How to change react component on someone else's onclick - html

I am building a React app where I render a family tree. For that, in each of the family tree component nodes, I have added a onclick which opens a modal (aka popup form) that allows the user to edit the info of that person. In that modal/popup, I have a submit button on the bottom. I want it so that when the submit button is clicked, the input fields in the form (ex: name, parents, etc..) are fetched and updated on the respective node in the tree. I tried this in my code:
submitbtn.onclick = () => {
alert("couple submit clicked!");
info.husband = document.getElementById("hname_inp").value;
info.wife = document.getElementById("wname_inp").value;
modal.style.display = 'none';
alert(info.husband + ' ' + info.wife)
};
return (
<li>
<div onClick={handleClick}>
<span className="male">{info.husband}</span>
<span className="spacer"></span>
<span className="female">{info.wife}</span>
</div>
<Children />
</li>
);
By default, the component shows the info passed through props. When the submit button is clicked, i want the data from the input fields to replace the data in the component. The onclick and the data is feteched fine, but the component is not updated. I am new to React so it might just be a silly mistake, please bare with me.
Finally, and this is a little of the topic, but when I click the submit button, the screen flickers for a second a html page with no formatting shows up then it goes back to normal. What might be the cause for that?
Edit (New Code):
import React from "react";
export default class Couple extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
husband: this.props.husband,
wife: this.props.wife,
};
this.handleClick = this.handleClick.bind(this);
}
handleClick() {
const newState = this.state
const modal = document.getElementById('coupleModal');
modal.style.display = 'block';
const submitbtn = document.getElementById('couplesubmitbtn');
submitbtn.onClick = (event) => {
event.preventDefault()
modal.style.display = 'none'
newState.husband = document.getElementById('hname').value;
newState.wife = document.getElementById('wname').value;
}
this.setState(newState);
}
render() {
const children = this.props.children;
return (
<li>
<div onClick={this.handleClick}>
<span className="male">{this.state.husband}</span>
<span className="spacer"></span>
<span className="female">{this.state.wife}</span>
</div>
{children != null && children.length !== 0 ? <ul>{children}</ul> : ""}
</li>
);
}
}

I think you should use different onClick functions on every node.and plus you can change name of the husband using a modal.I have used prompt and saved the data in state for husband and wife
const [Husband, setHusband] = useState("Varun")
const [Wife, setWife] = useState("Alia")
const handleClick = (e) => {
e.preventDefault()
setHusband(prompt("Please enter your Husband Name:"))
};
const handleWife = (e)=>{
e.preventDefault()
setWife(prompt("Please enter your Wife Name:"))
}
return (
<li>
<div>
<span className="male" onClick={handleClick}>{Husband}</span>
<span className="spacer"></span>
<span className="female" onClick={handleWife}>{Wife}</span>
</div>
</li>
);
};

As mentioned in comments before it would be great if you could provide a fiddle etc to look at.
You mentioned that you are new to React so even at the risk of sounding stupid may I just ask are you using some sorf of state handling here? If not then it might be something to look into. If you're already familiar with React state this answer is pointless and should be ignored.
In reactjs.org there are great documentations about what is the difference between state and props?
setState() schedules an update to a component’s state object. When state changes, the component responds by re-rendering.
https://reactjs.org/docs/faq-state.html#what-is-the-difference-between-state-and-props
So in this case information about your family tree would be initialized to state and popup should then update the state via setState. The new input then gets update and UI components rerender.
If I'm right and the state handling will help you go forward I would also recommend to look up React Hooks. Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8 and when you grasp an idea of state using Hooks will be a easy and more elegant way to write your application
==================== Part 2 ====================
Here's the answer to your question you asked below in comments and some additional thoughts:
I assume the flickering is actually page refreshing on submit. So catching the user event and passing it on and calling preventDefault() is a way to go. I will an example below.
Looking at your code I'm more and more convinced that you are indeed lacking the state handling and it's the initial problem here. You could really benefit reading little bit more about it. At the same time it will help you understand better the logic of how React generally works.
Here's another link that might be worth checking out:
https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/get-pro-with-react-setstate-in-10-minutes-d38251d1c781/
And lastly here's the codeSnippet. Note that the wifes input element you're trying to target with getElementById should be document.getElementById("hname") instead of document.getElementById("hname_inp")
submitbtn.onclick = (event) => {
event.preventDefault();
console.log(props.wife);
modal.style.display = "none";
info.husband = document.getElementById("name").value;
info.wife = document.getElementById("hname").value;
alert(info.husband + " " + info.wife);
};
==================== Part 3 ====================
Nice to see that you took a closer look on state handling and have tried it out. I would continue building the knowledge with some additional reading. Here's a good post about Reacts Data handling.
https://towardsdatascience.com/passing-data-between-react-components-parent-children-siblings-a64f89e24ecf
So instead of using state handling separately in different components I would suggest that you move it to App.js as it is the obvious Parent component of others. There you should also think about the data structure. I assume this project is not going to be connected (at least for now) for any api or database and so it's something that would be handled here as well.
So defining some sort of baseline to App.js could look for example like this.
this.state = {
state = { family : [
[{ name: 'kari', gender: male }]
[
{ name: 'jasper', gender: male },
{ name: 'tove', gender: femmale }
],
]
}
}
Then I suggest that you move the handlers here as well. Then writing them here you don't maybe even need separate ones to couples and singles any more.
I'm sorry to hear your still seeing the flickering. My best guess for this is that modal isn't aware about the event.preventDefault. For clarity I would refactor this a bit as well. Generally it's not a good practice to try to modify things via getElements inside React. It's usually all state and props all the way. So I added a few lines of code here as an example of how you could continue on
import React from "react";
import SingleModal from "./Modals/SingleModal";
export default class Couple extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
visible: false,
};
this.popUpHandler = this.popUpHandler.bind(this);
}
popUpHandler(event) {
event.preventDefault()
this.setState({visible: !this.state.visible})
}
render(props) {
return (
<>
<SingleModal visible={this.state.visible} popUpHandler={this.popUpHandler }/>
<li>
<div onClick={this.popUpHandler}>
<span className={this.props.gender}>{this.props.name}</span>
</div>
</li>
</>
);
}
}
And similary in SingleModal getting rid of the form submit like this:
<input
type="submit"
value="Submit"
className="submit"
id="singlesubmitbtn"
onClick={(e) => {
e.preventDefault();
props.popUpHandler(e)
}}
/>
PS. I think this is going to be my last answer on this question here. The answer is getting too long and it's starting to drift off topic of the original question. Good luck with your project

Related

How to represent a state machine with HTML elements?

On a web page I wish to display an element which depends on the state of some JavaScript. State like in a state machine. Currently the possible states are these (but I may add more):
input: display some input elements for the user to set. The user can click a button to start some JavaScript processing and move to the working state.
working: display a progress bar informing the user that the script is running. The user can cancel the computation (moving back to the input state) or the computation can end (moving to either the result or error state).
result: display the computation result. The user can go back to input with a button.
error: display the error. The user can go back to input with a button.
The JavaScript part is ready and working, but I'm unsure how to do this in HTML + CSS.
Current solution and its issue
Currently I've been doing it with classes: I set a class to a common ancestor element with the same name of the state and I display the right elements based on it. Something like this:
const parent=document.querySelector("#parent");
let timer=null;
function input(){
parent.classList.remove("working","result","error");
parent.classList.add("input");
}
function run(){
parent.classList.remove("input");
parent.classList.add("working");
timer=setTimeout(result,1500)
}
function stop(){
clearTimeout(timer);
input();
}
function result(){
parent.classList.remove("working");
if(Math.random()>0.5){parent.classList.add("result");}
else{parent.classList.add("error");}
}
input();
#input{display:none;}
#working{display:none;}
#result{display:none;}
#error{display:none;}
#parent.input #input{display:block;}
#parent.working #working{display:block;}
#parent.result #result{display:block;}
#parent.error #error{display:block;}
<div id="parent">
<div id="input">INPUT. RUN</div>
<div id="working">WORKING. STOP</div>
<div id="result">RESULT. RESTART</div>
<div id="error">ERROR. RESTART</div>
</div>
This solution works but it feels unstable: in theory it would be possible for the parent element to have no classes (in which case nothing is displayed) or multiple ones (in which case you'd see multiple states at once). This shouldn't happen, but the only thing preventing it is the correctness of my script.
Question
Are there better ways to implement this idea of states, so that the HTML elements can't end up in inconsistent states?
Let’s consider the role which HTML plays in a state machine on the web. A machine has moving parts, it is dynamic, so the core of any machine on the web must be implemented in Javascript. HTML is useful only to provide the interface between the user and the machine. It’s a subtle distinction but it fundamentally changes the way you write it.
Have you ever used React? React provides the framework to create entire web applications as “state machines”. React’s mantra is “UI is a function of state”. In a React app, you have a single variable which contains the current state, rendering code which builds the UI based on the state, and core code (mostly event handlers) which updates the state.
Even if you don’t want to build in React, you can use the same general idea:
keep the current state in a Javascript variable (typically you’d use an object, but in this case we only need a string)
write a rendering function which reads the state and then builds the appropriate HTML to represent that state
in the event handlers for your links, do any operations which are required, update the state and call the rendering function
let state = null
let timer = null
// core code
const input = () => {
state = 'input'
render()
}
const run = () => {
state = 'working'
render()
timer = setTimeout(result,1500)
}
const stop = () => {
clearTimeout(timer)
state = 'input'
render()
}
const result = () => {
if(Math.random()>0.5)
state = 'result'
else
state = 'error'
render()
}
// rendering code
const render = () => {
let x = state
switch(state) {
case 'input':
x += ' run'
break
case 'working':
x += ' stop'
break
case 'result':
x += ' restart'
break
case 'error':
x += ' restart'
break
}
document.getElementById('container').innerHTML = x
}
// initialisation code
state = 'input'
render()
<div id="container"></div>

Prevent form rerendering in conrolled react inputs

I am new to React.js and recently I learned about controlled inputs in React.
Code:
Here's a sample implementation that I made:
import React, { useState } from 'react';
const MyForm = () => {
console.log('rendered'); // Line 5
const [text1, setText1] = useState('');
const [text2, setText2] = useState('');
const onSubmit = (evt) => {
evt.preventDefault();
console.log(text1, text2);
}
return (<form onSubmit={onSubmit}>
<input type="text" value={text1} onChange={ev => setText1(ev.target.value)} />
<input type="text" value={text2} onChange={ev => setText2(ev.target.value)} />
<input type="submit"/>
</form>);
};
Problem:
Performance.
Above implementation works correctly, but I noticed that every time one of the field changes, console.log('rendered'); at line 5 is called again, and the entire form seems to be re-rendered. I guess that this could cause some problem especially for more advanced forms with many input fields and heavy pre-processing, etc. Ideally only the field that has changed should be re-rendered.
So I was wondering if my understanding of controlled inputs and form is okay. If not what is more scalable way of implementing this?
Since the state changes, the component will re-render. this is normal. if you dont want that, you need to "export" your input fields to new components with their own state, but then you have to somehow ref these components back to your parent form component in order to get their current values when you are going to submit the form.
Check this link on how to use ref, but I think that the form should be way too heavy in order for you to consider such a senario of creating for each input its own state in order to avoid parent component re-rendering on every input change, or even change to uncontrolled component, which is not usually recommended.

issue to make a component add a new component

I am building a restaurant review website with react js,html and css. I need to make a child component RestaurantInput update a sibling component Restaurant list.
I created handlers which pass informations to App component(the parent) by a callback and when there is an input change in the RestaurantInput it get updated by the handlers. The App component pass then the information to RestaurantList component by props which will render the new restaurant on the UI.
Unfortunatly there is no rendering of the new restaurant . I do not know where i got it wrong. Is there anyone who can help?
I have tried to console log the Restaurants imported from a Json at my local pc. But it look like it was not updated either.
I went to the React js documentation but did not get any clear answer either.
Many solution are for when there is a proper JSON file from the back end and I could not figure out how to apply them in my current situation.
RestauranInput.jsx:
handlechange(e){
const name=e.target.name;
const value=e.target.value;
this.setState((prevState)=>{
prevState.restaurant[name]=value;
return{restaurant:prevState.restaurant};
});
}
handleSave=(e)=>{
this.props.onSave(this.state.restaurant);
this.setState({
restaurant:Object.assign({},Init_value),
error:{}});
e.preventDefault();
}
App.js:
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(props){
super(props);
this.handlerestaurantclick=this.handlerestaurantclick.bind(this);
this.saveRestaurant=this.saveRestaurant.bind(this);
this.state={restaurants:Restaurantlist,showcomponent:false,
restaurantClicked:-1,newrestaurant:{}}
}
saveRestaurant(restaurant){
if(!restaurant.key){
restaurant.key= Object.keys(this.state.restaurants).length;}
this.setState((prevState)=>
{
let restaurants=prevState.restaurants;
restaurants[restaurant.key]=restaurant;
return{restaurants};
});
}
RestaurantList.jsx:
let list=[];
restaurantArray.forEach((item,index)=>{
list.push(<Restaurant key={index} name=
{item.restaurantName}
adress={item.address} ratings={item.ratings} onClick=
{()=>this.handleclick(index)}> </Restaurant>)})
return(<div className="restaurant-list">
<Filter getmin_filter={this.state.handle_min} get_max=
{this.state.handle_max}/>
{list}
</div>);
}
props are not states if they change  on the parent the child components are not rerender so you have to use "componentDidUpdate" check the link below
Re-render React component when prop changes
any communication that is not parent to child, you can either use events or states manager like redux

Refresh previous screen on goBack()

I am new to React Native. How can we refresh/reload previous screen when returning to it by calling goBack()?
Lets say we have 3 screens A, B, C:
A -> B -> C
When we run goBack() from screen C it goes back to screen B but with old state/data. How can we refresh it? The constructor doesn't get called 2nd time.
Adding an Api Call in a focus callBack in the screen you're returning to solves the issue.
componentDidMount() {
this.props.fetchData();
this.willFocusSubscription = this.props.navigation.addListener(
'willFocus',
() => {
this.props.fetchData();
}
);
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this.willFocusSubscription.remove();
}
UPDATE 2023: willFocus event was renamed to focus
componentDidMount() {
this.props.fetchData();
this.focusSubscription = this.props.navigation.addListener(
'focus',
() => {
this.props.fetchData();
}
);
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this.focusSubscription();
}
How about using useIsFocused hook?
https://reactnavigation.org/docs/function-after-focusing-screen/#re-rendering-screen-with-the-useisfocused-hook
const componentB = (props) => {
// check if screen is focused
const isFocused = useIsFocused();
// listen for isFocused, if useFocused changes
// call the function that you use to mount the component.
useEffect(() => {
isFocused && updateSomeFunction()
},[isFocused]);
}
For react-navigation 5.x use
5.x
use
componentDidMount() {
this.loadData();
this.focusListener = this.props.navigation.addListener('focus', () => {
this.loadData();
//Put your Data loading function here instead of my this.loadData()
});
}
For functional component
function Home({ navigation }) {
React.useEffect(() => {
const unsubscribe = navigation.addListener('focus', () => {
loadData();
//Put your Data loading function here instead of my loadData()
});
return unsubscribe;
}, [navigation]);
return <HomeContent />;
}
On your screen B constructor will work like magic :)
this.props.navigation.addListener(
'didFocus',
payload => {
this.setState({is_updated:true});
}
);
Yes, constructor is called only for the first time and you can't call it twice.
First: But you can separate the data getter/setter from the constructor and put it in a function, this way you can pass the function down to the next Scene and whenever you're going back you may simply recall the function.
Better: You can make a go back function in your first scene which also updates the scene while going back and pass the go back function down. This way the second scene would not be aware of your update function which is reasonable.
Best: You can use redux and dispatch a go-back action in your second scene. Then in your reducer you take care of going back & refreshing your scene.
The built in listener function which comes with React-Navigation would be the easiest solution. Whenever a component is 'focused' on a again by navigating back, the listener will fire off. By writing a loadData function that can be called both when loading the Component AND when the listener is notified, you can easily reload data when navigating back.
componentWillMount(){
this._subscribe = this.props.navigation.addListener('didFocus', () => {
this.LoadData();
//Put your Data loading function here instead of my this.LoadData()
});}
Easy! insert the function inside useFocusEffect(func)
import { useFocusEffect } from '#react-navigation/native'
I have a similar situation and the way i refreshed was to reset the route when the back button is pressed. So, what happens is when the back button is pressed the screen is re-pushed into the stack and the useEffect on my screen loads the data
navigation.reset({
index: 0,
routes: [{ name: "SCREEN WHERE THE GOBACK BUTTON SHOULD GO" }],
});
Update for react-navigation v5 and use the React Hooks. Actually, the use is the same with react base class. For more detail, please checkout the documentation here
Here is the sample code:
function Profile({ navigation }) {
React.useEffect(() => {
const unsubscribe = navigation.addListener('focus', () => {
// do something
});
return unsubscribe;
}, [navigation]);
return <ProfileContent />;
}
As above code, We add the event listener while the variable navigation change then We do something like call function refresh() and finally, we return the function for removing the event listener. Simple!
I think we have a very easy way (which works in 2021) to do so. Instead of using goBack or navigate, you should use push
this.props.navigation.push('your_route_B').
You can also pass params in the same way as we pass in navigate.
The only difference b/w navigate and push is that navigate checks if the route which we are passing exists in the stack. Thus taking us to the older one but, push just sends us there without checking whether that is in the stack or not (i.e, whether the route was visited earlier or not.)
This can be achived by useFocusEffect from '#react-navigation/native'
useFocusEffect will effect every time when screen is focus
Ref: https://reactnavigation.org/docs/use-focus-effect/
import { useFocusEffect } from '#react-navigation/native';
function Profile({ }) {
useFocusEffect(
React.useCallback(() => {
//Below alert will fire every time when profile screen is focused
alert('Hi from profile')
}, [])
);
return // ...code ;
}
You can use this event: navigation.addListener('focus'
And you can implement like this:
const Cards = ({ navigation }) => {
...
useEffect(() => {
const load =async ()=>{
const a = await selectGlobalCards()
}
navigation.addListener('focus',() =>{
load();
});
}, [])
or you can use useIsFocused, and you can use that as a dependecy for useEffect
import { useIsFocused } from '#react-navigation/native'
const Cards = ({ navigation }) => {
const isFocused = useIsFocused()
useEffect(() => {
const load =async ()=>{
const a = await selectGlobalCards()
}
load()
}, [isFocused])
For react navigation (5.x), you just need to add a focus subscription and put your component initializing logic in a separate function like so:
componentDidMount() {
this.init();
this.didFocusSubscription = this.props.navigation.addListener(
'focus',
() => {
this.init();
}
);
}
init = async () => {
//fetch some data and set state here
}
If you're trying to get new data into a previous view, and it isn't working, you may want to revisit the way you're piping data into that view to begin with. Calling goBack shouldn't effect the mounting of a previous component, and likely won't call its constructor again as you've noted.
As a first step, I would ask if you're using a Component, PureComponent, or Functional Component. Based on your constructor comment it sounds like you're extending a Component class.
If you're using a component, the render method is subject to shouldComponentUpdate and the value of your state is in your control.
I would recommend using componentWillReceiveProps to validate the component is receiving the new data, and ensuring its state has been updated to reflect the new data.
If you're using the constructor to call an API or async function of some kind, consider moving that function into a parent component of both the route you're calling goBack from and the component you're wanting to update with the most recent data. Then you can ask your parent component to re-query the API, or update its state from a child component.
If Route C updates the "state/data" of the application, that update should be propagated to a shared parent of routes A, B and C, and then passsed down as a prop.
Alternatively, you can use a state management solution like Redux to maintain that state independent of parent/child components - you would wrap your components in a connect higher-order component to get the latest updates any time the application state changes.
TL;DR Ultimately it sounds like the answer to your question is rooted in where your application state is being stored. It should be stored high enough in your component hierarchy that each route always receives the latest data as a prop, passed from its parent.
Thanks to #Bat.
I have spent a lot of hours on finding the answer and finally, I got a basic solution which is working according to my needs. I was quite worried though.
Simply make a function like this in your previous activity make sure to bind it.
changeData(){
var mydata= salesmanActions.retrieveAllSalesman();
this.setState({dataListFill: mydata});
alert('' + mydata.length);
}
Simple, then in constructor bind this,
this.changeData= this.changeData.bind(this);
After that, as I am using react native navigation, so I will simply pass this function to the second screen just like the code below:
onPress={() => this.props.navigation.navigate('Add Salesman', {doChange:
this.changeData} )}
So when the new screen registered as "Add Salesman" will be called, a parameter named "doChange" which is assigned a function will also be transfered to other screen.
Now, in other screen call this method anywhere, by :
this.props.route.params.doChange();
It works for me. I hope works for you too, THANKS for the idea #Bat.
let we have 2 screen A and B , screen A showing all data . and screen B is responsible for adding that data. we add some data on using screen B and want to show instant changes on Screen A . we use below code in A
componentDidMount(){
this.focusListener = this.props.navigation.addListener('focus', () => {
thi`enter code here`s.startData();
//Put your Data loading function here
});
}
This is what you can do with react navigation v6.
Create a separate stack in stack navigator like this:
const PropertyListStack = () => {
return (
<Stack.Navigator screenOptions={{headerShown: false}}>
<Stack.Screen name={ROUTE_PROPERTY_LIST} component={PropertyList}/>
</Stack.Navigator>
)};
Now, whenever you you want to reload your initial screen navigate using this stack. like this:
navigation.navigate(
ROUTE_DASHBOARD_TABS,
{screen: ROUTE_PROPERTY_LIST_STACK}
);
This will reload your base screen. In my case base screen is PropertyList.
If you know the name of the Screen you want to go , then you can use this code.
navigation.navigate("Screen"); navigation.replace("Screen");
This code works fine if you don't have nested routes.
This answer assumes that the react-native-navigation library is being used, which is unlikely because it doesn't actually have a goBack() method...
The constructor doesn't call a second time because screen A and B are still rendered (but hidden behind screen C). If you need to know when screen B is going to be visible again you can listen to navigation events.
class ScreenB extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
// Listen to all events for screen B
this.props.navigator.setOnNavigatorEvent(this.onNavigatorEvent);
}
onNavigatorEvent = event => {
switch (event.id) {
case 'willAppear':
// refresh your state...
break;
};
}
Other events: willDisappear, didAppear, didDisappear
An alternate solution to your problem is to use a state management solution like Redux to provide the state to all screens whenever it is updated (rather than just on screen transitions. See old react-native-nav/redux example.

In a <form onSubmit={}>, is the event data automatically passed?

I'm following along with a React tutorial on Thinkster and noticed that the form has an onSubmit tag, which automatically passes on the event to be intercepted.
I did some quick research and couldn't seem to find any indication that this is normally what happens on an onSubmit. Am I missing something here? I just found it rather curious.
From CommentInput.js
...
this.createComment = ev => {
ev.preventDefault();
const payload = agent.Comments.create(this.props.slug, {body: this.state.body});
this.setState({body: ''});
this.props.onSubmit(payload);
};
}
render() {
return (
<form className="card comment-form" onSubmit={this.createComment}>
...
}
Thanks!
inside constructor() method declare
this.createComment= this.createComment.bind(this); to remove auto submiting if it is the case of your question. But if you are asking that, are the data passed when you click submit button, then yes. They should be sent.