I am new to deep learning, trying to implement a neural network using 4-fold cross-validation for training, testing, and validating. The topic is to classify the vehicle using an existing dataset.
The accuracy result is 0.7.
Traning Accuracy
An example output for epochs
I also don't know whether the code is correct and what to do for increasing the accuracy.
Here is the code:
!pip install category_encoders
import tensorflow as tf
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from tensorflow import keras
import category_encoders as ce
from category_encoders import OrdinalEncoder
car_data = pd.read_csv('car_data.csv')
car_data.columns = ['Purchasing', 'Maintenance', 'No_Doors','Capacity','BootSize','Safety','Evaluation']
# Extract the features and labels from the dataset
X = car_data.drop(['Evaluation'], axis=1)
Y = car_data['Evaluation']
encoder = ce.OrdinalEncoder(cols=['Purchasing', 'Maintenance', 'No_Doors','Capacity','BootSize','Safety'])
X = encoder.fit_transform(X)
X = X.to_numpy()
Y_df = pd.DataFrame(Y, columns=['Evaluation'])
encoder = OrdinalEncoder(cols=['Evaluation'])
Y_encoded = encoder.fit_transform(Y_df)
Y = Y_encoded.to_numpy()
input_layer = tf.keras.layers.Input(shape=(X.shape[1]))
# Define the hidden layers
hidden_layer_1 = tf.keras.layers.Dense(units=64, activation='relu', kernel_initializer='glorot_uniform')(input_layer)
hidden_layer_2 = tf.keras.layers.Dense(units=32, activation='relu', kernel_initializer='glorot_uniform')(hidden_layer_1)
# Define the output layer
output_layer = tf.keras.layers.Dense(units=1, activation='sigmoid', kernel_initializer='glorot_uniform')(hidden_layer_2)
# Create the model
model = tf.keras.Model(inputs=input_layer, outputs=output_layer)
# Initialize the 4-fold cross-validation
kfold = KFold(n_splits=4, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
# Initialize a list to store the scores
scores = []
quality_weights= []
# Compile the model
model.compile(optimizer='adam',
loss=''sparse_categorical_crossentropy'',
metrics=['accuracy'],
sample_weight_mode='temporal')
for train_index, test_index in kfold.split(X,Y):
# Split the data into train and test sets
X_train, X_test = X[train_index], X[test_index]
Y_train, Y_test = Y[train_index], Y[test_index]
# Fit the model on the training data
model.fit(X_train, Y_train, epochs=300, batch_size=64, sample_weight=quality_weights)
# Evaluate the model on the test data
score = model.evaluate(X_test, Y_test)
# Append the score to the scores list
scores.append(score[1])
plt.plot(history.history['accuracy'])
plt.title('Model Training Accuracy')
plt.ylabel('Accuracy')
plt.xlabel('Epoch')
plt.legend(['Train'], loc='upper left')
plt.show()
# Print the mean and standard deviation of the scores
print(f'Mean accuracy: {np.mean(scores):.3f} +/- {np.std(scores):.3f}')
The first thing that caught my attention was here:
model.fit(X_train, Y_train, epochs=300, batch_size=64, sample_weight=quality_weights)
Your quality_weights should be a numpy array of size of the input.
Refer here: https://keras.io/api/models/model_training_apis/#fit-method
If changing that doesn't seemt to help then may be your network doesn't seem to be learning from the data. A few possible reasons could be:
The network is a bit too shallow. Try adding just one more hidden layer to see if that improves anything
From the code I can't see the size of your input data. Does it have enough datapoints for 4-fold cross-validation? Can you somehow augment the data?
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import keras
import tensorflow
from keras.models import Model
from keras.layers import Dense
from keras import optimizers
from keras.preprocessing.image import ImageDataGenerator
from keras.preprocessing import image
trdata = ImageDataGenerator()
traindata = trdata.flow_from_directory(directory="path",target_size=(224,224))
tsdata = ImageDataGenerator()
testdata = tsdata.flow_from_directory(directory="path", target_size=(224,224))
from keras.applications.vgg16 import VGG16
vggmodel = VGG16(weights='imagenet', include_top=True)
vggmodel.summary()
for layers in (vggmodel.layers)[:19]:
print(layers)
layers.trainable = False
#flatten_out = tensorflow.keras.layers.Flatten()(vggmodel.output)
#fc1 = tensorflow.keras.layers.Dense(units=4096,activation="relu")(flatten_out)
#fc2 = tensorflow.keras.layers.Dense(units=4096,activation="relu")(fc1)
#fc3 = tensorflow.keras.layers.Dense(units=256,activation="relu")(fc2)
#predictions = tensorflow.keras.layers.Dense(units=3, activation="softmax")(fc3)
X= vggmodel.layers[-2].output
predictions = Dense(units=3, activation="softmax")(X)
model_final = Model(vggmodel.input, predictions)
model_final.compile(loss = "categorical_crossentropy", optimizer = optimizers.SGD(lr=0.001, momentum=0.9), metrics=["accuracy"])
model_final.summary()
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint, LearningRateScheduler, TensorBoard, EarlyStopping
checkpoint = ModelCheckpoint("vgg16_1.h5", monitor='val_acc', verbose=1, save_best_only=True, save_weights_only=False, mode='auto', period=1)
early = EarlyStopping(monitor='val_acc', min_delta=0, patience=40, verbose=1, mode='auto')
model_final.fit_generator(generator= traindata, steps_per_epoch= 95, epochs= 100, validation_data= testdata, validation_steps=7, callbacks=[checkpoint,early])
i am classifying emotion in positive, negative and neutral.
i a, using Vgg16 transfer learning model.
though i m still not getting better validation accuracy.
things i've tried:
increase the number of training data
layers.trainable=False/True
learning rate:0.0001,0.001,0.01
Activation function= relu/softmax
batch size= 64
optimizers= adam/sgd
loss fn= categoricalcrossentrpy / sparsecategoricalcrossentrpy
momentum =0.09 /0.9
also, i tried to change my dataset color to GRAY and somehow it gave better accuracy than previous COLOR IMAGE but it is still not satisfactory.
i also changed my code and add dropout layers but still no progress.
i tried with FER2013 dataset it was giving me pretty decent accuracy.
these are the results on the FER dataset:
accuracy: 0.9997 - val_accuracy: 0.7105
but on my own dataset(which is pretty good) validation accuracy is not increasing more than 66%.
what else can I do to increase val_accuracy?
I think your model is more complex than necessary. I would remove the fc1 and fc2 layers. I would include regularization in the fc3 layer. I would add a dropout layer after the fc3 . In your early stopping callback change patience to 4. I recommend you use the Keras callback Reduce Learning rate on plateau. Full recommendations are in the code below
#flatten_out = tensorflow.keras.layers.Flatten()(vggmodel.output)
#fc3 = tensorflow.keras.layers.Dense(kernel_regularizer = regularizers.l2(l = 0.016),activity_regularizer=regularizers.l1(0.006),
bias_regularizer=regularizers.l1(0.006) ,activation='relu'))(flatten_out)
x=Dropout(rate=.4, seed=123)
#predictions = tensorflow.keras.layers.Dense(units=3, activation="softmax")(x)
rlronp=tf.keras.callbacks.ReduceLROnPlateau( monitor='val_loss',
factor=0.4,patience=2,
verbose=0, mode='auto')
callbacks=[rlronp, checkpoint, early]
X= vggmodel.layers[-2].output
predictions = Dense(units=3, activation="softmax")(X)
model_final.fit_generator(generator= traindata, steps_per_epoch= 95, epochs= 100, validation_data= testdata, validation_steps=7, callbacks=callbacks)
I do not like VGG it is a very large model and is a bit old and slow. I think you will get better and faster result using EfficientNet models, EfficientNetB3 should work fine.
If you want to try that get rid of all code for VGG and use
lr=.001
img_size=(256,256)
base_model=tf.keras.applications.efficientnet.EfficientNetB3(include_top=False,
weights="imagenet",input_shape=img_shape, pooling='max')
base_model.trainable=True
x=base_model.output
x=BatchNormalization(axis=-1, momentum=0.99, epsilon=0.001 )(x)
x = Dense(256, kernel_regularizer = regularizers.l2(l =
0.016),activity_regularizer=regularizers.l1(0.006),
bias_regularizer=regularizers.l1(0.006) ,activation='relu')(x)
x=Dropout(rate=.4, seed=123)(x)
output=Dense(class_count, activation='softmax')(x)
model=Model(inputs=base_model.input, outputs=output)
model.compile(Adamax(learning_rate=lr), loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=
['accuracy'])
NOTE: EfficientNet models expect pixels in the range 0 to 255 so don't scale the pixels. Also note I make the base model trainable. They tell you NOT to do that but in many experiments I find training the base model from the outset leads to faster convergence and net lower validation loss.
I am working on RNN. After training, I got a high accuracy on the test data set. However, when I make a prediction with some external data, it predicts so poorly. Also, I used the same data set, which has over 300,000 texts and 57 classes, on artificial neural networks, it's still predicting very poorly. When I tried the same data set on a machine learning model, it worked fine.
Here is my code:
import numpy as np
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder
from sklearn.preprocessing import OneHotEncoder
from keras.preprocessing.text import Tokenizer
from keras.preprocessing import sequence
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, LSTM, BatchNormalization
from keras.layers.embeddings import Embedding
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
df = pd.read_excel("data.xlsx", usecols=["X", "y"])
df = df.sample(frac = 1)
X = np.array(df["X"])
y = np.array(df["y"])
le = LabelEncoder()
y = le.fit_transform(y)
y = y.reshape(-1,1)
encoder = OneHotEncoder(sparse=False)
y = encoder.fit_transform(y)
num_words = 100000
token = Tokenizer(num_words=num_words)
token.fit_on_texts(X)
seq = token.texts_to_sequences(X)
X = sequence.pad_sequences(seq, padding = "pre", truncating = "pre")
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2)
model = Sequential()
model.add(Embedding(num_words, 96, input_length = X.shape[1]))
model.add(LSTM(108, activation='relu', dropout=0.1, recurrent_dropout = 0.2))
model.add(BatchNormalization())
model.add(Dense(y.shape[1], activation='softmax'))
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer="rmsprop", metrics=['accuracy'])
model.summary()
history = model.fit(X_train, y_train, epochs=4, batch_size=64, validation_data = (X_test, y_test))
loss, accuracy = model.evaluate(X_test, y_test)
Here are the history plots of the model:
After doing some research, I have realized that the model was actually working fine. The problem was using Keras Tokenizer wrongly.
At the end of the code, I used the following code:
sentence = ["Example Sentence to Make Prediction."]
token.fit_on_texts(sentence) # <- This row is redundant.
seq = token.texts_to_sequences(sentence)
cx = sequence.pad_sequences(seq, maxlen = X.shape[1])
sx = np.argmax(model.predict(cx), axis=1)
The problem occurs when I want to fit Tokenizer again, on the new data. So, removing that code line solved the problem for me.
I am trying, just for practising with Keras, to train a network to learn a very easy function.
The input of the network is 2Dimensional . The output is one dimensional.
The function can indeed represented with an image, and the same is for the approximate function.
At the moment I'm not looking for any good generalization, I just want that the network is at least good in representing the training set.
Here I place my code:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, Dropout, Activation
from keras.optimizers import SGD
import random as rnd
import math
m = [
[1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1],
[1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1],
[1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0],
[1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1],
[0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1],
[1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1],
[1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1]] #A representation of the function that I would like to approximize
matrix = np.matrix(m)
evaluation = np.zeros((100,100))
x_train = np.zeros((10000,2))
y_train = np.zeros((10000,1))
for x in range(0,100):
for y in range(0,100):
x_train[x+100*y,0] = x/100. #I normilize the input of the function, between [0,1)
x_train[x+100*y,1] = y/100.
y_train[x+100*y,0] = matrix[int(x/10),int(y/10)] +0.0
#Here I show graphically what I would like to have
plt.matshow(matrix, interpolation='nearest', cmap=plt.cm.ocean, extent=(0,1,0,1))
#Here I built the model
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(20, input_dim=2, init='uniform'))
model.add(Activation('tanh'))
model.add(Dense(1, init='uniform'))
model.add(Activation('sigmoid'))
#Here I train it
sgd = SGD(lr=0.5)
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer=sgd)
model.fit(x_train, y_train,
nb_epoch=100,
batch_size=100,
show_accuracy=True)
#Here (I'm not sure), I'm using the network over the given example
x = model.predict(x_train,batch_size=1)
#Here I show the approximated function
print x
print x_train
for i in range(0, 10000):
evaluation[int(x_train[i,0]*100),int(x_train[i,1]*100)] = x[i]
plt.matshow(evaluation, interpolation='nearest', cmap=plt.cm.ocean, extent=(0,1,0,1))
plt.colorbar()
plt.show()
As you can see, the two function are completely different, and I can't understand why.
I think that maybe model.predict doesn't work as I axpect.
Your understanding is correct; it's just a question of hyperparameter tuning.
I just tried your code, and it looks like you're not giving your training enough time:
Look at the loss, under 100 epochs, it's stuck at around 0.23. But try using the 'adam' otimizer instead of SGD, and increase the number of epochs up to 10,000: the loss now decreases down to 0.09 and your picture looks much better.
If it's still not precise enough for you, you may also want to try increasing the number of parameters: just add a few layers; this will make overfitting much easier ! :-)
I have changed just your network structure and added a training dataset. The loss decreases down to 0.01.
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""
Created on Thu Mar 16 15:26:52 2017
#author: Administrator
"""
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, Dropout, Activation
from keras.optimizers import SGD
import random as rnd
import math
from keras.optimizers import Adam,SGD
m = [
[1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1],
[1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1],
[1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0],
[1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1],
[0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1],
[1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1],
[1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1]] #A representation of the function that I would like to approximize
matrix = np.matrix(m)
evaluation = np.zeros((1000,1000))
x_train = np.zeros((1000000,2))
y_train = np.zeros((1000000,1))
for x in range(0,1000):
for y in range(0,1000):
x_train[x+1000*y,0] = x/1000. #I normilize the input of the function, between [0,1)
x_train[x+1000*y,1] = y/1000.
y_train[x+1000*y,0] = matrix[int(x/100),int(y/100)] +0.0
#Here I show graphically what I would like to have
plt.matshow(matrix, interpolation='nearest', cmap=plt.cm.ocean, extent=(0,1,0,1))
#Here I built the model
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(50, input_dim=2, init='uniform'))## init是关键字，’uniform’表示用均匀分布去初始化权重
model.add(Activation('tanh'))
model.add(Dense(20, init='uniform'))
model.add(Activation('tanh'))
model.add(Dense(1, init='uniform'))
model.add(Activation('sigmoid'))
#Here I train it
#sgd = SGD(lr=0.01)
adam = Adam(lr = 0.01)
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer=adam)
model.fit(x_train, y_train,
nb_epoch=100,
batch_size=100,
show_accuracy=True)
#Here (I'm not sure), I'm using the network over the given example
x = model.predict(x_train,batch_size=1)
#Here I show the approximated function
print (x)
print (x_train)
for i in range(0, 1000000):
evaluation[int(x_train[i,0]*1000),int(x_train[i,1]*1000)] = x[i]
plt.matshow(evaluation, interpolation='nearest', cmap=plt.cm.ocean, extent=(0,1,0,1))
plt.colorbar()
plt.show()