I'm able to give writer permissions using the Google Drive API (v3). This is the endpoint:
POST https://www.googleapis.com/drive/v3/files/FILE_ID/permissions"
The API reference says that I should use sendNotificationEmail: false (note, this is a boolean not a string), which is what I'm doing (in v2 this was called sendNotificationEmails).
However, after the call I still get the email from Google saying I've been invited to edit a file. 🤔
sendNotificationEmail: false works as intended, there is one small detail:
It is a request parameter that goes outside of the resource body.
I am not sure which language your are using, if e.g. Javascript, the request would be:
gapi.client.drive.permissions.create({
"fileId": "XXX",
"sendNotificationEmail": false,
"resource": {
"role": "writer",
"type": "user",
"emailAddress": "test#gmail.com"
}
})
Related
Our team is working with Autodesk Construction Cloud and it's Docs module quite heavily. Because of that we're trying to develop some internal tools which would automate some work that they do, mostly around copying files.
In ACC Docs you can easily copy files from one folder to another. From our investigation it looks like the ACC internally uses an endpoint like this to copy the files:
https://developer.api.autodesk.com/dm/v3/projects/{{projectId}}/documents:copy?targetFolder={{targetFolder}}
By using the authentication token from ACC requests (obtained from the browser), we can easily use this call from Postman or even an AWS Lambda function. But when we're using the auth tokens obtained from 3-legged auth process as described in the documentation, the same API call fails.
Is it even possible right now to obtain an auth token which works with that endpoint for copying ACC Docs files? Or is this not available right now as this API is still not really "public"?
Happy New Year!
Those APIs are internal APIs. Please do not try to use them. even if it may work, you would use it on your own risk..
Regarding with copy files files from one folder to the other, you can use the public API. After you get the version urn of the original file, call the endpoint below with the parameter
POST https://developer.api.autodesk.com/data/v1/projects/{PROJECT_ID}/items?copyFrom=urn%3Aadsk.wipprod%3Afs.file%3Avf.rH_L4XJsTmeiYA4ixCVNAA%3Fversion%3D1
with the payload, in which specify the target folder.
{
"jsonapi": {
"version": "1.0"
},
"data": {
"type": "items",
"relationships": {
"tip":{
"data":{
"type":"versions",
"id":"1"
}
},
"parent": {
"data": {
"type": "folders",
"id": "urn:adsk.wipprod:fs.folder:co.0xaYa2rVTJuFiz7rxLCOQQ"
//!<<< The folder we want to put this file
}
}
}
},
"included":[
{
"type":"versions",
"id":"1",
"attributes":{
"name":"rac_basic_sample_project.rvt" //!<<< Version name
}
}
]
}
We created a google sheet add on, and would like to communicate with people who installed it.
We know how to get the user's email after he opens the sheet for the first time, but we're trying to get the email when he accepts the scopes.
Is it possible ? i can't find any related doc on the google sites.
Thanks !
First you need to make sure that your application is requesting the https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email scope.
Then, when authenticating with OAuth and requesting the access token the response will also include an id_token field. The response will look something like this:
{
"access_token": <the access token>,
"id_token": <a long id token>,
"expires_in": 3599,
"token_type": "Bearer",
"scope": "openid https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email <other scopes>",
"refresh_token": <the refresh token>
}
Afterwards you can use the Google endpoint https://oauth2.googleapis.com/tokeninfo?id_token=<your id token> to decode the id_token. It will return a JSON object like this:
{
"iss": "https://accounts.google.com", // The JWT's issuer
"nbf": 161803398874,
"aud": "314159265-pi.apps.googleusercontent.com", // Your server's client ID
"sub": "3141592653589793238", // The unique ID of the user's Google Account
"hd": "gmail.com", // If present, the host domain of the user's GSuite email address
"email": "elisa.g.beckett#gmail.com", // The user's email address
"email_verified": true, // true, if Google has verified the email address
"azp": "314159265-pi.apps.googleusercontent.com",
"name": "Elisa Beckett",
// If present, a URL to user's profile picture
"picture": "https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a-/e2718281828459045235360uler",
"given_name": "Elisa",
"family_name": "Beckett",
"iat": 1596474000, // Unix timestamp of the assertion's creation time
"exp": 1596477600, // Unix timestamp of the assertion's expiration time
"jti": "abc161803398874def"
}
From here you can grab the email field for your own purposes.
The id_token is a JSON Web Token (JWT) string so you can also use other tools to decode it, not just the Google endpoint.
You can test this yourself with the scope above in Google's OAuth Playground too.
Reference: https://developers.google.com/identity/gsi/web/reference/js-reference#credential
Question: how to remove an application logo.
Solution: previous solution from this answer, https://stackoverflow.com/a/57168008/1992004, is no longer working.
Google changed the format of "iconUrl" to "icon", and uses now the Base64-encoded data stream, like "icon":"iVBORw0KGgoAAAAN..., instead of the image URL, previously written as "iconUrl":"https://...".
I've tried "icon":"" and many Base64-encoded values like "icon":"IA", "icon":"Lw", and some of other - no success. I get console messages like
for "icon":""
{
"error": {
"code": 400,
"message": "The request failed because one of the field of the resource is invalid.",
"status": "INVALID_ARGUMENT",
"details": [
{
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.PreconditionFailure",
"violations": [
{
"type": "client_auth_config",
"subject": "?error_code=9&error_field_name=UpdateIconRequest.icon&error_field_value=%3CByteString#3eeee81e+size%3D0+contents%3D%22%22%3E"
}
]
}
]
}
}
or
{
"error": {
"code": 400,
"message": "Request contains an invalid argument.",
"status": "INVALID_ARGUMENT",
"details": [
{
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.identity.clientauthconfig.v1.ClientAuthConfigError",
"code": "ICON_STORAGE_FAILURE"
},
{
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.identity.clientauthconfig.v1.IconStorageError",
"reason": "INVALID_IMAGE"
}
]
}
}
or
{
"error": {
"code": 400,
"message": "Invalid value at 'icon' (TYPE_BYTES), Base64 decoding failed for \" \"",
"status": "INVALID_ARGUMENT",
"details": [
{
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.BadRequest",
"fieldViolations": [
{
"field": "icon",
"description": "Invalid value at 'icon' (TYPE_BYTES), Base64 decoding failed for \" \""
}
]
}
]
}
}
Does somebody know, what should be inserted here to remove the logo image from the app?
Answer:
Unfortunately, there is no way for this to be done.
More Information:
Once an OAuth Application Logo has been uploaded there isn't a supported way of removing it - in the question that you linked the way that this was done is a bit hacky, inspecting the network requests and building a new request from the previous JSON object sent via the UI really shows this.
As the icon URL has changed to need a Base-64 encoded value this has been deprecated. Whether this was intentional by Google or not is hard to say, but now an empty value will always return INVALID_ARGUMENT. Any data in the value for icon will also just replace the image data and so this isn't a viable workaround, as as far as the validation process goes, image data exists and so will need to be verified.
If it's not too much of a arduous process, the only workaround here is to create a new GCP project with a new OAuth consent screen without uploading an image. Of course, you will need to reactivate all the relevant APIs and link the relevant scripts and projects to the new set-up.
Feature Request:
You can however let Google know that this is a feature that is important and that you would like to request they implement it. Google's Issue Tracker is a place for developers to report issues and make feature requests for their development services. I would suggest using the feature request template for G Suite Add-ons as this is a component for which GCP Projects could be used.
Update: The feature request for this is viewable here, to increase visibility on this, hit the ☆ at the top of the page.
Relevant Questions:
OAuth consent screen - ability to remove application logo [Obsolete]
May 2021 - It is still possible to completely delete the consent screen (and thus allowing to create it again). See my updated answer in https://stackoverflow.com/a/57168008/1992004
I am trying to set webhook notification for SharePoint Online drive using MS Graph API. The subscription is setup. Whenever I make any change in the drive by adding/deleting a file I get a notification but the resourceData is null.
Is this standard behaviour?
{"value":[
{"subscriptionId":"XXX",
"clientState":"secretClientValue",
"tenantId":"XXX",
"resource":"drives/<id>/root",
"resourceData":null,
"changeType":"updated",
"subscriptionExpirationDateTime":"2019-01-22T18:23:45.9356913+00:00"
}
]
}
Thank you for any suggestions.
Not all resources return resourceData within the notification itself, OneDrive is one of these.
OneDrive will return the following properties:
{
"subscriptionId": "string",
"expirationDateTime": "datetime",
"resource": "relative url",
"clientState": "string optional",
"changeType": "updated"
}
You can find the spesific documentation for this entity here.
I have:
An JavaScript Azure Function in an HTTP webhook configuration; the Function provides a URL; the Function performs an action
A webhook configured in the software I hope to receive notifications from
An Azure Logic App with an HTTP/webhook step that provides a URL for the webhook notification to go to
My goal is that the Azure Function's URL receives notifications from the software's webhook and performs an action. The Azure Logic App is for testing only.
What works
When the the Azure Logic App's URL is used in the software's webhook configuration, the desired action is performed. All works as expected.
The Azure Logic App's logging shows the JSON output from the incoming webhook. I expect (but believe this may be where I am going wrong) that this is the JSON the webhook is sending to the Azure Logic App's URL. When this JSON is used in the Azure Function UI's "Test" tab > "Request body" field, the desired action is performed. All works as expected.
When the Azure Function's URL and the JSON is in a Postman request, the desired action is performed. All works as expected.
What doesn't work
When the Azure Function's URL is used in the software's webhook configuration, no action is performed. This is of course my goal. From everything I have read, I understand that this URL as a webhook endpoint should work.
Azure Function's URL
This is from Get function URL > default (Function key).
https://<app_name>.azurewebsites.net/api/content?code=<api_key>
Other Azure Function config settings
Allowed HTTP methods: GET, POST
Authorization level: Function
The JSON I believe to be coming over the webhook
{
"headers": {
"Expect": "100-continue",
"Host": "redacted",
"X-Telligent-Webhook-Sender": "redacted",
"Content-Length": "16908",
"Content-Type": "application/json; charset=utf-8"
},
"body": {
"events": [{
"TypeId": "ec9da4f4-0703-4029-b01e-7ca9c9ed6c85",
"DateOccurred": "2018-12-17T22:55:37.7846546Z",
"EventData": {
"ActorUserId": 9999,
"ContentId": "redacted",
"ContentTypeId": "redacted",
"ForumReplyId": 9999,
"ForumThreadId": 9999,
"ForumId": 9999
}
}]
}
}
I also tried with the following test code for the same results. It aligns more closely with the sample payload data provided by the software company:
What I tried
{
"events": [{
"TypeId": "ec9da4f4-0703-4029-b01e-7ca9c9ed6c85",
"DateOccurred": "2018-12-17T22:55:37.7846546Z",
"EventData": {
"ActorUserId": 9999,
"ContentId": "redacted",
"ContentTypeId": "redacted",
"ForumReplyId": 9999,
"ForumThreadId": 9999,
"ForumId": 9999
}
}]
}
Sample payload data
{
"events": [
{
"TypeId": "407ad3bc-8269-493e-ac56-9127656527df",
"DateOccurred": "2015-12-04T16:31:55.5383926Z",
"EventData": {
"ActorUserId": 2100,
"ContentId": "4c792b81-6f09-4a45-be8c-476198ba47be"
}
},
{
"TypeId": "3b75c5b9-4705-4a97-93f5-a4941dc69bc9",
"DateOccurred": "2015-12-04T16:48:03.7343926Z",
"EventData": {
"ActorUserId": 2100,
"ContentId": "4c792b81-6f09-4a45-be8c-476198ba47be"
}
}
]
}
I do not know how to determine why the Azure Function is not triggered by the webhook. The software's API documentation does not seem to provide a way to look at the JSON being sent over the webhook, although in my inexperience I may be wrong.
Is there a mechanism within Azure, or Postman, or another tool that lets me see what JSON is being sent over the webhook? Or perhaps is there another approach to determining the cause of the issue?
Thank you for any help.
This is how I got the JSON file from Azure alerts.
Install Ruby on the server
Install Sinatra with following command gem install sinatra
Create file webhook.rb and paste code bellow
require 'sinatra'
set :port, 80
set :bind, '0.0.0.0'
post '/event' do
status 204 #successful request with no body content
request.body.rewind
request_payload = JSON.parse(request.body.read)
#append the payload to a file
File.open("events.txt", "a") do |f|
f.puts(request_payload)
end
end
Run the web service with command ruby webhook.rb
JSON fill be written to file events.txt