001.png with the link text being the output of:
''{{Index2Name|0001}}''
Or if you use:
[[Image:Big-001.jpg|link=Articles/{{Index2Name|0001}}]]
The image, when clicked, will redirect you to the output of:
{{Index2Name|0001}}
I try to implement a nested tab module the following way.
By clicking on a .tabs__menu item I want to get the next .tabs__contents to display the correct entry.
I've prepared a codepen with markup and leave out all unimportant code so don't be irritated that it's not working. I don't understand why the variable debug2 is 0 and debug3 is 1. I expect debug2 to be 1 as well since I expect the following expression should find the element. Can anyone help me with this?:
.find(".tabs__contents").not(".tabs__contents .tabs__contents");
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/JNLWQp
Thanks in advance and best wishes,
duc
ok I have an assumption why it's not working. It seems that the .not method doesn't starts to search relatively from the given collection but globally. With this statement
.not(".tabs__contents .tabs__contents")
debug2 finds itself and exclude it from the collection thats why the length is 0.
today i had a discussion with my colleague. The question was whether to use the additonal value attribute for a single HTML checkbox or not.
My preffered way is using a single checkbox without a additional value attribute and in backend doing a check like if
if (request.getParameter(checkboxName) != null)) {
...
}
My colleague argues that is would be more transparent using a single checkbox with a additonal checkbox value attribute like value="true" and doing a backend check like
if (Boolean.valueOf(request.getParameter(checkboxName))) {
...
}
As we want to make a small convention about our internal checkbox handling im now trying to find a "best practise" but couldn't find yet. I saw so far only examples with multiple checkbox with the same name. In this case of course it makes sense for me to use different values.
For me it seems to be a bit overhead using a value attribute in case of a single checkbox since i get always a String with "on" if its activated/checked.
We are using a Java Servlet/JSP MVC environment and im not 100% sure if this "on" comes from ServletRequest.getParameter.
I see reasons for following either method, which means there's probably no noticable difference between them. Whichever you pick will work out fine; just make sure you pick one. You could flip a coin or do a thumbwar or something.
As long as a single approach is consistently used, both will work. Yours is less code and doesn't require boolean conversion, the other´s html is more consistent with multiple checkboxes but will also break if you put the wrong value for whatever reason.
You could always do a bit of both and insert values in html for clarity but check for != null in the code and get the best of both options.
It makes no difference server-side as long as you are not checking the parameter for having a specific value. By HTML5 definition, which just establishes the longstanding practice as the rule, a checkbox element has the value on by default. This means that your server-side code cannot distinguish between data coming from <input type=checkbox name=foo> and data coming from <input type=checkbox name=foo value=on>.
The children functions returns the set of the member.
But I need the children of several members.
The problem is, that I can't use Union to make it work like that:
Union([Geography].[Geography].[USA].children,[Geography].[Geography].[Canada].children)
I don't know how many member it will be... So I actually would need all children of a set of members.
like:
([Geography].[Geography].[USA],[Geography].[Geography].[Canada],[Geography].[Geography].[GB]).children
Is there a function like that?
I couldn't answer my question and so I just edit it. With the help of DHN's answer and some brain work I found a solution I could use:
Except(DRILLDOWNLEVEL( {[Geography].[Geography].[USA],[Geography].[Geography].[Canada]},,0 ),
{[Geography].[Geography].[USA],[Geography].[Geography].[Canada]})
That does work for me.
Explanation: I drilldown the elements the tool provides me, which returns children plus parents and then I use DHN's idea and except the parents so clean the list up a bit.
Hopefully it is understandable.
You can use the Descendants method (the fourth form of the description linked uses a set as its first argument. Thus,
Descendants( {
[Geography].[Geography].[USA],
[Geography].[Geography].[Canada],
[Geography].[Geography].[GB]
},
1,
SELF
)
should deliver exactly what you want.
Well actually, you could use a Crossjoin to get the set you want.
Something like
[Geography].[Geography].[USA] * [Geography].[Geography].[Canada] * [Geography].[Geography].[GB]
But this is only a proper solution, if you have only a few different search criteria.
Alternatively, you could use Except to remove those criteria you're not interested in. E.g.
Except([Geography].[Geography].children, [Geography].[Geography].[Germany])
This would give you the whole content of the [Geography] dimension, except the one of [Germany].
Hope this helps a bit.
Edit after comment of TO
Ok, this wasn't part of your question, but I think what you need is the MemberToStr() function. Please find the doc here.
I think something like this should do the trick.
with member [Measures].[Cities]
as membertostr([Geography].[Geography].members.children)
select [Measures].[Cities] on 0
from [WhatEverYourCubeNameIs]
where (
[Geography].[Geography].[USA],
[Geography].[Geography].[Canada]
)
Please note that this query is totally untested. I also may have lost some of my skills, because it's been a while, since I used mdx. You will also have to create the query dynamically, since the selection seems to be user dependant. But I'm sure that you're aware of it. ;)