I have the following two tables:
movie_sales (provided daily)
movie_id
date
revenue
movie_rank (provided every few days or weeks)
movie_id
date
rank
The tricky thing is that every day I have data for sales, but only data for ranks once every few days. Here is an example of sample data:
`movie_sales`
- titanic (ID), 2014-06-01 (date), 4.99 (revenue)
- titanic (ID), 2014-06-02 (date), 5.99 (revenue)
`movie_rank`
- titanic (ID), 2014-05-14 (date), 905 (rank)
- titanic (ID), 2014-07-01 (date), 927 (rank)
And, because the movie_rate.date of 2014-05-14 is closer to the two sales dates, the output should be:
id date revenue closest_rank
titanic 2014-06-01 4.99 905
titanic 2014-06-02 5.99 905
The following query works to get the results by getting the min date difference in the sub-select:
SELECT
id,
date,
revenue,
(SELECT rank from movie_rank where id=s.id ORDER BY ABS(DATEDIFF(date, s.date)) ASC LIMIT 1)
FROM
movie_sales s
But I'm afraid that this would have terrible performance as it will literally be doing millions of subselects...on millions of rows. What would be a better way to do this, or is there really no proper way to do this since an index can not be properly done with a DATEDIFF ?
Unfortunately, you are right. The movie rank table must be searched for each movie sale and of all matching movie rows the closest be picked.
With an index on movie_rank(id) the DBMS finds the movie rows quickly, but an index on movie_rank(id, date) would be better, because the date could be read from the index and only the one best match would be read from the table.
But you also say that there are new ranks every few dates. If it is guaranteed to find a rank in a certain range, e.g. for each date there will be at least one rank in the twenty days before and at least one rank in the twenty days after, you can limit the search accordingly. (The index on movie_rank(id, date) would be essential for this, though.)
SELECT
id,
date,
revenue,
(
select r.rank
from movie_rank r
where r.id = s.id
and r.date between s.date - interval 20 days
and s.date + interval 20 days
order by abs(datediff(date, s.date)) asc
limit 1
)
FROM movie_sales s;
This is difficult to get quick with SQL. In a programming language I would choose this algorithm:
Sort the two tables by date and point to the first rows.
Move the rank pointer forward until we match the sales date or are beyond it. (If we aren't there already.)
Compare the sales date with the rank date we are pointing at and with the rank date of the previous row. Take the closer one.
Move the sales pointer one row forward.
Go to 2.
With this algorithm we would already be in about the position we want to be. Let's see, if we can do the same with SQL. Iterations are done with recursive queries in SQL. These are available in MySQL as of version 8.0.
We start with sorting the rows, i.e. giving them numbers. Then we iterate through both data sets.
with recursive
sales as
(
select *, row_number() over (partition by movie_id order by date) as rn
from movie_sales
),
ranks as
(
select *, row_number() over (partition by movie_id order by date) as rn
from movie_rank
),
cte (movie_id, revenue, srn, rrn, sdate, rdate, rrank, closest_rank) as
(
select
movie_id, s.revenue, s.rn, r.rn, s.date, r.date, r.ranking,
case when s.date <= r.date then r.ranking end
from (select * from sales where rn = 1) s
join (select * from ranks where rn = 1) r using (movie_id)
union all
select
cte.movie_id,
cte.revenue,
coalesce(s.rn, cte.srn),
coalesce(r.rn, cte.rrn),
coalesce(s.date, cte.sdate),
coalesce(r.date, cte.rdate),
coalesce(r.ranking, cte.rrank),
case when coalesce(r.date, cte.rdate) >= coalesce(s.date, cte.sdate) then
case when abs(datediff(coalesce(r.date, cte.rdate), coalesce(s.date, cte.sdate))) <
abs(datediff(cte.rdate, coalesce(s.date, cte.sdate)))
then coalesce(r.ranking, cte.rrank)
else cte.rrank
end
end
from cte
left join sales s on s.movie_id = cte.movie_id and s.rn = cte.srn + 1 and cte.closest_rank is not null
left join ranks r on r.movie_id = cte.movie_id and r.rn = cte.rrn + 1 and cte.rdate < cte.sdate
where s.movie_id is not null or r.movie_id is not null
-- where cte.closest_rank is null
)
select
movie_id,
sdate,
revenue,
closest_rank
from cte
where closest_rank is not null;
(BTW: I named the column ranking, because rank is a reserved word in SQL.)
Demo: https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=mysql_8.0&fiddle=e994cb56798efabc8f7249fd8320e1cf
This is probably still slow. The reason for this is: there are no pointers to a row in SQL. If we want to go from row #1 to row #2, we must search that row, while in a programming language we would really just move the pointer one step forward. If the tables had an ID, we could build a chain (next_row_id) instead of using row numbers. That could speed this process up. But well, I guess you already notice: this is not an algorithm made for SQL.
Another approach... Avoid the problem by cleansing the data.
Make sure the rank is available for every day. When a new date comes in, find the previous rank, then fill in all the rows for the intervening days.
(This will take some initial effort to 'fix' all the previous missing dates. After that, it is a small effort when a new list of ranks comes in.)
The "report" would be a simple JOIN on the date. You would probably need a 2-column INDEX(movie_id, date) or something like that.
Ultimate solution would be not to calculate all the ranks every time, but store them (in a new column, or even in a new table if you don't want to change existing tables).
Each time you update you could look for sales data without rank and calculate only for those.
With above approach you get rank always from last available rank BEFORE sales data (e.g. if you've data 14 days before and 1 days after, still the one before would be used)
If you strictly need to use ranking closest in time, then you need to run UPDATE also for newly arrived ranking info. I believe it would still be more efficient in the long run.
Related
Noobie to SQL. I have a simple query here that is 70 million rows, and my work laptop will not handle the capacity when I import it into Tableau. Usually 20 million rows and less seem to work fine. Here's my problem.
Table name: Table1
Fields: UniqueID, State, Date, claim_type
Query:
SELECT uniqueID, states, claim_type, date
FROM table1
WHERE date >= '11-09-2021'
This gives me what I want, BUT, I can limit the query significantly if I count the number of uniqueIDs that have been used in 3 or more different states. I use this query to do that.
SELECT unique_id, count(distinct states), claim_type, date
FROM table1
WHERE date >= '11-09-2021'
GROUP BY Unique_id, claim_type, date
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT states) > 3
The only issue is, when I put this query into Tableau it only displays the FIRST state a unique_id showed up in, and the first date it showed up. A unique_id shows up in multiple states over multiple dates, so when I use this count aggregation it's only giving me the first result and not the whole picture.
Any ideas here? I am totally lost and spent a whole business day trying to fix this
Expected output would be something like
uniqueID | state | claim type | Date
123 Ohio C 01-01-2021
123 Nebraska I 02-08-2021
123 Georgia D 03-08-2021
If your table is only of those four columns, and your queries are based on date ranges, your index must exist to help optimize that. If 70 mil records exist, how far back does that go... Years? If your data since 2021-09-11 is only say... 30k records, that should be all you are blowing through for your results.
I would ensure you have the index based on (and in this order)
(date, uniqueId, claim_type, states). Also, you mentioned you wanted a count of 3 OR MORE, your query > 3 will results in 4 or more unless you change to count(*) >= 3.
Then, to get the entries you care about, you need
SELECT date, uniqueID, claim_type
FROM table1
WHERE date >= '2021-09-11'
group by date, uniqueID, claim_type
having count( distinct states ) >= 3
This would give just the 3-part qualifier for date/id/claim that HAD them. Then you would use THIS result set to get the other entries via
select distinct
date, uniqueID, claim_type, states
from
( SELECT date, uniqueID, claim_type
FROM table1
WHERE date >= '2021-09-11'
group by date, uniqueID, claim_type
having count( distinct states ) >= 3 ) PQ
JOIN Table1 t1
on PQ.date = t1.date
and PQ.UniqueID = t1.UniqueID
and PQ.Claim_Type = t1.Claim_Type
The "PQ" (preQuery) gets the qualified records. Then it joins back to the original table and grabs all records that qualified from the unique date/id/claim_type and returns all the states.
Yes, you are grouping rows, so therefore you 'loose' information on the grouped result.
You won't get 70m records with your grouped query.
Why don't you split your imports in smaller chunks? Like limit the rows to chunks of, say 15m:
1st:
SELECT uniqueID, states, claim_type, date FROM table1 WHERE date >= '11-09-2021' LIMIT 15000000;
2nd:
SELECT uniqueID, states, claim_type, date FROM table1 WHERE date >= '11-09-2021' LIMIT 15000000 OFFSET 15000000;
3rd:
SELECT uniqueID, states, claim_type, date FROM table1 WHERE date >= '11-09-2021' LIMIT 15000000 OFFSET 30000000;
and so on..
I know its not a perfect or very handy solution but maybe it gets you to the desired outcome.
See this link for infos about LIMIT and OFFSET
https://www.bitdegree.org/learn/mysql-limit-offset
It is wise in the long run to use DATE datatype. That requires dates to look like '2021-09-11, not '09-11-2021'. That will let > correctly compare dates that are in two different years.
If your data is coming from some source that formats it '11-09-2021', use STR_TO_DATE() to convert as it goes in; You can reconstruct that format on output via DATE_FORMAT().
Once you have done that, we can talk about optimizing
SELECT unique_id, count(distinct states), claim_type, date
FROM table1
WHERE date >= '2021-09-11'
GROUP BY Unique_id, claim_type, date
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT states) > 3
Tentatively I recommend this composite index speed up the query:
INDEX(Unique_id, claim_type, date, states)
That will also help with your other query.
(I as assuming the ambiguous '11-09-2021' is DD-MM-YYYY.)
I have three columns User_ID, New_Status and DATETIME.
New_Status contains 0(inactive) and 1(active) for users.
Every user starts from active status - ie. 1.
Subsequently table stores their status and datetime at which they got activated/inactivated.
How to calculate number of active users at the end of each date, including dates when no records were generated into the table.
Sample data:
| ID | New_Status | DATETIME |
+----+------------+---------------------+
| 1 | 1 | 2019-01-01 21:00:00 |
| 1 | 0 | 2019-02-05 17:00:00 |
| 1 | 1 | 2019-03-06 18:00:00 |
| 2 | 1 | 2019-01-02 01:00:00 |
| 2 | 0 | 2019-02-03 13:00:00 |
Format the date time value to a date only string and group by it
SELECT DATE_FORMAT(DATETIME, '%Y-%m-%d') as day, COUNT(*) as active
FROM test
WHERE New_Status = 1
GROUP BY day
ORDER BY day
In MySQL 8 you can use the row_number() window function to get the last status of a user per day. Then filter for the one that indicate the user was active GROUP BY the day and count them.
SELECT date(x.datetime),
count(*)
FROM (SELECT date(t.datetime) datetime,
t.new_status,
row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY date(t.datetime)
ORDER BY t.datetime DESC) rn
FROM elbat t) x
WHERE x.rn = 1
AND x.new_status = 1
GROUP BY x.datetime;
If not all days are in the table you need to create a (possibly derived) table with all days and cross join it.
Find out the last activity status of users whose activity was changed for each day
select User_ID, New_Status, DATE_FORMAT(DATETIME, '%Y-%m-%d')
from activity_table
where not exists
(
select 1
from activity_table at
where at.User_ID = activity_table.User_ID and
DATE_FORMAT(at.DATETIME, '%Y-%m-%d') = DATE_FORMAT(activity_table.DATETIME, '%Y-%m-%d') and
at.DATETIME > activity_table.DATETIME
)
order by DATE_FORMAT(activity_table.DATETIME, '%Y-%m-%d');
This is not the solution yet, but a very very useful information before solution. Note that here not all dates are covered yet and the values are individual records, more precisely their last values on each day, ordered by the date.
Let's get aggregate numbers
Using the query above as a subselect and aliasing it into a table, you can group by DATETIME and do a select sum(new_Status) as activity, count(*) total, DATETIME so you will know that activity - (total - activity) is the difference in comparison to the previous day.
Knowing the delta for each day present in the result
At the previous section we have seen how the delta can be calculated. If the whole query in the previous section is aliased, then you can self join it using a left join, with pairs of (previous date, current date), still having the gaps of dates, but not worrying about that just yet. In the case of the first date, its activity is the delta. For subsequent records, adding the previous day's delta to their delta yields the result you need. To achieve this you can use a recursive query, supported by MySQL 8, or, alternatively, you can just have a subquery which sums the delta of previous days (with special attention to the first date, as described earlier) will and adding the current date's delta yields the result we need.
Fill the gaps
The previous section would already perfectly work (assuming the lack of integrity problems), assuming that there were activity changes for each day, but we will not continue with the assumption. Here we know that the figures are correct for each date where a figure is present and we will need to just add the missing dates into the result. If the results are properly ordered, as they should be, then one can use a cursor and loop the results. At each record after the first one, we can determine the dates that are missing. There might be 0 such dates between two consequent dates or more. What we do know about the gaps is that their values are exactly the same as the previous record, that do has data. If there were no activity changes on a given date, then the number of active users is exactly the same as in the previous day. Using some structure, like a table you can generate the results you have with the knowledge described here.
Solving possible integrity problems
There are several possibilities for such problems:
First, a data item might exist prior to the introduction of this table's records were started to be spawned.
Second, bugs or any other causes might have made a pause in creating records for this activity table.
Third, the addition of user is or was not necessarily generating an activity change, since its popping into existence renders its previous state of activity undefined and subject to human standards, which might change over time.
Fourth, the removal of user is or was not necessarily generating an activity change, since its popping out of existence renders is current state of activity undefined and subject to human standards, which might change over time.
Fifth, there is an infinity of other issues which might cause data integrity issues.
To cope with these you will need to comprehensively analyze whatever you can from the source-code and the history of the project, including database records, logs and humanly available information to detect such anomalies, the time they were effective and figure out what their solution is if they exist.
EDIT
In the meantime I was thinking about the possibility of a user, who was active at the start of the day being deactivated and then activated again by the end of the day. Similarly, an inactive user during a day might be activated and then finally deactivated by the end of the day. For users that have more than an activation at the start of the day, we need to compare their activity status at the start and the end of the day to find out what the difference was.
SELECT
DATE(DATETIME),
COUNT(*)
FROM your_table
WHERE New_Status = 1
GROUP BY User_ID,
DATE(DATETIME)
For MySQL
WITH RECURSIVE
cte AS (
SELECT MIN(DATE(DT)) dt
FROM src
UNION ALL
SELECT dt + INTERVAL 1 DAY
FROM cte
WHERE dt < ( SELECT MAX(DATE(DT)) dt
FROM src )
),
cte2 AS
(
SELECT users.id,
cte.dt,
SUM( CASE src.New_Status WHEN 1 THEN 1
WHEN 0 THEN -1
ELSE 0
END ) OVER ( PARTITION BY users.id
ORDER BY cte.dt ) status
FROM cte
CROSS JOIN ( SELECT DISTINCT id
FROM src ) users
LEFT JOIN src ON src.id = users.id
AND DATE(src.dt) = cte.dt
)
SELECT dt, SUM(status)
FROM cte2
GROUP BY dt;
fiddle
Do not forget to adjust max recursion depth.
Here is what I believe is a good solution for this problem of yours:
SELECT SUM(New_Status) "Number of active users"
, DATE_FORMAT(DATEC, '%Y-%m-%d') "Date"
FROM TEST T1
WHERE DATE_FORMAT(DATEC,'%H:%i:%s') =
(SELECT MAX(DATE_FORMAT(T2.DATEC,'%H:%i:%s'))
FROM TEST T2
WHERE T2.ID = T1.ID
AND DATE_FORMAT(T1.DATEC, '%Y-%m-%d') = DATE_FORMAT(T2.DATEC, '%Y-%m-%d')
GROUP BY ID
, DATE_FORMAT(DATEC, '%Y-%m-%d'))
GROUP BY DATE_FORMAT(DATEC, '%Y-%m-%d');
Here is the DEMO
I have users and orders tables with this structure (simplified for question):
USERS
userid
registered(date)
ORDERS
id
date (order placed date)
user_id
I need to get array of users (array of userid) who placed their 25th order during specified period (for example in May 2019), date of 25th order for each user, number of days to place 25th order (difference between registration date for user and date of 25th order placed).
For example if user registered in April 2018, then placed 20 orders in 2018, and then placed 21-30th orders in Jan-May 2019 - this user should be in this array, if he placed 25th (overall for his account) order in May 2019.
How I can do this with MySQL request?
Sample data and structure: http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!9/998358 (for testing you can get 3rd order as ex., not 25th, to not add a lot of sample data records).
One request is not required - if this can't be done in one request, few is possible and allowed.
You can use a correlated subquery to get the count of orders placed before the current one by a user. If that's 24 the current order is the 25th. Then check if the date is in the desired range.
SELECT o1.user_id,
o1.date,
datediff(o1.date, u1.registered)
FROM orders o1
INNER JOIN users u1
ON u1.userid = o1.user_id
WHERE (SELECT count(*)
FROM orders o2
WHERE o2.user_id = o1.user_id
AND o2.date < o1.date
OR o2.date = o1.date
AND o2.id < o1.id) = 24
AND o1.date >= '2019-01-01'
AND o1.date < '2019-06-01';
The basic inefficient way of doing this would be to get the user_id for every row in ORDERS where the date is in your target range AND the count of rows in ORDERS with the same user_id and a lower date is exactly 24.
This can get very ugly, very quickly, though.
If you're calling this from code you control, can't you do it from the code?
If not, there should be a way to assign to each row an index describing its rank among orders for its specific user_id, and select from this all user_id from rows with an index of 25 and a correct date. This will give you a select from select from select, but it should be much faster. The difficulty here is to control the order of the rows, so here are the selects I envision:
Select all rows, order by user_id asc, date asc, union-ed to nothing from a table made of two vars you'll initialize at 0.
from this, select all while updating a var to know if a row's user_id is the same as the last, and adding a field that will report so (so for each user_id the first line in order will have a specific value like 0 while the other rows for the same user_id will have a 1)
from this, select all plus a field that equals itself plus one in case the first added field is 1, else 0
from this, select the user_id from the rows where the second added field is 25 and the date is in range.
The union thingy is only necessary if you need to do it all in one request (you have to initialize them in a lower select than the one they're used in).
Edit: Well if you need the date too you can just select it along with the user_id, but calculating the number of days in sql will be a pain. Just join the result table to the users table and get both the date of 25th order and their date of registration, you'll surely be able to do the difference in code.
I'll try building an actual request, however if you want to truly understand what you need to make this you gotta read up on mysql variables, unions, and conditional statements.
"Looks too complicated. I am sure that this can be done with current DB structure and 1-2 requests." Well, yeah. Use the COUNT request, it will be easy, and slow as hell.
For the complex answer, see http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!9/998358/21
Since you can use multiple requests, you can just initialize the vars first.
It isn't actually THAT complicated, you just have to understand how to concretely express what you mean by "an user's 25th command" to a SQL engine.
See http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!9/998358/24 for the difference in days, turns out there's a method for that.
Edit 5: seems you're going with the COUNT method. I'll pray your DB is small.
Edit 6: For posterity:
The count method will take years on very large databases. Since OP didn't come back, I'm assuming his is small enough to overlook query speed. If that's not your case and let's say it's 10 years from now and the sqlfiddle links are dead; here's the two-queries solution:
SET #PREV_USR:=0;
SELECT user_id, date_ FROM (
SELECT user_id, date_, SAME_USR AS IGNORE_SMUSR,
#RANK_USR:=(CASE SAME_USR WHEN 0 THEN 1 ELSE #RANK_USR+1 END) AS RANK FROM (
SELECT orders.*, CASE WHEN #PREV_USR = user_id THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS SAME_USR,
#PREV_USR:=user_id AS IGNORE_USR FROM
orders
ORDER BY user_id ASC, date_ ASC, id ASC
) AS DERIVED_1
) AS DERIVED_2
WHERE RANK = 25 AND YEAR(date_) = 2019 AND MONTH(date_) = 4 ;
Just change RANK = ? and the conditions to fit your needs. If you want to fully understand it, start by the innermost SELECT then work your way high; this version fuses the points 1 & 2 of my explanation.
Now sometimes you will have to use an API or something and it wont let you keep variable values in memory unless you commit it or some other restriction, and you'll need to do it in one query. To do that, you put the initialization one step lower and make it so it does not affect the higher statements. IMO the best way to do this is in a UNION with a fake table where the only row is excluded. You'll avoid the hassle of a JOIN and it's just better overall.
SELECT user_id, date_ FROM (
SELECT user_id, date_, SAME_USR AS IGNORE_SMUSR,
#RANK_USR:=(CASE SAME_USR WHEN 0 THEN 1 ELSE #RANK_USR+1 END) AS RANK FROM (
SELECT DERIVED_4.*, CASE WHEN #PREV_USR = user_id THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS SAME_USR,
#PREV_USR:=user_id AS IGNORE_USR FROM
(SELECT * FROM orders
UNION
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT (#PREV_USR:=0) AS INIT_PREV_USR, 0 AS COL_2, 0 AS COL_3
) AS DERIVED_3
WHERE INIT_PREV_USR <> 0
) AS DERIVED_4
ORDER BY user_id ASC, date_ ASC, id ASC
) AS DERIVED_1
) AS DERIVED_2
WHERE RANK = 25 AND YEAR(date_) = 2019 AND MONTH(date_) = 4 ;
With that method, the thing to watch for is the amount and the type of columns in your basic table. Here orders' first field is an int, so I put INIT_PREV_USR in first then there are two more fields so I just add two zeroes with names and call it a day. Most types work, since the union doesn't actually do anything, but I wouldn't try this when your first field is a blob (worst comes to worst you can use a JOIN).
You'll note this is derived from a method of pagination in mysql. If you want to apply this to other engines, just check out their best pagination calls and you should be able to work thinks out.
I have 2 tables, one with hostels (effectively a single-room hotel with lots of beds), and the other with bookings.
Hostel table: unique ID, total_spaces
Bookings table: start_date, end_date, num_guests, hostel_ID
I need a (My)SQL query to generate a list of all hostels that have at least num_guests free spaces between start_date and end_date.
Logical breakdown of what I'm trying to achieve:
For each hostel:
Get all bookings that overlap start_date and end_date
For each day between start_date and end_date, sum the total bookings for that day (taking into account num_guests for each booking) and compare with total_spaces, ensuring that there are at least num_guests spaces free on that day (if there aren't on any day then that hostel can be discounted from the results list)
Any suggestions on a query that would do this please? (I can modify the tables if necessary)
I built an example for you here, with more comments, which you can test out:
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!9/10219/9
What's probably tricky for you is to join ranges of overlapping dates. The way I would approach this problem is with a DATES table. It's kind of like a tally table, but for dates. If you join to the DATES table, you basically break down all the booking ranges into bookings for individual dates, and then you can filter and sum them all back up to the particular date range you care about. Helpful code for populating a DATES table can be found here: Get a list of dates between two dates and that's what I used in my example.
Other than that, the query basically follows the logical steps you've already outlined.
Ok, if you are using mysql 8.0.2 and above, then you can use window functions. In such case you can use the solution bellow. This solution does not need to compute the number of quests for each day in the query interval, but only focuses on days when there is some change in the number of hostel guests. Therefore, there is no helping table with dates.
with query as
(
select * from bookings where end_date > '2017-01-02' and start_date < '2017-01-05'
)
select hostel.*, bookingsSum.intervalMax
from hostel
join
(
select tmax.id, max(tmax.intervalCount) intervalMax
from
(
select hostel.id, t.dat, sum(coalesce(sum(t.gn),0)) over (partition by t.id order by t.dat) intervalCount
from hostel
left join
(
select id, start_date dat, guest_num as gn from query
union all
select id, end_date dat, -1 * guest_num as gn from query
) t on hostel.id = t.id
group by hostel.id, t.dat
) tmax
group by tmax.id
) bookingsSum on hostel.id = bookingsSum.id and hostel.total_spaces >= bookingsSum.intervalMax + <num_of_people_you_want_accomodate>
demo
It uses a simple trick, where each start_date represents +guest_num to the overall number of quests and each 'end_date' represents -guest_num to the overall number of quests. We than do the necessary sumarizations in order to find peak number of quests (intervalMax) in the query interval.
You change '2017-01-05' in my query to '2017-01-06' (then only two hostels are in the result) and if you use '2017-01-07' then just hostel id 3 is in the result, since it does not have any bookings yet.
I have one table which is having four fields:
trip_paramid, creation_time, fuel_content,vehicle_id
I want to find the difference between two rows.In my table i have one field fuel_content.Every two minutes i getting packets and inserting to database.From this i want to find out total refuel quantity.If fuel content between two packets is greater than 2,i will treat it as refueling quantity.Multiple refuel may happen in same day.So i want to find out total refuel quantity for a day for a vehicle.I created one table schema&sample data in sqlfiddle. Can anyone help me to find a solution for this.here is the link for table schema..http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!2/4cf36
Here is a good query.
Parameters (vehicle_id=13) and (date='2012-11-08') are injected in the query, but they are parameters to be modified.
You can note that have I chosen an expression using creation_time<.. and creation_time>.. in instead of DATE(creation_time)='...', this is because the first expression can use indexes on "creation_time" while the second one cannot.
SELECT
SUM(fuel_content-prev_content) AS refuel_tot
, COUNT(*) AS refuel_nbr
FROM (
SELECT
p.trip_paramid
, fuel_content
, creation_time
, (
SELECT ps.fuel_content
FROM trip_parameters AS ps
WHERE (ps.vehicle_id=p.vehicle_id)
AND (ps.trip_paramid<p.trip_paramid)
ORDER BY trip_paramid DESC
LIMIT 1
) AS prev_content
FROM trip_parameters AS p
WHERE (p.vehicle_id=13)
AND (creation_time>='2012-11-08')
AND (creation_time<DATE_ADD('2012-11-08', INTERVAL 1 DAY))
ORDER BY p.trip_paramid
) AS log
WHERE (fuel_content-prev_content)>2
Test it:
select sum(t2.fuel_content-t1.fuel_content) TotalFuel,t1.vehicle_id,t1.trip_paramid as rowIdA,
t2.trip_paramid as rowIdB,
t1.creation_time as timeA,
t2.creation_time as timeB,
t2.fuel_content fuel2,
t1.fuel_content fuel1,
(t2.fuel_content-t1.fuel_content) diffFuel
from trip_parameters t1, trip_parameters t2
where t1.trip_paramid<t2.trip_paramid
and t1.vehicle_id=t2.vehicle_id
and t1.vehicle_id=13
and t2.fuel_content-t1.fuel_content>2
order by rowIdA,rowIdB
where (rowIdA,rowIdB) are all possibles tuples without repetition, diffFuel is the difference between fuel quantity and TotalFuel is the sum of all refuel quanty.
The query compare all fuel content diferences for same vehicle(in this example, for vehicle with id=13) and only sum fuel quantity when the diff fuel is >2.
Regards.