In Openshift 3.11 we used "ingress.bluemix.net/rewrite-path" annotation for rewrite. Now we have migrated to 4.3 version of Openshift in which Many annotations are not supported from 3.11. We have api and ui applications. So we keep host same and just add path /aps-ui/ and /aps-api/.This is the requirement of our applications.
As I know, the feature is developing at the moment here : https://github.com/openshift/router/pull/129
haproxy.router.openshift.io/rewrite-target
And it will be added to the OCP4.z in the future. I believe it'll be soon.
Related
I want to build my own pass platform based on cloudfoundry and openshift. I want to use some of the functions of these two platforms, and I don't want to deploy them all in the environment. Is this feasible? What similar open source projects can learn from?
Let me produce some contents about OpenShift for you as follows.
OpenShift Online : Free plan is enough to your first training.
OpenShift HandsOn training : Awesome practical training, it need not to prepare your env.
OpenShift Documentation - Enterprise and OpenShift OpenSource AKA OKD - Documentation
If you'd like to deploy to your on-premise as open source project of OpenShift, you can review/test/operate the OKD (former name: OpenShift Origin).
I hope if help you. :^)
In regards to Cloud Foundry, it is just a collection of services. We use Bosh to deploy Cloud Foundry, which knows how to deploy all the services so that they can talk to each other & function cohesively. There's nothing that would prevent you from using a different Bosh configuration (or even totally different tool) to deploy these services in a different way.
You can run projects like Gorouter, UAA, Cloud Controller and Garden stand-alone. The individual project sites typically have instructions for doing this.
Ex:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/gorouter#start
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/uaa#quick-start
Other components might be a little trickier as they depend on each other. Diego, for example, depends on Garden and is built to send logs through Loggregator. In these cases, you might need to do a little work if you didn't want to use one of the dependent components.
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/diego-design-notes#what-are-all-these-repos-and-what-do-they-do
I would disagree with your comment about these systems being bloated, and say that depends on your perspective. If you don't need a lot of the features, then I could see why you might think that. I'd say overkill might be a better way to put it though.
If you don't need all the functionality that PaaS platforms provide, you could look at other options: Dokku, Kubernetes, Knative, etc... You don't get all the features of CF, but the systems have smaller footprints. If you can live without the extra features, then these might be better options for you.
Hope that helps!
I am experimenting JRuby on Rails and need some guidance/tips in choosing the server. I have used nginx (and passenger) for my RoR in the past. JRuby wiki page Servers provide a lot of options and I have no experience in any of them.
What I am looking for is a simple to install, easy to scale server or the one widely used (so that I can find solutions if I am stuck)
I do realize this might be a broad question and the answer would be "it depends..." but would appreciate some pointers.
I might be biased being on the Trinidad team, but I still think it's top ... esp. as it handles high concurrency well while still being much lighter than TorqueBox (which I would also recommend if you do want something beyond just a web server e.g. built-in jobs but be aware that some of it is TB/JRuby specific). Most other options mentioned are Java web servers, which you can rule out if you do not want to install a Java server, warbling your application and deploying it as a .war file.
p.s. for the (next) version 1.5.0 re-deploys are to be revisited and one should be able to do some (memory leak-free) zero-down time deployments.
The new Netbeans 7.3 Beta 2 adds a really nice feature for creating an HTML5 application. It also provides a great way to create a Java Server based Web Application. But there does not appear to be any way, within the Netbeans IDE, to take advantage of both technologies in one project.
Is there a way combine these two type of projects, so there is only one web directory structure with both the HMTL5, js, and web services files?
This is definitely planned for the next release, but it is not yet possible in NetBeans 7.3. You can follow this enhancement request to see progress in this area: http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222236. If you'd like to experiment with this, you can build NetBeans with the patch attached to that issue.
Silverlight version of Windsor container does not provide XmlInterpreter() for reading bindings from config file. Could someone suggest how can I implement my own interpreter?
The online document suggest reading a configuration file, creating an instance of IConfiguration and registering them into IConfigurationStore.
How and where can I do this?
This feature is not available in Silverlight version of Windsor because Silverlight lacks System.Xml API that Windsor uses.
There's a ticket for that in Castle's Issue tracker along with patch (I'm afraid outdated) for implementing this feature using LINQ to Xml.
This can give you some ideas. If you want to update it and make it pass all the tests, and perform well we can include it in the upcoming release of Windsor (2.5).
We develop web application and we are going to deploy it on JBoss.
Now we use JSF, Facelets, Webflow, JMX, Spring.
We are going to use JMS(ActiveMQ).
Maybe in the future we will use EJB3. But for near future we will not use it.
What configuration of JBoss would be better to use - web, standard, default?
And why?
Go for the smallest config that does what you need. The "web" configuration seems to have everything you need, including ejb3 support.
Remember, the configurations in the distribution are just examples. It's perfectly acceptable to create custom server configs by copying the deployers and libs around to produce a config that does exactly what you need.
I've never found the need to use anything other than default, sometimes removing some of the config. And that's included JMS, EJB, Spring, Webflow, etc.
I you are using JBoss AS 5.1.X, I recommend this book: http://www.amazon.com/JBoss-AS-Development-Marchioni-Francesco/dp/1847196829
On page 31 there is a detailed explanation about the five provided configurations.