On the front end of my app I wanted to parse some data related to a CSV they upload. Through the file upload tool, I first get a FileList object and then pull the 1 file out of it.
I want to turn it into a json object which I could then iterate. I was thinking to user csv-parser from node, but I dont see a way to leverage a File object stored in memory.
How Can I accomplish this?
At first I was doing:
let f = fileList.item(0);
let decoder = new window.TextDecoder('utf-8');
f.arrayBuffer().then( data => {
let _data = decoder.decode(data)
console.log("Dataset", data, _data)
});
And that was passing the array buffer, and decoding the string. While I Could write a generic tool which process this string data based on \n and ',' I wanted this to be a bit more easier to read.
I wanted to do something like:
let json = csvParser(f)
is there a way to user csv-parser from node, (3.0.0) or is there another tool i should leverage? I was thinking that levering modules based on the browser ( new window.TextDecoder(...) ) is poor form since it has the opportunity to fail.
Is there a tool that does this? im trying to create some sample data and given a File picked from an input type="file" i would want to have this be simple and straight forward.
This example below works, but i feel the window dependancy and a gut feeling makes me think this is naive.
const f : File = fileList.item(0)
console.log("[FOO] File", f)
let decoder = new window.TextDecoder('utf-8');
f.arrayBuffer().then( data => {
let _data = decoder.decode(data)
console.log("Dataset", data, _data)
let lines = _data.split("\n")
let headers = lines[0].split(',')
let results = []
for ( let i = 1; i < lines.length; i++) {
let line = lines[i]
let row = {}
line.split(",").forEach( (item, idx) => {
row[headers[idx]] = item;
})
results.push(row)
}
console.log("JSON ARRAY", results)
})
The issue i run when i stop and do: ng serve is that it does not like using the arrayBuffer function and accessing TextDecoder from window, since that thost functions/classes are not a part of File and window respectively during build.
Any thoughts?
This is what I ended up doing, given the file input being passed into this function:
updateTranscoders(project: Project, fileList: FileList, choice: string = 'replace') {
const f: File = fileList.item(0)
//Reads a File into a string.
function readToString(file) : Promise<any> {
const reader = new FileReader();
const future = new Promise( (resolve,reject) => {
reader.addEventListener("load", () => {
resolve(reader.result);
}, false)
reader.addEventListener("error", (event) => {
console.error("ERROR", event)
reject(event)
}, false)
reader.readAsText(file)
});
return future;
}
readToString(f).then( data => {
let lines = data.split("\n")
let headers = lines[0].split(',')
let results = []
for (let i = 1; i < lines.length; i++) {
let line = lines[i]
let row = {}
line.split(",").forEach((item, idx) => {
row[headers[idx]] = item;
})
results.push(row)
}
if (choice.toLowerCase() === 'replace'){
let rows = project.csvListContents.toJson().rows.filter( row => row.isDeployed)
rows.push( ...results)
project.csvListContents = CsvDataset.fromJson({ rows: rows })
}else if (choice.toLowerCase() === 'append') {
let r = project.csvListContents.toJson();
r.rows.push(...results);
project.csvListContents = CsvDataset.fromJson(r);
}else {
alert("Invalid option for Choice.")
}
this.saveProject(project)
})
}
Now the CHOICE portion of the code is where I have a binary option to do a hard replace on CSV contents or just append to it. I would then save the project accordingly. This is also understanding that the first row contains column headers.
I'm trying to access a property of an object using a dynamic name. Is this possible?
const something = { bar: "Foobar!" };
const foo = 'bar';
something.foo; // The idea is to access something.bar, getting "Foobar!"
There are two ways to access properties of an object:
Dot notation: something.bar
Bracket notation: something['bar']
The value between the brackets can be any expression. Therefore, if the property name is stored in a variable, you have to use bracket notation:
var something = {
bar: 'foo'
};
var foo = 'bar';
// both x = something[foo] and something[foo] = x work as expected
console.log(something[foo]);
console.log(something.bar)
This is my solution:
function resolve(path, obj) {
return path.split('.').reduce(function(prev, curr) {
return prev ? prev[curr] : null
}, obj || self)
}
Usage examples:
resolve("document.body.style.width")
// or
resolve("style.width", document.body)
// or even use array indexes
// (someObject has been defined in the question)
resolve("part.0.size", someObject)
// returns null when intermediate properties are not defined:
resolve('properties.that.do.not.exist', {hello:'world'})
In javascript we can access with:
dot notation - foo.bar
square brackets - foo[someVar] or foo["string"]
But only second case allows to access properties dynamically:
var foo = { pName1 : 1, pName2 : [1, {foo : bar }, 3] , ...}
var name = "pName"
var num = 1;
foo[name + num]; // 1
// --
var a = 2;
var b = 1;
var c = "foo";
foo[name + a][b][c]; // bar
Following is an ES6 example of how you can access the property of an object using a property name that has been dynamically generated by concatenating two strings.
var suffix = " name";
var person = {
["first" + suffix]: "Nicholas",
["last" + suffix]: "Zakas"
};
console.log(person["first name"]); // "Nicholas"
console.log(person["last name"]); // "Zakas"
This is called computed property names
You can achieve this in quite a few different ways.
let foo = {
bar: 'Hello World'
};
foo.bar;
foo['bar'];
The bracket notation is specially powerful as it let's you access a property based on a variable:
let foo = {
bar: 'Hello World'
};
let prop = 'bar';
foo[prop];
This can be extended to looping over every property of an object. This can be seem redundant due to newer JavaScript constructs such as for ... of ..., but helps illustrate a use case:
let foo = {
bar: 'Hello World',
baz: 'How are you doing?',
last: 'Quite alright'
};
for (let prop in foo.getOwnPropertyNames()) {
console.log(foo[prop]);
}
Both dot and bracket notation also work as expected for nested objects:
let foo = {
bar: {
baz: 'Hello World'
}
};
foo.bar.baz;
foo['bar']['baz'];
foo.bar['baz'];
foo['bar'].baz;
Object destructuring
We could also consider object destructuring as a means to access a property in an object, but as follows:
let foo = {
bar: 'Hello World',
baz: 'How are you doing?',
last: 'Quite alright'
};
let prop = 'last';
let { bar, baz, [prop]: customName } = foo;
// bar = 'Hello World'
// baz = 'How are you doing?'
// customName = 'Quite alright'
You can do it like this using Lodash get
_.get(object, 'a[0].b.c');
UPDATED
Accessing root properties in an object is easily achieved with obj[variable], but getting nested complicates things. Not to write already written code I suggest to use lodash.get.
Example
// Accessing root property
var rootProp = 'rootPropert';
_.get(object, rootProp, defaultValue);
// Accessing nested property
var listOfNestedProperties = [var1, var2];
_.get(object, listOfNestedProperties);
Lodash get can be used in different ways, the documentation lodash.get
To access a property dynamically, simply use square brackets [] as follows:
const something = { bar: "Foobar!" };
const userInput = 'bar';
console.log(something[userInput])
The problem
There's a major gotchya in that solution! (I'm surprised other answers have not brought this up yet). Often you only want to access properties that you've put onto that object yourself, you don't want to grab inherited properties.
Here's an illustration of this issue. Here we have an innocent-looking program, but it has a subtle bug - can you spot it?
const agesOfUsers = { sam: 16, sally: 22 }
const username = prompt('Enter a username:')
if (agesOfUsers[username] !== undefined) {
console.log(`${username} is ${agesOfUsers[username]} years old`)
} else {
console.log(`${username} is not found`)
}
When prompted for a username, if you supply "toString" as a username, it'll give you the following message: "toString is function toString() { [native code] } years old". The issue is that agesOfUsers is an object, and as such, automatically inherits certain properties like .toString() from the base Object class. You can look here for a full list of properties that all objects inherit.
Solutions
Use a Map data structure instead. The stored contents of a map don't suffer from prototype issues, so they provide a clean solution to this problem.
const agesOfUsers = new Map()
agesOfUsers.set('sam', 16)
agesOfUsers.set('sally', 2)
console.log(agesOfUsers.get('sam')) // 16
Use an object with a null prototype, instead of the default prototype. You can use Object.create(null) to create such an object. This sort of object does not suffer from these prototype issues, because you've explicitly created it in a way that it does not inherit anything.
const agesOfUsers = Object.create(null)
agesOfUsers.sam = 16
agesOfUsers.sally = 22;
console.log(agesOfUsers['sam']) // 16
console.log(agesOfUsers['toString']) // undefined - toString was not inherited
You can use Object.hasOwn(yourObj, attrName) to first check if the dynamic key you wish to access is directly on the object and not inherited (learn more here). This is a relatively newer feature, so check the compatibility tables before dropping it into your code. Before Object.hasOwn(yourObj, attrName) came around, you would achieve this same effect via Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(yourObj, attrName). Sometimes, you might see code using yourObj.hasOwnProperty(attrName) too, which sometimes works but it has some pitfalls that you can read about here.
// Try entering the property name "toString",
// you'll see it gets handled correctly.
const user = { name: 'sam', age: 16 }
const propName = prompt('Enter a property name:')
if (Object.hasOwn(user, propName)) {
console.log(`${propName} = ${user[propName]}`)
} else {
console.log(`${propName} is not found`)
}
If you know the key you're trying to use will never be the name of an inherited property (e.g. maybe they're numbers, or they all have the same prefix, etc), you can choose to use the original solution.
I came across a case where I thought I wanted to pass the "address" of an object property as data to another function and populate the object (with AJAX), do lookup from address array, and display in that other function. I couldn't use dot notation without doing string acrobatics so I thought an array might be nice to pass instead. I ended-up doing something different anyway, but seemed related to this post.
Here's a sample of a language file object like the one I wanted data from:
const locs = {
"audioPlayer": {
"controls": {
"start": "start",
"stop": "stop"
},
"heading": "Use controls to start and stop audio."
}
}
I wanted to be able to pass an array such as: ["audioPlayer", "controls", "stop"] to access the language text, "stop" in this case.
I created this little function that looks-up the "least specific" (first) address parameter, and reassigns the returned object to itself. Then it is ready to look-up the next-most-specific address parameter if one exists.
function getText(selectionArray, obj) {
selectionArray.forEach(key => {
obj = obj[key];
});
return obj;
}
usage:
/* returns 'stop' */
console.log(getText(["audioPlayer", "controls", "stop"], locs));
/* returns 'use controls to start and stop audio.' */
console.log(getText(["audioPlayer", "heading"], locs));
ES5 // Check Deeply Nested Variables
This simple piece of code can check for deeply nested variable / value existence without having to check each variable along the way...
var getValue = function( s, context ){
return Function.call( context || null, 'return ' + s )();
}
Ex. - a deeply nested array of objects:
a = [
{
b : [
{
a : 1,
b : [
{
c : 1,
d : 2 // we want to check for this
}
]
}
]
}
]
Instead of :
if(a && a[0] && a[0].b && a[0].b[0] && a[0].b[0].b && a[0].b[0].b[0] && a[0].b[0].b[0].d && a[0].b[0].b[0].d == 2 ) // true
We can now :
if( getValue('a[0].b[0].b[0].d') == 2 ) // true
Cheers!
Others have already mentioned 'dot' and 'square' syntaxes so I want to cover accessing functions and sending parameters in a similar fashion.
Code jsfiddle
var obj = {method:function(p1,p2,p3){console.log("method:",arguments)}}
var str = "method('p1', 'p2', 'p3');"
var match = str.match(/^\s*(\S+)\((.*)\);\s*$/);
var func = match[1]
var parameters = match[2].split(',');
for(var i = 0; i < parameters.length; ++i) {
// clean up param begninning
parameters[i] = parameters[i].replace(/^\s*['"]?/,'');
// clean up param end
parameters[i] = parameters[i].replace(/['"]?\s*$/,'');
}
obj[func](parameters); // sends parameters as array
obj[func].apply(this, parameters); // sends parameters as individual values
I asked a question that kinda duplicated on this topic a while back, and after excessive research, and seeing a lot of information missing that should be here, I feel I have something valuable to add to this older post.
Firstly I want to address that there are several ways to obtain the value of a property and store it in a dynamic Variable. The first most popular, and easiest way IMHO would be:
let properyValue = element.style['enter-a-property'];
however I rarely go this route because it doesn't work on property values assigned via style-sheets. To give you an example, I'll demonstrate with a bit of pseudo code.
let elem = document.getElementById('someDiv');
let cssProp = elem.style['width'];
Using the code example above; if the width property of the div element that was stored in the 'elem' variable was styled in a CSS style-sheet, and not styled inside of its HTML tag, you are without a doubt going to get a return value of undefined stored inside of the cssProp variable. The undefined value occurs because in-order to get the correct value, the code written inside a CSS Style-Sheet needs to be computed in-order to get the value, therefore; you must use a method that will compute the value of the property who's value lies within the style-sheet.
Henceforth the getComputedStyle() method!
function getCssProp(){
let ele = document.getElementById("test");
let cssProp = window.getComputedStyle(ele,null).getPropertyValue("width");
}
W3Schools getComputedValue Doc This gives a good example, and lets you play with it, however, this link Mozilla CSS getComputedValue doc talks about the getComputedValue function in detail, and should be read by any aspiring developer who isn't totally clear on this subject.
As a side note, the getComputedValue method only gets, it does not set. This, obviously is a major downside, however there is a method that gets from CSS style-sheets, as well as sets values, though it is not standard Javascript.
The JQuery method...
$(selector).css(property,value)
...does get, and does set. It is what I use, the only downside is you got to know JQuery, but this is honestly one of the very many good reasons that every Javascript Developer should learn JQuery, it just makes life easy, and offers methods, like this one, which is not available with standard Javascript.
Hope this helps someone!!!
For anyone looking to set the value of a nested variable, here is how to do it:
const _ = require('lodash'); //import lodash module
var object = { 'a': [{ 'b': { 'c': 3 } }] };
_.set(object, 'a[0].b.c', 4);
console.log(object.a[0].b.c);
// => 4
Documentation: https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.15#set
Also, documentation if you want to get a value: https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.15#get
You can do dynamically access the property of an object using the bracket notation. This would look like this obj[yourKey] however JavaScript objects are really not designed to dynamically updated or read. They are intended to be defined on initialisation.
In case you want to dynamically assign and access key value pairs you should use a map instead.
const yourKey = 'yourKey';
// initialise it with the value
const map1 = new Map([
['yourKey', 'yourValue']
]);
// initialise empty then dynamically assign
const map2 = new Map();
map2.set(yourKey, 'yourValue');
console.log(map1.get(yourKey));
console.log(map2.get(yourKey));
demo object example
let obj = {
name: {
first_name: "Bugs",
last_name: "Founder",
role: "Programmer"
}
}
dotted string key for getting the value of
let key = "name.first_name"
Function
const getValueByDottedKeys = (obj, strKey)=>{
let keys = strKey.split(".")
let value = obj[keys[0]];
for(let i=1;i<keys.length;i++){
value = value[keys[i]]
}
return value
}
Calling getValueByDottedKeys function
value = getValueByDottedKeys(obj, key)
console.log(value)
output
Bugs
const getValueByDottedKeys = (obj, strKey)=>{
let keys = strKey.split(".")
let value = obj[keys[0]];
for(let i=1;i<keys.length;i++){
value = value[keys[i]]
}
return value
}
let obj = {
name: {
first_name: "Bugs",
last_name: "Founder",
role: "Programmer"
}
}
let key = "name.first_name"
value = getValueByDottedKeys(obj, key)
console.log(value)
I bumped into the same problem, but the lodash module is limited when handling nested properties. I wrote a more general solution following the idea of a recursive descendent parser. This solution is available in the following Gist:
Recursive descent object dereferencing
Finding Object by reference without, strings,
Note make sure the object you pass in is cloned , i use cloneDeep from lodash for that
if object looks like
const obj = {data: ['an Object',{person: {name: {first:'nick', last:'gray'} }]
path looks like
const objectPath = ['data',1,'person',name','last']
then call below method and it will return the sub object by path given
const child = findObjectByPath(obj, objectPath)
alert( child) // alerts "last"
const findObjectByPath = (objectIn: any, path: any[]) => {
let obj = objectIn
for (let i = 0; i <= path.length - 1; i++) {
const item = path[i]
// keep going up to the next parent
obj = obj[item] // this is by reference
}
return obj
}
You can use getter in Javascript
getter Docs
Check inside the Object whether the property in question exists,
If it does not exist, take it from the window
const something = {
get: (n) => this.n || something.n || window[n]
};
You should use JSON.parse, take a look at https://www.w3schools.com/js/js_json_parse.asp
const obj = JSON.parse('{ "name":"John", "age":30, "city":"New York"}')
console.log(obj.name)
console.log(obj.age)
I'm reading in a JSON that has a map of javascript objects. So.. for example :
{
offers : {
"1":{"id":"1", "category":"a", "offerType":"LS"},
"2":{"id":"2", "category":"a", "offerType":"EX"},
"3":{"id":"3", "category":"a", "offerType":"EX"},
"4":{"id":"4", "category":"a", "offerType":"LS"}
}
}
When I read this JSON, I am storing it in local storage. I want to "sort" is so that all offers that have offerType of "LS" show up on the TOP of my object in local storage.
The reason I want to do this is so when I display these offers on my site, the ones with offerType "LS" will display first.
I am doing this is Angular :
let offers = data.offers;
if (offers != null) {
for (var index in offers) {
var offer = offers[index];
if ( offer != undefined) {
if (offer.offerType == 'LS'){
offersLS = [...offersLS, offer];
}
}
}
if (offersLS != null){
offersLS.forEach(offerLS => {
let key = offerLS['id'];
listOffers = offers[key], listOffers;
});
}
listOffers = listOffers, offers;
}
listOffers is what ends up getting saved as my local storage object. I have tried to do it like : listOffers = [...offersLS, ...offers] but that obviously saves it in my localStorage as an array and I need it to be a 'map' of these objects or object of objects..not exactly sure what the correct terminology would be.
First, you have to know that sort an object may be a bad idea, it's not designed for that. Think about use arrays.
Anyway the solution is quite simple, it's about sort the keys then redo an object based on this new keys order:
const offers = {
"1":{"id":"1", "category":"a", "offerType":"LS"},
"2":{"id":"2", "category":"a", "offerType":"EX"},
"3":{"id":"3", "category":"a", "offerType":"EX"},
"4":{"id":"4", "category":"a", "offerType":"LS"}
};
let value1;
const sortedOffers = Object.keys(offers)
.sort((k1, k2) => {
// your sort rules here
value1 = offers[k1];
return value1.offerType === 'LS' ? -1 : 1;
})
.reduce((o, k) => {
o[k] = offers[k];
return o;
}, {});
I'm creating a very simple CRUD app using Polymer js but facing some issues while editing the records.
Here is the code for add/edit:
_addTodo() {
if(this.user.id) {
let foundIndex = this.users.findIndex( x => x.id === this.user.id);
this.users[foundIndex] = this.user;
this.set('users', this.users);
console.log(this.users);
}
else {
this.user.id = Math.floor((Math.random() * 100000) + 1);
this.push('users', this.user);
}
this.user = {};
}
Although I could see the values inside the users object getting changed in the browser console but it's not getting changed in the DOM/UI.
If I'm using a static user object like below then it works:
_addTodo() {
if(this.user.id) {
var users = [
{
id: 1,
name: 'xyz',
age: 21
},
{
id: 2,
name: 'xyz123',
age: 5
}
]
this.set('users', users);
console.log(this.users);
}
else {
this.user.id = Math.floor((Math.random() * 100000) + 1);
this.push('users', this.user);
}
this.user = {};
}
Even I have used "notifyPath" instead of "set" but that is also not working.
Could anyone please suggest what I am doing wrong here for which the user object is not getting changed in DOM?
Update:
As suggested below, I'm using splice for updating the array but still it's not working.
JSfiddle - https://jsfiddle.net/ansumanmishra/8490y4q8/1/
this.users[foundIndex] = this.user;
this.set('users', this.users);
Updating the DOM takes performance. Whenever set is used, Polymer dirty checks every value in the array, but you have already set the array to it's new value so when it compares (basically, it compares with itself), Polymer wont detect any updates and therefor wont update the DOM.
You can't however do this as solution: var newUserArr = this.users, and then modify newUserArr because objects and arrays only create references to each other.
var a = [1]
var b = a
b[0] = 2
console.log(a) // gives [2]
You will only end up with the same thing as above: Polymer dirty checking the array with itself. Remove the reference with JSON.stringify, and then set the new array. I use this method all the time.
if(this.user.id) {
let foundIndex = this.users.findIndex( x => x.id === this.user.id);
// Remove references
var newUserArr = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(this.users)));
newUserArr[foundIndex] = this.user;
this.set('users', newUserArr);
}
EDIT
However, when you want to edit something, you also create a reference from the object in the array, so when you type in your inputs, you will update the object in the existing array users.
I fiddled with your fiddle, and now it works. What I did was that I added JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) in the method _editUser() too.
http://jsfiddle.net/c6h2hwch/
From "Set a property or subproperty by path": "calling set on an object property won't cause Polymer to pick up changes to the object's subproperties, unless the object itself changes." Note example:
// DOES NOT WORK
this.profile.name = Alex;
this.set('profile', this.profile);
You need to replace this.profile with a new profile object, or update the path of each individual member of profile.
This isn't an observable change:
this.users[foundIndex] = this.user;
this.set('users', this.users);
You're modifying the array that this.users points to (in a way Polymer can't detect) and then setting this.users to the same array—this.set('users', this.users) is the same operation as this.users = this.users.
You have a couple options. One is to use this.splice:
this.splice('users', foundIndex, 1, this.user);
This says, "remove 1 item at foundIndex and insert this.user in its place.
The other option is to create a copy of the array (with Array.prototype.slice—note that's slice, not splice) to make the change observable:
const nextUsers = this.users.slice();
nextUsers[foundIndex] = this.user;
this.users = nextUsers;
I recommend this.splice because it doesn't make Polymer do quite as much work when re-rendering e.g. a dom-repeat for the array.
This piece of node.js code is run against a Spark History Server API.
What its supposed to do is find any jobs where the name matches the value passed in by uuid and return the id for only that job.
What the below code actually does is if the uuid is found in any job name, the id for every job is returned.
I think this has something to do with the way I'm parsing the JSON but I'm not entirely sure.
How do I change this so it works as I would like it to?
var arrFound = Object.keys(json).filter(function(key) {
console.log("gel json[key].name" + json[key].name);
return json[key].name;
}).reduce(function(obj, key){
if (json[key].name.indexOf(uuid)) {
obj = json[key].id;
return obj;
}
reduce is the wrong method for that. Use find or filter. You can even do that in the filter callback that you already have. And then you can chain a map to that to get the id property values for each matched key:
var arrFound = Object.keys(json).filter(function(key) {
console.log("gel json[key].name " + json[key].name);
return json[key].name && json[key].name.includes(uuid);
}).map(function(key) {
return json[key].id;
});
console.log (arrFound); // array of matched id values
Note also that your use of indexOf is wrong. You need to compare that value with -1 (not found). But nowadays you can use includes which returns a boolean.
Note that with Object.values you list the objects instead of the keys, which is more interesting in your case:
var arrFound = Object.values(json).filter(function(obj) {
console.log("gel obj.name " + obj.name);
return obj.name && obj.name.includes(uuid);
}).map(function(obj) {
return obj.id;
});
console.log (arrFound); // array of matched id values
While the accepted answer provides working code, I feel it's worth pointing out that reduce is a good way to solve this problem, and to me makes more sense than chaining filter and map:
const jobs = {
1: {
id: 1,
name: 'job: 2a2912c5-9ec8-4ead-9a8f-724ab44fc9c7'
},
2: {
id: 2,
name: 'job: 30ea8ab2-ae3f-4427-8e44-5090d064d58d'
},
3: {
id: 3,
name: 'job: 5f8abe54-8417-4b3c-90f1-a7f4aad67cfb'
},
4: {
id: 4,
name: 'job: 30ea8ab2-ae3f-4427-8e44-5090d064d58d'
}
}
const matchUUID = uuid =>
(acc, job) => job.name.includes(uuid) ? [ ...acc, job.id ] : acc
const target = '30ea8ab2-ae3f-4427-8e44-5090d064d58d'
const matchTarget = matchUUID(target)
// [ 2, 4 ]
console.log(Object.values(jobs).reduce(matchTarget, []))
reduce is appropriate for these kinds of problems: taking a larger, more complex or complete value, and reducing it to the data you require. On large datasets, it could also be more efficient since you only need to traverse the collection once.
If you're Node version-constrained or don't want to use array spread, here's a slightly more 'traditional' version:
var result = Object.keys(jobs).reduce(
function (acc, key) {
if (jobs[key].name.includes(uuid)) {
acc.push(jobs[key].id)
}
return acc
},
[]
)
Note use of Object.keys, since Object.values is ES2017 and may not always be available. String.prototype.includes is ES2015, but you could always use indexOf if necessary.